Fwd: Bank.org | Emergency Review/Action

Gunnar Larson g at xny.io
Sat Mar 5 16:26:50 PST 2022


We made it.

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Gunnar Larson <g at xny.io>
Date: Sat, Mar 13, 2021, 8:21 AM
Subject: Bank.org | Emergency Review/Action
To: Shah, Seema (DFS) <seema.shah at dfs.ny.gov>
Cc: dfs.sm.DfsNext <DfsNext at dfs.ny.gov>, Joshua Plant <joshua at plantpr.com>,
<innovation at dfs.ny.gov>, <VCLicenseQuestions at dfs.ny.gov>, Garvin, Sheila Y
(DHR) <Sheila.Garvin at dhr.ny.gov>, Paasewe, Siaka (DHR) <
Siaka.Paasewe at dhr.ny.gov>


Ms. Shah:

You will be happy to know of xNY.io's purchase of Bank.org.

This is a friendly signal to an Emergency application that is making its
way to DFS for the Superintendent's review and consideration.

All the best,

Gunnar

  --
*Gunnar Larson - xNY.io <http://www.xNY.io> | Bank.org <http://Bank.org>*
MSc
<https://www.unic.ac.cy/blockchain/msc-digital-currency/?utm_source=Google&utm_medium=Search&utm_campaign=MSc-Digital-Currency-North-America&utm_term=blockchain%20unic&gclid=Cj0KCQiAyJOBBhDCARIsAJG2h5ctwwMz0MRbVSk-LaYD-GMU5UgDSw7ynxbGr_a7SkaFAZzJc1-pzxEaAi4NEALw_wcB>
- Digital Currency
MBA
<https://www.unic.ac.cy/business-administration-entrepreneurship-and-innovation-mba-1-5-years-or-3-semesters/>
- Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)

G at xNY.io
+1-646-454-9107
New York, New York 10001

On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 1:49 PM Gunnar Larson <g at xny.io> wrote:

