Jamie Dimon’s Deposition in Epstein Case Reveals Email Stating that Dimon Was to Be Treated to “Heavy Snacks” at Epstein’s Home

Gunnar Larson g at xny.io
Thu Jun 1 08:15:57 PDT 2023


By Pam Martens and Russ Martens: June 1, 2023 ~

Jeffrey Epstein (left); Jamie Dimon (right).
Jeffrey Epstein (left); Jamie Dimon (right).

After much delay and legal protests by JPMorgan Chase, its Chairman and
CEO, Jamie Dimon, was forced by a Manhattan federal court to testify under
oath in a deposition about what he personally knew about the bank’s
long-term customer relationship with child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.
(Epstein died in a Manhattan jail on August 10, 2019. His death was ruled a
suicide by the medical examiner.)

The deposition was held last Friday, May 26, at the offices of JPMorgan
Chase in Manhattan. In a surprise move, opposing counsels agreed yesterday
to release the transcript of the deposition, with some segments marked as
sensitive and redacted.

The deposition arose as a result of two lawsuits being heard by Judge Jed
Rakoff in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
One lawsuit is on behalf of an alleged sexual assault victim of Epstein,
Jane Doe 1. The other lawsuit was brought by the Attorney General’s office
for the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) where Epstein maintained a secluded
compound on a private island he owned.

According to Dimon’s version of events, he lived a cloistered existence in
a corner office on the 48th floor of 270 Park Avenue where even the
executives who directly reported to him and worked only “a couple hundred
feet” away from his office, never shared with Dimon the bank’s many years
of internal investigations about Epstein’s massive cash withdrawals from
his accounts at the bank, that sometimes averaged more than $20,000 to
$40,000 a month, or its investigations of Epstein’s sex trafficking of
underage girls. According to the lawsuits, Epstein had accounts at the bank
from 1998 to 2013, at times amounting to hundreds of millions of dollars.

According to Dimon, even the former Director of the Division of Enforcement
at the Securities and Exchange Commission, Stephen Cutler, who became
General Counsel at JPMorgan Chase in February of 2007, worked in the office
next door to Dimon and reported to Dimon, didn’t share his numerous
objections with Dimon to keeping the Epstein accounts at the bank.

An email was introduced by opposing counsel during the deposition, showing
that as far back as 2011, Cutler had written in an email referring to
Epstein that “This is not an honorable person in any way. He should not be
a client.” According to the deposition transcript, it was two executives
who worked on the 48th floor with Dimon, Jes Staley and Mary Erdoes, who
decided to retain Epstein as a client after his Florida indictment, arrest,
jail term and after multiple internal investigations of his large cash
withdrawals from his JPMorgan Chase accounts.

Despite dozens of news articles about Epstein being indicted in Florida for
soliciting sex with a minor in 2006; despite bestselling author, James
Patterson’s 2016 book, “Filthy Rich,” covering Epstein’s sexual assaults on
young girls; notwithstanding Julie Brown’s blockbuster series on Epstein’s
crimes against young women in the Miami Herald in 2018, which caused a
viral media storm, Dimon’s under-oath position in the deposition was this:

“I don’t recall knowing anything about Jeffrey Epstein until the stories
broke sometime in 2019. And I was surprised that I didn’t even — had never
even heard of the guy, pretty much, and how involved he was with so many

That testimony came despite Dimon stating during the deposition that he
read the following newspapers: the New York Times, the Financial Times, the
Washington Post, and the Wall Street Journal.

Another serious challenge to Dimon’s efforts to distance himself from any
knowledge of Epstein or involvement with him came toward the end of the
deposition when well-known lawyer, David Boies, of law firm Boies, Schiller
& Flexner LLP, introduced an email directly referring to an Epstein meeting
with Dimon. (Boies is one of the lawyers representing the Jane Doe 1 victim
of Epstein in her lawsuit against the bank.) The exchange went as follows:

Boies: “On February 26, 2010, Lesley Groff writes Mr. Epstein on the
subject of, Jes [Staley] and Jamie. ‘Shall I have Lynn prepare heavy snacks
for your evening appointments with [redacted], Jes Staley and Jamie Dimon?
Or is this to be a nice, sit-down dinner at 9 p.m.?’ And Mr. Epstein
replies, ‘Snacks.’ “

Dimon responds:

“I have never had an appointment with Jeff Epstein. I’ve never met Jeff
Epstein. I never knew Jeff Epstein. I never went to Jeff Epstein’s house. I
never had a meal with Jeff Epstein. I have no idea what they’re referring
to here.”

The overall thrust of the U.S. Virgin Islands case against the bank is
presented in its second amended complaint as follows:

“…based on documents reviewed and interviews conducted by the Government,
JP Morgan knowingly facilitated, sustained, and concealed the human
trafficking network operated by Jeffrey Epstein from his home and base in
the Virgin Islands, and financially benefitted from this participation,
directly or indirectly, by failing to comply with federal banking
regulations, [redacted]. JP Morgan facilitated and concealed wire and cash
transactions that raised suspicion of—and were in fact part of—a criminal
enterprise whose currency was the sexual servitude of dozens of women and
girls in and beyond the Virgin Islands. Human trafficking was the principal
business of the accounts Epstein maintained at JP Morgan.

