grarpamp at gmail.com
Thu Feb 16 21:44:21 PST 2023
When Open-Source analysts and witnesses get too close and
start batting 100% against the criminals, the State shuts it all
down... like MKULTRA and many more... "it didn't happen"
"what records" "I do not recall" FOIA Glomar memoryholed...
WHO Suddenly Shelves Plans For Second Phase Investigation Into Origins
Of COVID-19: Report
More than three years after COVID-19 emerged in the Chinese city of
Wuhan, the World Health Organization (WHO) has shelved its plan for
the second phase of a study into the virus’ origins, Nature reported
In January 2021, a year after the initial outbreak, the WHO dispatched
an international team of scientists and doctors from various
disciplines to Wuhan, where they worked with Chinese experts to
examine evidence about the virus. The phase one investigation yielded
a report that only spawned more questions over the hypothesis that the
virus might have escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV),
which was tinkering with bat coronaviruses. It was also criticized for
ignoring China’s failure to hand over complete, original data and
In response to those concerns, the United Nations agency in July 2021
announced a plan for a more extensive second phase investigation.
Specifically, it promised to find and review more data on “relevant
laboratories and research institutions” in Wuhan, as well as data on
wild animals sold at the city’s live animal markets in late 2019, to
better understand whether it’s more likely that the pandemic began
with human contact with an infected animal, or from a lab escape.
The proposed probe never materialized.
Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, an epidemiologist at the WHO in Geneva,
Switzerland, told Nature that the plan “has changed.”
“There is no phase two,” Van Kerkhove told the scientific journal.
“The politics across the world of this really hampered progress on
understanding the origins,” she said.
In response to The Epoch Times’ request for further comments, a
spokesperson for Van Kerkhove said Nature’s report was “incorrect” and
that she has asked the publication for correction.
Nature has yet to issue any correction at the point of this publication.
The mere discussion of a lab escape as a possible scenario in the
first phase report irritated the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) regime,
which turned it into an excuse not to allow another WHO mission into
Just days after the WHO proposed a second phase investigation, the
regime mounted a pushback, claiming that the lab breach hypothesis
shouldn’t even be talked about, let alone be the focus of further
Security personnel keep watch outside the Wuhan Institute of Virology
during the visit by the World Health Organization (WHO) team tasked
with investigating the origins of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19),
in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, on Feb. 3, 2021. (Thomas
The proposal, according to vice minister of China’s National Health
Commission, Zeng Yixin, “did not respect common sense and violated
science.” He also insisted that there wasn’t any “man-made virus” at
the WIV, nor had the institute ever conducted gain-of-function
experiments on the novel coronavirus.
“It is impossible for us to accept such an origin-tracing plan,”
Zeng said at that time.
“We are opposed to politicizing the tracing work.”
Zeng’s comments prompted Washington to call out Beijing for its
“dangerous” and “irresponsible” behavior.
“We are deeply disappointed,” said White House press secretary Jen
Psaki said. “Their position is irresponsible, and frankly, dangerous.
It’s not a time to be stonewalling.”
Amid the tension between China and the United States, the WHO was
still seeking “directly engage” with Chinese officials and trying to
establish collaborations with Chinese scientists, according to Van
“We really, really want to be able to work with our colleagues there,”
she told Nature. “It’s really a deep frustration.”
WHO Leadership Change
Nature’s report comes as Jeremy Farrar, a British pharmaceutical trust
director involved in producing a paper arguing against the lab breach
hypothesis, is set to take the helm of WHO’s science division.
According to emails obtained and publicized by independent journalist
James Tobias via a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, Farrar had been
working on a draft of the paper with Dr. Anthony Fauci, who led the
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, in as early as
January 2020. At one point, the two appeared to discuss whether the
virus could have been put in a serial passage between animals in lab
experiments and then escaped.
The paper in question, titled “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2,” was
published in Nature Medicine in March 2020. It has since been widely
cited by government officials—Fauci himself included—and mainstream
media outlets as the scientific basis for dismissing the possibility
that COVID-19 might have come out of a lab.
More information about the cypherpunks