USA 2020 Elections: Thread
grarpamp
grarpamp at gmail.com
Sun Nov 28 23:25:35 PST 2021
> https://www.bitchute.com/video/rS0wcnLG4djO Trump Interview 4Nov2021
>
> https://frankspeech.com/
>
> https://frankspeech.com/tv/video/summary-us-supreme-court-complaint
>
> https://americaproject.com/
>
> https://www.bitchute.com/video/bkq1QLtlQ57Y
> General_Flynn-_Patrick_Byrne_Talk_January_6th_and_2022_Election
>
> https://www.bitchute.com/video/3LHFijOQD0oy Absolute Proof
> https://www.bitchute.com/video/AaCD0xX2yAaB Absolute Interference
https://donaldjtrump.com/
https://welovetrump.com/
https://michaeljlindell.com/
https://cdn.michaeljlindell.com/downloads/fix2020first/states-v-us-and-states-compl-2021-11-23.pdf
No. ______, Original
In the Supreme Court of the United States
STATE OF [INSERT YOUR STATE],
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PRESIDENT OF THE
UNITED STATES, VICE- PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED
STATES, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED
STATES; SPEAKER OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES, PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF
THE UNITED STATES SENATE, STATE OF ARIZONA,
STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF MICHIGAN,
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, AND STATE OF
WISCONSIN,
Defendants.
BILL OF COMPLAINT
[counsel name, address]
* Counsel of Record
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Exhibits .......................................................... iv
Introduction...................................................................
1
Nature of the Action ..................................................... 4
Jurisdiction and Venue ................................................ 8
Plaintiff State raises an Article III case or
controversy. ...................................................... 9
Sovereign immunity does not bar this action. ... 10
Plaintiff State lacks an alternate remedy for
this action. ...................................................... 11
This action is timely............................................. 11
Parties ..........................................................................
12
Legal Background ....................................................... 12
Facts .............................................................................
15
The uncontrolled use of mail-in ballots in
2020 made widespread election fraud
inevitable. ....................................................... 16
Electronic voting systems are inherently
vulnerable to hacking and manipulation. ... 18
The State of Arizona's electoral votes were
unlawfully certified and counted. ................ 23
1. Arizona's election violated the
Electors' Clause. ...................................... 23
2. Audits of Maricopa County found
outcome-determinative numbers of
unlawful votes. ........................................ 24
The State of Georgia's electoral votes were
unlawfully certified and counted. ................ 29
1. The violations of Article II in Georgia
resulted in outcome-determinative
numbers of unlawful votes. .................... 30
ii
2. Georgia's use of electronic voting
machines opened the door to
electronic manipulation of the vote. ...... 34
3. The Georgia Senate Election Law
Study Subcommittee found numerous
outcome determinative numbers of
unlawful votes and concluded the
election results "must be viewed as
untrustworthy." ....................................... 37
The State of Michigan's electoral votes were
unlawfully certified and counted. ................ 39
1. The violations of Article II in
Michigan resulted in outcome-
determinative numbers of unlawful
votes. ..................................................... 39
2. Election officials' illegal acts in
Wayne County resulted in outcome
determinative numbers of unlawful
votes. ..................................................... 43
3. A "glitch" in electronic voting
machines in Antrim County wrongly
awarding 6,000 votes to Mr. Biden. ...... 46
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's
electoral votes were unlawfully certified
and counted. ................................................... 47
1. Pennsylvania's voter registration
system can be easily hacked and
manipulated. ........................................... 47
iii
2. Pennsylvania's final results show
49,141 more votes than voters and
the Secretary of State unlawfully
certified the Pennsylvania election
results. ..................................................... 49
3. Pennsylvania misled this Court and
continued to illegally count tens of
thousands of ballots received after
November 3, 2020. .................................. 52
4. The Pennsylvania Secretary of State
unconstitutionally threw out state
election integrity laws governing
mail-in ballots. ........................................ 54
The State of Wisconsin's electoral voters
were unlawfully certified and counted. ....... 57
1. The Wisconsin Election Commission
has obstructed investigations into the
November 2020 election. ........................ 58
2. The Racine County Sheriff found the
WEC committed a felony and three
misdemeanors by encouraging voter
fraud in nursing homes .......................... 60
3. The WEC's and other officials illegal
use of drop boxes in violation of
Wisconsin law .......................................... 62
4. The WEC encouraged voters to
illegally declare themselves
"indefinitely confined" thereby
avoiding ballot security requirements .. 64
5. The LAB found that 45,665 voters
used identification to register that
did not match the records on file ........... 67
iv
6. The Office of the Special Counsel's
findings of illegal votes in its First
Interim Report. ....................................... 67
7. Democrat operatives were given
access to "hidden" networks
connecting "sensitive machines" at
the ballot tabulation center in Green
Bay, WI .................................................... 69
Count I: Electors Clause ............................................ 70
Count II: Due Process ................................................. 71
Count III: Guarantee Clause ..................................... 72
Count IV: Take Care Clause ...................................... 73
Prayer for Relief .......................................................... 73
TABLE OF EXHIBITS
Memo., John Ratcliffe, Director of National
Intelligence, Views on Intelligence Community
Election Security Analysis (Jan. 7, 2021) ............... 1
Letter from Pamela S. Karlan, Principal Deputy
Assistant Attorney General, Civil Rights
Division, to Arizona Sen. Karen Fann (May 5,
2021) ..........................................................................
