My blog post on FOIAs, executive function, Alan Turing, avoiding propaganda

Douglas Lucas dal at riseup.net
Tue Jun 15 19:03:37 PDT 2021


Thanks coderman!

On 6/16/21 1:32 AM, coderman wrote:
> 
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Monday, June 14, 2021 3:50 AM, Douglas Lucas <dal at riseup.net> wrote:
> ...
>> Anyway, this latest entry to my blog is at:
>> https://douglaslucas.com/blog/2021/06/13/foias-executive-function/
> 
> 
> hello Doug!
> 
> you mention,
> 
>> Now I’m confronting the confusing question of whether I can appeal
>> them at all, since some laws/policies require appeals to be filed
>> within, say, 90 days of the adverse determination. I’ve missed many
>> of those deadlines, and I’m currently trying to figure out if I
>> have to start completely over with brand new filings on the same
>> subject matters. But then, can’t the agency just say the new filing
>> is denied because it’s identical to the past filing that was
>> denied? Yet would that still open up a new 90-day window for an
>> appeal? In any case, I don’t want to end up waiting years and years
>> again between my new request and the new adverse determination.
>> I’ll ask the MuckRock experts for help on appealing.
> 
> 
> i am in the same boat, and in fact there is a long record of federal
> agencies using silent denials ("we sent it, we promise") to force the
> timeout on appeals for denied requests.
> 
> you will have to submit a *new* request, which will be denied, and
> you'll want to watch it, because again, they don't always send proper
> notifications.
> 
> once you see the denial come across, file the appeal, and
> specifically state how their claimed exemptions don't apply. E.g.
> this is in the public interest, this subject is no longer sensitive,
> etc.
> 
> good luck! :)
> 
> 
> best regards,
> 
>


More information about the cypherpunks mailing list