Fwd: [coreboot] Re: Deprecation of the Intel Quark SoC

[Karl Semich]

here's my reply, as things are left atm.

i'm thinking some of blockchain collaboration to reduce paranoia.

previously, the thread seemed broken into factions, where a pair of people
were arguing ferventlty and illogically to remove quark from the tree. they
have reasonable points but don't back them up with logic, rather
mismatching the logic.

with this further disconnection one starts imagining the list breaking into
fake lists where participants are surrounded by fake peers who treat them
crummily.

that's what blockchains and a handful of other p2p techs are designed to
avoid

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Karl Semich <0xloem at gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 13, 2022, 8:10 AM
Subject: Re: [coreboot] Re: Deprecation of the Intel Quark SoC
To: Patrick Georgi <patrick at coreboot.org>
Cc: Karl Semich <0xloem at gmail.com>, Coreboot <coreboot at coreboot.org>




On Wed, Apr 13, 2022, 6:26 AM Patrick Georgi <patrick at coreboot.org> wrote:

> Am 12.04.2022 um 23:54 schrieb Karl Semich:
> > Obviously a way to sidestep all this would be to simply test the board
> > in question, which is a small investment of money and time.
> I appreciate that you volunteer to do that for Quark. Can't be too bad,
> it's a small investment of money and time, after all.
>

Sorry, have I offended you? What is it you read me as saying?

Does this seem lengthy or expensive to you?

>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 2553 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20220413/f1697cbc/attachment.txt>