2
Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project,
Summary Report, Election Auditing, Key
Issues and Perspectives (2018)................................ 3
Declaration of Col. John R. Mills (USAR Ret.)
(Nov. 21, 2021) .......................................................... 4
Declaration of J. Alex Halderman (Sept. 21,
2021) ..........................................................................
5
Email, Steven Rosenberg, Fulton County Deputy
County Attorney to Garland Favorito (Sept.
27, 2021) ....................................................................
6
v
Email, Chris Harvey, Georgia Election Director,
to Larry Sampson, Murray Cty., Georgia (Dec.
2, 2020) ......................................................................
7
Sen. William Ligon, Chairman, Election Law
Study Subcommittee of the Georgia Standing
Senate Judiciary Committee (Dec. 17, 2020) ......... 8
Letter, Sen. William Ligon, Georgia State
Senate, to Donald J. Trump (Jan. 2, 2021) ............ 9
Genetski v. Benson, Case No. 20-000216-MM,
(Mich. Ct. Claims, March 9, 2021) ........................ 10
Affidavit of Jessy Jacob (Nov. 7, 2020) ..................... 11
Affidavit of William Hartman (Nov. 18, 2020)......... 12
Affidavit of Monica Palmer (Nov. 18, 2020) ............. 13
Affidavit of Lisa Gage (Dec. 10, 2020) ...................... 14
Affidavit of Ben Cotton (Apr. 8, 2021) ...................... 15
Letter, Rep. Francis X. Ryan, Pennsylvania
House of Representatives, to Rep. Scott Perry,
U.S. House of Representatives (Dec. 4, 2020) ...... 16
Wisconsin Legislative Audit Bureau Report (Oct.
2021) ........................................................................
17
Presentation, Sheriff, Racine County, Wisconsin
(Oct. 28, 2021) ......................................................... 18
First Interim Rept., Wisconsin Office of the
Special Counsel (Nov. 10, 2021) ............................ 19
Cyber Ninjas, Maricopa County Forensic
Election Audit, vol. III (Sept. 24, 2021) ................ 20
A. V. Shiva Ayyadurai, Ph.D., Pattern
Recognition Classification of Early Voting
Ballot (EVB) Return Envelope Images for
Signature Presence Detection: An Engineering
Systems Approach to Identify Anomalies to
Advance the Integrity of US. Election (Sept.
2124, 2021) .............................................................. 21
vi
Letter, Eugene A. DePasquale, Pennsylvania
Auditor General, to Tom Wolf, Governor,
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Dec. 13,
2019) ........................................................................
22
Wisconsin Elections Commission Memoranda,
To: All Wisconsin Election Officials 3 (Aug. 19,
2020) ........................................................................
23
Wisconsin Safe Voting Plan 2020 Submitted to
the Center for Tech & Civic Life, June 15,
2020, by the Mayors of Madison, Milwaukee,
Racine, Kenosha and Green Bay (Jun. 15,
2020) ........................................................................
24
1
"You will never know how much it has cost my
generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you will
make a good use of it."
John Adams
INTRODUCTION
We are in unchartered territory as a Nation.
The November 2020 election was stolen. Our Country
is divided in a manner not seen in over a century. Just
last month, 56% of respondents agreed that "it's likely
that cheating affected the outcome of the 2020
presidential election"--a 5% increase since April
2021.1 The fault for this deepening divide lies directly
with the federal and state public officials who not only
abdicated their sworn duty to support and defend the
Constitution of the United States, but in many cases
actively sought to subvert it. The Justices of this
Court can no longer ignore what the public already
sees--a time in history like that which Churchill once
characterized as the gathering storm.
