Coronavirus: Thread

[grarpamp]

Post links to what you're quoting you "ASSHOLE".


Syndicated article, one link...
https://alicespringstomind.wordpress.com/2022/01/02/atrocities-hidden-in-broad-daylight/

Atrocities Hidden in Broad Daylight

Author: Helen Libertas Omnium

Master of Public Health. Long standing experience with infectious
disease surveillance (including influenza-like-illness monitoring),
outbreak control, case management, vaccination program management. If
you don't see the forest you might be lost in the trees. Liberty.
Justice.

Chapter One of The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma and the
Global War on Democracy and Public Health, by Robert F. Kennedy Jr,
outlines details of exceptional levels of corruption throughout
medical academia and public health. Transcribed below are pages 24-30
(without the references included in the book), to give a tiny glimpse
of Kennedy’s research into how this corruption has afflicted, and
continues to afflict, the Covid-19 pandemic response.

The details below relate specifically to Hydroxychloroquine, a
recognised effective early treatment against Covid-19. The book
outlines equally corrupted responses from Dr Fauci and his team of
venal officials with Big Pharma interests, relating to Ivermectin.
Physicians such as the Frontline Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance, led
by Dr Pierre Kory, and others such as Dr Peter McCullough and many at
Americas Frontline Doctors, (as one example of many leading
organisations cited by Kennedy), are fighting a behemoth. These are
historic times and Kennedy chronicles events in a compelling,
intelligent way with credible references throughout.

In any other instance, these revelations would be a monumental
scandal. In “new world order” those daring to stand up and speak out
are maligned and silenced. A practice which Kennedy discloses has been
commonplace in the mafia-style world of Fauci and Gates for decades.
This answers the mystery as to why the most renowned, ethical and
uncompromised public health experts have been demeaned and sabotaged
over the past two years, merely for performing work they are trained
to do: advising on established, authentic and valid public health over
oppressive fearmongering and pseudoscience.

Pharmacy’s War on HCQ (p.24)

The prospect of an existing therapeutic drug (with an expired patent)
that could out-perform any vaccine in the war against COVID posed a
momentous threat to the pharmaceutical cartel. Among the features
pharma companies most detest is low cost, and HCQ is about $10 per
course. Compare that to more than $3,000 per course for Dr Fauci’s
beloved remdesivir.

No surprise, pharmaceutical interests launched their multinational
preemptive crusade to restrict and discredit HCQ starting way back in
January 2020, months before the WHO declared a pandemic and even
longer before President Trump’s controversial March 19 endorsement. On
January 13, when rumours of Wuhan flu COVID-19 began to circulate, the
French government took the bizarre, inexplicable, unprecedented, and
highly suspicious step of reassigning HCQ from an over-the-counter to
a prescription medicine. Without citing any studies, French health
officials quietly changed the status of HCQ to “List II poisonous
substance” and banned its over-the-counter sales. This absolutely
remarkable coincidence repeated itself a few weeks later when Canadian
health officials did the exact same thing, quietly removing the drug
from pharmacy shelves.

A physician from Zambia reported to Dr Harvey Risch that in some
villages and cities, organised groups of buyers emptied drugstores of
HCQ and then burned the medication in bonfires outside the towns.
South Africa destroyed two tons of life-saving hydroxychloroquine in
late 2020, supposedly due to violation of an import regulation. The US
government in 2021 ordered the destruction of more than a thousand
pounds of HCQ, because it was improperly imported. “The Feds are
insisting that all of it be destroyed, and not be used to save a
single life anywhere in the world”, said a lawyer seeking to resist
the senseless order.

