Collapse: Earth Overshoot Day

[grarpamp]

Before there were 8 Billion human leeches toxifying
and gobbling up the planet (the two actual issues
that they are hiding), it was much hotter...


There Is No Climate Crisis: History Shows Us That The Earth Has Seen Far Worse

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2014/7/2/1311260/-The-Great-European-Heat-Wave-and-Drought-of-1540
https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-global-temperature

Climate science has been so suffocated by ideological zealotry it's
becoming difficult just to find normal objective analysis these days.
Any piece of data that contradicts the man-made climate change
narrative is surrounding by a spin machine that either dismisses the
information or obscures it in a deluge of global warming propaganda,
inoculating the reader well before they get a chance to digest the
news that maybe climate change is not all it's cracked up to be.

Whenever high temperatures are reported in the US or Europe the news
is hyperinflated into wild theories of climate Apocalypse by the
media, but weather history suggests that the panic is fabricated
rather than justified.  In fact, any hot weather event you can pick
out in recent years is likely overshadowed by a much worse event
decades or centuries before “man-made carbon pollution” was ever a
thing.

For example, the media is frantic over the current drought and “record
temps” in Europe this summer, warning that it could become the “worst
drought” in 500 years.  Of course, this claim opens the door to a
question that climate scientists and propagandists don't want to
answer:  What happened 500 years ago?

A similar level of global warming hysteria was present during a heat
wave in Europe in 2003, as well as in 2018.  The few climate
scientists still not bought and paid for by governments and the UN
have had to point out that these droughts are nothing compared to the
living hell that was the drought of 1540.  This event is often termed
a “mega-drought” because the region suffered historically hot temps
while receiving almost no rain for a year.

Temperatures that year averaged 5°C to 7° C  above average
temperatures in Europe in the 20th century.   In US terms, that means
daily summer temps of around 104° F.  Hundreds of historic accounts
written at the time describe around half a million deaths, along with
vast wildfires and a winter in Italy that “felt like July.”  Keep in
mind that carbon levels in Europe in 1540 were 30% LOWER than they are
today, yet, the region suffered perhaps the worst warming event in its
recorded history.

Today's climate data is based on records held by the NOAA and other
institutions, and these records only go back to 1880.  So, whenever
you hear the mainstream media rant about record temperatures, they are
using a tiny sliver of global weather history going back a little over
a century.  Any honest scientist in this field will tell you that the
Earth's climate record is vast compared to the limited data used by
global warming ideologues, and the majority of destructive weather
crises have occurred well before man-made carbon emissions.

It certainly wasn't carbon pollution from cars, farming and industry
that caused the crisis in 1540.

Try doing any research on the 1540 event and you will be buried in a
pile of mainstream articles that acknowledge the disaster but then try
to use it as an example of why we must comply with carbon restrictions
and climate authoritarianism in 2022.  They say “Look at what happened
to Europe in 1540.  You don't want that to happen again, do you?”

Of course, humanity had no say or control over the weather in 1540,
just as we have no say or control over the weather today.  There was
no carbon based global warming back then, and there is no carbon based
global warming now.

Scientists still have no idea what caused many of the warming events
of the past including the crisis of 1540, so why should we have blind
faith in their claims that carbon is the cause of warming in recent
years?  In fact, the NOAA and other climate research institutions
still offer no concrete proof of a relationship between carbon
emissions and rising temperatures.  Their argument is that they have
excluded all other possible causes, leaving only carbon as the
remainder.  This is not science, this is haphazard guesswork.

If there was ever a field that defies the logic, reason and analysis
commonly associated with the scientific method, it is climate science.

Set aside the fact that billions of dollars in funding are paid out to
climate scientists every year, but only those scientists that operate
from the assumption that climate change is caused by human beings.
That is to say, there are numerous incentives for scientists to
discount other causes for global warming.  They are not scientists,
they are paid political activists.  Luckily, temperatures are not that
high.  The NOAA's own data shows that the average temperature of the
Earth has risen less than 1°C in the past century.  This is nothing,
so why all the panic?

Let's just say that carbon controls are a powerful tool for
micromanaging the population and justifying authoritarianism in the
name of the “greater good.”  If the public is convinced to accept
false climate change narratives, then government would have the
ability to control every aspect of daily life, from the amount of
electricity we use, to the food we eat, to the businesses we can run,
to the level of production and the size of the population.  This is
not fiction this is reality, and it is happening much faster than many
people realize, all in the name of saving the planet from a threat
that doesn't exist.