“Upon information and belief, JP Morgan turned a blind eye to evidence of
human trafficking over more than a decade because of Epstein’s own
financial footprint, and because of the deals and clients that Epstein
brought and promised to bring to the bank. These decisions were advocated
and approved at the senior levels of JP Morgan, including by the former
chief executive of its asset management division and investment bank, whose
inappropriate relationship with Epstein should have been evident to the

The second amended complaint by the U.S. Virgin Islands also adds a Fifth
Count, charging JPMorgan Chase with obstruction. It reads in part:

“By providing financing for Epstein’s sex trafficking organization from at
least 2000 through about August 2013, and concealing its actions
thereafter, JP Morgan obstructed, interfered with, and prevented the
federal government’s enforcement of the TVPA [Trafficking Victims
Protection Act] against Epstein. To the extent that the federal government
was able to ultimately charge Epstein with TVPA violations, the filing of
these charges was delayed by JP Morgan’s actions. Because of that delay,
women and girls in the Virgin Islands were coercively caused to engage in
commercial sex acts.”

The second amended complaint also incorporates information obtained from a
deposition of Mary Erdoes, one of the highest female executives at JPMorgan
Chase. Much of the new information is stunning in terms of just how much it
alleges that the bank knew about Epstein’s sex trafficking while it
displayed a callous disregard for the underage girls being impacted by its
failing to take action. It reads in part:

“In 2006, a JP Morgan Rapid Response Team noted that Epstein ‘routinely’
made cash withdrawals in amounts from $40,000 to $80,000 several times per
month, totaling over $750,000 per year. In addition, Mary Erdoes admitted
in her deposition that JP Morgan was aware by 2006 that Epstein was accused
of paying cash to have underage girls and young women brought to his home.
In the years that followed, JP Morgan employees, including senior
executives, emailed internally that Epstein was under investigation or had
been sued for trafficking or sexual abuse. This includes an email in 2010
between Mary Erdoes and Jes Staley regarding a federal investigation of
Epstein for child trafficking; a 2011 email summarizing a few 2010 news
stories connecting Epstein to human trafficking and promising to ‘monitor
the accounts and cash usage closely going forward;’ and a 2011 compliance
memo noting that ‘[n]umerous articles detail various law enforcement
agencies investigating Jeffrey Epstein for allegedly participating in child
trafficking and molesting underage girls’ and that ‘Epstein had settled a
dozen civil lawsuits out of court from his victims regarding solicitation
for an undisclosed amount.’ Internal emails also questioned who Epstein’s
clients were, circulating an article regarding whether Epstein was running
a Ponzi scheme.

“Indeed, Epstein’s behavior was so widely known at JPMorgan that senior
executives joked about Epstein’s interest in young girls. In 2008, for
example, Mary Erdoes received an email asking her whether Epstein was at an
event ‘with miley cyrus.’ In her deposition, Mary Erdoes testified that JP
Morgan terminated Epstein as a customer in 2013 after she became aware that
the withdrawals were ‘actual cash.’ However, Epstein had made substantial
cash withdrawals every year he banked with JP Morgan, including more than
$800,000 per year in 2004 and 2005.”

There is also this devastating claim in the U.S. Virgin Islands’ complaint:

“One internal document [obtained from JPMorgan Chase] describes the account
of Epstein’s ‘assistant or young lady he brought over from Prague (or some
place like that),’ clearly referring to Jane Doe 1. The document describes
charges in New York, Palm Beach, and St. Thomas for lingerie and other
sexually explicit material. Elsewhere, JP Morgan describes media reports
referring to the fact that Epstein purchased her at age 14. She remained a
customer of JP Morgan, and Epstein paid her more than $600,000, from his
accounts at JP Morgan, including more than $165,000 after Epstein’s plea.”

One of the more curious parts of the deposition on Friday came when Boies
asked Dimon the following:

“In the entire time that you have been the chief executive officer of the
bank, who are the three bank customers whose business with the bank has
been most reputationally damaging to the bank?”

It should have taken Dimon about 1 second to blurt out the name Bernie
Madoff as his biggest regret. JPMorgan Chase and its predecessor bank held
the business account for Madoff for decades as he conducted the biggest
Ponzi scheme in history. On January 7, 2014, the U.S. Department of Justice
charged JPMorgan Chase with two criminal felony charges over the way it
handled the Madoff account. The bank admitted to the charges and entered a
deferred prosecution agreement. (This would be the first two felony
charges, with three more felony charges for rigging foreign exchange,
precious metals and Treasury markets to follow over the next six years.)
(See our 2014 report: JPMorgan and Madoff Were Facilitating Nesting
Dolls-Style Frauds Within Frauds.)

But instead of giving Boies the name of Madoff, or any other human
customer, Dimon instead named Bear Stearns, an investment bank purchased by
JPMorgan Chase in the early days of the financial crisis in 2008.

For a stunning look at the totality of the major crimes and charges that
have occurred on Dimon’s watch, see JPMorgan Chase’s rap sheet here.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 13076 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20230601/5ab93b25/attachment.txt>

More information about the cypherpunks mailing list