By March, front-line doctors around the world were spontaneously
reporting miraculous results following early treatment with HCQ, and
this prompted growing anxiety for Pharma. On March 13, a Michigan
doctor and trader, Dr James Todaro, MD, retweeted his review of HCQ as
an effective COVID treatment, including a link to a public Google doc.
Google quietly scrubbed Dr Todaro’s memo. This was six days before the
President endorsed HCQ. Google apparently didn’t want users to think
Todaro’s message was missing; rather, the Big Tech platform wanted the
public to believe that Todaro’s memo never even existed. Google has a
long history of suppressing information that challenges vaccine
industry profits. Google’s parent company Alphabet owns several
vaccine companies, including Verily, as well as Vaccitech, a company
banking on flu, prostate cancer, and COVID vaccines. Google has
lucrative partnerships with all the large vaccine manufacturers,
including a $715 million partnership with GlaxoSmithKline. Verily also
owns a business that tests for COVID infection. Google was not the
only social media platform to ban content that contradicts the
official HCQ narrative. Facebook, Pinterest, Instagram, YouTube,
MailChimp, and virtually every other Big Tech platform began scrubbing
information demonstrating HCQ’s efficacy, replacing it with industry
propaganda generated by one of the Dr Fauci/Gates-controlled public
health agencies: HHS, NIH and WHO. When President Trump later
suggested that Dr Fauci was not being truthful about
hydroxychloroquine, social media responded by removing his posts.

It was a March 2020 news conference where Dr Fauci launched his
concerted attack on HCQ. Asked whether HCQ might be used as a
prophylaxis for COVID, he shouted back: “The answer is No, and the
evidence you’re talking about is anecdotal evidence”. His reliable
allies at the New York Times then launched a campaign to defame Dr
Raoult.

In the midst of a deadly pandemic, somebody very powerful wanted a
medication that had been available over the counter for decades, and
known to be effective against coronaviruses, to be suddenly but
silently pulled from the shelves – from Canada to Zambia.

In March, at HHS’s request, several large pharmaceutical companies –
Novartis, Bayer, Sanofi, and others – donated their inventory, a total
of 63 million doses of hydroxychloroquine and 2 million of
chloroquine, to the Strategic National Stockpile, managed by BARDA, an
agency under the DHHS Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and
Response. BARDA’s Director, Dr Rick Bright, later claimed the
chloroquine drugs were deadly, and he needed to protect the American
public from them. Bright colluded with FDA to restrict use of the
donated pills to hospitalised patients. FDA publicised the
authorisation using language that led most physicians to believe that
prescribing the drug for any purpose was off-limits.

But at the beginning of June, based on clinical trials that
intentionally gave unreasonably high doses to hospitalised patients
and failed to start the drug until too late, FDA took the
unprecedented step of revoking HCQ’s emergency authorisation,
rendering that enormous stockpile of valuable pills off limits to
Americans while conveniently indemnifying the pharmaceutical companies
for their inventory losses by allowing them a tax break for the
donations.

After widespread use of the drug for 65 years, without warning, FDA
somehow felt the need to send out an alert on June 15, 2020 that HCQ
is dangerous, and that it required a level of monitoring only
available at hospitals. In a bit of twisted logic, Federal officials
continued to encourage doctors to use the suddenly-dangerous drug
without restriction for lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, Lyme and malaria.
Just not for COVID. With the encouragement of Dr Fauci and other HHS
officials, many states simultaneously imposed restrictions on HCQ’s
use.

The Fraudulent Industry Studies

Prior to COVID-19, not a single study had provided evidence against
the use of HCQ based on safety concerns.

In response to the mounting tsunami that HCQ was safe and effective
against COVID, Gates, Dr Fauci and their Pharma allies deployed an
army of industry-linked researchers to gin up contrived evidence of
its dangers.

By 2020, we shall see, Bill Gates exercised firm control over WHO and
deployed the agency in his effort to discredit HCQ.

Dr Fauci, Bill Gates, and WHO financed a cadre of research mercenaries
to concoct a series of nearly twenty studies – all employing
fraudulent protocols deliberately designed to discredit HCQ as unsafe.
Instead of using the standard treatment dose of 400mg/day, the 17 WHO
studies administered a borderline lethal daily dose starting with
2,400mg on Day 1, and using 800mg/day thereafter. In a cynical,
sinister and literally homicidal crusade against HCQ, a team of BMGF
operatives played a key role in devising and pushing through the
exceptionally high dosing. They made sure that UK government
“Recovery” trials in 1,000 elderly patients in over a dozen British,
Welsh, Irish and Scottish hospitals, and the U.N. “Solidarity” study
of 3,500 patients in 400 hospitals in 35 countries, as well as
additional sites in 13 countries (the “REMAP-COVID” trial), all used
those unprecedented and dangerous doses. This was a brassy enterprise
to “prove” chloroquine dangerous, and sure enough, it proved that
elderly patients can die from deadly overdoses. “The purpose seemed,
very clearly, to poison the patients and blame the deaths on HCQ”,
says Dr Meryl Nass, a physician, medical historian, and biowarfare
expert.

