Coronavirus: Thread

[grarpamp]

30 Facts You Need To Know: A COVID Cribsheet
You asked for it, so we made it. A collection of all the arguments
you’ll ever need.

https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/22/30-facts-you-need-to-know-your-covid-cribsheet/

We get a lot of e-mails and private messages along these lines “do you
have a source for X?” or “can you point me to mask studies?” or “I
know I saw a graph for mortality, but I can’t find it anymore”. And we
understand, it’s been a long 18 months, and there are so many
statistics and numbers to try and keep straight in your head.

So, to deal with all these requests, we decided to make a
bullet-pointed and sourced list for all the key points. A
one-stop-shop.

Here are key facts and sources about the alleged “pandemic”, that will
help you get a grasp on what has happened to the world since January
2020, and help you enlighten any of your friends who might be still
trapped in the New Normal fog: “Covid deaths” – Lockdowns – PCR Tests
– “asymptomatic infection” – Ventilators – Masks – Vaccines –
Deception & Foreknowledge

*  *  *
PART I: “COVID DEATHS” & MORTALITY

1. The survival rate of “Covid” is over 99%. Government medical
experts went out of their way to underline, from the beginning of the
pandemic, that the vast majority of the population are not in any
danger from Covid.

Almost all studies on the infection-fatality ratio (IFR) of Covid have
returned results between 0.04% and 0.5%. Meaning Covid’s survival rate
is at least 99.5%.

*

2. There has been NO unusual excess mortality. The press has called
2020 the UK’s “deadliest year since world war two”, but this is
misleading because it ignores the massive increase in the population
since that time. A more reasonable statistical measure of mortality is
Age-Standardised Mortality Rate (ASMR):

By this measure, 2020 isn’t even the worst year for mortality since
2000, In fact since 1943 only 9 years have been better than 2020.

Similarly, in the US the ASMR for 2020 is only at 2004 levels:

For a detailed breakdown of how Covid affected mortality across
Western Europe and the US click here. What increases in mortality we
have seen could be attributable to non-Covid causes [facts 7, 9 & 19].

*

3. “Covid death” counts are artificially inflated. Countries around
the globe have been defining a “Covid death” as a “death by any cause
within 28/30/60 days of a positive test”.

Healthcare officials from Italy, Germany, the UK, US, Northern Ireland
and others have all admitted to this practice:

Removing any distinction between dying of Covid, and dying of
something else after testing positive for Covid will naturally lead to
over-counting of “Covid deaths”. British pathologist Dr John Lee was
warning of this “substantial over-estimate” as early as last spring.
Other mainstream sources have reported it, too.

Considering the huge percentage of “asymptomatic” Covid infections
[14], the well-known prevalence of serious comorbidities [fact 4] and
the potential for false-positive tests [fact 18], this renders the
Covid death numbers an extremely unreliable statistic.

*

4. The vast majority of covid deaths have serious comorbidities. In
March 2020, the Italian government published statistics showing 99.2%
of their “Covid deaths” had at least one serious comorbidity.

These included cancer, heart disease, dementia, Alzheimer’s, kidney
failure and diabetes (among others). Over 50% of them had three or
more serious pre-existing conditions.

This pattern has held up in all other countries over the course of the
“pandemic”. An October 2020 FOIA request to the UK’s ONS revealed less
than 10% of the official “Covid death” count at that time had Covid as
the sole cause of death.

*

5. Average age of “Covid death” is greater than the average life
expectancy. The average age of a “Covid death” in the UK is 82.5
years. In Italy it’s 86. Germany, 83. Switzerland, 86. Canada, 86. The
US, 78, Australia, 82.

In almost all cases the median age of a “Covid death” is higher than
the national life expectancy.

As such, for most of the world, the “pandemic” has had little-to-no
impact on life expectancy. Contrast this with the Spanish flu, which
saw a 28% drop in life expectancy in the US in just over a year.
[source]

*

6. Covid mortality exactly mirrors the natural mortality curve.
Statistical studies from the UK and India have shown that the curve
for “Covid death” follows the curve for expected mortality almost
exactly:

The risk of death “from Covid” follows, almost exactly, your
background risk of death in general.

The small increase for some of the older age groups can be accounted
for by other factors.[facts 7, 9 & 19]

*

7. There has been a massive increase in the use of “unlawful” DNRs.
Watchdogs and government agencies have reported huge increases in the
use of Do Not Resuscitate Orders (DNRs) over the last twenty months.

