Cevap: Re: The key to society of sovereign individuals

[Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0]

On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:19:13 +0100 (CET)
alessandrot at tutanota.com wrote:

> Socrates, Internet, Bitcoin... Maybe you guys should look into my proposal instead of talking about everything else? I introduced Internet and Bitcoin only in a way of comparison. 


	Your comments were fine. They showed that your understanding of the problem isn't correct. 


>Then accusations of using wrong verbiage. Seriously, what happened to those times when cypherpunks were actually about doing something?


	I'm 'accusing' you of using the wrong ideas. If you can't discuss your ideas, why bother?



> One more thing. The whole idea of the system I proposed is a currency that redistributes wealth algorithmically, without any centralised human element needed. 

	how about you explain it here in two sentences? Is your wealth redistribution based on justice, or are you a run of the mill socialist? 


>Where you see different causes like "govt bad, let's change it", 


	cypherpunks are supposed to be anarchists, so it's "govt bad, let's exterminate it". Are you an advocate of 'good' government?


> because the power (money) is in the hands of those "bad."

	They have money because they have political power, which in turn means the cops and soldiers follow their orders. Also, the technonazi capitalists (jim bell) are a mirror image of commies.