The Daily Beast: Devin Nunes Says 'Republicans Have No Way to Communicate'—on Fox News

[Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0]

On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 01:21:24 +0000 (UTC)
jim bell <jdb10987 at yahoo.com> wrote:

>  On Monday, January 11, 2021, 10:57:30 PM PST, Zenaan Harkness <zen at freedbms.net> wrote:
>  
>  
>  On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 06:24:31PM +0000, coderman wrote:
> > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> >> On Monday, January 11, 2021 7:26 AM, jim bell <jdb10987 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > >Jim Bell's comment:
> > >
> > > >Again:. This is a blatant Anti-trust violation.
> > >
> > >> See Sherman and Clayton Antitrust acts.
> > 
> >> Jim, when every provider out there rejects your platform for facilitating treason and mob violence, it's not anti-trust - it's common sense and national consensus!
> 
> >Aka "censorship is the new national concensus".
> 
> >A stunning position for a purported anarchist to take...
> 
> 
> It's not clear to which comment you are responding.


	it's clear he was responding to agent coderman not you. 



> While I do agree that a tiny bit of Federal Government research planted a tiny 'seed' in designing the Internet Protocol,


	See, jim bell, another technofascist, brazenly lying about the most basic facts of 'US history' and, like the typical randroid he is, pretending that the US government isn't HEAVILY involved in ALL of the 'private' sector's businesses. Oh no, it was just a 'tiny seed'.




> The way I see it, government (and mostly the Federal Government) CAUSED, at least indirectly (and somewhat directly, too) the problems we have been seeing with the censorship in the major Socialist-Media 


	Yeah the trillionaire technofascists from joogle, fukerbook and all the rest are 'socialists'. And intel is a 'capitalist' business. 



>(What I call 'Social Media").   I say that at this moment, the biggest threat to our freedom, at least the most immediate and imminent threat right now, comes from companies named Google, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, and Apple.  


	And when did mr. bell realize that his goverment, I mean, the 'private' sector, is a threat to freedom? Why, twatter became a 'threat to freedom' when he banned the orange monkey, emperor of the trumpofascists.



> Consider:  When Facebook decided to offer a service, did it string up it own data links, all over the country?  No, it piggy-backed onto an already-existing system, which once was called "Arpanet" but was eventually split into "Internet" and "Milnet".

	yeah, facebook is the arpanet, you just discovered that? 



> We've had a situation where for years, Facebook and Twitter, etc, appeared to not 'play sides'.  They lobbied for Section 320, which gave them serious advantages, but knowingly with the requirement that they not censor.  (except, arguably, certain minor kinds of censorship not relevant to this discussion).

	LMAO! Fucking dishonest garbage. 'Minor censorship' Fukerbook twatter and the rest of the arpanet 'deparments' operated in the way they operate today since day zero. The trumpofascits just 'realized' how bad the arpanet is when things didn't (completely) go their way. 

	Because in reality the trumpofascists and the rest of 'conservatives' are hardly opposed to US fascism, just like the orange monkey is a billionaire oligarch from jew york city. 


	as to the rest of the 'proposal' yeah go ask the pentagon to shutdown the arpanet, no doubt the 'US government' will 'regulate' the 'private sector' to 'protect' the 'little guy'.