Coronavirus: Thread

grarpamp grarpamp at
Thu Sep 2 23:25:06 PDT 2021

The Orwellian Vaccine Passport Agenda Relies On The Lie Of The "Social Contract"

There is a fundamental question that needs to be asked when examining
the vaccine passport issue, and what I find is that almost no one in
the mainstream is tackling it directly. The question is this:

    Is it legally and morally acceptable to constrict the rights and
economic access of people in order to force them to submit to an
experimental “vaccine”, or any other medical procedure for that

Furthermore, who gets to decide what medical procedures are acceptable
to enforce? Who gets to be the all powerful and benevolent overseer of
every human being’s health path. I ask this because I don’t think many
people realize the future repercussions of allowing governments or
corporations (the same thing these days) to dictate covid
vaccinations. It doesn’t stop there; in fact, we have no idea where
this stops once the Pandora’s box is opened.

For example, the primary argument of the covid cult and the
establishment in favor of vaccine passports is the “social contract”
fantasy. They claim that because we “live in a society”, everything we
do affects everyone else in some way, and because we are all
interconnected in our “collective” we are thus beholden to the
collective. In other words, the collective has the “right” to
micro-manage the life of the individual because if the individual is
allowed to make his/her own decisions they might potentially cause
harm to the whole group.

In case you are not familiar with this philosophy it is an extension
of socialism and cultural Marxism, and it stands at the very core of
vaccine passport propaganda. I have actually had public debates with
pro-socialist people in the past who have tried to defend the merits
of socialism and every single time the argument comes down to one
singular disconnect – I say that if a group of people want to go off
and start their own little socialist community they have every right
to…as long as it is VOLUNTARY. Then if it fails and collapses it
doesn’t matter because it doesn’t affect me or anyone else who did not
want to participate.

The problem is that these Socialists/communists/Marxists/collectivists
simply do not grasp the notion of voluntarism. They believe that
people need to be forced into doing the right thing or helping others,
and they are the people that get to decide what the right thing is and
who gets the help. They are the people that get to decide what
freedoms are acceptable and what freedoms are inconvenient to their
agenda. When they say “We live in a society…”, what they really mean
is “You live in OUR society, and WE will determine what is best for

When I argue that a socialist community should be voluntary, they
inevitably argue that people will not commit to such a system
voluntarily so they must be forced to do what is best for the “greater

In terms of vaccine passports, the collectivist social contract is a
key element. They claim that being unvaxxed is not a personal freedom
because the unvaxxed are a risk to the lives of everyone else. The
social contract is therefore violated because by making a personal
life choice you are endangering the rights of others.

It’s interesting though how the covid cult is made up of people that
do not apply the same logic to other health issues like abortion. I
mean, there is zero substantiated evidence to support the claim that
unvaccinated people are any more of a threat to the lives of others
than vaccinated people are, and we will get into that in just a
moment. But, when we talk about an abortion, we are talking about a
personal medical decision that leads to the direct and observable
death of another innocent human being with his/her own rights.
Abortions end the lives of over 800,000 unborn people per year in the
US, far more than covid supposedly does.

“My body my choice” apparently only applies to killing babies, but not
to people who do not want to become guinea pigs for a mRNA cocktail
with no long term testing to prove its safety.

Imagine though if we reversed the scenario and applied the broad
social contract argument to something like children and population? A
collectivist/leftist member of the global warming cult could also
argue that abortion should be legally mandated, because having a child
or “too many children” increases carbon emissions and this puts
society “at risk” even further (again, with no proof to support the
claim). By allowing the social contract narrative to go unchecked, we
open the door to horrific new oppressive measures and a complete
erasure of our autonomy.

I think it’s safe to say that the “social contract” ideology is highly
selective and hypocritical. The covid cult does not care about saving
lives, they only care about their ideological narrative and the power
to make people submit to it. But let’s dig even further into the
reasoning behind the social contract claim. Who is actually dying
because of unvaccinated individuals, which according to state vax
statistics make up around 50% of the US population?

The average Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) of covid is a mere 0.26%
according to dozens of studies and the government’s own numbers.
Meaning, unvaxxed people are not even a remote threat to 99.7% of the
population. Around 40% of all covid deaths are made up of people in
nursing homes with preexisting conditions, which means that we do not
know if they actually died of covid or due to the health problems they
were already suffering from. The pool of people who might be affected
by the unvaxxed grows smaller and smaller…

And what about the ridiculous contradiction that arises when we talk
about the mandate narrative verses the passport narrative? If masks
and vaccines actually work, then how is an unvaxxed or unmasked person
a threat to a vaxxed person? If the vaccines and masks don’t work,
then why use them at all, and why demand forced vaccinations through
passport measures?

