European Union: Counterfeits: Breaking Young People's Consumer Habits
g at xny.io
Tue Nov 1 05:57:11 PDT 2022
With the technological advance of the internet, increased access to content
and information is proportional to the heightened access to content that
infringes IP rights.
If it is possible to access entertainment content on a paid streaming
service, it is also possible to find on the internet the same movie, music
or game on platforms that provide this access sometimes for free and
without the proper authorisation. The same occurs with counterfeit clothing
and footwear, available for reduced prices.
EUIPO's 2022 IP Youth Scoreboard
According to the 2022 IP Youth Scoreboard, released by the European Union
Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) in June 2022, the intentional access
to counterfeit products or pirated digital content has increased.
The main objective of the study, carried out by the EUIPO, is to understand
the perceptions of young people in EU member states regarding intellectual
property rights in the digital field. The first edition occurred in 2016
and it is possible to identify changes in the perceptions of online
consumers since then, mainly after the COVID-19 pandemic, when online
According to the Youth Scoreboard, in 2019 only 14% of respondents
confirmed that they had intentionally purchased counterfeit goods. These
numbers jumped during the COVID-19 pandemic, reaching 37% of respondents in
The results of the 2022 study indicated that cost is the main factor for
intentional purchases of counterfeit goods, as it was in 2016 and 2019,
with 48% of respondents affirming that cheaper prices were the main reason
they bought fake goods.
The second main reason was a lack of concern that the product was fake (27%
of respondents) and the belief that there was no difference between the
original and the counterfeit product (24% of respondents).
Clothes and accessories accounted for 29% of purchases of counterfeit
goods, and footwear 23%, which increased by 24% and 19% respectively since
2019. But it is also concerning that the purchase of counterfeit cosmetics
and medication has increased by 19% and 14%, respectively, in the past
Regarding access to platforms of online content such as movies, TV series
and music, the main reason for intentionally using illegal sources was the
high costs of the legal streaming services. In the survey results,
respondents voiced their frustrations and feelings of injustice about this
situation, suggesting that accessing illegal content was almost an act of
This behaviour could benefit consumers if it prompts the legal platforms to
review their prices and the advantages to subscribers. However, winning
over the younger generation to paid content is a challenge if they consider
broad access to illegal sources to be a form of democratisation and means
to culture for all.
Ways to improve statistics
It is possible to find ways to improve the results indicated in the EUIPO
research. For a start, a focus on risk awareness could help to change the
attitudes of young people towards illegal content and fake goods.
In the study, the respondents affirmed that they would think twice before
proceeding with a purchase of counterfeit goods or accessing illegal
sources if there was more information regarding the risks.
It is important to note, however, that the risks that concern young people
relate to their own losses, not to collective, social or commercial damage.
The main red flags that the respondents said would make them think again
about accessing illegal content or products were the possibility of credit
card details being stolen (43%), the absence of a guarantee for the product
(34%) and the risk of their computer being infected by viruses (34%).
Other factors that the respondents said would influence their decision was
the probability of fake products being prejudicial to health (31%) and the
risk of punishment (22%).
The question remains as to how to combat the counterfeiting trend
perpetuated by the younger generation. Part of the solution certainly lies
in understanding that for these consumers, social media apps are the main
influence on behaviours or trends and that paid publicity can dictate
choices through repetitive results appearing on a smartphone screen.
Social media influencers
Social media influencers are a relevant piece of the puzzle, considering
they are trusted by the public as opinion leaders, according to research
and analysis of the impact of social media influencers promoting
counterfeit goods released by UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO).
According to this study, some social media influencers have contracts with
providers of counterfeit goods to promote the sale of these items. This
promotion can increase access to illegal sources and, as proved by the
research, influence young people's behaviour.
In the EUIPO's Youth Scoreboard survey, some of the respondents stated that
a lot of influencers advertise original and luxury products, which
stimulates the search for similar products.
But other respondents revealed that in some social media apps, where videos
are shown according to users' preferences, users can be directed to videos
or posts with influencers promoting fake products. These videos often
demonstrate a comparison with the original, or tests that show some
'quality' of the counterfeit products, as feedback of the purchase.
With great power comes great responsibility. In the same way that social
media influencers can induce their audiences to consume certain products
and services, it would not be absurd to demand that they direct their
followers to the enforcement of laws and the purchase of legal products.
Maybe it is time to start thinking about the social function of digital
influencers. It is not only about rights and privileges, but also about
Furthermore, new duties should be imposed on the owners of social media
platforms. From the indication of ingredients, allergenic substances,
suggested age range and risk of using chemicals, companies have always been
obliged to ensure the physical and mental health of consumers. Requiring
digital platforms to include warnings about social and economic risks is
just another reasonable measure for the benefit of digital consumers.
Considering the repetitive advertising directed to social media users to
stimulate consumption, maybe repetitive warnings could encourage more
The complete 2022 IP Youth Scoreboard report can be found here.
This is a co-published article, which was originally published in the World
Intelectual Property Review (WIPR).
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the
subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 8269 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the cypherpunks