Cryptocurrency: War On Crypto - US Crypto Regulation Far More Invasive Than Thought

Thu Oct 27 23:32:06 PDT 2022

New US Crypto Regulation Far More Invasive Than We Thought

US Congress intends to regulate crypto on a level far deeper than
currently understood―They will:

    Designate Bitcoin, Ether, and their hard-forks as commodities and
regulate their transactions accordingly;
    Create legal uncertainty for all other crypto projects and ICOs by
allowing them to be labeled as securities;
    Ban the use of (unauthorized) stablecoins;
    Introduce penalties for the use of mixers and privacy coins;
    Rebrand smart-contracts that take longer than 24 hours to deliver
as futures contracts and regulate them accordingly;
    Re-define legal tender and change the way money is created by the
Federal Reserve; and authorize the issuing of a digital USD of which
all transactions are recorded;
    Introduce foreign regulations into US law for all virtual asset
service providers in the US (and with US clients).

In short: Congress wants to bring crypto-currencies under full
oversight and control.

These new regulations introduce massive regulatory burdens on existing
projects, ban and criminalize current normal activities, restrain
innovation and free enterprise, and even introduce a transparent
central bank digital digital currency that redefines money as we know
it!

According to United States representative Don Beyer, congress should
incorporate “digital assets into existing financial regulatory
structures.”(1) As you will see, they intend to do just that.

And it will change the way things are done for crypto forever…

<What This Post Is About_

This post provides an overview of the crypto legislation currently
(September 2021) being put through US congress.

It does not just look at the proposed bills, but rather at the wide
range of laws that are to be amended.

Once all the puzzle pieces are put together, the big picture reveals
shockingly strict regulations of crypto and a complete overhaul of the
idea of “money.” This could have serious effects not only on the
crypto sector, but also on the financial system as a whole.

Behind the excuses of preventing money laundering and ensuring
investor protection, the use of crypto is transformed in something it
was not supposed to be. Especially delicate is the fact that part of
this legislation is drafted outside the US.

Disclaimer*: This report provides a high-level overview of the US laws
that are to be introduced/amended by two new bills. Its depth is
limited by the inadequate knowledge of the author of the large body of
US law involved, and given that these bills are subject to amendments
and have not even passed into law yet, none of this information can be
considered legal or financial advice.*

<What Is Going On?

On April 06, 2021, a “must pass” bill was introduced called the
“Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act”(2) (“Infrastructure Bill”).
It passed in the House of Representatives and, after fierce debate,
the Senate. Hidden in this bill, an amendment to the Internal Revenue
Code was added. It introduced new reporting requirements and
obligations for record keeping.

While this bill created a lot of public outcry, more recently, a real
game-changing bill was introduced in the House on July 28, 2021,
namely the: “Digital Asset Market Structure and Investor Protection
Act” (3) (“Digital Asset Bill”).

This bill proposes amendments to the Federal Reserve Act, the Bank
Secrecy Act, Securities Exchanges Acts, and the Commodity Exchange
Act. It changes the definition of legal tender, and it introduces
international crypto regulation into US law.

This article looks at each of these amendments…

<Commodities or Securities?_

The main take-away is that two different bodies of law will apply to
crypto projects: commodities and securities laws. So far, only
Bitcoin, Ether, and their hard-forks are confirmed to be commodities
(see below). All other cryptos are subject to future guidance by
market regulators:

“Not later than 150 days after the date of the enactment of this
section, the SEC and CFTC shall jointly publish, for purposes of a
60-day public comment period, a proposed rulemaking that classifies
each of the major digital assets.

Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act*,
the SEC and CFTC shall jointly publish a final rule that classifies*
each of the top 25 major digital assets by (i) highest market
capitalization and (ii) highest daily average trading volume as—

(1) a digital asset; or(2) a digital asset security.” (4)

Interpretation:

    Cryptos will be subject to two different regulatory regimes:
commodities and security regulations.
    Services engaged with both digital assets (commodities) and
digital asset securities (securities) could be subjected to both
regulatory regimes.

<Commodities Regulation_

The Commodity Exchange Act regulates the trading of commodity futures
in the United States. Passed in 1936, it has been amended several
times since then.(5) It provides federal regulation of all commodities
and futures trading activities and requires all futures and commodity
options to be traded on organized exchanges.

