[archive] wasn't unsubscribed Fwd: You have been unsubscribed from the cypherpunks mailing list
Karl
gmkarl at gmail.com
Fri Jan 1 04:19:37 PST 2021
I received, I think over 30 emails from this list, after unsubscribing
from it. I've noticed different emails in my inbox than in the list
archives, but I haven't looked through them carefully to see whether
the sets are the same or different [i have trouble picking out text].
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: cypherpunks-bounces at lists.cpunks.org
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 16:42:45 -0800
Subject: You have been unsubscribed from the cypherpunks mailing list
To: gmkarl at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
Delivered-To: gmkarl at gmail.com
Received: by 2002:a2e:b816:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u22csp11135341ljo;
Tue, 29 Dec 2020 16:42:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxkdqmeuHByOP6+QZsmiZvbq9odYESJ6H3Ic2H21+4UKNFdgf8lL1HJNfe93Ln6BE0WfrKQ
X-Received: by 2002:a63:6fce:: with SMTP id k197mr23376173pgc.423.1609288975243;
Tue, 29 Dec 2020 16:42:55 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1609288975; cv=none;
d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
b=s+X7OUSbEq3+7SfxU3ApC7vU6PaFi/Bn5RsGEHIiSyGc8baYtLbtbZTKdxcs8j33uZ
k41DGpKatrqseJME4+QA0mlSKjpqa1jArx2qmCFa5xk6wma3aMlW5ZEVsiceRxuaxIFm
1Ow/5zihSXCcv4fK/jXE7Q9dbTYWiw10HQV+8srMo0Zt45XKSIBhDKO2KJXTGt6r9GD3
0Mg8WhCvjzdab1Q/Edifd4ai0Acy9Qd8+/ft0bDWcImA+pzmH/xTJpMIpolzG4RUw8Np
coVnQqNnU7ByB06z/gQEdIFEW3vOqDPNh1PDsvIEhqetqa5BECCRICY1hfVgeWIP3vKF
ALiQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
h=sender:errors-to:list-id:precedence:date:message-id:to:from:subject
:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version;
bh=47DEQpj8HBSa+/TImW+5JCeuQeRkm5NMpJWZG3hSuFU=;
b=DkE7NRZ9AuaNjn+dNn71LNLJzsP6n1givmxfH7PPh4vhXt/MSgH8gJkWIQzstZGKFW
7HGxhQnXrOHWigvwlyWJ9WLPTOk2smF8VE4YFu6PFHFCT2D2U+6+hQndf5bOfQfttJkc
mM7T1VzJfv/jNEkRIg6H8GIZxWr3yiUXrNwTyRJLabSRNzfrswSJOixLVX+HLnwdCJOD
/IpjJ4c3Mic3jiFGfo83Un4UcUA4xRprbsyedbpT0MZAzWe9j2qT5Ky5xkJ00YbvyXPx
fwJ/B61UVdB6kUw3X0lr688xAbBwUglSedxLxhrcWxpvGkC0s68ZDemZdx4ZsMA5xzg9
0z2w==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: domain of cypherpunks-bounces at lists.cpunks.org designates 65.50.255.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=cypherpunks-bounces at lists.cpunks.org;
dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=lists.cpunks.org
Return-Path: <cypherpunks-bounces at lists.cpunks.org>
Received: from pglaf.org (mail.pglaf.org. [65.50.255.19])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a1si41381299pfd.314.2020.12.29.16.42.54
for <gmkarl at gmail.com>;
Tue, 29 Dec 2020 16:42:55 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of cypherpunks-bounces at lists.cpunks.org designates 65.50.255.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=65.50.255.19;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: domain of cypherpunks-bounces at lists.cpunks.org designates 65.50.255.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=cypherpunks-bounces at lists.cpunks.org;
dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=lists.cpunks.org
Received: by pglaf.org (Postfix, from userid 116)
id A0BC011C2CB5; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 16:42:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail.pglaf.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
FSL_BULK_SIG,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,PYZOR_CHECK autolearn=no
autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from mail.pglaf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pglaf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 524E811C2EFD