In the US, hospitals considered “universal DNRs” for any patient who
tested positive for Covid, and whistleblowing nurses have admitted the
DNR system was abused in New York.

In the UK there was an “unprecdented” rise in “illegal” DNRs for
disabled people, GP surgeries sent out letters to non-terminal
patients recommending they sign DNR orders, whilst other doctors
signed “blanket DNRs” for entire nursing homes.

A study done by Sheffield Univerisity found over one-third of all
“suspected” Covid patients had a DNR attached to their file within 24
hours of hospital admission.

Blanket use of coerced or illegal DNR orders could account for any
increases in mortality in 2020/21.[Facts 2 & 6]

*  *  *
PART II: LOCKDOWNS

8. Lockdowns do not prevent the spread of disease. There is little to
no evidence lockdowns have any impact on limiting “Covid deaths”. If
you compare regions that locked down to regions that did not, you can
see no pattern at all.

“Covid deaths” in Florida (no lockdown) vs California (lockdown)

“Covid deaths” in Sweden (no lockdown) vs UK (lockdown)

*

9. Lockdowns kill people. There is strong evidence that lockdowns –
through social, economic and other public health damage – are deadlier
than the “virus”.

Dr David Nabarro, World Health Organization special envoy for Covid-19
described lockdowns as a “global catastrophe” in October 2020:

    We in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as
the primary means of control of the virus[…] it seems we may have a
doubling of world poverty by next year. We may well have at least a
doubling of child malnutrition […] This is a terrible, ghastly global
catastrophe.”

A UN report from April 2020 warned of 100,000s of children being
killed by the economic impact of lockdowns, while tens of millions
more face possible poverty and famine.

Unemployment, poverty, suicide, alcoholism, drug use and other
social/mental health crises are spiking all over the world. While
missed and delayed surgeries and screenings are going to see increased
mortality from heart disease, cancer et al. in the near future.

The impact of lockdown would account for the small increases in excess
mortality [Facts 2 & 6]

*

10. Hospitals were never unusually over-burdened. the main argument
used to defend lockdowns is that “flattening the curve” would prevent
a rapid influx of cases and protect healthcare systems from collapse.
But most healthcare systems were never close to collapse at all.

In March 2020 it was reported that hospitals in Spain and Italy were
over-flowing with patients, but this happens every flu season. In 2017
Spanish hospitals were at 200% capacity, and 2015 saw patients
sleeping in corridors. A paper JAMA paper from March 2020 found that
Italian hospitals “typically run at 85-90% capacity in the winter
months”.

In the UK, the NHS is regularly stretched to breaking point over the winter.

As part of their Covid policy, the NHS announced in Spring of 2020
that they would be “re-organizing hospital capacity in new ways to
treat Covid and non-Covid patients separately” and that “as result
hospitals will experience capacity pressures at lower overall
occupancy rates than would previously have been the case.”

This means they removed thousands of beds. During an alleged deadly
pandemic, they reduced the maximum occupancy of hospitals. Despite
this, the NHS never felt pressure beyond your typical flu season, and
at times actually had 4x more empty beds than normal.

In both the UK and US millions were spent on temporary emergency
hospitals that were never used.

*  *  *
PART III: PCR TESTS

11. PCR tests were not designed to diagnose illness. The
Reverse-Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) test is
described in the media as the “gold standard” for Covid diagnosis. But
the Nobel Prize-winning inventor of the process never intended it to
be used as a diagnostic tool, and said so publicly:

    PCR is just a process that allows you to make a whole lot of
something out of something. It doesn’t tell you that you are sick, or
that the thing that you ended up with was going to hurt you or
anything like that.”

*

12. PCR Tests have a history of being inaccurate and unreliable. The
“gold standard” PCR tests for Covid are known to produce a lot of
false-positive results, by reacting to DNA material that is not
specific to Sars-Cov-2.

A Chinese study found the same patient could get two different results
from the same test on the same day. In Germany, tests are known to
have reacted to common cold viruses. A 2006 study found PCR tests for
one virus responded to other viruses too. In 2007, a reliance on PCR
tests resulted in an “outbreak” of Whooping Cough that never actually
existed. Some tests in the US even reacted to the negative control
sample.

The late President of Tanzania, John Magufuli, submitted samples goat,
pawpaw and motor oil for PCR testing, all came back positive for the
virus.