In 1974, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) was created
to oversee the market. With certain exceptions, the CFTC has been
granted exclusive jurisdiction over commodity futures, options, and
all other derivatives that fall within the definition of a swap.
Certain cryptos will be regulated as commodities.

Definition of “Commodity” Amended to Include Digital Asset:

First and foremost, Section 1a of the Commodity Exchange Act on
definitions will be amended to read as follows:

“The term “commodity” means wheat, cotton, rice, corn, oats, barley,
rye, flaxseed, grain sorghums, mill feeds, butter, eggs, Solanum
tuberosum (Irish potatoes), wool, wool tops, fats and oils (including
lard, tallow, cottonseed oil, peanut oil, soybean oil, and all other
fats and oils), cottonseed meal, cottonseed, peanuts, soybeans,
soybean meal, livestock, livestock products, digital asset (including
Bitcoin, Ether, and their hardforks), and frozen concentrated orange
juice, and all other goods and articles, except onions (as provided by
section 13–1 of this title) and motion picture box office receipts (or
any index, measure, value, or data related to such receipts), and all
services, rights, and interests (except motion picture box office
receipts, or any index, measure, value or data related to such
receipts) in which contracts for future delivery are presently or in
the future dealt in.”(6)

Digital Asset Definition

Next, the end of Section 1a of the Commodity Exchange Act will be
amended by adding a clarification of what a digital asset is
(7)(definition to long to post here)

Smart Contracts with Delivery Time of More than 24 hours are Futures Contracts

A sharpening of the definition of retail commodity transactions could
decrease the options for the use of smart contracts outside of
regulated exchanges.

Currently, Section 2(c)(2)(D)(i) of the Commodity Exchange Act
prohibits persons that are not “eligible contract participants” or
“eligible commercial entities” to engage in agreements, contract or
transactions in commodities on leverage, margin, or financed by the
offeror, the counterparty, or a person acting in concert with the
offeror or counterparty on a similar basis.(8)

Next, additional amendments mentioned in the SEC. 202 of the Digital
Asset Bill applies this on transactions done by smart contract of
which the delivery takes longer than 24 hours:

“(ii)  Exceptions

(III) a contract of sale that–

(cc) with respect to digital assets*, results in* actual delivery
(including transfer of control over private keys) not later than 24
hours after the transaction is entered into and such delivery is
accomplished by either-

(AA) recording the transaction on the public distributed ledger for
the digital asset; or

(BB) with respect to digital which are not recorded on a public
distributed ledger for the digital asset, reporting the transaction to
a CFTC registered digital asset trade repository; or” (9)

Dodd-Frank Act and Market Transparency

After the 2008 financial crisis, the Dodd-Frank Act introduced strict
regulations for swaps. Naturally, these will also apply to digital
assets as well.

The definition of swaps, as provided by the Commodity Exchange Act
(section 1a(47)) is broad. For example, it could refer to any
“agreement, contract or transaction” that “provides for any purchase,
sale, payment, or delivery that is dependent on the occurrence,
nonoccurrence, or the extent of the occurrence of an event or
contingency associated with a potential financial, economic, or
commercial consequence.” (10)
Next, the Dodd-Frank bill authorizes the CFTC to:

    Regulate swap dealers by installing capital and margin
requirements, require dealers to meet robust business conduct
standards, and meet recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
    Increase transparency and improve pricing in the derivatives
marketplace by requiring standardized derivatives to be traded on
regulated exchanges or swap execution facilities and bring better
pricing to the market place and lower costs for businesses and
consumers.
    Lower risk to the American public by moving standardized
derivatives to central clearinghouses.(11)

Digital Asset Trade Repository

To meet the above mentioned market transparency requirement, the
Commodity Exchange Act stipulates the need for a digital asset trade
repository to collect information on SWAPS in order to provide the
public with the correct market information:

“The term ‘digital asset trade repository’ means any person that
collects and maintains information or records with respect to
transactions or positions in, or the terms and conditions of,
contracts of sale of digital assets in interstate commerce entered
into by third parties (both on chain public distributed ledger
transactions as well as off chain transactions) for the purpose of
providing a centralized recordkeeping facility for any digital asset,
but does not include a private or public distributed ledger or the
operator of either such ledger unless such private or public
distributed ledger or operator seeks to aggregate/include ‘off chain’
transactions as well.” (12)

