Banks that Put Up $30 Billion to “Rescue” First Republic May Have Been Trying to Rescue their Own Exposure to $247 Trillion in Derivatives
g at xny.io
Thu Apr 27 09:40:43 PDT 2023
By Pam Martens and Russ Martens: April 27, 2023 ~Bank Logos (Thumbnail)
Ever since 11 banks on March 16 donned the garb of heroic fire fighters,
rushing to extinguish an inferno at a competitor bank before it spread
further, we have been asking ourselves the question – why just this group
of 11 banks.
We’re talking about the action on March 16 when 11 banks chipped in a total
of $30 billion and bizarrely placed those funds as uninsured deposits into
First Republic Bank – which was in full scale unraveling mode because of
bond losses and – wait for it – too many uninsured deposits. Four banks
contributed two-thirds of the total deposits with JPMorgan Chase, Bank of
America, Citigroup and Wells Fargo ponying up $5 billion each. Morgan
Stanley and Goldman Sachs deposited $2.5 billion each; while BNY Mellon,
State Street, PNC Bank, Truist and U.S. Bank each deposited $1 billion,
together making up the other one-third of the $30 billion.
According to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as of December 31,
2022 there were 4,706 federally-insured commercial banks and savings
associations in the U.S. The 11 banks rushing to “rescue” First Republic
Bank represent less than a fraction of one percent of the total banks.
Banking in the U.S. is not particularly regarded as an altruistic industry.
In fact, it frequently resembles a blood sport. So why this uncanny display
of generosity to a competitor and why were just these 11 banks involved?
Yesterday, we had an epiphany. We pulled up the most recent table from the
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency showing the 25 bank holding
companies that have the largest exposure to derivatives. Sure enough, each
of those 11 banks is on the list. (See page 19 at this link.) The data is
as of December 31, 2022.
Equally noteworthy, the four banks that chipped in the giant sums of $5
billion each, control 58 percent of the total $247 trillion notional (face
amount) in derivatives controlled by all 25 banks.
And if that wasn’t already plenty to raise one’s blood pressure, for many
of these banks the dollar amount of derivatives is exponentially more than
the total assets of the bank holding company. For example, SMBC Americas
Holdings, Inc. has $34.6 billion in assets and $10.3 trillion in
derivatives. (You can’t make this stuff up.)
It also caught our eye that three of the 25 banks on this list had their
credit ratings impacted by the big action taken by Moody’s on April 21 when
it downgraded the credit ratings of 11 banks on that date and put five more
on negative watch. (See chart below.)
So let’s look back a little further at what was going on in terms of credit
ratings during the two days just preceding that $30 billion display of
goodwill toward First Republic Bank.
On Monday, March 13, Moody’s downgraded the entire U.S. banking system
outlook to negative from stable. On that same date, a bank with ties to
crypto customers, Metropolitan Commercial Bank, lost 44 percent of its
market value and a California regional bank, Western Alliance Bancorp, lost
47 percent of its market value. By Wednesday morning, March 15, Dow futures
were down more than 600 points just after 8:00 a.m. in New York; major
banks in Europe had been temporarily halted from trading after steep
selloffs; and Credit Suisse, with deep interconnections to the mega banks
on Wall Street, had plunged to less than 2 bucks.
Also, on March 15, the Wall Street Journal ran this subhead: “JPMorgan,
Bank of America, Citigroup and Wells Fargo have lost about $91 billion in
market value over the past week,” indicating that the contagion had spread
to the biggest banks.
To put it succinctly, the actions of those big derivative banks on March 16
might have had a lot more to do with white knuckles over the potential for
this contagion to focus on the big derivative counterparty banks than a
warm and fuzzy feeling toward First Republic Bank.
Credit Downgrades by Moody's and Derivatives Exposure.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 5038 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the cypherpunks