for <gmkarl at gmail.com>; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 16:42:46 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Subject: =?utf-8?q?You_have_been_unsubscribed_from_the_cypherpunks_mailin?=
=?utf-8?q?g_list?=
From: cypherpunks-bounces at lists.cpunks.org
To: gmkarl at gmail.com
Message-ID: <mailman.0.1609288965.1095.cypherpunks at lists.cpunks.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 16:42:45 -0800
Precedence: bulk
X-BeenThere: cypherpunks at lists.cpunks.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
List-Id: The Cypherpunks Mailing List <cypherpunks.lists.cpunks.org>
X-List-Administrivia: yes
Errors-To: cypherpunks-bounces at lists.cpunks.org
Sender: "cypherpunks" <cypherpunks-bounces at lists.cpunks.org>
-------------- next part --------------
Delivered-To: gmkarl at gmail.com
Received: by 2002:a2e:b816:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u22csp12807721ljo;
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 18:59:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4bc1:: with SMTP id o1mr24437684lfq.232.1609469991762;
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 18:59:51 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=3; a=rsa-sha256; t=1609469991; cv=pass;
d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
b=VH/pqJ4WrdpF84fhrJxQHny1st61YgrJMpe0I3pek9r54EEOsWuC4C0RSgghwPnRFj
zF+i8dO3/I+BnUbWVOqaVgzTpobV6fY/5FVgxlbJQE1XGXaKczrBtx/9HnCQ5X1avpeU
qzKNxvWPARGrAFiChAbim/SRZ+TGPCz1CVTCU1SJU5Ovyql6nmzGCv/pwF/ojYnuSKix
txXz/SWkfk6LVrdIYYK9r27QPQ5rYS/Pz5TLaVBom5MElHvkcTV0AV7I9PinOHKG2q0Y
lkk9T1m+EJvNTCbeOpA+YlHxlxfMYMFu+N7+nFGzFbF5J45qsHfGTdNbiJIvdOGj7Luw
6+pQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=3; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
h=sender:errors-to:list-subscribe:list-help:list-post:list-archive
:list-unsubscribe:list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:to
:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:dkim-signature
:delivered-to:delivered-to:delivered-to;
bh=amGFHOsdw+PGYKEPDyf81PppkPEmzj5sMCMIuPGUwZE=;
b=pdIBuyR2cwc/wFugg8htAuSgFRadCDDKTQUmTryKsSYFYclKI8zcBzIp0LibzkJjD1
k+AR4QWUiAnvPWHOEyEIF9sU9vCvzlB9pr8gW+IFskNR/2PeAKIrPGGoCZPeHqZ0oj+Z
GG1IfHUWSXSMGJZ4G0WEtzggKUrNzWAahlPfSiBQ6o7Hi8IcUO++Ox3YwEjOBRB6m+lb
BqJTFrt6g06P7HEuQfWCV2oo+JbaAcGy+HmjDEduyGCRwpGakncGEZMf1zwHisMMdRyq
o3Kq7Ls17V3N+iBPvmRhQLX9kGQB/Pg/XYMrwoBdGKjUG0t82C3oZlGa8x6MlfiefK6C
frcQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=3; mx.google.com;
dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=kJYSfQbp;
arc=pass (i=2 spf=pass spfdomain=gmail.com dkim=pass dkdomain=gmail.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=gmail.com);
spf=pass (google.com: domain of baffo32+caf_=gmkarl=gmail.com at gmail.com designates 209.85.220.41 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="baffo32+caf_=gmkarl=gmail.com at gmail.com";
dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
Return-Path: <baffo32+caf_=gmkarl=gmail.com at gmail.com>
Received: from mail-sor-f41.google.com (mail-sor-f41.google.com. [209.85.220.41])
by mx.google.com with SMTPS id 18sor11428446lfp.188.2020.12.31.18.59.51
for <gmkarl at gmail.com>
(Google Transport Security);
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 18:59:51 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of baffo32+caf_=gmkarl=gmail.com at gmail.com designates 209.85.220.41 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.41;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=kJYSfQbp;
arc=pass (i=2 spf=pass spfdomain=gmail.com dkim=pass dkdomain=gmail.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=gmail.com);
spf=pass (google.com: domain of baffo32+caf_=gmkarl=gmail.com at gmail.com designates 209.85.220.41 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="baffo32+caf_=gmkarl=gmail.com at gmail.com";
dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
Authentication-Results: mx1.riseup.net;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="kJYSfQbp";
dkim-atps=neutral
Authentication-Results: pglaf.org;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="kJYSfQbp";
dkim-atps=neutral
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:delivered-to:delivered-to:delivered-to
:dkim-signature:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:content-transfer-encoding:precedence:list-id:list-unsubscribe
:list-archive:list-post:list-help:list-subscribe:errors-to:sender;
bh=amGFHOsdw+PGYKEPDyf81PppkPEmzj5sMCMIuPGUwZE=;
b=t68ZynF2OO2tq9rfp83kUayZQM5EP5Sp2O69+2uoh2aI8MNpffj5xINRcttkAUXv8j
KJ1QCVemelTOw1n+dFMXvjpNRGI+UM82TUgF6UUMetPTrqUDLxSx7NMmrOPYBPHG8Hak
LhOqu/CEJmXQ7hCyluLibM+4tHLOR2lAz9B4S9npDXVhcLx+VKIa9rJRoM3h4iOjYhBj
qNpPajgWQDTxtpqfGi/WRuR9+kJ0b9ooBCl/7OFNkf8CClDIoXhJaQg805EgftbHtOdk
AMydi1yg7/Yx5FBRt0i7KoDQJLBbWBhJ0bTwEVINOTLwjaqJXwiRAdMFAwmilddHoz2V
+Hdg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530/15Q9204occso+y3hLR64qih76XgnpQk01nglCMoVEnU2hLFs
wqZd7MQ7ZNUMDq4dSXb41j0qfXvXGghMOnJvhNKviz6uGnjhq5PFkA==
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4a62:: with SMTP id q2mr24215345lfp.188.1609469991452;
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 18:59:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Forwarded-To: gmkarl at gmail.com
X-Forwarded-For: baffo32 at gmail.com gmkarl at gmail.com
Delivered-To: baffo32 at gmail.com
Received: by 2002:ac2:51da:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u26csp13013554lfm;
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 18:59:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:b09:: with SMTP id h9mr56571158ejl.155.1609469985482;
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 18:59:45 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1609469985; cv=pass;
d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
b=Pgb9hVgptZIBqf5R3Cy25foeLZSxtF8XZtSfCjHew8uvDDu1kwAiZvAdBltVwn0o61
SMplHA9S8wOzLVcYYdYiY8d2aVgRfHbhy9cr1khHP9uBEDGjpYkKn9VfjcVvEIpK7xm7
4Qtk+R0qxxE+gl1g/PQybgUiTLqlUEAab+YhE3MhO33siNqFillppMUDPl9pakLZxhq7
P904ta35hokdq1MZ58X5eACySl+gdW58+dwUoYayk4R8FnyDSooeG6KoeHu3qkc+ijYP
IP8OzyVlbHzAByu3gFDsbYYm2glX09Wctj5FfjZ+N6VOMNEOMmVcvR/SAMbUgaSoCcei
RFHw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
h=sender:errors-to:list-subscribe:list-help:list-post:list-archive
:list-unsubscribe:list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:to
:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:dkim-signature
:delivered-to:delivered-to;
bh=amGFHOsdw+PGYKEPDyf81PppkPEmzj5sMCMIuPGUwZE=;
b=YTMtVayhZoYHL2LkqGnquIr1jzXdWkNU4E3wTuiv0Y2QAxWZk5v/V5+77lWcN9dP1w
2Wc6BOD7pikCQrUbUOtF0hIx295QVlP/DwEe17MVngrLiOKdBbnLncPpk5ZTROKQUdob
H3xEPw66fnnI0PaBro9FaqrBQt7rzkdg3QW9jhR2nI4MFyQiGEQ4AmT+oL5D1bFuVVgB
7Uw3Ku+DrxyjzvnCg1J3/0cClWTGew6tRRBcUAlb9BEJBqynUVqb/BAd0UAhYY7Jdxgd
5s0R+6s7J99Tolg/LGhOcykG1JgIw0f530IPtFZUubcJ9/g3doTQnL7jx+dJ9reWyYAG
6c2Q==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com;
dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=kJYSfQbp;
arc=pass (i=1 dkim=pass dkdomain=gmail.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=gmail.com);
spf=pass (google.com: domain of 0xloem+caf_=baffo32=gmail.com at gmail.com designates 209.85.220.41 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="0xloem+caf_=baffo32=gmail.com at gmail.com";
dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
Return-Path: <0xloem+caf_=baffo32=gmail.com at gmail.com>
Received: from mail-sor-f41.google.com (mail-sor-f41.google.com. [209.85.220.41])
by mx.google.com with SMTPS id a21sor35342946ejf.71.2020.12.31.18.59.45
for <baffo32 at gmail.com>
(Google Transport Security);
