USA 2020 Elections: Thread

[grarpamp]

Metabiota CDC China...

https://cdn.locals.com/documents/682652/682652_2te2jkvse59jsf3.pdf
https://epistemology.locals.com/post/1906117/breaking-newly-published-emails-regarding-hunter-biden-and-metabiota-ukraine-biolabs-march-26th-2

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/13288589.html

ipfs://QmSnywTXzHJPqnvq54B1RLyV1mcx5Ag8TrTUaxZAgSq8XW  Spartacus Letter

https://drive.infomaniak.com/app/share/475026/4aef7d10-2b2a-49cf-96ef-9dc58795dc59/files/1794

Former FBI director reportedly gave $100K to Biden grandchildren's
trust, emailed Hunter that he'd like to work 'with you and dad'

Hunter Biden Drops Conspiracy Theory That Russian Drug Dealers Stole His Laptop

Total Missing Hunter laptops: 3

Joe Biden Mandate Doesn't Exist. It's Just a Press Release.

Russia MoD exposes Hunter Biden's relation with US bioactivity in Ukraine

Daily Mail: "Hunter Biden DID help secure millions in funding for US
contractor in Ukraine specializing in deadly pathogen research, laptop
emails reveal, raising more questions about the disgraced son of then
vice president "

Daily Mail: emails show Hunter helped secure millions of dollars of
funding for Metabiota, a Department of Defense contractor specializing
in research on pandemic-causing diseases

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/the-nyt-now-admits-the-biden-laptop


    These "former intel officials" did not actually say that the
“Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo." Indeed, they stressed in
their letter the opposite: namely, that they had no evidence to
suggest the emails were falsified or that Russia had anything to do
them, but, instead, they had merely intuited this "suspicion" based on
their experience:

    We want to emphasize that we do not know if the emails, provided
to the New York Post by President Trump’s personal attorney Rudy
Giuliani, are genuine or not and that we do not have evidence of
Russian involvement -- just that our experience makes us deeply
suspicious that the Russian government played a significant role in
this case.

    Any residual doubts that the Biden archive was genuine — and there
should have been none — were shattered when a reporter from Politico,
Ben Schreckinger, published a book last September, entitled "The
Bidens: Inside the First Family’s Fifty-Year Rise to Power," in which
his new reporting proved that the key emails on which The New York
Post relied were entirely authentic. Among other things, Schreckinger
interviewed several people included in the email chains who provided
confirmation that the emails in their possession matched the ones in
the Post's archive word for word. He also obtained documents from the
Swedish government that were identical to key documents in the
archive. His own outlet, Politico, was one of the few to even
acknowledge his book. While ignoring the fact that they were the first
to spread the lie that the emails were "Russian disinformation,”
Politico editors — under the headline “Double Trouble for Biden”—
admitted that the book “finds evidence that some of the purported
Hunter Biden laptop material is genuine, including two emails at the
center of last October’s controversy.”

    The vital revelations in Schreckinger's book were almost
completely ignored by the very same corporate media outlets that
published the CIA's now-debunked lies. They just pretended it never
happened. Grappling with it would have forced them to acknowledge a
fact quite devastating to whatever remaining credibility they have:
namely, that they all ratified and spread a coordinated disinformation
campaign in order to elect Joe Biden and defeat Donald Trump. With
strength in numbers, and knowing that they speak only to and for
liberals who are happy if they lie to help Democrats, they all joined
hands in an implicit vow of silence and simply ignored the new proof
in Schreckinger's book that, in the days leading up to the 2020
election, they all endorsed a disinformation campaign.

    It will now be much harder to avoid confronting the reality of
what they did, though it is highly likely that they will continue to
do so. This morning, The New York Times published an article about the
broad, ongoing FBI criminal investigation into Hunter Biden's
international business and tax activities. Prior to the election, the
Times, to their credit, was one of the few to apply skepticism to the
CIA's pre-election lie, noting on October 22 that “no concrete
evidence has emerged that the laptop contains Russian disinformation.”

    Because the activities of Hunter Biden now under FBI investigation
directly pertain to the emails first revealed by The Post, the
reporters needed to rely upon the laptop's archive to amplify and
inform their reporting. That, in turn, required The New York Times to
verify the authenticity of this laptop and its origins — exactly what,
according to their reporters, they successfully did:

    People familiar with the investigation said prosecutors had
examined emails between Mr. Biden, Mr. Archer and others about Burisma
and other foreign business activity. Those emails were obtained by The
New York Times from a cache of files that appears to have come from a
laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop. The email and
others in the cache were authenticated by people familiar with them
and with the investigation.

    That this cache of emails was authentic was clear from the start.
Any doubts were obliterated by publication of Schreckinger's book six
months ago. Now the Paper of Record itself explicitly states not only
that the emails “were authenticated” but also that the original story
from The Post about how they obtained these materials — they “come
from a laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop” —
“appears” to be true.

    What this means is that, in the crucial days leading up to the
2020 presidential election, most of the corporate media spread an
absolute lie about The New York Post's reporting in order to mislead
and manipulate the American electorate. It means that Big Tech
monopolies, along with Twitter, censored this story based on a lie
from “the intelligence community.” It means that Facebook's promise
from its DNC operative that it would suppress discussion of the
reporting in order to conduct a "fact-check” of these documents was a
fraud because if an honest one had been conducted, it would have
proven that Facebook’s censorship decree was based on a lie. It means
that millions of Americans were denied the ability to hear about
reporting on the candidate leading all polls to become the next
president, and instead were subjected to a barrage of lies about the
provenance (Russia did it) and authenticity (disinformation!) of these
documents

    Whatever else is true, both the CIA/media disinformation campaign
in the weeks before the 2020 election and the resulting regime of
brute censorship imposed by Big Tech are of historic significance.
Democrats and their new allies in the establishment wing of the
Republican Party may be more excited by war in Ukraine than the
subversion of their own election by the unholy trinity of the
intelligence community, the corporate press, and Big Tech. But today's
admission by The New York Times that this archive and the emails in it
were real all along proves that a gigantic fraud was perpetrated by
the country's most powerful institutions. What matters far more than
the interest level of various partisan factions is the core truths
about U.S. democracy revealed by this tawdry spectacle.