Coronavirus: Thread

[grarpamp]

You're Gonna Get Sick, Get Used To It

Authored by Todd Hayen via Off-Guardian.org,

Zero Covid, zero disease, zero suffering, zero death. Unrealistic
goals? You bet - although many countries (particularly China) have
seemingly adopted a “Zero Covid” stance and have made a rather
destructive effort to eliminate any occurrence of Covid-19 from their
citizenry - boarding people up in their apartments, attacking people
trying to escape, all those fun things fascists like to do.

This effort to maintain a “Zero Covid” environment is yet another
piece of the agenda intended to brainwash and thus control the
populace. The powers that be know that, but most of the people they
are controlling do not.

The people might think “Zero Covid” sounds like a good idea, but it is
fantasy, and typically you can’t count too much on fantasy in a
nitty-gritty real world.

Now, I’m not knocking fantasy. Sometimes it is just what we need to
get through the day. But this isn’t our own personal fantasy, this is
fantasy put upon us by an authority that has a nefarious agenda. It is
a slight of hand card trick, it is an intentional deception—a
deception premeditated to cause harm to some (most) and benefit others
(a few).

What is the card trick regarding “Zero Covid?” Well, it is once again
an effort to convince us that being human is a problem. Isn’t all that
is going on in the world right now have the same intention?—the “Woke
Culture,” the “Cancel Culture,” the “transgender/identity” issue? Need
I list more examples?

It seems that whatever “power that be entity” that likes to dabble in
human cognitive dissonance has been assigned the task of doing
whatever possible to make humans confused, and thus dissatisfied, with
their human-ness.

Should people born a certain biological (human) sex really be
encouraged to mess with their humanness and alter it to “look like” a
different sex? Sure, psychologically people can “feel” all sorts of
“identities” and even act out on them, but why destroy the physical
“human” part of ourselves as a result? Why be encouraged to insert
microchips in our brains to make us smarter or more efficient than
what nature intended us to be?

As a result of all of this fluidity to “alter” our nature, we become
more and more comfortable with this idea that there is something wrong
with how we came out of the box. We find our inability to live
forever, or ward off all disease, or remove all physical danger from
our lives, to be a defect—a manufacturer’s error. And then we go
bonkers to compensate for our human problem.

I shouldn’t say we “become comfortable” with the idea of innate
imperfection, because it is anything but comfortable, in fact, it is
downright crazy making. Of course this doesn’t apply to all of us, but
those that it does apply to are among us.

Where did this insane desire to alter our normal human “is-ness” come
from? Well, we certainly have seen it from day one. Humans obviously
have not evolved from their origin into creatures that integrate with
the natural environment the way all other creatures have done. This is
an age-old question, and nearly everything “human” has become part of
that all-important question, from all the “good things” such as art,
music, and other creativity from the heart, to all the bad things such
as weaponry, pollution, and genetic engineering.

I find it difficult not to include any advancement in technology with
the “bad things.” Any of the things we could say are “good” have only
been effective in providing convenience, avoidance of hard work, and
the extension of life, which are not necessarily noble
accomplishments.

If hard pressed I would say hygiene, and the mitigation of suffering
can definitely be included in the “good human advancements,” but
advancements in hygiene, such as clean water, waste disposal, etc. is
only needed after humans moved from a natural environment to a
man-made one…any other suggestions?

Needless to say this argument can get complicated and dicey, possibly
moving into the other argument, which suggests that we should never
have moved out of caves—which obviously is not plausible nor
necessarily desireable. Is there a way to be human without entering
into the obsession to be “better than human?” Probably not, and
possibly we have just reached the level of technology where becoming
“better than human” moves us most definitely into a phase of
transhuman ascendance.

But there is another element to factor in here—is our advancement a
natural movement, or is it a coerced movement? Are we, as a whole,
being manipulated into advancing too fast, or in a particular
trajectory that will eventually destroy us? Maybe a little bit of both
is at work here.

Obviously in cave days some overlord with the intention of destroying
the masses with fire did not trigger the quest for fire—that desire
more than likely came naturally. But can you say the same for the
invention of the atomic bomb? Was it really for the good of mankind as
a whole to destroy Imperial Japan, or was the incentive for creating
such a horrific form of destruction have less humanitarian
underpinnings?

We have reached a point in human development where it has been made
clear that the development of the mRNA vaccine to treat another human
engineered invention, the SARSCoV2 “virus,” does not have a
humanitarian intention.

This all has clearly happened for the benefit of a few at the expense
of many. And part of what has made this possible—the ease in
implementation of these bioweapons in the complying bodies of those
masses—is to convince people their “god given right” is to live
forever and not face nature’s natural challenges.

If we follow the “rules of nature” and take care of ourselves
naturally—eat healthy foods (which also is nearly impossible due to
the pressures from above to do otherwise), exercise, fill the mind
with less toxic thoughts, have meaning and purpose in our lives,
didn’t pollute our environment, and never became possessed to consume
everything in sight—then in my humble opinion very few diseases and
“challenges of nature” would always be powerful enough to make us
suffer intolerably, or to, as an end result, kill us—unless we have
lived long enough or nature decided it was time to cull our species.

We all die. We all suffer. We seem to have mostly come to a conclusion
that we can skirt the natural systems and rely on technology to erase
all of life’s dangers and dispel with nature’s wisdom.

People have been brainwashed to believe that only man-made medication
and medical intervention can cure us. Most people give no credit to
the human immune system and its miraculous ability to confront nearly
any pathogen and give it a run for its money. Of course part of the
agenda is to create an environment so toxic and contrary to the
natural way of things that we are indeed faced with more formidable
pathogens for our immune systems to deal with. Again, it is a
complicated issue.

But the Covid hoax, to be successful, had to be released on people who
believed a limited belief: humans are not capable of withstanding a
natural phenomenon (a virus). This is what the people were told, which
was always an illusion, yet still created as a fantasy bogeyman, and
that the only way to face it and dispel it was to rely on man-made
preventions (masks, social distancing and lockdowns) and cures (bogus
vaccines).

Couple this with our insane insistence that we continue moving toward
transhumanism (which at this time is still primarily a fantasy) and
are above pain, suffering, illness, and particularly death, and you
have the formula for madness.

If we are human, and not machines, or dependent on the assistance of
machines (nano or macro), then we are going to get sick. Plain and
simple. It is nature’s way of doing things and has been since humans
crawled out of the primordial muck. Get used to it.