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 18:59:45 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of 0xloem+caf_=baffo32=gmail.com at gmail.com designates 209.85.220.41 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.41;
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:4243:: with SMTP id np3mr54844635ejb.212.1609469985107;
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 18:59:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Forwarded-To: baffo32 at gmail.com
X-X-Forwarded-For: 0xloem at gmail.com baffo32 at gmail.com
Delivered-To: 0xloem at gmail.com
Received: by 2002:ab4:a744:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id fg4csp12265980ecb;
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 18:59:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:d70e:: with SMTP id y14mr15764165pju.9.1609469738168;
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 18:55:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwS5JrxhVAXaZyU08U+bb4uabEmh8LhA/Z9q3srLYe5XrzXCNKj8ZPc25iWmtQnUoGUMMKA
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:d70e:: with SMTP id y14mr15763864pju.9.1609469731324;
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 18:55:31 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1609469731; cv=none;
d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
b=veGYzKo/AcIwr9Bn/mJyYiMMsQpMKdTj2zDlsjvbcXZKGLrEtanebC4r+7UQCZ0pcp
x6K/lkS7X+c1jo+shsHuws20OfCKWB5ciX4vepW9ZUcqbqfXPtFHef/saQ7lX4B3UV0q
NXw+W/3oXhvmxZYxUeBZxhUUWwbYKE2y9wK9cGkiv9h2LAtau/Uwkr4Y2qeKjl8DYa9H
ZfAgSBk5PUdUypXND/uagZ7nOBP7jaHgZS+GCXwbBOm9Ry8YSu1jb0n1dYJo9dylHfrk
fVrWS3wHcWPl0OwwtJs7bxTdlxNrRU+zZ6hMHWu0siVXqWwBVA2lKUwkDhveDs2WT7nO
jS/w==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
h=sender:errors-to:list-subscribe:list-help:list-post:list-archive
:list-unsubscribe:list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:to
:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:dkim-signature
:delivered-to;
bh=amGFHOsdw+PGYKEPDyf81PppkPEmzj5sMCMIuPGUwZE=;
b=kmsydRt+19qOrejGGsPafXkY6siCSQFYC8CTfMdnsXhXynONgq8ftxc62j5ni2hQMC
YctjSVZzHOB7BhL7ji57AOdqbfTFEw9vs96Ex9X624x/MDuvjlc6zZwdieuXPnuD89pc
RX/AltdGC2vZszquCx041mmyZjRctayqUW0MrhYpmAyueczB+zwl/YA6pa9PMPFNKX4l
Na8jjO2zwZVnFgGZgrpt1hY4jnq05Y+Okq6e/6W7qE8G0M2bXIdwjJmeJUyudZddn0Fe
zHMNFGxQiR7/zpWvi1poOB19NA6SmQBaBpr2QpKDBqzUTMbSJuPfuktrMHD3Y2eSi6GS
aBzA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;
dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=kJYSfQbp;
spf=fail (google.com: domain of cypherpunks-bounces at lists.cpunks.org does not designate 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=cypherpunks-bounces at lists.cpunks.org;
dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
Return-Path: <cypherpunks-bounces at lists.cpunks.org>
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net. [198.252.153.129])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p15si4906339pgh.341.2020.12.31.18.55.31
for <0xloem at gmail.com>
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256);
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 18:55:31 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: fail (google.com: domain of cypherpunks-bounces at lists.cpunks.org does not designate 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender) client-ip=198.252.153.129;
Received: from pglaf.org (mail.pglaf.org [65.50.255.19])
by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6V4k26rGzFf3M;
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 18:55:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pglaf.org (Postfix, from userid 116)
id F217311C0670; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 18:55:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail.pglaf.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,URIBL_SBL,