As early as February of 2020 experts were admitting the test was
unreliable. Dr Wang Cheng, president of the Chinese Academy of Medical
Sciences told Chinese state television “The accuracy of the tests is
only 30-50%”. The Australian government’s own website claimed “There
is limited evidence available to assess the accuracy and clinical
utility of available COVID-19 tests.” And a Portuguese court ruled
that PCR tests were “unreliable” and should not be used for diagnosis.

You can read detailed breakdowns of the failings of PCR tests here,
here and here.

*

13. The CT values of the PCR tests are too high. PCR tests are run in
cycles, the number of cycles you use to get your result is known as
your “cycle threshold” or CT value. Kary Mullis said: “If you have to
go more than 40 cycles[…]there is something seriously wrong with your
PCR.”

The MIQE PCR guidelines agree, stating: “[CT] values higher than 40
are suspect because of the implied low efficiency and generally should
not be reported,” Dr Fauci himself even admitted anything over 35
cycles is almost never culturable.

Dr Juliet Morrison, virologist at the University of California,
Riverside, told the New York Times: Any test with a cycle threshold
above 35 is too sensitive…I’m shocked that people would think that 40
[cycles] could represent a positive…A more reasonable cutoff would be
30 to 35″.

In the same article Dr Michael Mina, of the Harvard School of Public
Health, said the limit should be 30, and the author goes on to point
out that reducing the CT from 40 to 30 would have reduced “covid
cases” in some states by as much as 90%.

The CDC’s own data suggests no sample over 33 cycles could be
cultured, and Germany’s Robert Koch Institute says nothing over 30
cycles is likely to be infectious.

Despite this, it is known almost all the labs in the US are running
their tests at least 37 cycles and sometimes as high as 45. The NHS
“standard operating procedure” for PCR tests rules set the limit at 40
cycles.

Based on what we know about the CT values, the majority of PCR test
results are at best questionable.

*

14. The World Health Organization (Twice) Admitted PCR tests produced
false positives. In December 2020 WHO put out a briefing memo on the
PCR process instructing labs to be wary of high CT values causing
false positive results:

    when specimens return a high Ct value, it means that many cycles
were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction
between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is
difficult to ascertain.

Then, in January 2021, the WHO released another memo, this time
warning that “asymptomatic” positive PCR tests should be re-tested
because they might be false positives:

    Where test results do not correspond with the clinical
presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the
same or different NAT technology.

*

15. The scientific basis for Covid tests is questionable. The genome
of the Sars-Cov-2 virus was supposedly sequenced by Chinese scientists
in December 2019, then published on January 10th 2020. Less than two
weeks later, German virologists (Christian Drosten et al.) had
allegedly used the genome to create assays for PCR tests.

They wrote a paper, Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by
real-time RT-PCR, which was submitted for publication on January 21st
2020, and then accepted on January 22nd. Meaning the paper was
allegedly “peer-reviewed” in less than 24 hours. A process that
typically takes weeks.

Since then, a consortium of over forty life scientists has petitioned
for the withdrawal of the paper, writing a lengthy report detailing 10
major errors in the paper’s methodology.

They have also requested the release of the journal’s peer-review
report, to prove the paper really did pass through the peer-review
process. The journal has yet to comply.

The Corman-Drosten assays are the root of every Covid PCR test in the
world. If the paper is questionable, every PCR test is also
questionable.

*  *  *
PART IV: “ASYMPTOMATIC INFECTION”

16. The majority of Covid infections are “asymptomatic”. From as early
as March 2020, studies done in Italy were suggesting 50-75% of
positive Covid tests had no symptoms. Another UK study from August
2020 found as much as 86% of “Covid patients” experienced no viral
symptoms at all.

It is literally impossible to tell the difference between an
“asymptomatic case” and a false-positive test result.

*

17. There is very little evidence supporting the alleged danger of
“asymptomatic transmission”. In June 2020, Dr Maria Van Kerkhove, head
of the WHO’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, said:

    From the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an
asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary
individual,”

A meta-analysis of Covid studies, published by Journal of the American
Medical Association (JAMA) in December 2020, found that asymptomatic
carriers had a less than 1% chance of infecting people within their
household. Another study, done on influenza in 2009, found:

    …limited evidence to suggest the importance of [asymptomatic]
transmission. The role of asymptomatic or presymptomatic
influenza-infected individuals in disease transmission may have been
overestimated…”

Given the known flaws of the PCR tests, many “asymptomatic cases” may
be false positives.[fact 14]

*  *  *
PART V: VENTILATORS

18. Ventilation is NOT a treatment for respiratory viruses. Mechanical
ventilation is not, and never has been, recommended treatment for
respiratory infection of any kind. In the early days of the pandemic,
many doctors came forward questioning the use of ventilators to treat
“Covid”.

