Mises: Leviathan and Liberty

[grarpamp]

The Never-Ending Battle Between Leviathan And Liberty

Authored by James Bovard via The Mises Institute for Peace & Prosperity,

The notion that Americans will always be free is part of the catechism
that is force-fed to public school students. For hundreds of years,
philosophers, politicians, and reformers have touted a law of history
that assures the ultimate triumph of freedom. “Oppressed people cannot
remain oppressed forever. The urge for freedom will eventually come,”
Martin Luther King Jr. wrote in his famous “Letter from Birmingham
Jail.”

But few political follies are more hazardous than presuming that one’s
liberties are forever safe. None of the arguments on why liberty is
inevitable can explain why it has not yet arrived. Most of the human
race existed with little or no freedom for 95+ percent of recorded
history. If liberty is God’s gift to humanity, then why were most
people who ever lived on Earth denied this divine bequest?

Many efforts at limiting state power have failed almost immediately.
In the thirteenth century, oppressed English nobles revolted and
sought to bind their kings in perpetuity. King John signed the Magna
Carta in 1215, petulantly accepting a limit to his prerogative to
pillage everything in his domain. While the Magna Carta is celebrated
nowadays as the dawn of a new age, it failed to even bind the king who
signed the document. The ink on his signature was barely dry before
King John brought in foreign forces and proceeded to slaughter the
barons who forced his signature. King John died just after his
vengeance commenced, providing a respite for Englishmen. In the final
realm, the Magna Carta was simply a political pledge that was honored
only insofar as private courage and weaponry compelled sovereigns to
limit their abuses.

History is a chronology of nations pillaged by reckless regimes.
English kings recited coronation oaths that limited their power. Such
oaths were as binding as a congressional candidate’s campaign
promises. Rampaging kings sometimes converted smouldering discontent
into a raging fire of resistance. Historian Thomas Macaulay summarized
England’s path to its Glorious Revolution of 1688: “Oppression
speedily did what philosophy and eloquence … failed to do.” King James
II was ousted in 1688 and Parliament speedily enacted laws to curb all
subsequent monarchs.

The United States was the first government to be created with strict
limitations on its power, enshrined in the Constitution. As James
Madison wrote in the Federalist Papers, “If men were angels, no
government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither
external nor internal controls on government would be necessary.” The
Founders included numerous checks and balances in the Constitution to
restrain political ambition. But they were never so naïve as to
presume that a parchment barrier would keep American liberty safe in
perpetuity.

Within the first decade of the nation’s existence, Congress and
President John Adams enacted the Alien and Sedition Acts, which
destroyed freedom of the press and speech. Thomas Jefferson responded
by writing a resolution in 1799 that warned, “Free government is
founded in jealousy, not confidence…. In questions of power, then, let
no more be heard of confidence in men, but bind him down from mischief
by the chains of the Constitution.” Senator John Taylor, in his 1821
book Tyranny Unmasked, scoffed at presuming “our good theoretical
system of government is a sufficient security against actual tyranny.”

Those “chains of the Constitution” have often been illusory or merely
a placebo phantasm for government victims. Politicians perennially
invoke the Constitution to prove that citizens have no reason to fear
the government. When the House of Representatives considered the
PATRIOT Act in October 2001, Representative James Sensenbrenner (R-WI)
assured fellow members of Congress that “the bill does not do anything
to take away the freedoms of innocent citizens. Of course we all
recognize that the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution prevents the
government from conducting unreasonable searches and seizures, and
that is why this legislation does not change the United States
Constitution or the rights guaranteed to citizens of this country.”
Sensenbrenner talked as if that the mere existence of the Bill of
Rights shackled Congress. This is akin to claiming that because
automobiles have brakes, drivers can never exceed the speed limit. The
PATRIOT Act unleashed a constitutional crime wave, as the Bush
administration suspended habeas corpus and conducted waves of secret
arrests, unleashed the FBI to conduct hundreds of thousands of
warrantless searches, and entitled the National Security Agency to
vacuum up Americans’ emails and other personal data.