URIBL_SBL_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from mail.pglaf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pglaf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C630211C036D;
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 18:54:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: cypherpunks at cpunks.org
Delivered-To: cypherpunks at cpunks.org
Received: by pglaf.org (Postfix, from userid 116)
id 6644911C0380; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 18:54:24 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.218.44;
helo=mail-ej1-f44.google.com; envelope-from=grarpamp at gmail.com;
receiver=<UNKNOWN>
Received: from mail-ej1-f44.google.com (mail-ej1-f44.google.com
[209.85.218.44])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pglaf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 414C311C0265
for <cypherpunks at cpunks.org>; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 18:54:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ej1-f44.google.com with SMTP id w1so27047764ejf.11
for <cypherpunks at cpunks.org>; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 18:54:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=amGFHOsdw+PGYKEPDyf81PppkPEmzj5sMCMIuPGUwZE=;
b=kJYSfQbpERGc5htr0rySaBFc5CbbuwtrOPNk9hEnyMwNurBSwGK1E+PyGwpdyiSYHW
3kXbSWQ86+eb4gvSQ1FAQAXhPnlC8c61yQGBkqwuwn2IZeD7CPXF6hsTNtoAf83uPBtr
xH9moGRG04QaSJIFlz3WOwqSJDWLVagkUJM1wniJInfWm0mz/7W8XQ7lr0DKXJWKsslj
zjT4GsrpI64eNfKxWMlduHwVCuG3wyGCJd+ez5wcfXG43tqgfl9B8sGR4R23BmknEYyz
vTcjIMGNMRXcAkfniBsqXncwM/UKg8xKxnqLkH+qHZG1zBccg7Ab6Qgurh5P1oqcWkAY
YThg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b002:: with SMTP id
v2mr56150383ejy.531.1609469593496;
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 18:53:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a54:3d8d:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 18:53:13
-0800 (PST)
From: grarpamp <grarpamp at gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 21:53:13 -0500
Message-ID: <CAD2Ti2_AVD2PrQfFi=P7SgPacxkpj34h+wMGTuhyK-QfkX0CNA at mail.gmail.com>
Subject: COINTELPRO: 1970's - Old News to 2020's DeepState Ops re BLM Antifa
Corona Elections Laptop
To: cypherpunks at cpunks.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BeenThere: cypherpunks at lists.cpunks.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Cypherpunks Mailing List <cypherpunks.lists.cpunks.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.cpunks.org/mailman/options/cypherpunks>,
<mailto:cypherpunks-request at lists.cpunks.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks>
List-Post: <mailto:cypherpunks at lists.cpunks.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cypherpunks-request at lists.cpunks.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.cpunks.org/mailman/listinfo/cypherpunks>,
<mailto:cypherpunks-request at lists.cpunks.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: cypherpunks-bounces at lists.cpunks.org
Sender: "cypherpunks" <cypherpunks-bounces at lists.cpunks.org>
https://www.nytimes.com/1975/02/24/archives/exoperative-says-he-worked-for-=
fbi-to-disrupt-political-activities.html
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3D25595897
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO
"
Ex=E2=80=90Operative Says He Worked for F.B.I. to Disrupt Political Activit=
ies Up to '74
By John M. Crewdson; Special to The New York Times
February 24, 1975
WASHINGTON, Feb. 23 =E2=80=94 Despite assurances by the Justice Department
that the Federal Bureau of Investigation's controversial
Counterintelligence Program was halted in April, 1971, a former
undercover operative says that the bureau continued as late as last
June to employ program=E2=80=90style, techniques against domestic political
groups.