Writing in The Spectator, Dr Matt Strauss stated:

    Ventilators do not cure any disease. They can fill your lungs with
air when you find yourself unable to do so yourself. They are
associated with lung diseases in the public’s consciousness, but this
is not in fact their most common or most appropriate application.

German Pulmonologist Dr Thomas Voshaar, chairman of Association of
Pneumatological Clinics said:

    When we read the first studies and reports from China and Italy,
we immediately asked ourselves why intubation was so common there.
This contradicted our clinical experience with viral pneumonia.

Despite this, the WHO, CDC, ECDC and NHS all “recommended” Covid
patients be ventilated instead of using non-invasive methods.

This was not a medical policy designed to best treat the patients, but
rather to reduce the hypothetical spread of Covid by preventing
patients from exhaling aerosol droplets.

*

19. Ventilators killed people. Putting someone who is suffering from
influenza, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or any
other condition which restricts breathing or affects the lungs, will
not alleviate any of those symptoms. In fact, it will almost certainly
make it worse, and will kill many of them.

Intubation tubes are a source of potential a infection known as
“ventilator-associated pneumonia”, which studies show affects up to
28% of all people put on ventilators, and kills 20-55% of those
infected.

Mechanical ventilation is also damaging to the physical structure of
the lungs, resulting in “ventilator-induced lung injury”, which can
dramatically impact quality of life, and even result in death.

Experts estimate 40-50% of ventilated patients die, regardless of
their disease. Around the world, between 66 and 86% of all “Covid
patients” put on ventilators died.

According to the “undercover nurse”, ventilators were being used so
improperly in New York, they were destroying patients’ lungs:

This policy was negligence at best, and potentially deliberate murder
at worst. This misuse of ventilators could account for any increase in
mortality in 2020/21 [Facts 2 & 6]

*  *  *
PART VI: MASKS

20. Masks don’t work. At least a dozen scientific studies have shown
that masks do nothing to stop the spread of respiratory viruses.

One meta-analysis published by the CDC in May 2020 found “no
significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face
masks”.

Another study with over 8000 subjects found masks “did not seem to be
effective against laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infections
nor against clinical respiratory infection.”

There are literally too many to quote them all, but you can read them:
[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Or read a summary by SPR here.

While some studies have been done claiming to show mask do work for
Covid, they are all seriously flawed. One relied on self-reported
surveys as data. Another was so badly designed a panel of experts
demand it be withdrawn. A third was withdrawn after its predictions
proved entirely incorrect.

The WHO commissioned their own meta-analysis in the Lancet, but that
study looked only at N95 masks and only in hospitals. [For full run
down on the bad data in this study click here.]

Aside from scientific evidence, there’s plenty of real-world evidence
that masks do nothing to halt the spread of disease.

For example, North Dakota and South Dakota had near-identical case
figures, despite one having a mask-mandate and the other not:

In Kansas, counties without mask mandates actually had fewer Covid
“cases” than counties with mask mandates. And despite masks being very
common in Japan, they had their worst flu outbreak in decades in 2019.

*

21. Masks are bad for your health. Wearing a mask for long periods,
wearing the same mask more than once, and other aspects of cloth masks
can be bad for your health. A long study on the detrimental effects of
mask-wearing was recently published by the International Journal of
Environmental Research and Public Health

Dr. James Meehan reported in August 2020 he was seeing increases in
bacterial pneumonia, fungal infections, facial rashes .

Masks are also known to contain plastic microfibers, which damage the
lungs when inhaled and may be potentially carcinogenic.

Childen wearing masks encourages mouth-breathing, which results in
facial deformities.

People around the world have passed out due to CO2 poisoning while
wearing their masks, and some children in China even suffered sudden
cardiac arrest.

*

22. Masks are bad for the planet. Millions upon millions of disposable
masks have been used per month for over a year. A report from the UN
found the Covid19 pandemic will likely result in plastic waste more
than doubling in the next few years., and the vast majority of that is
face masks.

The report goes on to warn these masks (and other medical waste) will
clog sewage and irrigation systems, which will have knock on effects
on public health, irrigation and agriculture.