Revelations of rampant lawlessness by officials
in states like Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona,
and Pennsylvania (collectively, "Defendant States")
involving outcome-changing illegal votes appear
daily. For example, in Pennsylvania, after all counties
had finally uploaded their official November 2020
election results, there were still 49,171 more votes
1 That includes 84% of Republicans, 32% of Democrats, and
54% of Independents. Rasmussen Reports, Vote-By-Mail: Most
Voters Think It Will Cause More Cheating (Oct. 11, 2021),
https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/gene
ral_politics/october_2021/vote_by_mail_most_voters_think_it_w
ill_cause_more_cheating (last visited Nov. 23, 2021).
2
than voters--just one of many examples of illegal
votes. Under express Pennsylvania law, the election
should not have been certified.
This September, it was revealed that election
officials in Maricopa County, Arizona were caught
red-handed destroying election records from the
November 2020 election--in violation of federal law--
after a court rejected the County's attempt to thwart
the Arizona Senate's investigation into the November
2020 election. That investigation also found tens of
thousands of illegal ballots, and that there were
hundreds of thousands of corrupted or missing ballot
images--on which the November 2020 election vote
count is based.
Also in September, a renowned cyber security
expert, University of Michigan Professor J. Alex
Halderman, revealed in a Georgia federal court that
he had conclusively demonstrated that Dominion
Voting Systems machines used in at least sixteen
states can be easily hacked to "steal votes."
Inexplicably, the district court denied Prof.
Halderman's request to strategically unseal his
expert report detailing these systemic
vulnerabilities for the limited purpose of
bringing it to the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure
Security Agency ("CISA") to attempt to fix these
issues before the next election. Prof. Halderman also
testified that Georgia Secretary of State
Raffensperger, a defendant in that case, refused to
even look at the report or meet with him to go over
these dangerous security vulnerabilities. The district
court's decision to bury Prof. Halderman's evidence
3
and prevent it from being shared with authorities
charged with protecting elections is unfathomable.
This October, the Racine County, Wisconsin,
Sheriff announced the results of a felony criminal
investigation of the Wisconsin Election Commission
("WEC") into illegal vote harvesting in nursing homes.
The Sheriff stated that the governing "election statute
was in fact not just broken but shattered" in all 72
counties across Wisconsin and referred the case for
prosecution. The validity of up to 50,000 ballots may
be at issue as a consequence.
Two issues regarding the November 2020
election are not in dispute. First, in the months
leading up to the November 2020 election, a few non-
legislative officials in the Defendant States used the
COVID-19 pandemic as an excuse to
unconstitutionally revise or violate their states'
election laws. Their actions had one effect: to
uniformly weaken security measures put in place by
state legislatures to protect the integrity of the vote.
These changes squarely violated the Electors Clause
of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 vesting state
legislatures with plenary authority to make election
law. These government officials then flooded the
Defendant States with millions of illegal ballots to be
sent through the mails, or placed in drop boxes, with
little or no chain of custody as required by law.2
2 See, e.g., Tiffany Morgan, Five Months After 2020 Election,
Georgia Still Has Not Produced Chain of Custody Records for
355,000 Absentee Vote by Mail Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes,
THE GEORGIA STAR NEWS, Apr. 8, 2021, available at
https://georgiastarnews.com/2021/04/08/five-months-after-2020-
election-georgia-still-has-not-produced-chain-of-custody-records-for-355000-absentee-vote-by-mail-ballots-deposited-in-
drop-boxes/ (last visited Nov. 23, 2021).
4
Second, the United States' failure to challenge
the Defendant States' violations of Article II,
including at a time when four of eight justices had
evenly split on whether to hear such violations in
October 2020, violated the Take Care Clause and the
Guarantee Clause of the Constitution commanding
that the Executive "shall take Care that the Laws be
faithfully executed" and that "the United States shall
guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican
Form of Government." A stolen election, as the
November 2020 election was, neither faithfully
executes the law nor provides a republican form of
government.
Since Marbury v. Madison this Court has, on
significant occasions, had to step into the breach in a
time of tumult, declare what the law is, and right the
ship. This is just such an occasion. In fact, it is
situations precisely like the present--when the
Constitution has been cast aside unchecked --that
leads us to the current precipice. In times such as this,
it is the duty of the Court to be a "faithful guardian[]
of the Constitution." THE FEDERALIST NO. 78, at 470
(C. Rossiter, ed. 1961) (A. Hamilton).
Against that background, the State of [insert
Your State] ("Plaintiff State") brings this action based
on the following allegations:
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list