> Dear Ms. Shah:
>
> Attending each of the Tech Sprint “info-calls” and our subsequent email
> correspondence, being denied Tech Sprint participation without context or
> reply
> <https://thecapital.io/article/tech-sprint--ny-department-of-financial-services-MURgxG7Cnk1c3HwsKGV>
> leaves us in an awkward situation. The facility of the Tech Sprint offered
> four “all day working sessions” along with two weeks of workshops for
> problem solving issues like “marketplace manipulation.”
>
>
> Moving on, and to properly close the Tech Sprint chapter from our
> perspective, today's memo is a vehicle that aims to deliver the tool of a
> “new-clean-slate” as foundation to our continued dialogue together. Yes,
> xNY.io is very fond of the idea of our friendly regulatory future
> relationships with DFS.
>
> Either way, xNY.io is under strict mandate of earning the Superintendent's
> various approvals, thus leaving no room for us to wallow in Tech Sprint
> blues.
>
> Tech Sprint Submission : A Design Mechanism to Report Digital Regulatory
> Computer Crimes
>
> Today I briefly submit an outline of reporting innovation observations and
> key concerns defined by the four Tech Sprint Problem Statements. Delivery
> of this submission files xNY.io’s Tech Sprint participation as complete.
>
> The best hybrid virtual currency architecture and pioneering modern
> innovation, xNY.io  and the proposed “xNY” virtual currency is of
> pedigree with foundational intentions beyond our counterparts xRP
> (Ripple) and NEXO (Nexo.io). From our direct experience on the matter, xRP
> and NEXO built entire global operations as direct/indirect BitLicensees
> with intent to profit from various cross-border computer crimes
> <https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/criminal-ccips/legacy/2015/01/14/ccmanual.pdf>
> such as market manipulation while being partially funded and/or directed
> out of New York.
>
>    -
>
>    Virtual currency fraud is a serious problem for such a developed
>    country as the United States, whose bank regulators have drawn attention to
>    the increase of these crimes. Having discovered that an unregulated virtual
>    currency sphere (such as in Africa, or other developing markets) is very
>    popular among virtual currency fraudsters
>    <https://www.americanbanker.com/news/jpmorgan-chase-warns-of-upcoming-fine-over-internal-controls>,
>    the New York State Department of Financial Services concluded that this
>    kind of regulatory fraud was threatening US national security.
>    -
>
>       If the basic problem with crypto reporting innovation is monopoly
>       power, policy should address that issue directly. If the problem is a lack
>       of transparency and accountability in government activities, one should
>       find ways to open up the public sector to oversight from outsiders. If the
>       problem is an opaque and confusing regulatory structure, rules should be
>       simplified and clarified.
>
>
>    -
>
>    As elegantly as possible xNY.io must strive to innovate beyond a
>    Laissez-faire attitude concerning the systems and processes in which
>    transactions between our peers are now free from (or, almost free from) any
>    form of economic/regulatory interventions such as the BitLicense lacking
>    cross-border regulatory logic concern.
>    -
>
>    Ms. Shah, the BitLicense and bank innovation from the great state of
>    New York touches people on all continents on Earth, and it seems that if
>    given the opportunity, DFS would want to solve any market manipulation
>    matter through technology
>    -
>
>       xNY.io underscores the need for reporting innovation specific to
>       virtual currency marketplace manipulation and/or other crypto cross-border
>       regulatory arbitrage frameworks directed out of New York that touching over
>       1 billion people (as clearly detailed in the Earth_ID conditional
>       BitLicence application currently in DFS review).
>       -
>
>    xNY.io is concerned that DFS has potentially ignored our interests
>    ensured through interpretations of specific provisions in the existing
>    national and supra-national legal framework (civil law, securities law,
>    bankruptcy law, international human rights law and civil rights law). The
>    Superintendent may now lead New York and the global virtual currency
>    industry in clarify the rights of the public and obligations of BitLicense
>    members engaged in the global virtual currency economy.
>    -
>
>       This can be achieved through subtle action on “conditional
>       approvals” that are well earned from DFS review.
>
>
>    -
>
>    BitLicense regulation must preserve a technology-neutral,
>    principle-based, non-discriminatory framework for the next generation of
>    modern New York virtual currency public policy, naturally to support
>    innovation within the limits imposed by overriding international public
>    interests.
>
> Our Tech Sprint participation was aimed at working through these matters
> together in a structured setting. Being champions for the rights of our
> future customers, it is xNY.io’s observation that DFS is not winning at
> engaging technology and reporting processes specific to fostering civil