A study from the University of Swansea found “heavy metals and plastic
fibres were released when throw-away masks were submerged in water.”
These materials are toxic to both people and wildlife.

*  *  *
PART VII: VACCINES

23. Covid “vaccines” are totally unprecedented. Before 2020 no
successful vaccine against a human coronavirus had ever been
developed. Since then we have allegedly made 20 of them in 18 months.

Scientists have been trying to develop a SARS and MERS vaccine for
years with little success. Some of the failed SARS vaccines actually
caused hypersensitivity to the SARS virus. Meaning that vaccinated
mice could potentially get the disease more severely than unvaccinated
mice. Another attempt caused liver damage in ferrets.

While traditional vaccines work by exposing the body to a weakened
strain of the microorganism responsible for causing the disease, these
new Covid vaccines are mRNA vaccines.

mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acid) vaccines theoretically work by
injecting viral mRNA into the body, where it replicates inside your
cells and encourages your body to recognise, and make antigens for,
the “spike proteins” of the virus. They have been the subject of
research since the 1990s, but before 2020 no mRNA vaccine was ever
approved for use.

*

24. Vaccines do not confer immunity or prevent transmission. It is
readily admitted that Covid “vaccines” do not confer immunity from
infection and do not prevent you from passing the disease onto others.
Indeed, an article in the British Medical Journal highlighted that the
vaccine studies were not designed to even try and assess if the
“vaccines” limited transmission.

The vaccine manufacturers themselves, upon releasing the untested mRNA
gene therapies, were quite clear their product’s “efficacy” was based
on “reducing the severity of symptoms”.

*

25. The vaccines were rushed and have unknown longterm effects.
Vaccine development is a slow, laborious process. Usually, from
development through testing and finally being approved for public use
takes many years. The various vaccines for Covid were all developed
and approved in less than a year. Obviously there can be no long-term
safety data on chemicals which are less than a year old.

Pfizer even admit this is true in the leaked supply contract between
the pharmaceutical giant, and the government of Albania:

    the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not
currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine
that are not currently known

Further, none of the vaccines have been subject to proper trials. Many
of them skipped early-stage trials entirely, and the late-stage human
trials have either not been peer-reviewed, have not released their
data, will not finish until 2023 or were abandoned after “severe
adverse effects”.

*

26. Vaccine manufacturers have been granted legal indemnity should
they cause harm. The USA’s Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness
Act (PREP) grants immunity until at least 2024.

The EU’s product licensing law does the same, and there are reports of
confidential liability clauses in the contracts the EU signed with
vaccine manufacturers.

The UK went even further, granting permanent legal indemnity to the
government, and any employees thereof, for any harm done when a
patient is being treated for Covid19 or “suspected Covid19”.

Again, the leaked Albanian contract suggests that Pfizer, at least,
made this indemnity a standard demand of supplying Covid vaccines:

    Purchaser hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless
Pfizer […] from and against any and all suits, claims, actions,
demands, losses, damages, liabilities, settlements, penalties, fines,
costs and expenses

*  *  *
PART VIII: DECEPTION & FOREKNOWLEDGE

27. The EU was preparing “vaccine passports” at least a YEAR before
the pandemic began. Proposed COVID countermeasures, presented to the
public as improvised emergency measures, have existed since before the
emergence of the disease.

Two EU documents published in 2018, the “2018 State of Vaccine
Confidence” and a technical report titled “Designing and implementing
an immunisation information system” discussed the plausibility of an
EU-wide vaccination monitoring system.

These documents were combined into the 2019 “Vaccination Roadmap”,
which (among other things) established a “feasibility study” on
vaccine passports to begin in 2019 and finish in 2021:

This report’s final conclusions were released to the public in
September 2019, just a month before Event 201 (below).

*

28. A “training exercise” predicted the pandemic just weeks before it
started. In October 2019 the World Economic Forum and Johns Hopkins
University held Event 201. This was a training exercise based on a
zoonotic coronavirus starting a worldwide pandemic. The exercise was
sponsored by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and GAVI the
vaccine alliance.

The exercise published its findings and recommendations in November
2019 as a “call to action”. One month later, China recorded their
first case of “Covid”.

*

29. Since the beginning of 2020, the Flu has “disappeared”. In the
United States, since Februart 2020, influenza cases have allegedly
dropped by over 98%.

