FTX Bombshell: Former FTX Lawyer, Daniel Friedberg, Alleges Fraud by Sullivan & Cromwell in Court Filing Today
g at xny.io
Fri Jan 20 07:10:31 PST 2023
By Pam Martens and Russ Martens: January 19, 2023 ~
Ryne Miller, Former Sullivan & Cromwell Partner; Now General Counsel of
Ryne Miller, Former Sullivan & Cromwell Partner; Now General Counsel of
Daniel Friedberg, a former attorney at the collapsed crypto exchange, FTX,
has filed a heart-stopping declaration today with the U.S. bankruptcy court
in Delaware. He is effectively accusing one of the oldest law firms in
America, Sullivan & Cromwell (S&C), of engaging in a fraudulent scheme in
the FTX bankruptcy case. Friedberg further alleges that this fraudulent
conspiracy was helped from the inside of FTX by S&C’s former law partner,
According to new management at FTX, at least $8 billion of customer funds
are missing, with the bulk of the money illegally diverted for use by
Alameda Research, a hedge fund owned by the former co-founder and CEO of
FTX, Sam Bankman-Fried, who has pleaded not-guilty to 8 criminal felony
counts brought by the U.S. Department of Justice. Two of his top
lieutenants, Caroline Ellison and Gary Wang, have pleaded guilty and are
cooperating with prosecutors.
A hearing is scheduled at the bankruptcy court tomorrow at 10:00 a.m. to
take testimony on Sullivan & Cromwell’s petition to become the lead counsel
in the case. The U.S. Trustee in the case, which represents the Justice
Department in bankruptcy matters, had already filed objections to Sullivan
& Cromwell becoming lead counsel. Another objector, a former customer of
FTX, Warren Winter, has said it would be like allowing the fox to guard the
hen house if Sullivan & Cromwell is put in charge. Four sitting U.S.
Senators were so alarmed about Sullivan & Cromwell’s conflicts that they
took the unusual step of filing an objection with the Court.
But none of the prior objections can hold a candle to the breathtaking
charges being made by Friedberg. In one section of Friedberg’s declaration
involving former S&C law partner, Ryne Miller, Friedberg writes as follow:
“In 2021, the then President of FTX.US made the decision to hire Ryne
Miller (‘Mr. Miller’) as general counsel of FTX.US and counsel for Alameda,
and FTX International. Mr. Miller’s salary was paid by FTX.US and Alameda,
but services were also performed by Mr. Miller for FTX International in
addition to FTX.US and Alameda…
“After being hired, Mr. Miller came to me and asked if he could engage
Sullivan & Cromwell, LLP (‘S&C’) as counsel for the Debtors. I responded
that as general counsel, it was his role to generally approve outside
counsel for FTX.US.
“Mr. Miller informed me that it was very important for him personally to
channel a lot of business to S&C as he wanted to return there as a partner
after his stint at the Debtors. This bothered me very much and I told him
that his job was to only hire the best outside counsel for the job, and
that his allegiance was now to the Debtors and not S&C. This continued to
be a problem throughout his work at the Debtors as further described below.
“Mr. Miller quickly engaged S&C on many matters for FTX.US and S&C acted as
primary counsel for FTX.US, FTX Derivatives (formerly Ledger X) which was a
subsidiary of FTX.US (‘LedgerX’), and Emergent (an entity owned by Sam that
invested in Robinhood shares). S&C also acted as personal counsel to Nishad
[Nishad Singh, an FTX executive] and Sam….”
Later in the filing, Friedberg makes even bolder allegations, writing:
“On November 7, 2023, certain FTX personnel including Sam informed certain
executives in the Bahamas of the existence of an $8 billion customer
deficit with respect to FTX International.
“The FTX International general counsel contacted me by zoom to inform me of
this shocking development.
“Prior to this disclosure, I had no idea of any customer deficit. It was
not my job as regulatory counsel to conduct a customer proof of reserves;
indeed, I would have no idea how to do this. I relied on the executives,
the finance team, and the auditors, and believed that the customer assets
were fully funded on a 1:1 basis as advertised to the customers.
“I was in the New York office of FTX.US at the time and went to Ryne Miller
to inform him of the development. Mr. Miller was already aware of the
development and said that he was busy contacting ‘all the billionaires that
he knew’ to provide emergency financing to cover the customer deficit.
“I explained to Mr. Miller that he had to review his ethical obligations
before continuing to represent FTX.US under such circumstances, and
soliciting financing under the circumstances might conflict with his
ethical duties. He dismissed my concerns and remained optimistic about
helping Sam get future financing.
“I reviewed my ethical obligations that evening and felt that there was
substantial risk that I would be used to further additional fraud in
connection with the additional investment efforts if I stayed on. In
addition, I no longer trusted Sam, Gary, or Nishad, and did not think that
I could proceed under such circumstances.
“I therefore tendered my resignation the following day.
“A day or two later, I had a final call with Ryne Miller as I was concerned
about the direction of the companies. This was after CZ of Binance [a
crypto exchange competitor] had announced that he was abandoning the
purchase of the Debtors and it looked like bankruptcy was the only answer
for the FTX International Group and the Alameda Group.