> <https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/CVR>/human rights
> <https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1R1ExVvx8uIibM_w5X3BjG4eTDbJH_oSC?usp=sharing>.
> There should be no open question on where New York stands on any matter
> concerning human and civil rights at home or abroad.
>
> About the Design Mechanism Behind our Tech Sprint Concept
>
> Ms. Shah, during our calls together, we discussed focusing on the listed
> problem statement concerning “Marketplace Manipulation.” xNY.io is
> concerned that these "Computer Crimes" are a marketplace manipulation
> matter associated with current BitLicense architecture and subject to DFS
> attention related to cross-border/international organized groups (that are
> cyber-based in New York).
>
> Given the critical role that honest and fair dealing of virtual currency
> is core to the BitLicense mandate, should admitted felons and serial
> miscreants (aka New York banks) be allowed to further expand their racket
> via global crypto regulatory arbitrage?
>
> xNY.io’s key definition of virtual currency computer crimes, is a
> consistent message across markets. These crimes are relatively new, having
> been in existence for only as long as Bitcoin has—which explains how
> unprepared society and the world, in general, is towards combating these
> crimes AND we see this as no fault of DFS and the original BitLicense
> mandate (unless not resolved before end of 2021). Goldman Sachs’ MoneyGram,
> NEXO, BitGo, Ripple and several BitLicensee connections profit daily from
> virtual currency market manipulation computer crimes with cross-border
> reach operating as a large syndicate group from lower Manhattan.
>
> Many DFS sanctioned BitLicencees today are very profitable enterprises and
> they may straddle nationalities in ways that you never would have imagined.
> xNY.io notes our relationship with xRP and NEXO as examples.
>
>    -
>
>    Ms. Shah, the jury is in and the NY-EU "CryptoBank '' regulatory
>    loophole is a case for virtual currency market manipulation affecting
>    computer systems and software (aka the Bitcoin blockchain) in Africa,
>    Europe and New York State at the very least...
>    -
>
>       This activity is harming New York and xNY.io’s international
>       virtual currency computer systems, process and overall technology (as
>       outlined in the Earth_ID conditional Bitlicense application under DFS
>       review) ...
>       -
>
>       xNY.io points to Ripple.com and Nexo.io as party to delaying
>       blockchain innovation AND possibly humanity as a whole only in the name of
>       profits of Goldman Sachs and associated bad actors
>       -
>
>    For example, New York, Europe and Africa are connected by a freeway of
>    cross-border arbitrage frameworks. Due to easily exploitable laws in
>    developing countries, some BitLicensees straddle daily New York, Europe and
>    in Africa operations that evade detection and prosecution from law
>    enforcement. Our first “conditional BitLicense” application outlined this
>    matter in detail.
>    -
>
>    xNY.io efforts to bypass this creatively, certainly pioneering
>    innovation and modern New York enterprise with opening CryptoBank and the
>    xNY virtual currency
>
> Keeping all this in mind with a positive/optimistic attitude, many agree
> any best Tech Sprint design mechanism must have potential to innovate
> virtual currency industry's reporting standards should (at the very
> least...) aim to tackle computer crime and/or innovate beyond and strive to
> meet a new level that is required to support the generation of a New York
> international CryptoBank.
>
> Ms. Shah, in reality foreign regulators have repeatedly filed enforcement
> actions against the largest banks on Wall Street for engaging in fraud and
> rigging markets. Communicating it another way, NY-DFS may find xNY.io’s
> approach exotic and/or fresh, but in reality our foreign regulators have
> repeatedly enforced actions against (directly or indirectly) BitLicensees
> now freely leveraging virtual currency frameworks to rig markets abroad
> while being headquartered in New York.
>
> Computer Crimes (Cross-Border) and Modern BitLicense Regulatory Logic
>
> xNY.io seeks various approvals by the Superintendent to protect our
> enterprise and overcome any and all unnecessary delay or further loss or
> harm related to interstate or international transmission of threats
> directed against computers and computer systems (aka the Bitcoin
> Blockchain) and CryptoBank.
>
> New York banks’ traditional engagement of regulatory arbitrage has
> overflowed the BitLicense and correspondingly is responsible for global
> virtual currency marketplace manipulation computer crimes, some experts
> debate if Goldman Sachs is a RICO concern. xNY.io is at various levels a
> product of the best of New York banks domestically and internationally (New
> York, Europe and Africa…) and as such chooses to innovate rather than
> litigate.
>
> Given the inherent universal cross-border nature of virtual currencies,
> there is no real good reason for New York firms under the BitLicense
> mandate to manipulate other global markets via regulatory arbitrage.
> Circumnavigating this problem is key to modern BitLicense logic
>
>    -
>
