much cesorship, now including the cp list

[Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0]

On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 17:07:05 -0500
Karl <gmkarl at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 1/9/21, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 <punks at tfwno.gf> wrote:
> > On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 22:03:23 +0100
> > Stefan Claas <spam.trap.mailing.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> We all know that, for example, IPv6 would allow all citizens on this
> >> planet to have an own dedicated IPv6, if it would roll out.
> >
> >
> > 	ah yes. And don't forget to tatoo the unique per-subject, SORRY, per
> > 'citizen' address on the subject's, I MEAN 'citizen's' forehead.
> 
> too negative, harmful

	
	Actually, you're completely wrong. My comment is perfectly valid and isn't harmful at all. What is harmful is the idea of LINKING EVEN MORE IDENTIFIERS TO PEOPLE. It's an idea that would make anonimity even weaker than it currently is. 

	There is no need for more addresses and you can run servers at home without any New IPv6 Bullshit.