In each of these two trials, SOLIDARITY and RECOVERY, the
hydroxychloroquine arm predictably had 10-20 percent more deaths than
the control arm (the control arm being those patients lucky enough to
receive standard supportive care).

The UK government and Wellcome Trust and the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation (BMGF) jointly financed the Recovery Trial. The principal
investigator (PI), Peter Horby, is a member of SAGE and is the
chairman of NERVTAG, the New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats
Advisory Group, both important committees that give the UK government
advice on mitigating the pandemic. Horby’s willingness to risk death
of patients given toxic doses of HCQ fueled his subsequent rise in the
UK medical hierarchy. Horby received a parade of extraordinary
promotions after he orchestrated the mass poisonings of senior
citizens. Queen Elizabeth recently knighted him.

Gates’s fingerprints are all over this sanguinary project. Despite
suspiciously missing pages, the published minutes of WHO’s part-secret
March and April meetings show these medical alchemists establishing
the lethal dosing of chloroquines (CQ and HCQ) for WHO’s Solidarity
clinical trial. Only four participants attended the second WHO meeting
to determine the dose of HCQ and CQ for the Solidarity trial. One was
Scott Miller, the BMGF’s Senior Program Officer. The report admits
that the Solidarity trial was using the highest dose of any recent
trial.

The report acknowledges that, “The BMGF developed a model of
chloroquine penetration into tissues for malaria”. BMGF’s unique
dosing model for the studies deliberately overestimated the amount of
HCQ necessary to achieve adequate lung tissue concentrations. The WHO
report confesses that, “This model is however not validated”. Gates’s
deadly deception allowed FDA to wrongly declare that HCQ would be
ineffective at safe levels.

The minutes of that March 13, 2020 meeting suggest that BMGF knew the
proper drug dosing and the need for early administration. Yet their
same researchers then participated in deliberately providing a
potentially lethal dose, failing to dose by weight, missing the early
window during which treatment was known to be effective, and giving
the drug to subjects who were already critically ill with
comorbidities that made it more likely they would not tolerate the
high dose. The Solidarity trial design also departed from standard
protocols by collecting no safety data: only whether the patient died,
or how many days they were hospitalised. Researchers collected no
information on in-hospital complications. This strategy shielded the
WHO from gathering information that could pin adverse reactions on the
dose.

The report of WHO’s HCQ trial notes that WHO researches did not retain
any consent forms from the elderly patients they were overdosing, as
the law in most countries requires, and makes the bewildering claim
that some patients signed consent forms “in retrospect” – a stunning
procedure that is unethical on its face. The WHO’s researchers noted
in their interim report on the trial, “Consent forms were signed and
retained by the patients; [An extremely unorthodox and suspicious
procedure that suggests that there may have been no formal consents]
but noted for record that, consent was generally prospective, but
could (where locally approved) be retrospective“. One wonders if
researchers notified their families of the high dose they were giving
to their elderly parents and grandparents in locked COVID wards to
which they denied family members access.

The researchers evinced their guilty knowledge by concealing the
research records of the doses they used in Solidarity when they filed
their trial reports. They also omitted dosing numbers from the report
of WHO’s meeting to determine the dose, and omitted details of dosing
from the WHO’s Solidarity trial registration.

Another group of researchers using overdose concentrations of
chloroquine published their study as a preprint in mid-April 2020 (and
quickly brought to print) in the preeminent journal, JAMA (The Journal
of the American Medical Association). In this murder-for-hire scheme,
Brazilian researchers used a dose of 1,200mg/day for up to ten days of
CQ. According to a 2020 review of CQ and HCQ toxicity, “As little as
2-3g of chloroquine may be fatal in adult patients, though the most
commonly reported lethal dose in adults is 3-4g”. Predictably, so many
subjects died in the Brazilian high dose study (39 percent, 16 of 41
of the subjects who took this dose) that the researchers had to halt
the study. The subjects’ mean age was only 55. Their medical records
revealed EKG changes characteristic of CQ toxicity.