Interpretation Commodities Regulations:

    As of writing, only BTC and Ether (and their hard-forks) will be
confirmed as commodities. All other cryptos could potentially be
regulated as securities (what this means is explained next).
    The fact that novel technologies such as Bitcoin and Ether are to
be subjected to a large body of law that developed around the trading
of livestock and frozen concentrated orange juice could spell
regulatory uncertainty for various business models in the industry.
    No “trading on margin” is allowed outside regulated entities,
unless done by high-level investors called “eligible contract
parties.” This could perhaps frustrate particular ideas about
decentralized finance or OTC markets.
    Smart contracts that take longer than 24 hours to deliver could be
considered futures contracts under the jurisdiction of the CFTC. That
smart contracts can be labeled as futures contracts appears indeed to
be the opinion of the CFTC.(13)

<Securities Regulations_

In the US, securities are regulated by the 1933 Securities Act.
Additionally, the 1934 Securities Exchange Act further regulates the
trade of securities, and established the SEC to oversee these markets.
Definition of “Security” Amended to Include Digital Asset Security:

First and foremost, Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Exchange Act
will be amended to include a “digital asset security” (and exclude
“digital assets”) in the definition of security:

“(10) The term “security” means any note, stock, treasury stock,
security future, security-based swap, bond, debenture, certificate of
interest or participation in any profit-sharing agreement or in any
oil, gas, or other mineral royalty or lease, any collateral-trust
certificate, preorganization certificate or subscription, transferable
share, investment contract, digital asset security*, voting-trust
certificate, certificate of deposit for a security, any put, call,
straddle, option, or privilege on any security, certificate of
deposit, or group or index of securities (including any interest
therein or based on the value thereof), or any put, call, straddle,
option, or privilege entered into on a national securities exchange
relating to foreign currency, or in general, any instrument commonly
known as a “security”; or any certificate of interest or participation
in, temporary or interim certificate for, receipt for, or warrant or
right to subscribe to or purchase, any of the foregoing;* but shall
not include any fiat currency, commodity, digital asset*, or any note,
draft, bill of exchange, or banker’s acceptance which has a maturity
at the time of issuance of not exceeding nine months, exclusive of
days of grace, or any renewal thereof the maturity of which is
likewise limited.”* (14)
Digital Asset Security Definition

Next, the Digital Asset Bill (SEC. 101) defines what a digital asset
security will be:

“(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘digital asset security’ means a digital asset that:

(i) Provides the holder of the digital asset with any of the following rights:

(I) Equity or debt interest in the issuer.

(II) Right to profits, interest, or dividend payments from the issuer.

(III) Voting rights in the major corporate actions (which shall not
include new block creations, hardforks, or protocol changes related to
the digital asset) of the issuer.

(IV) Liquidation rights in the event of the issuer’s liquidation.

(ii) In the case of an issuer with a service, goods, or platform that
is not wholly operational at the time of issuing such digital asset,
with respect to any fundraising or capital formation activity
(including initial coin offerings*) which is accomplished through the
issuance of such a digital asset, issues such digital asset to a
holder in return for money (including other digital assets) to fund
the development of the proposed service, goods, or platform of the
issuer.”* (15)

What does it mean to be regulated as a security?

Investing in securities in the US is regulated to:

“protect interstate commerce, the national credit, the Federal taxing
power, to protect and make more effective the national banking system
and Federal Reserve System, and to insure the maintenance of fair and
honest markets in such transactions.” (16)

Regulations focus on both the issuing of securities (primary market),
and subsequent trade of such securities (secondary market).

The goal of securities laws is firstly to require issuers to fully
disclose all material information that an investor would need in order
to make up his or her mind about the potential investment. A regulated
company must create a registration statement, which includes a
prospectus, with copious amounts of information about the security,
the company, the business, including audited financial statements.