It’s not just the US either, globally flu has apparently almost
completely disappeared.

Meanwhile, a new disease called “Covid”, which has identical symptoms
and a similar mortality rate to influenza, is supposedly sweeping the
globe.

*

30. The elite have made fortunes during the pandemic. Since the
beginning of lockdown the wealthiest people have become significantly
wealthier. Forbes reported that 40 new billionaires have been created
“fighting the coronavirus”, with 9 of them being vaccine
manufacturers.

Business Insider reported that “billionaires saw their net worth
increase by half a trillion dollars” by October 2020.

Clearly that number will be even bigger by now.


https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/22/30-facts-you-need-to-know-your-covid-cribsheet/
https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/covid-facts-banner2-2000x900.jpg
https://www.youtube.com/embed/adj8MCsZKlg
https://swprs.org/studies-on-covid-19-lethality/#age
https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/uk-age-standardised-mortality-rate-1943-2020-650x352.jpg
https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/us-mortality-1900-2020-age-adjusted-650x267.jpg
https://swprs.org/covid-19-mortality-overview/
https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/22/30-facts-you-need-to-know-your-covid-cribsheet/#7
https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/22/30-facts-you-need-to-know-your-covid-cribsheet/#9
https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/22/30-facts-you-need-to-know-your-covid-cribsheet/#19
https://off-guardian.org/2020/04/05/covid19-death-figures-a-substantial-over-estimate/
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Tw9Ci2PZKZg
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/how-to-understand-and-report-figures-for-covid-19-deaths-
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9279767/BEL-MOONEY-dad-died-chronic-illness-hes-officially-Covid-victim.html
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/why-no-one-can-ever-recover-from-covid-19-in-england
https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/22/30-facts-you-need-to-know-your-covid-cribsheet/#14
https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/22/30-facts-you-need-to-know-your-covid-cribsheet/#4
https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/22/30-facts-you-need-to-know-your-covid-cribsheet/#18
https://off-guardian.org/2020/03/23/italy-only-12-of-covid19-deaths-list-covid19-as-cause/
https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/covid19deathswithnounderlyinghealthconditionsbrokendownbyage
https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/averageageofthosewhohaddiedwithcovid19
https://swprs.org/studies-on-covid-19-lethality/#age
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data-visualization/mortality-trends/index.htm
https://medium.com/wintoncentre/how-much-normal-risk-does-covid-represent-4539118e1196
https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-021-06026-6
https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/1_rfqdUarlb3mIIhJv1muvQQ-650x489.png
https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/covid-deathrate-vs-normal-deathrate-650x398.jpg
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-51979654
https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/22/30-facts-you-need-to-know-your-covid-cribsheet/#7
https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/22/30-facts-you-need-to-know-your-covid-cribsheet/#9
https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/22/30-facts-you-need-to-know-your-covid-cribsheet/#19
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/03/25/coronavirus-patients-do-not-resucitate/
https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/11/watch-perspectives-on-the-pandemic-9/
https://www.hsj.co.uk/coronavirus/unprecedented-number-of-dnr-orders-for-learning-disabilities-patients/7027480.article
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/covid-do-not-resuscitate-nhs-b1816413.html
https://www.pulsetoday.co.uk/news/regulation/cqc-to-review-blanket-do-not-resuscitate-orders/
https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/news/do-not-resuscitate-orders-were-common-patients-admitted-suspected-covid-19
https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/22/30-facts-you-need-to-know-your-covid-cribsheet/#2
https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/22/30-facts-you-need-to-know-your-covid-cribsheet/#6
https://fee.org/articles/sweden-saw-lower-mortality-rate-than-most-of-europe-in-2020-despite-no-lockdown/
https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/florida-california-650x392.jpg
https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/uk-sweden-graph-650x394.jpg
https://off-guardian.org/2020/04/01/could-the-covid19-response-be-more-deadly-than-the-virus/
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-children-un/u-n-warns-economic-downturn-could-kill-hundreds-of-thousands-of-children-in-2020-idUSKBN21Y2X7
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/un-pandemic-could-push-tens-of-millions-into-chronic-hunger/2020/07/13/0733e34e-c51e-11ea-a825-8722004e4150_story.html
https://news.un.org/en/story/2020/06/1067432
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32275300/