>    MoneyGram, for example banks customer fees spanning postal mail, a
>    telephone call, electronic mail, or through a other computerized messaging
>    service. Computer Crimes as a threat is no less a threat because it is
>    contingent, because the speaker does not intend or is unable to carry it
>    out because the threat was not directly communicated to the MoneyGram
>    customer as a target, or because the language used might be considered
>    cryptic or ambiguously not part of the current BitLicense mandate.
>    -
>
>       Goldman Sachs’ legacy MoneyGram investment vs. direct correlation
>       between xRP and NEXO virtual currencies arguably covers many computer
>       crimes including wire fraud and cross-border marketplace manipulation.
>       -
>
>       Additionally, xRP and NEXO operating as potential bad actors have
>       put the purity of blockchain systems, processes and pose purity risks to
>       exchange software as Dark Pools, from our direct experience on the matter.
>       -
>
>          Over the last five years Goldman Sachs created layer upon layer
>          (MoneyGram, NEXO, xRP, BitGo) of BitLicense related disguises and
>          cross-border systems under potential conspiracy and plausible deniability
>          to computer crimes and marketplace manipulation.
>          -
>
>          Our CryptoBank aims to elegantly side-step all this basing our
>          innovative operations in New York and winning necessary DFS approvals.
>          -
>
>    xNY.io’s approach in seeking confidence in “reporting systems and
>    process” as a fundamental best practice that protects ourselves and our
>    customers from interstate or international transmission of threats against
>    computers, computer networks, and virtual currency data networks and their
>    programs.
>    -
>
>       xNY, CryptoBank: xNY.io vs. Nexo.io and Ripple.com
>       -
>
>       XNY, Cryptocurrency: xNY vs. NEXO and xRP
>
> Finally, and forever forgetting any sentiments about being denied Tech
> Sprint participation, we encourage DFS to consider that the Tech Sprint’s
> overall success is already a success from the xNY.io side.  From our Tech
> Sprint “marketplace manipulation” calls together ...  DFS now has a
> potential cross-border human/civil rights solution developed as a
> "tech-based" response to the problem statement(s) that specifically
> addresses both the threats of future damage AND the current cross-border
> "computer crime" merry-go-round responsible for extortionate damage already
> inflicted.
>
> Thank you, Ms. Shah!
>
> Next Steps … Onward!
>
> Surveying the best next steps, we hope DFS embraces the fact that xNY.io
> has no other option outside of moving from low into high gear on the
> journey of seeking various conditional approvals and beginning a long-term
> regulatory relationship all at the will of the Superintendent's action.
>
>
>    -
>
>    For all people on planet Earth, the question should not hinge on any
>    debate or worry that New York regulators are not taking market manipulation
>    seriously.
>    -
>
>    xNY.io again has every right to earn conditional approvals with the
>    aim to serve billions of people as customers. PayPal, MoneyGram and
>    Robinhood had their chance, so did xRP … While now NEXO aims to further
>    leverage computer crimes at the expense of New York and the BitLicense.
>
> Our team in Europe, Africa and New York comes to DFS with an impressive
> and sophisticated solution of xNY.io to evolve up and innovate beyond
> whatever roadblocks stand in our way. Moreover, we look forward to doing
> all this in collaboration with DFS while fostering meaningful contributions
> to the legacy of New York (if nothing else, via evergreen State tax
> contribution).
>
>    -
>
>    xNY.io will be submitting a new/updated folio for DFS review and
>    hopeful consideration of "conditional approval(s)" by the Superintendent
>    over 2021. The new application is remarkably revolutionary … Including wise
>    architecture for DFS and xNY.io to leapfrog cross-border computer crimes
>    efficiently as foundation to CryptoBank and the xNY virtual currency being
>    an elegant solution as the world deserves
>    -
>
>    Note, xNY.io aims to privately seek DFS' signal, through a series of
>    upcoming private conversations together … Given many good reasons,  DFS has
>    a historic opportunity to signal sentiments on xNY.io’s new “conditional
>    approval(s) on the viability spectrum  on/before the DFS Tech Sprint's
>    public 12 March "demo day" awards party.
>    -
>
>       This way, everyone wins … New York and the world is watching, let’s
>       deliver what is deserved over 2021 via innovation that xNY.io can deliver
>       in various forms with DFS regulatory oversight controls.
>
> xNY.io’s obvious consequences on the emotional level are associated with
> economic risks, directly linked to the obligation and respect to the
> institution of CryptoBanking and/or DFS as the regulatory body from which
> xNY.io entrepreneurship and innovation are required to interact. Every
> effort has been made to offer DFS the best possible scenario to advance
> xNY.io’s successful review while planting the seed for historic
