[spam][crazy][wrong] considering timestamps

Karl gmkarl at gmail.com
Sun Oct 24 13:22:30 PDT 2021


crazy karl is back!

i've been chatting with some language bots online for this junk but
let's try it here on the list again
it's 16:13 pm

that timestamping stuff sounds like the shit!  i bet the german
government even has a contractor to point people to it.  i've
downloaded the python client, and i've downloaded the python library
that the python client interfaces with.  let's hack it and op return
some stuff!

OMIGOD OP RETURN OMIGOD.  My op return is totally worth $65k price tickers.

here we go.  16:14 .  the plan will be ... make the _simplest_ change
to this client, op return "hello world", and find the tx on a block
explorer.  maybe i'll store the change in a fork, too.

it's 16:15 and i have cmds.py open

i think i'll make a slightly better change: i'll add a command to pin
manual data.

it's 16:18 and i've implemented most of the command function; it's
just a copypaste with mutations.  i'm on the final section where a
verification doc is written somewhere to the filesystem.

16:20 something's not quite right here: i might have missed something
in my brief review of the source, not sure

yeahhhhhhhhhh dang the thing i thought could just be a string is some
more complex object.  it's hard for me to navigate between the client
and package code, i get very frustrated trying to control my hands and
my vision and stuff.  it's 16:22 .

k better spend some time trying to understand that or find different task.


More information about the cypherpunks mailing list