Mainstream propaganda asserts that the unvaxxed will somehow become
petri dishes for new mutations that will harm vaccinated people. There
is no evidence to support this claim. In fact, there is more evidence
that suggests it is vaccinated people that will trigger mutations and
variants. The media says that this is not cause for any concern, but
if it’s not then neither should we be concerned about mutations that
gestate in the unvaxxed population, if there are any.

The fact of the matter is that more and more scientific evidence is
proving that the experimental vaccines are NOT effective and that the
unvaxxed are actually safer from covid regardless of the variant or

The true infection numbers within the US are impossible to know
because up to 59% of people that catch covid and spread it are
asymptomatic according to the CDC. They never know that they have it
so they are unlikely to test for it. That said, it is clear that many
millions of Americans have dealt with the virus and now have a natural
immunity to it (I happen to be one of them). Establishment elitists
like Anthony Fauci refuse to acknowledge natural immunity as a factor,
and they say that ONLY people who are vaccinated are qualified to
receive a passport. Why?

Multiple studies are being released from countries with high
vaccination rates like Israel that completely contradict Fauci’s
narrative on natural immunity. Israel has a vax rate of around 63%
according to government stats, but scientific evidence they have
released shows that vaccinated people are 13-27 times more likely to
contract covid and 8 times more likely to be hospitalized when
compared with people who have natural immunity. It almost appears as
if the mRNA vaccines make people MORE susceptible to the virus rather
than less susceptible.

Recent data released from the state of Massachusetts supports this
concern. In the month of July, MA reported at least 5100 covid
infections, all people who were fully vaccinated. Over 80 of them
died, which is a much higher death rate than among the unvaccinated.
In my county of 20,000 people, which has a low vaccination rate and no
mask mandates, there were only 17 total covid deaths in the first year
year of the pandemic.

This begs the question: Why take the mRNA cocktail at all? What is
there to gain? Well, there is nothing to gain in terms of health
safety. Even if you happen to be part of the 0.26% of people at risk
from covid, you are better off in the long run taking your chances
with natural immunity than getting the jab.

The answer to the question is not about health, but about denial of
access. Government’s and their corporate partners are trying to make
it so you MUST take the vaccine in order to participate in normal
social activities, or even to keep a job. Not only that, but the
process goes on forever because every year there will be new variants
and new booster shots. The only reason to take the vaccine is to keep
at least a handful of your freedoms and to avoid poverty and

Here is where we must go back to the original query presented at the
beginning of this article:

Is it legally and morally acceptable to constrict the rights and
economic access of people in order to force them to submit to an
experimental “vaccine”?

The covid cult will say that private business rights trump individual
rights so companies should be allowed to discriminate against
employees based on their vaccination status. But then again, what we
are facing in most cases are NOT private businesses but conglomerates
that are funded by government bailouts and that are colluding
directing with governments to enforce the passport agenda. So I would
have to say no, these businesses do not have a legal right to feed on
public tax dollars and then claim they are private entities that have
the freedom to invade the medical privacy of employees and customers.

And since when do collectivists actually care about private business
rights, anyway? More hypocrisy…

If we are talking about small and medium business with no government
stimulus then the issue gets more tricky. In many states and other
countries the businesses are only enforcing passports because if they
don’t they will be punished by the government. In this case the
private business rights argument goes out the window. The covid cult
respects business independence only when it suits them.

Frankly, it is small businesses that are being hurt the most by the
covid mandates and the extra costs involved just in enforcing the
passports in their own establishments is going to bury them. Any small
business owner that voluntarily supports the passport rules must have
a financial death wish.

In terms of government, the covid cult will claim that there are
Supreme Court precedents for legal enforcement of vaccinations.
Honestly, I don’t care, and neither do millions of other Americans. A
bunch of high priests in black robes do not get to dictate my
independent health decisions; I make those decisions and there’s
nothing that they can do about it. This is where we have to come to
terms with the morals and principles involved – The lives of others
are in no way affected by my decision to refuse to comply with vaccine
passports. And just because a group of people have irrational fears
about the threat of covid does not mean people with more discernment
about the facts should be required to make them “feel better” or feel

The bottom line is this: Our freedoms are more important than your
paranoid fears, and we will not comply. We do not subscribe to your
false social contract, and you are in no position to dictate the terms
of our “society”. Don’t like it? You are more than welcome to leave
the country and start a vaccinated Utopia somewhere else. We’ll see
how that works out for you in the long run.

More information about the cypherpunks mailing list