The former operative, Joseph A. Burton, told The New York Times in a
series of recent interviews of activities he carried out for the
F.B.I. that appear similar to several of the categories of =E2=80=9Cdirty
tricks=E2=80=9D that characterized the Counterintelligence Program, or
Cointelpro, effort.
Mr. Burton's account included examples of bogus documents, informants
and sham =E2=80=9Crevolutionary=E2=80=9D front groups used to disrupt a var=
iety of
political activities in this country.
He also told of =E2=80=9Cinfiltrating=E2=80=9D labor unions and, with other=
F.B.I.
undercover operatives, of reporting to the F.B.I. on the Republican
National Convention at Miami Beach in 1972, and of encouraging and
assisting demonstations against the Nixon Administration over the
Watergate scandals.
F.B.I. Challenges Assertions
An F.B.I. spokesman termed many of Mr. Burton's allegations =E2=80=9Cdistor=
ted
or false=E2=80=9D in a statement issued today.
The spokesman reiterated that the bureau's =E2=80=9CCointelpro effort had n=
ot
continued beyond April, 1971, and maintained that the F.B.I. had not
instructed Mr. Burton to join or report on any labor unions and had no
knowledge of his involvement in any =E2=80=9Cviolent=E2=80=9D demonstration=
s during
the Miami convention.
Cointelpro's operation is expected to be investigated by the select
committees that the Senate and House of Representatives have recently
set up to examine intelligence gathering by Federal agencies.
Cointelpro was described in a report by the Justice Department last
November as a 17=E2=80=90 year attempt to disrupt, expose or neutralize suc=
h
organizations as the communist party and the Ku Klux Klan.
In making the Cointelpro report public, William B. Saxbe, then the
Attorney General, disclosed that such activities =E2=80=9Cwere implemented =
at
various times during the period from 1956 to 1971. when all programs
were discontinued.=E2=80=9D
No Renewal Asked
Mr. Saxbe, who became Ambassador to India earlier this month, said
that during his tenure as Attorney General he had not been asked to
consider the reinstatement of any Counterintelligence Programs against
domestic groups and could foresee no circumstances under which he
would do so.
He also pointed out that Clarence M. Kelley, the F.B.I. director,
cautioned his agents in December, 1973, when the existence of
Cointelpro was made public, that they must not =E2=80=9Cengage in any
investiga tive activity which could abridge in any way=E2=80=9D the
constitutional rights of American citizens.
In a subsequent speech to Duke University law students, Mr. Kelley
affirmed that he would not direct the bureau to enter into domestic
counterintelligence efforts without first consulting the Attorney
General and the President.
Mr. Burton, who lives in Tampa, Fla., said that he and other
undercover intelligence agents operated bogus =E2=80=9CCommunist=E2=80=9D
organizations, set up with the assistance of the F.B.I., to help them
gain a foothold with radicals in their communities and with other
revolutionary groups around the country.
=E2=80=98Formed Red Star=E2=80=99 Group
For more than two years, Mr. Burton headed the =E2=80=9CRed Star Cadre,=E2=
=80=9D
ostensibly a pro=E2=80=90Communist Chinese organization that he said he for=
med
in May, 1972, =E2=80=9Cat the direction of the bureau,=E2=80=9D and directe=
d until he
left the bureau's employ in July, 1974.
The F.B.I., he said, supplied him with everything from the name to
operating funds to Tshirts, bearing a large red star and the legend
=E2=80=9CFight Back,=E2=80=9D that he and his radical comrades were to demo=
nstrations.
Mr. Burton, a 42=E2=80=90year=E2=80=90old auctioneer and antique dealer, sa=
id he
became involved with the F.B.I. after he was invited by a co=E2=80=90worker=
at
a Tampa janitorial service to join the Communist party.
Mr. Burton said he advised the F.B.I.'s Tampa field office of the
invitation and was visited the next day by two agents, who persuaded
him to adopt a revolutionary guise and to try to infiltrate radical
groups in the Tampa area. He said he was later asked to infiltrate
other groups in the United States and Canada.
