List Status

Karl gmkarl at gmail.com
Sun May 30 10:06:48 PDT 2021


[spam]

On Fri, May 28, 2021, 11:16 AM Greg Newby <gbnewby at pglaf.org> wrote:

> Hi, Karl. Yeah, it was 250 lines or so.
>
> As you noticed, I managed to break the list while trying to improve
> things. I think it's back now.
>
> Meanwhile, I've been seeing messages in my gmail folder. I added a filter
> rule to not flag cypherpunks messages as spam.
>
> For your gmail setup, are you using the web interface (i.e.,
> https://www.gmail.com or similar)? Or, are you using IMAP/POP to download
> messages to another client? I realized that if you are downloading, the
> stuff gmail filters as spam might simply not be visible.
>
> If you haven't already, try the web interface, and select the Spam folder,
> to see whether there is anything from cpunks there.
>
> Best,
>   Greg
>
> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 05:14:37PM -0400, Karl wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > Thanks so much for sharing this.  I'm okay with others on the list
> > seeing my loglines, if that's ever an issue.
> >
> > So you know, I see 250 loglines here, not 900+ .  I don't see mailman
> > bounces listed here.
> >
> > It looks like the development sources of mailman store bounce delivery
> > status notifications as of 1 month ago:
> >
> https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/commit/e1d20b316024990535aeedc54aa84cd11a668317
> > .
> >
> > I see you resolved the spamassassin configuration issue around 09:30
> > today, timezone unspecified.
> >
> > It looks like the way to log mailman bounces a bit better would be to
> > open up mailman/model/bounce.py and add temporary output to
> > BounceProcessor.register around line 80:
> >         with open('/var/tmp/' + email + '.bouncelog', 'a') as bouncelog:
> >             bouncelog.write(str(msg) + "\n")
> >
> > Bounces from me would then hopefully end up in
> > /var/tmp/gmkarl at gmail.com.bouncelog .
> >
> > On 5/27/21, Greg Newby <gbnewby at pglaf.org> wrote:
> > > Here are the 900+ logfile messages for your email address, in case you
> find
> > > anything informative.
> > >
> > > As noted, I've made a few changes. These include:
> > > - turning off outbound spamassassin for cypherpunks list traffic, via
> > > whitelist
> > > - adding a bad spamc.cf setting, then fixing it (pertains to maximum
> message
> > > length of messages, which isn't a factor in the cpunks list)
> > > - removing blacklist checking, as mentioned on the list
> > >
> > > The bounce score in Mailman isn't much of an issue: if you get
> unsubscribed,
> > > I can easily add you back. But I don't know where those bounces came
> from -
> > > Mailman doesn't provide an easy way, even for a list admin, to recover
> > > specific bounce details.
> > >
> > > I'm not paranoid about surveillance on the cypherpunks list, since
> it's an
> > > open list with open archives. The subscriber list is kept confidential
> > > within Mailman (so only I can see it), but anyone that could tap the
> network
> > > would know who messages were going to. So, it's confidential, but
> barely
> > > secure.
> > >
> > > The standard techniques like John linked to are much more likely to be
> > > damaging, or potentially damaging, to the cypherpunks list:
> > > https://cryptome.org/2012/07/gent-forum-spies.htm
> > >
> > > Meanwhile, though, it's distressing that gmail seems to be filtering. I
> > > indeed confirmed that a list message went to the spam folder, but it
> was
> > > visible there (i.e., it didn't simply disappear, for me).
> > >
> > > Best,
> > >   Greg
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 01:23:10PM -0400, Karl wrote:
> > >> >> Maybe some day a cronjob that filters logs for only people who
> post,
> > >> >> or only who have an option set, could make for public logs
> eventually
> > >> >> ...
> > >> >
> > >> > Yes, that would be aligned with the transparency that is the
> philosophy
> > >> > of
> > >> > the list.
> > >> >   Best,
> > >> >     Greg
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> grep --fixed-strings --file=one_email_address_per_line.txt
> > >> /var/log/mailman/bounce.log > public_logfile
> > >>
> > >> mailman is written in python; i'm thinking of how hackable it might
> be.
> > >>
> > >> sorry to be bugging you, it's sad the bounces don't show up in the
> > >> logs =S  really some malicious sotware could be messing with us.
> > >> cleaning logfiles is such a basic part of malicious software.
> > >
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 5896 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20210530/d82a8001/attachment.txt>


More information about the cypherpunks mailing list