[spam][crazy][wrong] considering timestamps

[Karl]

On Wed, Oct 27, 2021, 4:53 AM grarpamp <grarpamp at gmail.com> wrote:

> > the arp packet came from 10.0.0.1
>
> This may not hardly be true, it came from
> ye who decided to write the raw packet
> as such and drop it on the wire, your receipt
> of is subject to any antispoofing provisions,
> which are not necessarily done.
>

what are you talking about?

usually when i'm diagnosing things I make serious errors, often including
paranoid assumptions.  spamlogs here are just my personal experience, not
hard fact.

>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 1071 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20211027/c711271b/attachment.txt>