USA 2020 Elections: Thread

[grarpamp]

>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aiiSq7toqlQ  Tony Bobulinski #SinoHawk
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avjspkRfW3Q Bobulinski interview Tucker
> https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7x4b9v Bobulinski interview Tucker
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9rMR3NnRfg John Paul Mac Isaac Laptop
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdONdK2HwQQ John Paul Mac Isaac Laptop
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JT66q4_3610 John Paul Mac Isaac
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0M4Vrv2_-Z4 John Isaac laptop
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pr_rfxMEvAo John Isaac laptop


Joe Biden & The Disappearing Elephant: How To Make A Full-Sized
Scandal Vanish In Front Of An Audience Of Millions

https://jonathanturley.org/2021/10/19/joe-biden-and-the-disappearing-elephant-how-to-make-a-full-sized-scandal-vanish-in-front-of-an-audience-of-millions/

https://jonathanturley.org/2021/10/14/is-it-time-for-a-special-counsel-on-the-hunter-biden-scandal/
https://www.wildabouthoudini.com/2018/01/100-years-ago-houdini-vanished-elephant.html
https://jonathanturley.org/2020/11/18/twitter-ceo-admits-censoring-hunter-biden-story-was-wrong-democrats-call-for-more-censorship/
https://twitter.com/svdate/status/1371900183752146945
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/521823-50-former-intelligence-officials-warn-ny-post-story-sounds-like-russian
https://jonathanturley.org/2021/09/24/report-hunter-biden-sought-millions-to-help-unfreeze-libyan-assets-while-his-father-was-vice-president/
https://nypost.com/2021/06/22/did-joe-inadvertently-pay-for-hunter-bidens-wild-night-at-chateau-marmont/
https://jonathanturley.org/2019/09/22/biden-i-have-never-spoken-to-my-son-about-his-overseas-business-dealings/
https://www.wsj.com/articles/state-department-official-raised-concerns-in-2015-over-hunter-biden-11571407543
https://nypost.com/2021/05/29/biden-hired-rosemont-seneca-employee-to-private-vp-office/
https://jonathanturley.org/2021/08/12/it-was-fing-crazy-sh-videotape-shows-hunter-biden-purportedly-admitting-russians-have-blackmail-material-on-him/
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2021/04/feds-raid-rudy-giuliani-ukraine-probe.html
https://www.inspiringquotes.us/quotes/nplY_uCIqOLMB

This week marked the anniversary of one of the greatest political
tricks in history: the disappearance of Hunter Biden scandal.

New emails were released that added new details to what was a raw
influence peddling operation that netted millions from foreign
sources. A new tranche of emails connecting President Joe Biden to key
accounts prove just how this political sleight of hand was worthy of
Houdini. After all, Houdini only made an elephant disappear. The
Bidens made the equivalent to an entire circus disappear in front of
an audience of millions.

How Houdini made his 10,000 pound elephant Jennie disappear every
night in New York’s Hippodrome remains a matter of some debate. There
are no good pictures of his famous cabinet and Houdini later
threatened to sue those claiming “disappearing elephants.”  What is
clear is that the sheer size and the audacity of the act (like that of
the Bidens) contributed to the trick. The fact is that Jennie never
left the large cabinet, people just didn’t see it.

The Bidens achieved the same effect. They made a full-sized scandal
disappear with the help of media and members who did not want the
public to see it.  Twitter banned postings about the laptop until
after Biden was elected. The media dismissed the story as a conspiracy
theory with some mocking the “New York Post and everyone else who got
suckered into the ridiculous Hunter Biden Laptop story. Take a bow.”

Committee Chairman Adam Schiff assured that public that “this whole
smear on Joe Biden comes from the Kremlin.”

Some 50 former intelligence officials, including Obama’s CIA directors
John Brennan and Leon Panetta, also insisted the laptop story was
likely the work of Russian intelligence.

The laptop is, of course, now recognized as genuine even by some of
the early deniers. Hunter remains under criminal investigation for
possible tax and money laundering violations. But the greatest
“reveal” is the person referred to as “the Big Guy” and “Celtic” in
these emails: President Biden.

Recently released emails reference payments to President Biden from
son’s accounts and indicate the possible commingling of funds.  Even
more embarrassing, the shared account may have been used to pay a
Russian prostitute named “Yanna.” In one text, a former secret service
agent warns Hunter (who was holed up with a prostitute in an expensive
hotel) “Come on H this is linked to Celtic’s account.”

The question is whether prosecutors will continue to act like they do
not see the elephant. Consider these established facts:

    First, it is widely believed that Hunter Biden and his uncle James
Biden, received millions in influence peddling. For his part, Hunter
only had influence and access to sell. He admits that he was a crack
addict and alcoholic all the way up to the start of his father’s
presidential campaign — in his words, “Drinking a quart of vodka a day
by yourself in a room is absolutely, completely debilitating,” as well
as “smoking crack around the clock.”

    Second, Joe Biden has continued to deny knowledge or involvement
in these foreign dealings and those denials are now directly
contradicted by emails and witnesses. Hunter himself contradicted his
father’s repeated denials. Likewise, a key business associate of
Hunter Biden, Anthony Bobulinski, directly accused Joe Biden of lying
about his involvement. Bobulinski has detailed a meeting with Joe
Biden in a hotel to go over the dealings. Past emails included
discussions of offering access to then-Vice President Biden. They also
include alleged payments to Joe Biden. In one email, there is a
discussion of a proposed equity split of “20” for “H” and “10 held by
H for the big guy?” Bobulinski confirmed that “H” was used for Hunter
Biden and that his father was routinely called “the big guy” in these
discussions.

    Third, while he was vice president, Joe Biden allowed Hunter to
fly on Air Force 2 to countries like China where he was seeking
millions. He also met with Hunter’s foreign business associates. In
2015, a State Department official flagged the possible conflicts from
Hunter’s dealings during the Obama Administration.

    Fourth, new emails suggest a commingling of funds between Hunter
and his father. Emails from Eric Schwerin, his business partner at the
Rosemont Seneca consultancy, refer to the payment of household bills
for both Joe Biden and Hunter Biden. He also notes that he was
transferring money from Joe Biden. Rosemont Seneca is directly
involved in the alleged influence peddling schemes and questionable
money transfers from Chinese and Russian sources.

    Finally, Hunter himself admitted that his missing computers files
may have been stolen by foreign agents for blackmail purposes.
Hunter’s emails claim one of his laptops may have been stolen by
Russian agents after a drug and alcohol binge with prostitutes.

Given the ongoing criminal prosecution, that would seem an ample basis
for the appointment of a special counsel. The President is mentioned
repeatedly in emails and by witnesses in relation to influence
peddling schemes and even receiving funds from shared accounts. He has
also denied knowledge that key witnesses refute, including his son.

Influence peddling is common in Washington and can be done legally.
Yet, it has also been the subject of intense criminal investigations.
For example, the FBI raided the home of Trump counsel Rudolph Giuliani
and others based on allegations of influence peddling in an ongoing
criminal investigation. The Justice Department wants to know if
Giuliani secured contracts in exchange for access or influence. The
media gleefully recounted the raids and how Giuliani may have cashed
in on his access.

It seems that the illusion depends on the specific elephant.

Houdini once said that “It is still an open question . . . as to what
extent exposure really injures a performer.” The same question can be
asked about a politician. President Biden is in full display in these
emails. The question is whether the public – or the prosecutors – want
to see him.