Fwd: FOIL Request No. 2022-089773 - Larson

[Gunnar Larson]

SENT VIA EMAIL
(G at xny.io)
January 19, 2023
Gunnar D. Larson
xNY.io – Bank.org
406 West 25th Street
New York, NY 10001
Re: Freedom of Information Law (“FOIL”) Tracking No. 2022-089773
Dear Gunnar D. Larson:
I write in response to the FOIL request that you submitted to the New York
State
Department of Financial Services (“Department”) on January 26, 2022, which
states as follows:
“Please submit any and all records related to the LendingClub.com
September 11 Board of Directors resignation below. The date of the
resignation is in question. You may understand the sensitive nature of the
date of the resignation. Gunnar Larson Sun, Oct 24, 2021, 5:06 PM to Anuj,
Investor, Press Hello there: Thank you very much for the reply. Gunnar On
Sun, Oct 24, 2021, 11:36 AM Anuj Nayar wrote: Hi Gunnar On September
11, 2021, in connection with her nomination to serve as superintendent of
the New York State Department of Financial Services, Adrienne Harris
notified us of her resignation, effective September 12, 2021, from the
Company’s Board. Details can be found in the 8k filed on 9/15/21 (below)
https://d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001409970/bbc437e4-2920-
4d5d-8e0d-86bca622f0ca.pdf From: Gunnar Larson Date: Saturday,
October 23, 2021 at 9:37 AM To: Investor Relations , Press Cc: Gunnar
Larson Subject: [EXT] LendingClub: Current Board of Directors
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
the content is safe. Dear Madam or Sir: Good day to you. Surveying market
research, I was wondering if you can kindly confirm, from LendingClub's
July 15, 2021 press release: Is Ms. Adrienne Harris currently a member of
LendingClub's board of directors?
https://www.prnewswire.com/newsreleases/lendingclub-appoints-adrienne-harris-to-its-board-of-directors-
301335198.html#financial-modal [prnewswire.com] Reviewing your
website, Ms. Harris is not
referenced:https://www.lendingclub.com/company/leadership Bloomberg
and other sources do not reference Ms. Harris as a LendingClub board
member: https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/LC:US [bloomberg.com]
Sending you the very best regards. Thank you, Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson -
xNY.io [xny.io] | Bank.org [bank.org] MSc [unic.ac.cy] - Digital Currency
MBA [unic.ac.cy] - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip) G at xNY.io +1-
646-454-9107 New York, New York 10001.”
Public Officers Law (“POL”) § 89(3) requires a FOIL request to reasonably
describe the
records sought. This means that the description of the documents sought
must be sufficient to
allow the agency to locate and identify the documents requested. See Matter
of Farbman & Sons
v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 62 NY2d 75 (1984); Matter of Wright
v Hippolyte,
2014 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1247, 2014 NY Slip Op 30705(U) (Sup. Ct. N.Y. County
March 20,
2014). The Committee on Open Government, which is responsible for, inter
alia, issuing
advisory opinions regarding FOIL, has opined that “[w]hether a request
reasonably describes the
records sought . . . may be dependent upon the terms of a request, as well
as the nature of an
agency’s filing or record-keeping system.” Committee on Open Government
(“Committee”)
Opinion No. FOIL-AO-16073 (July 17, 2006). In the Committee’s Opinion No.
FOIL-AO-11960
(February 17, 2000), it opined that a FOIL request that sought records
“‘tending to support’ a
particular statement, or ‘utilized’, ‘used’ or ‘relating to’ various
activities of the Department of
Environmental Conservation” was not a reasonably described request for
records under Public
Officers Law Article 6. The Committee stated that a response to such a
request “would involve
making a series of judgments based on opinions, some of which would be
subjective, mental
impressions”, and require “ascertaining which records might ‘tend to
support’ a statement [that]
would involve an attempt to render a judgment regarding the use, utility,
accuracy or value of
records.” The Committee held that “for purposes of [FOIL], a request for
such materials would
not meet the standard of ‘reasonably describing’ the records sought, for
such a request would not
enable the [agency] to locate and identify the records in the manner
envisioned by that statute.”
Your FOIL request fails to meet the “reasonably describe” requirement in
POL § 89(3)
because it includes vague and imprecise phrases such as “any and “all,” and
“related to” and it
does not clearly describe the records that you are seeking to enable the
Department to conduct a
reasonable search for those records. Such vague phrases are imprecise terms
that require
Department staff to make subjective judgments as to whether a document is
responsive to your
FOIL request. When such subjective judgments are required of staff, the
FOIL request may be
denied for failure to meet the reasonably describe requirement in POL §
89(3). Additionally, the
Department does not have an indexing system that allows it to search all of
its paper and
electronic records by terms that may appear in such records. Accordingly,
the Department is
denying your FOIL request on the basis that the request is not reasonably
described.
Notwithstanding the foregoing issues with your FOIL request, please be
advised that, in
August of 2021, the Superintendent resigned from the Board of Directors of
the Lending Club,
effective September 12, 2021.

In accordance with POL § 89(4), you may appeal this determination within 30
days by
sending an email to FOIL.Appeals at dfs.ny.gov.
Very truly yours,
Pascale Jean-Baptiste
FOIL Officer

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: JeanBaptiste, Pascale (DFS) <Pascale.JeanBaptiste at dfs.ny.gov>
Date: Thu, Jan 19, 2023, 9:51 AM
Subject: FOIL Request No. 2022-089773 - Larson
To: Gunnar Larson <g at xny.io>
Cc: Garrett, Carmen (DFS) <Carmen.Garrett at dfs.ny.gov>


Good Morning:



Please see the attached determination in response to your FOIL request.
Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 9154 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20230119/b9191d35/attachment.txt>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Determination (2022-089773) - 1.19.23 Final.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 256448 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20230119/b9191d35/attachment-0001.pdf>