USA 2024 Elections Thread

[grarpamp]

Democrats and their Agencies... Nothing but Corruption


Destroying America - An Inside Job

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/19315/destroying-american-democracy

https://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/2023/january/twitter-files-show-social-site-suspended-250k-accounts-on-behalf-of-us-govt
https://www.axios.com/2023/01/12/biden-classified-documents-timeline
https://nypost.com/2023/01/11/penn-biden-center-is-dark-money-nightmare-patronage-mill/
https://nypost.com/2022/06/11/the-fbi-knew-russiagate-was-a-lie-but-hid-that-truth/
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jim-jordan-house-judiciary-trump-biden-documents-the-takeout/
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fbi-may-violated-first-amendment-twitter-moderation-requests-experts-warn
https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/whistleblowers-reports-reveal-double-standard-in-pursuit-of-politically-charged-investigations-by-senior-fbi-doj-officials
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53784048
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/385278-gop-report-clapper-told-cnn-host-about-trump-dossier-in-2017/
https://americanmilitarynews.com/2022/03/hillary-clinton-dnc-fined-by-fec-over-trump-russia-collusion-hoax/
https://news.yahoo.com/zuckerberg-admits-facebook-suppressed-hunter-121655720.html
https://nypost.com/2022/10/19/its-been-two-years-since-51-intelligence-agents-interfered-with-an-election-they-still-wont-apologize/
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1601364807831425025
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1601362905785860098
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11558251/FBI-paid-Twitter-3M-devoting-staff-processing-requests.html

Over the last few years, there has been much written about the
destruction of American democracy. Frequently the threat has been of
alleged interference in U.S. elections by Russia, China or other state
actors. Government agencies, the name of election integrity, were
assigned to identify and disrupt these foreign intrusions. As more and
more information is revealed about these agencies, it seems that
America's Intelligence Community participated in these activities
domestically, and in a way that poses a grave threat to both election
integrity and American democracy.

Just last week it was revealed that the FBI again withheld pertinent
information from the American public, for past two months, until after
the November 8, 2022 federal election. As with the Bureau's reported
cover-up of evidence influence-peddling reportedly found on Hunter
Biden's laptop, agents knew, since November 2, 2022, about at least
some of the three sets of classified material that illegally found
their way into the garage and library of President Joe Biden and into
the Penn Biden Center think tank at the University of Pennsylvania --
to which anonymous members of the Chinese Communist Party have donated
$54.6 million.

Their existence only became known this week, after the newly elected
Republican-majority House of Representatives announced that it would
hold hearings on "how the [Justice] department handled investigations
into classified materials found at former President Donald Trump's
Florida home and those found at President Joe Biden's office in a
Washington think tank bearing his name and his Delaware home..."

In addition, the recent release of the "Twitter Files" has raised at
least two major concerns regarding actions by the Intelligence
Community. The first is that the wall of separation between the
Intelligence Community and the U.S. media has not only sprung a leak,
it has totally collapsed. The report that officials from the Office of
the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) met weekly with Twitter
executives to coordinate information is totally inappropriate. Would
officials from the ODNI review, affirm or label certain sets of
information as false? When ODNI was created, no one intended its
officials to have a role in these types of discussions.

It also appears that intelligence officials in recent years have
politically weaponized intelligence. The combination of a politically
weaponized Intelligence Community, operating hand-in-hand with
organizations that are the main gateways for information to millions
of Americans, poses a serious threat to American democracy and the
integrity of our elections.

Let us just briefly look at the steep slope of lying, deceit and
corruption that has seeped into the leadership of the U.S.
Intelligence Community.

First, there are not enough words to praise our Intelligence Community
and the men and women who risk their lives to keep America safe. These
are the rank-and-file professionals that form the core of the
Intelligence Community. Most are dedicated to the mission of gathering
the necessary information to protect our nation. Their leaders have a
responsibility to serve these individuals. Too often, however, as the
current array of whistleblowers indicates, those leaders have let
these individuals down.

Imagine their reaction in 2013 when, in response to a question from
Senator Ron Wyden to then-Director of National Intelligence (DNI)
James Clapper about whether the National Security Agency (NSA)
collects "any type of data on millions, or hundreds of millions of
Americans," Clapper answered, "No sir, not wittingly." Clapper, who
had been given the question the previous day, was asked after the
hearing if he wanted to amend the answer, and declined. It was shortly
thereafter that a massive NSA program containing millions of pieces of
Americans' data was revealed. Clapper was caught in a huge lie -- to
U.S. Senator Wyden and the American people.

On January 12, 2017, CNN reported that President-elect Donald Trump
had been briefed by DNI Clapper, FBI Director James Comey, CIA
Director John Brennan, and NSA Director Michael Rogers. The topic:
"Russian operatives claim to have compromising personal and financial
information about Donald Trump." It was intended to inform the
President-elect that these allegations "are circulating among
intelligence agencies, senior members of Congress, and other
government officials in Washington." The briefing also touched on
other major allegations they claimed were "circulating."

Having this false information -- some of which the FBI actually
altered -- in the public domain was evidently intended to damage
Trump. The Russian "hoax" allegations would haunt and damage the Trump
presidency for almost two years. Clapper himself stated:

    "I express my profound dismay at the leaks that have been
appearing in the press ... they are extremely corrosive and damaging
to our national security."

