1984: Thread

[grarpamp]

The WEF’s Stakeholder Capitalism Is Just Global Fascism By Another Name

Authored by Brandon Smith via Alt-Market.us

The concept of “fascism” was originally entered into the Encyclopedia
Italiana by Italian philosopher Giovanni Gentile, who stated that
“Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is
a merger of state and corporate power.” Benito Mussolini would later
take credit for the quote as if he had written it himself, but it’s
important to note because it outlines the primary purpose of the
ideology rather than simply throwing the label around at people we
don’t like as a dishonest means to undermine their legitimacy.

Despite the fact that leftists today often attack conservatives as
“fascists” because of our desire to protect national boundaries and
western heritage, the truth is that all fascism is deeply rooted in
leftist philosophies and thinkers.

Mussolini was a long time socialist, a member of the party who greatly
admired Karl Marx. He deviated from the socialists over their desire
to remain neutral during WWI, and went on to champion a combination of
socialism and nationalism, what we now know as fascism. Adolph Hitler
was also a socialist and admirer of Karl Marx, much like Mussolini. It
is actually hard to find where Marx, the communists and the fascists
actually differ from each other – A deeper sense of nationalism seems
to be one of the few points of contention.

Though Marx saw the existence of nation states as temporary to the
proletariat and to the ruling class, he noted that the industrialists
were erasing national boundaries anyway. Marx argues in the Communist
Manifesto with some optimism:

“National differences and antagonisms between peoples are already
tending to disappear more and more, owing to the development of the
bourgeoisie, the growth of free trade and a world market, and the
increasing uniformity of industrial processes and of corresponding
conditions of life.”

Marx saw the development of corporate power as useful and the next
necessary step towards socialism, noting that joint-stock companies
(corporations) and the credit system are:

“The abolition of the capitalist mode of production within the
capitalist mode of production itself.”

In other words, corporations are viewed as a tool for the eventual
transition to a socialist “Utopia” and the death of free markets. Once
again, we see there is very little difference in motive between the
political left and the fascists. The natural progression of every form
of Marxism, communism, socialism, fascism etc. all ultimately lead to
a kind of globalist ideology and erasure of cultural separation. The
methods might differ slightly but the end result is the same. Some
think this is a good thing, but it is actually quite poisonous.

Globalism requires an overarching social dynamic, a single hive mind,
otherwise it cannot survive. If people have the ability to choose or
create better options (or different options) for living then globalism
loses significance. The existence of choice has to be erased. This is
a behavior that the political left has fully embraced and they are
more than happy to work hand-in-hand with corporate oligarchs to make
their ideal system a reality. Long gone are the days of the
anti-corporate progressive – They LOVE corporate dominance, but only
if those companies promote and enforce leftist models for society.

Mussolini’s fascism is at the root of the very corporate governance
that leftists applaud and lust after today. They have far more in
common with fascists than they realize.

The new fascism is a re-branded philosophy best represented by
something called “Stakeholder Capitalism.” It is a term often used by
globalists at the World Economic Forum and the head of the WEF, Klaus
Schwab. The media friendly definition of Stakeholder Capitalism is:

A form of capitalism in which companies do not only optimize
short-term profits for shareholders, but seek long term value
creation, by taking into account the needs of all their stakeholders,
and society at large.

But who are “all stakeholders” in the opinion of the WEF?

Well, according to Klaus Schwab they are all of human civilization,
now and in the future. In other words, the goal of SHC is for
corporate leaders and globalist bureaucracy to take responsibility for
the entire world, not just their own employees, shareholders and
profits. And such leaders would not be acting as individuals, they
would be acting as a collective. In other words, SHC requires all
major corporations to act as a single unit with a single purpose and a
unified collectivist ideology – An ideological monopoly.

As Klaus Schwab states:

“The most important characteristic of the stakeholder model today is
that the stakes of our system are now more clearly global. Economies,
societies, and the environment are more closely linked to each other
now than 50 years ago. The model we present here is therefore
fundamentally global in nature, and the two primary stakeholders are
as well.