Next, the subsequent selling and trading in these securities is
regulated, by restricting trade to market places over which the
regulator has oversight. The Security Exchange Act section §78l(a)
states:

“It shall be unlawful for any member, broker, or dealer to effect any
transaction in any security (other than an exempted security) on a
national securities exchange unless a registration is effective as to
such security for such exchange in accordance with the provisions of
this chapter and the rules and regulations thereunder.” (17)

Summary of Securities Regulations:

    Crypto projects will need to be regulated and provide clear
financial information for investors to make an informed decision.
    Trading of securities will generally take place on regulated exchanges.
    Any new fundraising or capital formation activity (including ICOs)
are likely to be securities.
    When a crypto is regulated as a security, the entire coin is
subject to strict regulations. In the case of commodities, only
specific use cases (futures) are regulated. It is a big difference.
    US Congress is taking a leap of faith. It needs identifiable
persons to enforce a law upon. Who is going to be held accountable in
a decentralized network? Many issuing companies have handed control
over to network participants. Perhaps for this reason, Section 12(g)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 will be amended to allow the
issuer to apply for “desecuritization.” (18) The question remains: who
will apply for desecuritization once a network is decentralized? The
investors? Weren’t they the ones supposed to be protected in the first
place?

<Changing the Nature of Money_

These regulations are not just about crypto. It is clearly part of a
wider discussion on the future of money. As shown below, this bill not
only changes the definition of money in the US, but also changes how
money is created!

As a first, in Section 5312(a)(3)(B) of title 31, US Code (Money and
Finance) digital assets are included as a monetary instrument.(19)
However, Section 5103, of title 31, US Code will be amended to
specifically exclude digital assets and digital asset securities as
legal tender.(20) And finally, it is determined that digital assets
and digital asset securities will not be covered by Federal Deposit
Insurance (FDIC or NCUA).(21)

Introducing the Digital USD (or Central Bank Digital Currency/CBDC)

After slamming the door on digital assets to be used as lawful money,
the Federal Reserve Act is amended to provide the Federal Reserve
Board with far reaching new powers; section 11 will be amended to say:

“(d) To supervise and regulate through the Secretary of the Treasury
the issue and retirement of Federal Reserve notes (both physical and
digital), except for the cancellation and destruction, and accounting
with respect to such cancellation and destruction, of notes unfit for
circulation, and to prescribe rules and regulations (including
appropriate technology) under which such notes may be delivered by the
Secretary of the Treasury to the Federal Reserve agents applying
therefor.” (22)

In addition, Federal Reserve notes will in the future also be issued
digitally; an amendment to section 16 confirms this:

“Federal reserve notes, to be issued at the discretion of the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the purpose of making
advances to Federal reserve banks through the Federal reserve agents
as hereinafter set forth and for no other purpose, are authorized.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System is authorized to issue digital versions of
Federal reserve notes in addition to current physical Federal reserve
notes. Further, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,
after consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, is authorized
to use distributed ledger technology for the creation, distribution
and recordation of all transactions involving digital Federal reserve
notes. The said notes shall be obligations of the United States and
shall be considered legal tender and shall be receivable by all
national and member banks and Federal reserve banks and for all taxes,
customs, and other public dues. They shall be redeemed in lawful money
on demand at the Treasury Department of the United States, in the city
of Washington, District of Columbia, or at any Federal Reserve bank.”
(23)

Interpretations on the Future of Money:

    The door is shut for the use of cryptos as legal tender.
    The Federal Reserve Board is to be authorized to create and
distribute a ledger-based Federal reserve note that could be used for
everyday transactions in USD.
    Digital federal reserve notes will make the “recordation” of all
transactions possible. Did they use this word because “monitoring all
transactions” would be too obvious? Recording all transactions without
anyone looking at them makes no sense.
    These amendments significantly increase the power of the Federal
Reserve. Contrary to what is widely understood, the Fed does not
“print money.” It can only manage the money supply indirectly.(24) The
private sector “creates” most of what we use as money by issuing
credit. It is with the supply of credit by the private banks that the
monetary supply is inflated. Conversely, with the reduced demand for
credit, the money supply deflates. The Fed is not as powerful as it
wants the market to believe, and the Federal Reserve Act restricts a
lot of its actions. This amendment, however, could drastically expand
the authority of the Fed, by allowing them to create and distribute a
“digital USD” directly. It could change the entire structure of the
financial system and potentially have far reaching consequences.
    The original idea behind the Federal Reserve was for private bank
deposits to be combined to provide an emergency line of credit in
times of economic stress.(25) But if the Digital Dollar is based on a
blockchain, how can it also be based on reserves? And what mechanism
will determine how funds (and how much) are added to the economy? And
where and how will they be distributed? What about privacy and
security? Will all this authority be handed over to a board of seven
unelected bureaucrats? This amendment has the potential to change the
way the Federal Reserve operates. This deserves a wider discussion by
economists and financial experts outside the crypto-space as well.

