Post Office scandal: echoes of Watergate?

[Gunnar Larson]

But her emails.

---

It is difficult to bring home the enormity of the Post Office Horizon IT
scandal for the legal profession in England and Wales. One way would be to
compare the impact with the famous break-in into the Democrats’ campaign
office in the Watergate building and ensuing cover-up. That brought down
President Nixon (pictured below) and led to disciplinary proceedings being
brought against 29 lawyers.

Francis Dingwall

Francis Dingwall

How can the two be compared? As the Gazette reported, the Post Office
scandal is arguably the most widespread miscarriage of justice in British
history, and the inquiry into it is about to turn its spotlight on the role
of lawyers. The focus is likely to be whether the lawyers put a thirst for
victory above their wider duties. No one would suggest that they were
involved in anything like the burglaries, perjury and bribery that ensnared
the Watergate lawyers. But as the author of Watergate and the Law Schools
put it in 1975: ‘There is a difference in application, but not in
underlying principle, between those who would state that it is the lawyer’s
duty to use any means… to achieve a victory and those who would break into
[an] office or engage in illegal wiretapping.’

ADVERT

It has come to light that after one sub-postmaster was sent to prison in
November 2010 (unjustly, it transpired), a senior Post Office lawyer
celebrated the victory in an email, observing that: ‘… [the sub-postmaster
had made] an unprecedented attack [on the Horizon computer]… It is to be
hoped the case will set a marker to dissuade other defendants from jumping
on the Horizon bashing bandwagon.’

President Nixon

In fact, the one thing Horizon needed was to be bashed a lot harder, a lot
sooner, by the Post Office’s own solicitors. Another lawyer is alleged to
have warned a sub-postmaster: ‘We will ruin you.’ (This accusation has been
strongly rejected). Those may prove to be the tip of the iceberg.
Solicitors were involved at every stage of the saga; the number may match
the 29 involved in Watergate.

Watergate led to much soul-searching within the profession in the US. It
resulted in a requirement that law schools provide legal ethics education.
The view was that ‘although we cannot ensure that any attorney will in fact
behave ethically, we can at least be certain that he is fully aware of what
his ethical duties are’.

PARTNERSHIP

Ever since, law schools have employed lecturers in legal ethics who run the
mandatory courses; some of them also have practices advising law firms. It
is a recognised discipline. Despite the lawyer jokes in the US, all lawyers
have received training on legal ethics, there is an extensive library of
textbooks and commentaries, there are thoughtful debates on wide-ranging
issues, and there is an Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers,
dedicated to bringing about positive change in legal ethics and the law of
lawyering.

In England and Wales, when it comes to studying legal ethics, prospective
solicitors generally study the SRA Standards and Regulations, whether for
the Legal Practice Course or the Solicitors Qualifying Examination. There
is a widespread view that ‘legal ethics = the SRA Principles + the SRA
Codes of Conduct’. Wrong: legal ethics do not begin or end there.

Take for example the solicitor’s obligation towards third parties –
sub-postmasters if you will. There are rules and SRA Principles that help.
But the deeper question concerns the societal role. Does the solicitor have
a role as a moral agent of justice? What does it mean to be an ‘officer of
the court’? Should solicitors serve the public interest, and if so, how? If
the solicitors acting for the Post Office, in-house and external, had been
used to engaging with legal ethics, perhaps the wrongful convictions, the
ruin of lives, would have been avoided. We would at least be certain that
they were fully aware of what their ethical duties were.

ADVERT

In England and Wales, there is only a handful of academics who specialise
in legal ethics, and a handful of solicitors like the writer who provide
training in legal ethics to law firms. Likewise there is only a handful of
student textbooks on the subject. It is not the same in the medical
profession: medical students spend much of their time on the subject.
Ironically, you can do an LLM in medical law and ethics, even a PhD, but
not in lawyers’ law and ethics.

And it is not only lawyer involvement in the Post Office scandal that lends
urgency to the issue. A headline in the FT (10 May) tells its own story:
‘Big law firms fall out of fashion with idealistic Generation Z’. It may
become increasingly difficult to persuade bright young lawyers to represent
corporate clients which have a bad environmental, social and governance
profile.

That may result from a lack of understanding of the ethics of the lawyer’s
role. If budding idealistic lawyers were taught about the so-called
‘standard conception’, they would learn that a solicitor should adopt a
neutral stance concerning the morality of their client. The importance of
this is self-evident when it comes to criminal law, because it is plainly a
good thing to see that a suspicious suspect receives legal representation
of the right sort. So too with Big Oil, perhaps? Discuss, as the examiners
would say.

https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/commentary-and-opinion/post-office-scandal-echoes-of-watergate/5116287.article
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 6518 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20230619/60adea1d/attachment.txt>