https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/news/latest/2020/05/covid-disruption-28-million-surgeries-cancelled.aspx
https:/amp.theguardian.com/society/2020/jun/01/millions-in-uk-miss-cancer-screenings-tests-and-treatments-due-to-covid-19
https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/22/30-facts-you-need-to-know-your-covid-cribsheet/#2
https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/22/30-facts-you-need-to-know-your-covid-cribsheet/#6
https://www.lasexta.com/noticias/nacional/el-hospital-madrileno-de-la-paz-colapsado-los-sindicatos-llevan-a-la-justicia-la-eliminacion-de-camas-video_201903195c90fbcf0cf2877038852c8e.html
https://elpais.com/ccaa/2015/01/13/madrid/1421182112_975809.html
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2763188
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/dec/02/nhs-winter-crisis-extra-beds-created-by-52-per-cent-of-uk-hospitals
https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/bed-availability-and-occupancy/
https://www.hsj.co.uk/acute-care/nhs-hospitals-have-four-times-more-empty-beds-than-normal/7027392.article
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-56327214
https://apnews.com/article/virus-outbreak-ap-top-news-international-news-weekend-reads-manhattan-e593ba57f37206b495521503d7e5e4c5
https://off-guardian.org/2020/10/05/pcr-inventor-it-doesnt-tell-you-that-you-are-sick/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32219885/
https://www.schwerin.de/news/4a3e5560-78c9-11ea-b543-1967de695b51/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2095096/
https://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/22/health/22whoop.html
https://www.science.org/news/2020/02/united-states-badly-bungled-coronavirus-testing-things-may-soon-improve
https://off-guardian.org/2021/03/18/discuss-president-magufuli-dead-at-61/
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-tanzania-idUSKBN22F0KF
https://off-guardian.org/2020/09/05/australian-govts-own-website-admits-covid-tests-are-totally-unreliable/
https://www-dgsi-pt.translate.goog/jtrl.nsf/33182fc732316039802565fa00497eec/79d6ba338dcbe5e28025861f003e7b30
https://off-guardian.org/2020/04/15/has-covid-19-testing-made-the-problem-worse/
https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/
https://off-guardian.org/2021/03/27/making-something-out-of-nothing-pcr-tests-ct-values-and-false-positives/
https://books.google.de/books?q=mullis+If+you+have+to+go+more+than+40+cycles+to+amplify+a+single-copy+gene,+there+is+something+seriously+wrong+with+your+PCR
https://www.gene-quantification.de/miqe-bustin-et-al-clin-chem-2009.pdf
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_Vy6fgaBPE
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html
https:/www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/duration-isolation.html
https:/www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Vorl_Testung_nCoV.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html
https://www.rcpath.org/uploads/assets/90111431-8aca-4614-b06633d07e2a3dd9/Guidance-and-SOP-COVID-19-Testing-NHS-Laboratories.pdf
https://off-guardian.org/2020/12/18/who-finally-admits-pcr-tests-create-false-positives/
https://off-guardian.org/2021/01/25/who-finally-admits-pcr-is-not-a-diagnostic-test/
https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045
https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/
https://www.repubblica.it/salute/medicina-e-ricerca/2020/03/16/news/coronavirus_studio_il_50-75_dei_casi_a_vo_sono_asintomatici_e_molto_contagiosi-251474302/
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20201009/86-percent-of-the-UKs-COVID-19-patients-have-no-symptoms.aspx
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/08/asymptomatic-coronavirus-patients-arent-spreading-new-infections-who-says.html
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2774102
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2646474/
https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/22/30-facts-you-need-to-know-your-covid-cribsheet/#14
https://archive.is/KX5IQ#selection-4609.23-4621.63
https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/modes-of-transmission-of-virus-causing-covid-19-implications-for-ipc-precaution-recommendations
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/infection-control-recommendations.html
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/infection-control/control-recommendations.html
https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/Infection-prevention-control-for-the-care-of-patients-with-2019-nCoV-healthcare-settings_update-31-March-2020.pdf
https:/www.england.nhs.uk/coronavirus/wp-content/uploads/sites/52/2020/03/clinical-management-of-persons-admitted-to-hospita-v1-19-march-2020.pdf
https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/full/10.1164/ajrccm.165.7.2105078
https://europepmc.org/article/med/3706887
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S027252311630079X
https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20200415/ventilators-helping-or-harming-covid-19-patients#1
https://apnews.com/article/health-us-news-ap-top-news-international-news-virus-outbreak-8ccd325c2be9bf454c2128dcb7bd616d
https://www.youtube.com/embed/UIDsKdeFOmQ
https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/22/30-facts-you-need-to-know-your-covid-cribsheet/#2