…What was once seen as externalities in national economic policy
making and individual corporate decision making will now need to be
incorporated or internalized in the operations of every government,
company, community, and individual. The planet is thus the center of
the global economic system, and its health should be optimized in the
decisions made by all other stakeholders.”

The SHC concept is deceptive on its very face because it pretends as
if corporations will be held accountable by the public within some
form of “business democracy,” as if the public will have a vote on
what the corporations do. In reality, it will be corporations telling
the public what is acceptable to think and do and corporations in
conjunction with governments using their power to punish people who do
not agree.

The great magic trick is that these same unified corporations use the
shield of “private property” and business rights as a means to control
society without repercussions. After all, a primary principle of
conservatism and the US constitution is private property rights. So,
stepping in to disrupt corporate governance would be violating one of
our own beloved ideals. It sounds like a Catch-22, but it’s really
not.

As mentioned above, corporations are at their very core a socialist
concept: They are created through government charter, handed legal
personhood and given special protections from government. They are NOT
free market entities, and Adam Smith, the originator of most free
market ideals, stood against corporations as destructive and prone to
monopoly.

As long as they receive protections from government including monetary
stimulus and bailouts, corporations should not enjoy the same private
property protections as regular businesses do. They are parasitic
creations, alien to the natural business world. In a freedom-based
society they would be dismantled to prevent authoritarian outcomes.

Shareholder Capitalism is also an incredibly arrogant premise because
it assumes that corporate leaders have the wisdom or objective
intelligence to expand their role beyond business and into social and
political spheres. This has already happened in many respects with
much chaos created, but open corporate governance is the end game and
it is anything but objective or benevolent.

What are some examples of this kind of corporate/political governance
(fascism) in action?

How about Big Tech social media censorship leaning HEAVILY against
conservatives and liberty activists? How about evidence of collusion
between Big Tech companies and government, such as the Biden
Administration and the DHS working closely with Twitter and Facebook
to actively remove voices and viewpoints they don’t like? How about
corporate leaders colluding to destroy conservative based social media
competitors like Parler?

How about ESG loans funded by corporate backers such as Blackrock or
globalist non-profits like the Rockefeller Foundation?

If all corporate lenders applied ESG to their loan practices, all
individuals and businesses would have to adopt leftist social
ideologies and dubious environmental claims in order to have access to
credit. ESG is a monetary incentive created by corporate elites to
keep all other businesses in line. If it continues, ESG could wipe out
political opposition to globalism in the span of a single generation.

And, what about the Council For Inclusive Capitalism? This is the most
blatant expression of open global fascism I have ever seen, with money
elites and politicians working in concert with the UN and even
religious leaders like Pope Francis. Their goal is to institute a
single centralized world governing platform built around the same
agendas outlined in ESG and SHC, making corporations members of a new
global council which they refer to as “The Guardians.” They aren’t
even trying to hide the conspiracy anymore, it’s right out in the
open.

Klaus Schwab takes special care to mention often that global crisis
events are the “opportunity” that is needed to push the public into
the arms of Stakeholder Capitalism through a nexus point called “The
Great Reset.” Meaning, he thinks that widespread fear and desperation
must exist (or be engineered) to perpetuate the SHC framework quickly.

Obviously, the globalists are on a shrinking timeline, though it’s
hard to say why. They are tearing off the mask faster in the past two
years than they have in the previous decade. More than likely they
understand to some degree that if they go too slow the public will
have time to mount a defense against them.

They will conjure all kinds of distractions and scapegoats to prevent
liberty minded people from hitting them back. They’ll aim us at
Russia, they’ll aim us at China, they’ll aim us at useful idiots among
the leftists. They’ll aim Russia, China and the leftists at us. They
will try to send us to war, they will call us insurrectionists, they
will call us terrorists, they will say we started the whole collapse
and that we are to blame for the world’s ills. None of this matters.
What matters is that the globalists at the top pay the price for the
harm they cause.

When the head of the snake is removed, only then can we sort out who
is to blame; who were the heroes, who were the villains, and who were
the idiots. Only then can we rebuild with true freedom in mind.