[spam][crazy][spam] imaginary code resembling trained dissociation

[Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many]

On 7/9/23, Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many
<gmkarl at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/9/23, Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many
> <gmkarl at gmail.com> wrote:
>> maybe it bears some similarity to that turing problem of predicting
>> the completion of another code
>> turing’s contrived counterexample places power regarding prediction
>> and control in such a way that the goal cannot succeed. of course this
>> proof also disproves itself in some ways because the code in question
>> must be able to predict the behavior of the halting-prediction code.
>
> i often get in arguments with mathematicians because i don’t learn
> much math theory. we both walk away thinking we are right.
>
> i would, for the purposes of this larger concept, assuming that a
> halting problem can be fully solved only if it is contrived such that
> it has more capability to predict its test processes than they have to
> predict it.
>
> you can make physical systems where both have an equal ability to
> predict the other, and you then reach a logical real physical
> conclusion where the answer is indeterminate because the action of
> each depends on the choice of other in fair balance.

uhh so quick argument against halting problem: the halting detector’s
data is not input data to the detection function. considering only
pure function -like behavior, it looks solvable to me. i am not a
mathematician, and have not read the problem in depth.