https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/22/30-facts-you-need-to-know-your-covid-cribsheet/#6
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0240287
https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-6817
https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/covid-19-face-masks-community-first-update.pdf
https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/masking-lack-of-evidence-with-politics/
https://www.cochrane.org/CD006207/ARI_do-physical-measures-such-hand-washing-or-wearing-masks-stop-or-slow-down-spread-respiratory-viruses
https://escipub.com/irjph-2021-08-1005/
https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/5.0057100
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/04/commentary-masks-all-covid-19-not-based-sound-data
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006372
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577
https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/a-1174-6591
https://swprs.org/face-masks-and-covid-the-evidence/
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-24115-7
https://reason.com/2020/06/22/prominent-researchers-say-a-widely-cited-study-on-wearing-masks-is-badly-flawed/
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.10.21.20208728v2
https://swprs.org/who-mask-study-seriously-flawed/
https://www.grandforksherald.com/newsmd/coronavirus/6824462-North-Dakota-got-a-mask-mandate-South-Dakota-didnt.-COVID-19-cases-have-plummeted-in-both
https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/35950359_1609461256265-650x302.png
https://sentinelksmo.org/more-deception-kdhe-hid-data-to-justify-mask-mandate/
https://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2019/02/01/Millions-in-Japan-affected-as-flu-outbreak-grips-country/9191549043797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8072811/pdf/ijerph-18-04344.pdf#page37
https://www.globalresearch.ca/medical-doctor-warns-bacterial-pneumonias-rise-mask-wearing
https://off-guardian.org/2020/11/06/face-masks-a-danger-to-our-planet-our-children-ourselves/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20129889/
https://nypost.com/2020/04/24/driver-crashes-car-after-passing-out-from-wearing-n95-mask/
https://www.thatsmags.com/china/post/31100/student-deaths-lead-schools-to-adjust-rules-on-masks-while-exercising
https://off-guardian.org/2020/11/06/face-masks-a-danger-to-our-planet-our-children-ourselves/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7430241/
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-56972074
https://www.abc.net.au/news/health/2020-04-17/coronavirus-vaccine-ian-frazer/12146616
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3335060/
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2004/12/sars-vaccine-linked-liver-damage-ferret-study
https://horizon-magazine.eu/article/five-things-you-need-know-about-mrna-vaccines.html
https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2015/rna-vaccines-a-novel-technology-to-prevent-and-treat-disease/
https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4037
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/feb/22/one-vaccine-protection-severe-covid-evidence
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/06/vaccine-development-barriers-coronavirus/
https://gogo.al/ekskluzive-kontrata-sekrete-e-qeverise-me-pfizer-per-vaksinat/
https://off-guardian.org/2021/01/03/what-vaccine-trials/
https:/clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT04516746
https:/clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04540393
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/16/covid-vaccine-side-effects-compensation-lawsuit.html
https://fullfact.org/health/unlicensed-vaccine-manufacturers-are-immune-some-not-all-civil-liability/
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-health-coronavirus-eu-vaccine-idUKKCN26D0UG
https://off-guardian.org/2020/04/08/coronavirus-fact-check-2-the-emergency-powers-will-only-last-2-years/
https://off-guardian.org/2020/05/22/report-eu-planning-vaccination-passport-since-2018/
https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/vaccination/docs/2018_vaccine_confidence_en.pdf
https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/portal/files/documents/designing-implementing-immunisation-information-system_0.pdf
https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/eu-vaccine-passport-plan-2018-650x253.jpg
https://off-guardian.org/wp-content/medialibrary/2019-2022_roadmap_en-1.pdf
https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/scenario.html
https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/event201-resources/200117-PublicPrivatePandemicCalltoAction.pdf
https://www.healthline.com/health-news/why-the-flu-season-basically-disappeared-this-year#What-drove-down-flu-activity?
https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/flu-disappeared-graph-650x419.jpg
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/flu-has-disappeared-worldwide-during-the-covid-pandemic1/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/giacomotognini/2021/04/06/meet-the-40-new-billionaires-who-got-rich-fighting-covid-19/
https://www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/covid-vaccines-create-9-new-billionaires-combined-wealth-greater-cost-vaccinating
https://www.businessinsider.com/billionaires-net-worth-increases-coronavirus-pandemic-2020-7
https://swprs.org/