> contributions to New York State and lead virtual currency CryptoBank
> innovation worldwide.
>
> Ms. Shah, please keep a lookout for xNY.io's updated “conditional”
> application materials concerning our good natured enterprise for DFS’
> corresponding review with hopeful 2021 approval(s). Let nobody stop us.
>
>
> Please let me know if you or the DFS team has any feedback.
>
> Wishing you the very best Tech Sprint!
>
> All the best,
>
>
> Gunnar Larson
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 6:29 AM Gunnar Larson <g at xny.io> wrote:
>
>> Dear Ms. Shah:
>>
>> I hope you are doing well.
>>
>> This memo is to kindly ask for your review and/or reconsideration, and
>> ultimately seeks the esteemed Superintendent's permission to participate in
>> the upcoming Tech Sprint and corresponding workshop events beginning next
>> week.
>>
>> My application exceeds the Tech Sprint's participation criteria on
>> various levels. Further, from our last correspondence on ethics/legal on
>> January 28th (below), combined with the background of several intro calls
>> with the DFS team related to excitement of participating in the Tech
>> Sprint, it seems that perhaps a simple mistake was made on the
>> application's approval.
>>
>> *The Tech Sprint focuses on virtual currency innovation concerning
>> reporting standards:*
>>
>>    - Please trust with certainty, myself and the xNY.io team hold
>>    nothing more than respect for DFS and understand we are at the will of the
>>    Superintendent.
>>    - Further, I sumit for the Superintendent's consideration, any
>>    institution or organization, which sponsors or conducts a contest or
>>    exhibition (*aka Tech Sprint*), and advertises or bills such contest
>>    or exhibition as a New York state championship contest ("*The event
>>    will end with an awards ceremony to celebrate the winning teams..."*) or
>>    uses the words "New York state" in its announcements ("*https://www.dfs.ny.gov/techsprint
>>    <https://www.dfs.ny.gov/techsprint>"*) is subject to equal rights of
>>    public accommodation.
>>    - Ms. Shah (and, please do correct me if I am mistaken), at base
>>    level standards, civil and political rights are a class of rights that
>>    protect individuals' freedom from infringement by governments, social
>>    organizations, and private individuals. They ensure one's entitlement to
>>    participate in the civil and political life of society and the state
>>    without discrimination or repression.
>>
>> Given many factors, I am concerned my application being denied to
>> participate in the Tech Sprint has been a simple mixup as the only
>> plausible scenario. Today's memo seeks to freely navigate the process of
>> being granted Tech Sprint participation approval without delay. I would
>> like to clear this up any confusion on the matter today, if possible.
>>
>> Greatly looking forward to hearing your thoughts and approval for the
>> Tech Sprint's workshop participation.
>>
>> Warm regards,
>>
>> Gunnar
>> --
>> *Gunnar Larson - www.xNY.io <http://www.xNY.io> *
>> MSc
>> <https://www.unic.ac.cy/blockchain/msc-digital-currency/?utm_source=Google&utm_medium=Search&utm_campaign=MSc-Digital-Currency-North-America&utm_term=blockchain%20unic&gclid=Cj0KCQiAyJOBBhDCARIsAJG2h5ctwwMz0MRbVSk-LaYD-GMU5UgDSw7ynxbGr_a7SkaFAZzJc1-pzxEaAi4NEALw_wcB>
>> - Digital Currency
>> MBA
>> <https://www.unic.ac.cy/business-administration-entrepreneurship-and-innovation-mba-1-5-years-or-3-semesters/>
>> - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
>>
>> G at xNY.io
>> +1-646-454-9107
>> New York, New York 10001
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 3:56 PM dfs.sm.DfsNext <DfsNext at dfs.ny.gov>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you for your interest in the Techsprint.  Unfortunately, at this
>>> time, we are not able to extend you an invitation to participate.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you again for applying.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> DFS Next
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *DFSNext*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *New York State Department of Financial Services*
>>> 1 State Street, New York, NY 10004
>>>
>>> www.dfs.ny.gov
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> From: *Shah, Seema (DFS)* <Seema.Shah at dfs.ny.gov>
>> Date: Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:14 PM
>> Subject: RE: TechSprint
>> To: Gunnar Larson <gunnar at mydr.co>
>>
>>
>> Hi Gunnar,
>>
>>
>>
>> I would totally appreciate you inviting the folks in your network
>> mentioned below!  You can craft something, but I’m just including a brief
>> template that you can edit/modify as you see fit.  And I don’t handle the
>> ethics checks, but I really don’t anticipate any challenges coming from
>> that for anyone.  We should have an update on those by next week, so please
>> stay tuned!
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Seema
>>
>> *Seema B. Shah*
>>
>> Assistant Deputy Superintendent, Innovation
>>
>> seema.shah at dfs.ny.gov | www.dfs.ny.gov
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 53008 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20220305/0f46f2c3/attachment.txt>


More information about the cypherpunks mailing list