<International FATF Crypto Regulation Introduced in the US_

Those paying attention to international anti-money laundering
legislation know that the following sections from the Digital Asset
Bill originate from guidance issued by the FATF (Financial Action Task
Force). FATF is an intra-governmental organization creating financial
legislation.

In March, the Paris based FATF issued draft guidance(26) (“FATF
Guidance”) on a number of topics. And even though this guidance hasn’t
been finalized, there are already a number of points directly included
in the Digital Asset Bill.

Banning the use of Stablecoins

Subchapter I of chapter 51 of subtitle IV of title 31, United States
Code, department of treasury regulation, will be amended, to read as
follows:

“(a) IN GENERAL.—Beginning on the date of the enactment of this
section, no person may issue, use, or permit to be used a digital
asset fiat-based stablecoin that is not approved by the Secretary of
the Treasury under subsection (b).”(27)

Criminalizing the use of privacy coins and anonymizing services
(mixers, coinjoins)

The bank secrecy act is going to be amended to sanction the use of
anonymity-enhanced convertible virtual currencies and anonymizing
services.(28) It is worth noting that willful violations of the bank
secrecy act could give rise to a fine of not more than $250,000, or
imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.(29)

Introduction of the term Virtual Asset Service Provide (VASP) into US Law

As a next step, the term Virtual Asset will be introduced into Section
5312(a) of title 31, United States Code. A Virtual Asset can be a
digital asset, or “a digital representation of value that can be
digitally traded, or transferred, and can be used for payment or
investment purposes;”(30)

So far we have seen a number of definitions. To understand their
relationship, the following image was made based on the definition of
Virtual Asset according to Section 5312(a) of title 31, United States
Code:(31)

https://preview.redd.it/9h73a1z879o71.png?width=502&format=png&auto=webp&s=28730b1ce17e8b920d65d9df418c1d9b7be5f0de

Virtual Asset is a broad definition; it covers most activities
involving cryptos. We can see in the Digital Asset Bill that entities
that are facilitating transactions in Virtual Assets are to be called
“virtual asset service providers,” or VASPS. Sec 301 of the Digital
Asset Bill defines a VASP:

“(A) means a person who—

(i) exchanges between digital asset and fiat currencies

(ii) exchanges between digital assets;

(iii) transfers of digital assets;

(iv) is responsible for the custody, safekeeping of a digital asset or
an instrument that enables control over a digital asset;

(v) issues or has the authority to redeem a digital asset; and

(vi) provides financial services related to the offer or sale of a
digital asset by a person who issues such digital asset; and

(B) does not include any person who—

(i) obtains a digital asset to purchase goods or services for themself;

(ii) provides communication service or network access services used by
a money transmitter; or

(iii) develops, creates, or disseminates software designed to be used
to issue a digital asset or facilitate financial activities associated
with a digital asset.” (32)

This definition comes directly from the FATF Guidance, with the only
difference being that the US excludes the exchange between different
forms of one virtual assets. On the other hand, section (v) is a new
addition.

The Big Picture: Global Regulation

The logic behind this seems to be to first introduce a high-level
definition (including coins regulated as commodities, securities, and
everything in between). Next, any future global restrictions on the
wider crypto-space can be applied at this level.

>From the latest FATF Guidance, a number of possible additional
restrictions can already be deducted. Things to look out for are the
restriction of the use of “unhosted wallets,” the introduction of the
“travel rule,” labeling those who engage in peer-to-peer transactions
as a risk, and a whole host of other measures. (33)

One additional aspect of VASP regulation mentioned in the FATF
Guidance is also included in the Digital Asset Bill; VASPS engaged in
services which are available in the United States and to United States
persons, have to be regulated in the United States, even if the
provider is located outside the United States. (34)
Interpretation International Regulation in the US:

    International AML legislation, created by Paris-based FATF, is
being introduced in the US.
    The FATF term “virtual asset service provider” (VASP) is
introduced in the US. The definition is so broad that it covers
practically all crypto projects.
    After first being in the FATF Guidance, the banning of stablecoins
and anonymity-enhanced cryptos and the obligation for VASPs to be
licensed in the country of their clients are included in the Digital
Asset Bill.
    It is not hard to imagine that other restrictions for cryptos
currently discussed by FATF, such as the travel rule and restricting
unhosted wallets, will be introduced next. This is not a regulation
you introduce to then never use.
    All VASPs with operating in the US or with US clients need to be
regulated in the US.

