Coronavirus: Thread

[grarpamp]

> Fauci Exposed...

Fauci keeps digging himself deeper in stinky batshit...


Unearthed Video From 2019 Reveals Fauci Contradictions on mRNA Vaccines

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMLmCV_rjHI  Fauci warns mRNA
https://vitalstoffblog.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/wodarg_yeadon_ema_petition_pfizer_trial_final_01dec2020_en_unsigned_with_exhibits.pdf
https://www.unc.edu/posts/2021/09/23/3d-printed-vaccine-patch/

Although Dr. Anthony Fauci has spent the better part of two years
assuring the public of the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, he expressly
stated the necessity of adhering to an exhaustive three-stage clinical
trial approval process in October of 2019 for any future developments
in vaccine manufacturing. In another seemingly endless line of
historical statements which contradict the various positions Fauci has
contemporaneously, video has emerged in which the NIAID Director
expressly compromises the fundamental premise of his support of
Operation Warp Speed's mass vaccination campaign.

During the Milken Institute Future of Healthcare Summit in 2019, Fauci
joined a panel moderated by New Yorker staff writer Michael Specter
discussing the future of vaccine development. During the discussion,
the topic shifted to the premise of a universal flu vaccine. Specter
introduces the idea by stating that a the medical paradigm behind
vaccines needs to be completely changed, asking "Why don't we blow the
system up? I mean, obviously we can't just turn off the spigot on the
system that we have an say 'Oh hey, everyone in the world should get
this new vaccine we haven't given to anyone yet' but there must be
some way..." Specter, who serves as an adjunct professor of
bioengineering at Stanford University took that tenor opining that the
current methods of vaccine development through in vitro cell culture
in place for over 50 years has become anachronistic.

Fauci's conjecture to Specter's opinion was agreeable, although
moderate. He would go respond to the idea by doubling down on the
importance of adhering to the "tried and true process" in place which
has been entirely disregarded during the development of the mRNA
vaccines to fight the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic which a Chinese dissident
stated had already begun by the time the October 29th, 2019 discussion
had taken place. Fauci asserted:


    "In order to make the transition from getting out of the tried and
true egg growing which we know gives us results that can be, you know,
beneficial, I mean we've done well with that, to something that has to
be much better, you have to prove that this works and then you have to
go through all of the clinical trials: phase 1, phase 2, phase 3, and
then show that this particular product is going to be good over a
period of years. That alone, if it works perfectly, is going to take a
decade."

Fauci's statements clearly convey the importance of existing oversight
in assuring the safety and efficacy of new vaccine technologies. Yet,
much of the support for the use of mRNA technology behind the vaccines
designed to combat COVID-19 was predicated upon the idea that
traditional vaccines using attenuated viruses require an exhaustive,
decade-long process which was an unconquerable hurdle given the sense
of urgency behind the response to an on-going pandemic.

As of June, 2020, only 10 of over 133 candidates for COVID-19 vaccines
had been approved for human trial, per the World Health Organization.
Yet, by that time, the first vaccines administered under emergency use
authorizations throughout the world had been in use for over 7 months.
Despite the lack of adherence to the exhaustive regulatory process in
place, Pfizer lauded the preliminary results of its initial studies as
being tantamount to those vetted following traditional clinical
trials. Michael Yeadon, former chief scientist and Vice President of
Pfizer's Allergy and Respiratory Research Unit, and Dr. Wolfgang
Wogard filed an emergency petition seeking to halt the process put in
place to halt the ad hoc trials that the European Medicines Agency put
in place to authorize the emergency use of Pfizer's and other's
COVID-19 vaccines in the EU. A copy of the petition was also sent to
the U.S. Food and Drug Administration at the time of its filing. The
basis of the petition asserted that the trials in place which
circumvented those such as the existing three-phase clinical trial
process were "inadequate to accurately assess efficacy" of the mRNA
vaccines. The basis for this assertion was predicated upon a multitude
of issues, including the propensity for high cycle thresholds of
RT-PCR tests being a diagnostic crux used in the study.

The petitioners went on to express their concerns for the potential
crises which could emerge if the unproven vaccines were authorized for
emergency use, including the risk of antibody dependent enhancement
observed in conventional clinical trials for other mRNA vaccines, the
high risk of allergic reactions to the polythylene glycol used by
Pfizer and BioNTech to coat the lipid nanoparticles designed to
deliver mRNA, and the impact that the antibodies produced by the
response to vaccines could have in attacking the cells necessary for
the formation of placenta cells in pregnant women. Yeadon and Wodarg's
grounds for the petition convey the complexity of developing a novel
vaccine and the important of adherence to existing clinical trial
processes, a position tantamount to that which Fauci previously opined
during the Milken Institute Future of Healthcare Summit in October of
2019. Yet, despite the extensive concerns that existed which were more
relevant than every given the timing of their execution, adherence to
existing regulations were entirely abandoned in order to approve these
mRNA vaccines.

In hindsight, the discussion held by the panel including Fauci serves
as a prescient forecast for the vaccine development under Operation
Warp Speed. Rick Bright, the Director of Biomedical Advanced Research
& Development Authority at the Department of Health and Human Services
sounded close to clairvoyant as her entertained the idea that:


    "...it is not too crazy to think that an outbreak of a novel avian
virus could occur in China somewhere. We could get the RNA sequence
from that, beam it to a number of regional centers, if not local, if
not even in your home at some point and print those vaccines on
patches and self-administer them."

Though pointing out that Fauci's testimony best serves to reinforce
the issues regarding the approval and administration of mRNA vaccines
against COVID-19, it also should be used as an example of how issues
like this hidden in plane sight can offer valuable insight into the
future. Given that research akin to the possibility introduced by
Robert Bright is rapidly unfolding, the panel discussion from Milken
Institute Future of Healthcare Summit in 2019 should serve not just as
basis of conjecture against what has been put in place for us to
arrive at where we stand amidst a hurried, disjointed, and dangerous
mass vaccination campaign but also as an ominous forewarning of what
lays ahead on the path it has already paved.