Clapper also released a statement that neither he nor anyone else in
the Intelligence Community were responsible for the leaks. How did
this highly classified information, then, get into the public domain?

A House Republican investigation provides the answer. Clapper denied
leaking the dossier but admitted to discussing the dossier with CNN
correspondent Jake Tapper and perhaps other journalists in early
January 2017. Later in 2017, Clapper would go on to join CNN as a
"national security" contributor and CNN would receive an award for its
reporting at the White House Correspondents' dinner.

Today we know that the "Russia hoax" was a lie. After a 22-month
investigation, no evidence of collusion between any element of the
Trump campaign and Russia was uncovered. The supposedly compromising
evidence had never existed; the information in the "Steele dossier"
was false -- and the FBI had known it was from the start. The entire
fabrication had been an attempt to attack and politically weaken
Trump.

In October 2020, shortly before the elections 51 former intelligence
professionals had even signed a joint letter stating that the Hunter
Biden laptop had "has all the classic earmarks of a Russian
information operation." They stated that their national security
experience made them "deeply suspicious that the Russian government
played a significant role in this case." They went on:

    "If we are right, this is Russia trying to influence how Americans
vote in this election, and we strongly believe that Americans need to
be aware of this."

The New York Times raised questions about the authenticity of the
materials found on the laptop. Bill Evanina, the National
Counterintelligence and Security Center Director, had indicated in
August that Russia was trying to denigrate the Biden campaign. All
these manufactured "facts" were apparently intended to create
circumstances where reasonable people would have to conclude that the
Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation.

Signatories of the 2020 letter included Clapper, Brennan, Michael
Hayden, Jeremy Bash and David Buckley. Clapper and Brennan are
familiar names. They were involved in the January 2017 briefing to
President Donald Trump on the fake Steele dossier. Jeremy Bash and
David Buckley are worth mentioning because they continue to play
significant roles in domestic and national security areas in the U.S.
government. Buckley was the majority staff director on the House
Select Committee investigating January 6th. Bash has been named to
co-chair a government commission to review the war in Afghanistan.

The fraudulent efforts by the U.S. government, Clapper, Brennan and
the 49 others -- along with Hillary Clinton, her campaign committee,
the Democratic National Committee and the suppression of the media and
social media (here and here) -- to influence the public unfortunately
met with some success. For almost two years, the authenticity of the
material found on Hunter Biden's laptop was questioned. Today, its
authenticity has been verified; the information is real and damning.
As summarized by the New York Post:

    "Yes that letter from the Dirty 51 had all the classic earmarks of
a disinformation operation, all right – one designed to ensure Joe
Biden won the presidency. And it was essentially a CIA operation,
considering 43 of the 51 signatories were former CIA."

One final example of the Intelligence Community involving itself in
domestic politics comes from the recent release of the "Twitter
Files." According to tweet #20 of the third tranche released:

    "This post about the Hunter Biden laptop situation shows that Roth
not only met weekly with the FBI and DHS, but with the Office of the
Director of National Intelligence."

Tweet #17 states: "executives were also clearly liaising with federal
enforcement and intelligence agencies about moderation of
election-related content."

Finally, the FBI paid Twitter $3.5 million reportedly to "handle
requests from the bureau."

We now know what happened. Twitter suppressed discussion of the Hunter
Biden laptop story and suppressed conservative messaging, while at the
same time it appears the FBI, DHS and the ODNI had literally had set
up shop at Twitter.

The American people should be outraged. This level of collaboration
between federal law enforcement and a private sector company on
controlling speech is terrifying. Having our Intelligence Community,
which is supposed to be focused on foreign intelligence collection,
involved is even more terrifying.

DNI James Clapper lying to the American people in 2013 about
government surveillance of them, the promoting of the Russian hoax
theory in 2017 by CIA Director Brennan, DNI Clapper, FBI Director
Comey and others, the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story by
51 former intelligence professionals, and the close working
arrangement between the FBI, DHS and the ODNI in 2020-2022 raises a
staggering series of questions:

    Can our government, law enforcement, and the Intelligence
Community still be trusted?

    Have those federal government agencies literally weaponized law
enforcement and intelligence against political opponents in the U.S.?

    Has more than one solitary person -- former FBI attorney Kevin
Clinemith, for altering an email -- been held accountable for these
egregious abuses of power?

    Why wasn't there a more powerful response from the Intelligence
Community and the law enforcement community about the disinformation
from the 51 former intelligence professionals?

    Who authorized the cozy relationship between law enforcement, the
intelligence community with Twitter?

    Who in these government agencies reviewed and approved of the
output and decisions coming from these joint efforts?

    Were political appointees in the review loop?

    Who has the records, notes and decisions that emanated from these groups?

It is clear that our law enforcement community needs to be
investigated, but most importantly we need to investigate how our
Intelligence Community has evolved from having literally a
non-existent relationship with speech in America to being inside the
room determining what speech is allowed.

There also needs to be a significant investigation by an outside,
non-government group to understand how far this massive government
overreach into free speech and election manipulation went.

Clearly the government has been influencing what we get to see and
hear. It needs to stop -- now -- before our democracy is destroyed.