American presidents take an oath of office solemnly swearing to
“preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
But this has long been an empty ritual, akin to Roman emperors making
public sacrifices to pagan gods they knew did not exist. Fealty to the
Constitution has evaporated in part because philosophical trends have
long favored absolute power.

Intellectual servility has been perennially profitable and there has
never been a shortage of writers exalting supreme rulers. Writing in
1651, English philosopher Thomas Hobbes labeled the state as
Leviathan, “our mortal God.” Leviathan signifies a government whose
power is unbounded, with a right to dictate almost anything and
everything to the people under its sway. While Hobbes was reviled in
the first century after his book was published, his ideas later became
fashionable as academics rushed to echo his derision of
“tyrannophobia.” Hobbes declared that it is forever prohibited for
subjects in “any way to speak evil of their sovereign” regardless of
how badly they are abused. Hobbes offered “suicide pact sovereignty”:
to recognize a government’s existence is to automatically concede the
government’s right to destroy everything in its domain.

Hobbes profoundly influenced subsequent political philosophers,
including German philosopher G.W.F. Hegel, who trumpeted the doctrine
that history is the actualization of freedom. But Hegel was not using
“freedom” in the sense that the Founding Fathers did. Instead, Hegel
declared, “The State in-and-for-itself is the ethical whole, the
actualization of freedom.” Hegel also proclaimed that “[t]he State is
the Divine Idea as it exists on earth” and derided the notion of
freedom as individual choice as “uneducated superficiality.” Hegel’s
slavish version of freedom was difficult to distinguish from Hobbes’ s
totalitarian vision of sovereignty.

Hegel had a profound influence on communism (via Marx), fascism, and
on the most popular philosopher in Washington in recent decades.
Francis Fukuyama, a State Department functionary, hailed Hegel as the
supreme “philosopher of freedom.” In 1989, Fukuyama proclaimed the
“unabashed victory of economic and political liberalism” and boasted
that “we in the liberal West occupy the final summit of the historical
edifice.” He announced “the end of history as such: that is, the end
point of mankind’s ideological evolution and the universalization of
Western liberal democracy as the final form of human government.”

Fukuyama’s “law of history” supposedly proved that government was no
longer a threat to freedom. By making political power appear
innocuous, Fukuyama became an instant hero inside the Beltway.
Fukuyama’s “end of history” revelation was zealously embraced by the
political-media establishment. Fukuyama provided a law of history that
supposedly negated all the warnings from history about political
power.

Fukuyama’s doctrine “liberated” presidents in the name of freedom. In
his 2002 National Security Strategy, President George W. Bush echoed
Fukuyama’s view: “The great struggles of the twentieth century between
liberty and totalitarianism ended with a decisive victory for the
forces of freedom—and a single sustainable model for national success:
freedom, democracy, and free enterprise.” At a 2002 Republican
fundraiser dinner, Bush declared: “We will do whatever it takes to
make the homeland secure and to make freedom reign across the world.”
In his 2005 inaugural address, Bush whooped, “We go forward with
complete confidence in the eventual triumph of freedom.” Bush used
“freedom bosh” to sanctify his wars, torture regime, and militaristic
threats against any foreign regime that disobeyed Washington.

Why would history stop after either liberty or democracy is achieved?
The experience of many countries has been “one person, one vote, one
time.” Faith in democracy as a perpetual guarantor of freedom is
tricky to reconcile with the collapse of more than thirty democracies
around the globe in recent years. Few of the democracies that have
survived have fastidiously respected citizens’ rights.

Some libertarians are confident that, despite post–9/11 debacles,
liberty will inevitably triumph in the end. But why would freedom be
safer in the future than now? Because of a law of history that was
never enacted by God, a convocation of cardinals, or even the Arkansas
state legislature?

Presuming that America or any other nation is destined to be free
lulls people against potential oppressors. Author Robert Anton Wilson
observed, “Every national border in Europe marks the place where two
gangs of bandits got too exhausted to kill each other any more and
signed a treaty.” Similarly, the current extent of government power
marks the boundary of political onslaughts into the private domain of
liberty.