<Amendments in the Infrastructure Bill_

Last August saw public outcry over the US Infrastructure bill. It
included a section on IRS reporting for crypto. Some highlights:
Clarification of Definition of Broker

It makes sense that the tax authorities use a wide definition to cover
all possible economic activities in crypto. Section 80603 of the
Infrastructure Bill amendments the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
provides that brokers need to report the activity of their clients to
the IRS and adds the following to the definition of broker:

“(D) any person who (for consideration) is responsible for regularly
providing any service effectuating transfers of digital assets on
behalf of another person.” (35)
Reporting of Digital Assets

In addition, a unique wide definition of digital assets is added:

“any digital representation of value which is recorded on a
cryptographically secured distributed ledger or any similar technology
as specified by the Secretary.” (36)
Effective Date

Effective after December 31, 2023. So there is time.

Interpretation Infrastructure Bill

There was a lot of commotion about this bill. This was mainly due to
the wide definitions used, which could cover all activities in the
crypto space, including mining. In response, according to an article
on Bloomberg, the U.S. treasury will shortly issue additional
guidance, along the lines of the following:

“Other firms key to the nearly $2 trillion crypto market — from
developers and miners to hardware and software providers — won’t have
any new requirements, so long as they don’t also act as brokers,
according to a Treasury official” (37)

At a glance, it appears that this bill is not as invasive as
originally feared. It would also be impossible to enforce this
legislation on miners due to the nature of the technology.

In this case perhaps it would have been better if clear definitions
were used of what is, and isn’t included. Moreover, comments from
“anonymous sources at the treasury” do not provide real regulatory
clarity. This industry too easily accepts the opinions of officials as
decree. But we are all, including officials, subject to the law. Given
that officials change over time, opinions and guidance are not the way
forward; clear laws are needed.

The commotion also distracted from the massive changes proposed in the
Digital Asset Bill discussed in this post, which so far have been
ignored by the industry...

<Sources_

I added all 37 footnotes here, but the post become to long to post.
For those who wish to check the footnotes, they can be found in the
PDF version here:

https://decentralizedlegalsystem.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Review-US-Digital-Asset-Regulation-September-2021.pdf

<TL;DR_

Next to the widely discussed infrastructure bill, another bill is
pushed through US Congress: the “Digital Asset Market Structure and
Investor Protection Act.” Both are not law yet and non of this is
likely to take effect in 2021 (this cycle). And bills can be amended.
But stricter regulations are coming for crypto in the US.

Bitcoin, Ether, and their hard-forks, are to be regulated as
commodities. Smart-contracts taking longer to deliver than 24 hours
are considered futures contracts and regulated as such. Futures
contracts are subjected to many existing regulations, including to the
Dodd-Frank Act and in certain cases filing obligations with a CFTC
digital asset trade repository.

Every other project and future ICO is potentially a security. This
remains to be determined by a joined ruling of the CFTC and SEC, which
will likely be issued somewhere in 2022 (270 days after this bill is
passed). Issuers of securities are likely required to provide
transparency and financial information to investors. Trade is
generally restricted to regulated exchanges.

In addition, international anti-money laundering legislation is
introduced in the US; Stablecoins, privacycoins, and mixers are
prohibited. The high-level term VASP is introduced for likely further
future regulation. Every US based VASP (or with US clients) has to be
regulated (KYC) in the US. VASP regulation covers a large part of
crypto projects.

Finally, cryptos are specifically excluded as legal tender, and the
Federal Reserve Board is authorized to create and distribute a
distributed ledger based digital reserve note (CBDC), with
"recordation" of all transactions.

https://old.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/pqm1ba/new_us_crypto_regulation_far_more_invasive_than/