The WHO and UK trial coordinators must have known this information,
but they made no efforts to stop their own overdose trials, nor to
lower the doses.

Although Gates did not fund the JAMA study directly (it’s very
possible he funded it indirectly through a nebulous list of funders),
the senior and last author, Marcus Vinicius Guimaraes Lacerda, has
been a Gates-funded researcher on numerous projects. Further, the BMGF
has funded multiple projects at the same medical foundation where he
and the first, or “lead” author, Borba, work in Manaus, Brazil.
(Traditionally the first listed author is generally seen as the senior
and accountable author).

Gates and his cabal used an arsenal of other deceptive gimmickry to
assure that HCQ would appear not just deadly, but ineffective. Each of
the studies that Gates funded failed to incorporate Zithromax and zinc
– important components of HCQ protocols. All of the Fauci, Gates, WHO,
Solidarity, Recovery and Remap-COVID studies administered HCQ at late
stages of COVID infection, in contravention of the prevailing
recommendations that deem HCQ effective only when doctors administer
it early. Viewing this orchestrated sabotage with frustration, critics
accused the Gates grantees of purposefully designing these studies, at
best, to fail and, at worst, to murder. Brazilian prosecutors have
accused the authors of the study of committing homicide by
purposefully poisoning the elderly subjects in their study with high
doses of chloroquine.

All through 2020, Bill Gates and Fauci lashed out against HCQ every
chance they got. During the early stages of the pandemic in March,
Bill Gates penned an op-ed in the Washington Post. Besides calling for
a complete lockdown in every state, along with accelerated testing and
vaccine development, Gates warned that: “Leaders can help by not
stoking rumours or panic buying. Long before the drug
hydroxychloroquine was approved as an emergency treatment for
COVID-19, people started hoarding it, making it hard for lupus
patients who need it to survive”.

This, of course, was a lie. The only ones hoarding HCQ were Dr Fauci
and Rick Bright, who had padlocked 63 million doses in the Strategic
National Stockpile – more than enough to supply virtually every
gerontology-ward patient in America. Despite such efforts to create a
shortage, none existed. HCQ is cheap, quick, and easy to manufacture,
and since its patient is expired, dozens of manufacturers around the
world can quickly ramp up production to meet escalating demand.

In July, Gates endorsed censorship of HCQ recommendations after a
video touting its efficacy against coronavirus accumulated tens of
millions of views. Gates called the video “outrageous” and praised
Facebook and YouTube for hastily removing it. He nevertheless
complained “You can’t find it directly on those services, but
everybody’s sending the link around because it’s still out there on
the internet”. This, Gates told Yahoo News, revealed a persistent
shortcoming of the platforms. “Their ability to stop things before
they become widespread, they probably should have improved that”,
Gates scolded.

Asked by Bloomberg News in mid-August about how the Trump White House
had promoted HCQ “despite its repeatedly being shown to be ineffective
and, in fact, to cause heart problems in some patients”, Gates happily
responded: “This is an age of science, but sometimes it doesn’t feel
that way. In the test tube, hydroxychloroquine looked good. On the
other hand, there are lots of good therapeutic drugs coming that are
proven to work without the severe side effects”. Gates went on to
promote Gilead’s remdesivir as the best alternative, despite its
lacklustre track record compared to HCQ. He didn’t mention having a
large stake in Gilead, which stood to make billions if Dr Fauci was
able to run remdesivir through the regulatory traps.

Obsequious reporters consistently encouraged Gates to portray himself
as an objective expert, and Gates used that interview to discredit
HCQ, and also me. His Bloomberg questioner opened the door with a
typical softball: “For years, people have said if anti-vaxxers had
lived through a pandemic, the way their grandparents did, they’d think
differently”. Gates replied: “The two times I’ve been to the White
House [since 2016], I was told I had to go listen to anti-vaxxers like
Robert Kennedy Jr. So, yes, it’s ironic that people are questioning
vaccines and we’re actually having to say, “Oh my God, how else can
you get out of a tragic pandemic?”.

If he had only asked me, I could have told him!