The function of the Red Star Cadre, he said, was to =E2=80=9Cmake other
organizations come to us and want to discuss ideology.=E2=80=9D
Attracted Members
He was successful in this, he said, as well as in attracting as
members of his cadre a number of local radicals in whom the F.B.I. was
interested.
Mr. Burton said he was later told by the F.B.I. that his efforts in
Tampa were part of larger attempt by the bureau to find and cut off
funds believed to be flowing to Maoist groups in this country from
China.
To provide a headquarters for the cadre, Mr. Burton said, he opened a
junk store, the Red Star Swap Shop, for which the F.B.I. provided half
the overhead expenses while allowing him to keep the profits it
produced.
The shop quickly became a gathering place for radicals in Tampa, Mr.
Burton said, and he was soon reporting to the bureau not only on the
cadre membership, which at its peak numbered less than 20, but also on
anyone who ventured into the store, =E2=80=9Ceven if they came in to buy.=
=E2=80=9D
At one point, he said, the approached him with a plan to conceal
recording and filming equipment in the store's air=E2=80=90conditioning
system. He said he rejected the proposal because, if the equipment was
discovered, it might =E2=80=9Cget me killed.=E2=80=9D
Sent to Miami Beach
As the fledgling Tampa group became known to other radical
organizations around the country, Mr. Burton said he was called upon
by the Surea to leave the city in connection with his work.
His first out=E2=80=90of=E2=80=90town assignment, he said, was to =E2=80=9C=
cover=E2=80=9D the
demonstrations at the Republican National Convention in 1972 in Miami
Beach, where he and other Red Star members traveled at the F.B.I.'s
expense.
While his =E2=80=9Ccomrades=E2=80=9D protested or slept in a large tent in =
Flamingo
Park, also paid for by the agency, Mr. Burton said he slipped away to
telephone periodic reports to the bureau's Miami office.
During one report, he said, the Miami agents =E2=80=9Csuggested that I try =
to
get into one of the =E2=80=98affinity groups=E2=80=99 which ended up later =
=E2=80=98trashing=E2=80=99
the taxicabs=E2=80=9D around the convention site.
But he said he demurred on the ground that =E2=80=9Cthe type of Left
philosophy that I was expounding at that time would not have condoned
my doing that.=E2=80=9D
=E2=80=9CThe only thing I helped to do,=E2=80=9D he said, =E2=80=9Cwas inci=
te people to turn
over one of the buses and then told them that if they really wanted to
blow the bus up, to stick a rag in the gas tank and light it.=E2=80=9D
The protesters, he said, were unable to overturn the vehicle.
=E2=80=98Sense of Importance=E2=80=99
Asked why he had agreed to undertake such tasks in return for
relatively little money or security, Mr. Burton, who never graduated
from high school, replied:
=E2=80=98Most people work in intelligence because it gives you sense of
importance, a sense of being worthwhile and doing something worthwhile
instead of mopping floors.
=E2=80=9CI felt like, being the person that I am, the social position that =
I'm
in, the educational background and everything, that this was something
I could give to my country.=E2=80=9D
The experiences that followed the Miami trip, however, according to
Mr. Burton, led gradually to frustration and, finally, to concern
about the legality and propriety of what he and others were doing in
the bureau's behalf.
=E2=80=9CWhen the F.B.I. came to me,=E2=80=9D he said, =E2=80=9CI felt hono=
red, the most
trusted person in town. After I got to know them a little oloser, I
said, =E2=80=98We got a monster running around in this country.=E2=80=99 I =
hate to say
that, but that's the way I feel about it.