“On that call, I first informed Mr. Miller that we had been counseled by
all our other law firms that the bankruptcy filings of FTX International
Group and the Alameda Group should occur outside the United States, and
likely in Bahamas or Europe. This was in part because of the unnecessary
expense of the US bankruptcy system, the situs of the primary regulator, as
well as the fact that creditors of the FTX International Group were outside
the United States, amongst other legal issues.
“Mr. Miller told me that the bankruptcy filings of FTX International Group,
the Alameda Group, and the FTX.US Group had to be in the United States
because otherwise S&C couldn’t do the job.
“I then told Mr. Miller that FTX.US should not file bankruptcy at all until
it was certain that there were insufficient assets at FTX.US. Indeed, the
tech team checked the wallets and had told the FTX International general
counsel at the time of the disclosure of the customer deficit that FTX.US
was not affected. I told Mr. Miller that the FTX.US crypto exchange needed
to be retained if at all possible and sold as a going concern to allow the
preferred shareholders to be paid back. Mr. Miller stated that he needed to
include FTX.US as part of the bankruptcy because FTX.US had the cash to pay
S&C its retainer. Without this retainer from FTX.US, S&C wouldn’t file. I
told him that it wasn’t proper for FTX.US to pay for the expenses of the
bankruptcy of FTX International Group or the Alameda Group.
“Mr. Miller informed me that S&C was installing ‘S&C’s guy’ to run all the
companies. [That refers to John J. Ray III who has been put in the post of
CEO of the FTX group of companies and has appointed a new Board of
Directors.] I told Mr. Miller that S&C was not the proper law firm to
select because of the claims and conflicts, as well as the exorbitant costs
of the firm. Mr. Miller told me that there was over $200 million cash in
LedgerX and that he was going to send these funds to S&C, and that
bankruptcy legal costs were therefore not a problem.
“I was horrified at this response and started to try to remind him of his
ethical obligations and that he was stealing further funds from customers,
but he hung up the phone on me and terminated the call….”
If that is not enough to take one’s breath away, Friedberg goes on to
provide a chart of the legal causes of action that could be leveled against
the various separate business entities of FTX to demonstrate why it was
improper for the new CEO and Sullivan & Cromwell to lump all of these
companies together as one pot of money. Friedberg writes:
“Based on advice of counsel, each of these groups were intended to be
separated. For example, the FTX International exchange was operated from a
server housed in Japan, while the FTX.US exchange was operated from a
server in Virginia. The wallets and assets of FTX International and FTX.US
were separated in these different instances. There are conflicting claims
that arise between each of these entities as set forth below, and each of
these groups deserve separate independent counsel as described in the chart
below. Note that the chart below raises just a few of the myriad of
conflicts between the group entities requiring separate counsel.”
Equally striking, Friedberg notes the following:
“Each of these groups have different creditor classes which each deserve
separate legal representation as well as separate creditor committees.
“S&C represented all of these groups simultaneously without proper conflict
waiver. S&C also represented Sam and Nishad personally. The lawyers in this
important bankruptcy proceeding should be independent and not have a
history of representing all of the various groups and the principals at one
Sullivan & Cromwell did provide a document previously to the court that
confirmed that Sam Bankman-Fried and Nishad Singh were former clients of
Next, Friedberg goes on to detail the claims that creditors would likely
have against Sullivan & Cromwell, which should disqualify it from serving
as lead counsel. Friedberg writes in part:
“The first claim involves a breach of ethical obligations and overbilling
by S&C during their representation of Alameda in its credit bid in the
“At the time that this Voyager credit bid matter commenced, S&C sent me
their retention letter which I signed with respect to that particular
matter. Regretfully, I did not fully read the exhibit to the letter. S&C
was our prior counsel and I did not imagine that they would try to slip
something in the engagement letter. I was proved to be wrong.
“S&C represented Alameda for a few months on this matter without tendering
a bill. I saw that there were an unnecessary number of S&C lawyers working
on the matter, and assumed that it would be a high bill, and expected a
cost of $500,000. This sounds like a shocking fee but this would be normal
“Andrew Dietrich [Dietderich] sent me a bill for $6.5 million as a flat fee
for the entire matter and stated that the engagement letter I had signed
provided for ‘value billing’ and this was a $1 billion transaction. I was
absolutely shocked and told him that we only pay by the hour.
“To be clear, Alameda engaged S&C to place a bid on assets in a bankruptcy
that took a few months and they charged $6.5 million for the matter!
“I told Ryne Miller to fix the problem and Mr. Miller told me that we
should help Andy on this as he needed the bankruptcy work. I angrily told
Mr. Miller to get them to bill us by the hour or I would have to involve
Sam. Mr. Miller told me not to tell Sam and promised to fix the matter.
“I later learned that Ryne Miller authorized payment of $2.5 million to S&C
for the matter.”
Friedberg also lists what he alleges are numerous false statements made to
the court by Sullivan & Cromwell partners. For example, he writes the
following about law partner Andrew Dietderich:
“In paragraph 5 of the Dietderich Supplemental Declaration, Mr. Dietderich
states that Mr. Ray was the one who decided to file the Debtors for Chapter
11 protection. As stated above, S&C and Ryne Miller selected this route and
chose ‘their guy’ to run it….”
Friedberg closes this bombshell by indicating that he expects to be
targeted by S&C for making these allegations and declares under penalty of
perjury that his statements are truthful.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 15041 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the cypherpunks