Lancetgate

It remains an enduring mystery just which powerful figure(s) caused
the world’s two most prestigious scientific journals, The Lancet and
the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), to publish overtly
fraudulent studies from a non-existent database owned by a previously
unknown company. Anthony Fauci and the vaccine cartel celebrated the
Lancet and NEJM papers on May 22, 2020 as the final nail in
hydroxychloroquine’s coffin.

Both studies in these respected publications relied on data from the
Surgisphere Corporation, an obscure Illiniois-based “medical
education” company that claimed to somehow control an extraordinary
global database boasting access to medical information from 96,000
patients in more than 600 hospitals. Founded in 2008, this sketchy
enterprise had eleven employees, including a middling science fiction
writer and a porn star/events hostess. Surgisphere claimed to have
analysed data from six continents and hundreds of hospitals that had
treated patients with HCQ or CQ in real time. Someone persuaded the
Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine to publish two
Surgisphere studies in separate articles on May 1 and May 22. Like the
other Gates-supported studies, the Lancet article portrayed HCQ as
ineffective and dangerous. The Lancet study said that the Surgisphere
data proved that HCQ increased cardiac mortality in COVID-19 patients.
Based on this study, the FDA withdrew its EUA recommendation on June
15, 2020, the WHO and UK suspended their hydroxychloroquine clinical
trials on May 25. Each resumed briefly, then stopped for good in June
declaring HCQ unhelpful. Three European nations immediately banned use
of HCQ, and others followed within weeks.

That would normally have been the end of it, if not for the 200
independent scientists who quickly exposed the Lancet and NEJM studies
as shockingly clumsy con jobs. The Surgisphere datasets that formed
the foundation of the studies were so ridiculously erroneous that they
could only have been a rank invention. To cite only one of many
discrepancies, the number of reported deaths among patients taking
hydroxychloroquine in one Australian hospital exceeded the total
number of deaths for the entire country. An international brouhaha
quickly revealed that the Surgisphere database did not exist, and soon
enough, Surgisphere itself vanished from the internet. The University
of Utah terminated the faculty appointment of one of the article’s
authors, Amit Patel. Surgisphere’s founder, Sapan S. Desai,
disappeared from his job at Chicago hospital.

Even the New York Times reported that “More than 100 scientists and
clinicians have questioned the authenticity” of the database, as well
as the study’s integrity. Despite the barrage of astonished criticism,
the Lancet held firm for two weeks before relenting to the
remonstrances. Finally, three of the four Lancet coauthors requested
the paper be retracted. Both the Lancet and NEJM finally withdrew
their studies in shame. Somebody at the very pinnacle of the medical
cartel had twisted arms, kicked groins, and stoved in kneecaps to
force these periodicals to abandon their policies, shred their ethics,
and spend down their centuries of hard-won credibility in a desperate
bid to torpedo HCQ. To date, neither the authors nor the journals have
explained who induced them to coauthor and publish the most momentous
fraud in the history of scientific publishing.

The headline of a comprehensive exposé in The Guardian expressed the
global shock among the scientific community at the rank corruption by
scientific publishing’s most formidable pillars: “The Lancet has made
one of the biggest retractions in modern history. How could this
happen?” The Guardian writers openly accused The Lancet of promoting
fraud: “The sheer number and magnitude of the things that went wrong
or missing are too enormous to attribute to mere incompetence”. The
Guardian commented, “What’s incredible is that the editors of these
esteemed journals still have a job – that is how utterly incredible
the supposed data underlying the studies was”.

The capacity of their Pharma overlords to strong-arm the world’s top
two medical journals, the NEJM and The Lancet, into condoning deadly
research and to simultaneously publish blatantly fraudulent articles
in the middle of a pandemic, attests to the cartel’s breathtaking
power and ruthlessness. it is no longer controversial to acknowledge
that drug makers rigorously control medical publishing and that The
Lancet, NEJM and JAMA are utterly corrupted instruments of Pharma. The
Lancet editor, Richard Horton, confirms “Journals have devolved into
information laundering operations for the pharmaceutical industry”. Dr
Marcia Angell, who served as an NEJM editor for 20 years, says
journals are “primarily a marketing machine”. Pharma, she says, has
co-opted “every institution that might stand in its way”. (p.30)