There will be no perpetual truce along this border, because political
marauders will continually create new pretexts to invade citizens’
lives. The private domain relies primarily on voluntary agreements,
independence, and peaceful coexistence. The political domain relies on
command and control, subjugation, and threats and penalties.

One of the greatest perils to the private domain is the notion that
Leviathan is more legitimate than liberty. Downplaying government
coercion is the key to this propaganda coup. For most of the American
media, compelling submission to political commands is a nonissue,
equivalent of the sun rising in the east each morning.

At the time when political power began soaring, in the 1930s, American
political thinking systematically disregarded the danger from
government. In the 1940s, as Professor David Ciepley observed, “the
State was dropped from American social science, as part of the
reaction to the rise of totalitarianism. All traces of state autonomy,
now understood as ‘state coercion,’ were expunged from the image of
American democracy.” Ciepley explained that “the emergence of Hitler
and Stalin as the ultimate social engineers led American political
scientists to … fall silent about all such activities in the American
governmental system. If totalitarianism means elite social
engineering, then American democracy must mean popular control.”
Democracy became the purported champion of freedom, because people
were taught that democracies were inherently nonoppressive. But as
Senator John Taylor warned two centuries ago, “Self-government is
flattered to destroy self-government.”

For many people, liberty is an abstraction until government agents
ravage their lives. A lucid recognition of the coercive nature of
Leviathan is vital for the defense of freedom. Leviathan’s abuses and
atrocities must be weaponized to awaken as many people as possible to
the perils they face.

“Legitimacy” spawns a political fog that obscures people’s recognition
of their own victimhood. Lenin reputedly said that the capitalists
would sell communists the rope with which the capitalists were hanged.
Similarly, Leviathan perennially provides ample gunpowder for
detonating its legitimacy. Leviathan without legitimacy is simply a
regime that must rely on brute force to compel submission to its
decrees. At some point, the brute force becomes too great for regime
lackeys to cover up.

Once legitimacy is lost, governments can collapse like overheated
soufflés. For instance, East Bloc regimes imploded much faster than
almost anyone expected. Prior to 1989, Soviet leaders believed that
cosmetic reforms would keep people subdued despite a failing economic
system. CIA analysts predicted that 100+ million people in East Europe
would remain docile and downtrodden for decades longer. But
proliferating protests in several nations spurred the Hungarian
government to permit a breach in the Iron Curtain along the Austrian
border in May 1989. That breach quickly spurred a flood of humanity
rushing to escape communism, taking with them the tattered remnants of
regimes’ legitimacy. Six months later, the Berlin Wall was breached
and governments fell like dominos. On Christmas Day, Romanian soldiers
celebrated by lining their dictator and his wife up in front of a
stone wall and executing them.

Most contemporary governments have more popular support than Soviet
Bloc regimes received in the 1980s. But sustained abuses can be an
acid drip that eventually topples any government regardless of its
purported mandate. More Americans believe in witches, ghosts, and
astrology nowadays than trust the federal government. In the covid-19
era, America is degenerating into a cage keeper democracy, where
voters merely select the politicians who place them under house
arrest.

Expecting liberty to permanently triumph would require rulers to
miraculously become selfless if not self-sacrificing. But, as Hayek
warned in his essay “Why the Worst Get on Top,” power is a magnet for
the dregs of humanity. Faith in the state will continue reviving as
long as some people feel entitled to domineer other people. Political
action pays a higher premium on deceit than almost any other human
activity and thus will remain perilous to everything decent. “Eternal
vigilance is the price of liberty,” as our forefathers recognized in
the nineteenth century.

To presume that liberty is inevitable is to absolve oneself from
fighting oppression. As soon as people drop the reins on government,
politicians will leash the people. Rather than hoping for an “end of
history” triumph, people must battle forever to defend their rights.
As long as individuals continue to defy oppressors, the seeds of
resistance will produce bountiful harvests of freedom in better times.