DEATH to Rittenhouse - Kyle Wanted Dead or Alive. Prefer Dead.

[jim bell]

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
 
  On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 3:01 PM, professor rat<pro2rat at yahoo.com.au> wrote:>The people who got shot were white allies to BLM and against the police shooting of an unarmed black man.

And hundreds of people who DIDN'T get shot were also. "white allies to BLM and against the police shooting of an unarmed black man."
>Rittenhouse was there at the invitation of several right wing notices online and on the dark web. 
Are you sure about that?
I don't doubt there were some "several right wing notices online and on the dark web.".  But do you know for sure Kyle actually saw them?   And are you sure that there weren't many other NON-right wing notices?   Or will you declare that ANY such notice MUST have been "right wing"?
As if you're claiming that no centrist or left-wing person could possibly want businesses in the neighborhood protected from rioting?  That would be a terrible indictment of the morals and ethics of such people, huh?
>One of his defense witnesses ( supposedly with a media company called Real America's Voice and on Fox News a lot) was allowed to attack both BLM and ANTIFA in his testimony many times. 

What was the nature of that 'attack'?
>On the dark web, the racists, neo nazis and alt right are claiming this verdict a victory and a call to arms.
Are you implying that nobody other than "racists, neo-nazis, and alt-right" say the verdict is a "victory,"?  
I saw the videos, and I think it's clear that three people were shot AFTER they attacked Kyle Rittenhouse, and they attacked Kyle KNOWING he was armed with a long gun.  And the second and third people shot had been chasing after Kyle.
Grosskreutz couldn't continue to lie, because he learned, 15 months before the trial, that his actions had been recorded.
I think the charges actually brought were utter nonsense.  The prosecutor was obviously pandering to the braying, threatening crowds.  And during the trial, they couldn't find even one person to 'hang' the jury.  All 12 agreed, not guilty. 
"He shouldn't have been there!" is not a valid, chargeable crime.  
      Jim Bell
 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 7438 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20211123/ed8e883b/attachment.txt>