Opposed Disruption
=E2=80=9CI don't see anything wrong with gleaning intelligence, but do see =
it
with setting up an espionage agency in order to glean that
intelligence and, at the same time, to do disruptive, disorganizing
types of things.=E2=80=9D
Mr. Burton conceded that =E2=80=9CI don't like the left.=E2=80=9D
=E2=80=9CThe real solution to the left,=E2=80=9D he went on, =E2=80=9Cis to=
solve our social
problems in the country, and then the left has no inroad. But until we
can do that, then I think we should operate under the law.=E2=80=9D
He said he had not yet received a reply to a letter he addressed lag.
month to Mr. Kelley, the F.B.I. director, asking for some assurance
that his bureau directed activities =E2=80=9Cboth inside and outside=E2=80=
=9D of the
country were =E2=80=9Clegal and proper and within the=E2=80=A6 jurisdiction=
of the
F.B.I.=E2=80=9D
Asked about the validity of Mr. Burton's concern, Nick F. Starnes, the
former head of the F.B.I.'s Tampa office, declined to make any
specific comment on Mr. Burton's account.
Mr. Stapes, who has recently, been promoted to head the bureau's
Washington field office, did say that Mr. Burton had done =E2=80=9Can
outstanding job when he was under our control,=E2=80=9D and that, to the
F.B.I.'s knowledge, he had not engaged in any illegal activities.
Not Bring Them Together
Mr. Burton said his general instructions from the bureau could be
characterized as =E2=80=9Cdo not ever do anything that will bring
Marxist=E2=80=90Leninists together in any way, do anything to prevent them
from coming together.=E2=80=9D
One element of this, he went on, was to impose =E2=80=9Ca financial, econom=
ic
drain on them, keep draining them for everything you can get.=E2=80=9D
In this connection, he said he set about ordering vast quanitles of
revolutionary literature, ostensibly for redistribution in Florida,
from other pro=E2=80=90Chinese groups around the country.
Little of the material was ever passed out, he said, but the bureau
continued to direct him to order it by the crate, =E2=80=9Cjust because it =
was
hurting the organization to produce the printing,=E2=80=9D or because it wa=
s
=E2=80=9Churting the Chinese to ship it to them.=E2=80=9D
Mr. Burton said, however, that some of the materials he distributed
were printed not by leftist organizations or by the Chinese Government
but by the F.B.I.
He produced one document that he said had been approved by F.B.I.
headquarters in Washington, printed by the bureau and mailed to a
number of Marxist=E2=80=90Leninist =E2=80=9Ccollectives=E2=80=9D around the=
country.
He said the intent of the document, which contained a number of
unfounded accusations, were to undermine an incipient move by
independent collectives to unite as the =E2=80=9COrganization of United Sta=
tes
MarxistLeninists.=E2=80=9D
=E2=80=9CIn the F.B.I.'s files there is a report.=E2=80=9D Mr. Burton said,=
that
credits the bogus document with =E2=80=9Cbreaking up that organi zation.=E2=
=80=9D
On another occasion, he said, he was told that intelligence
specialists at F.B.I. headquarters =E2=80=9Cthought it would be a goody ide=
a
if we put out a newspaper here.=E2=80=9D
In addition to serving as a vehicle for propaganda, he said, the
publication, to be named The Southern Socialist, might provide a cover
for an F.B.I., photographer to circulate freely at radical meetings
and others events.
Mr. Burton, who once owned a small newspaper in Colorado, said he
prepared a prototype edition of The Southern Socialist, but that he
and an agent, in the F.B.I.'s Chicago office, reputed to be an expert
uon Marxist philosophy, could not agree on what line the newspaper
should espouse, =E2=80=9Cand I just kind of let it die.=E2=80=9D
Mr. Burton said that although he knew of no burglaries carried out by
the F.B.L, whenever he visited the home or office of a radical leader,
=E2=80=9CI always filed an entry report on it.=E2=80=9D
On some occasions, he said, he was asked for such details as =E2=80=9Cwhat
kind of locks are on the door and how the windows opened.=E2=80=9D
After one visit to the Chicago apartment of a black Communist leader,
Mr. Burton said he reported to the F.B.I. that the man kept his funds
in cash, secreted between the pages of the Marxist volumes in his
library.
The F.B.I., he said, was =E2=80=9Cvery specific in asking me, =E2=80=98Whic=
h books?
Which page? What shelf?=E2=80=99=E2=80=9D
Another time, he said he noticed some letters in the office of another
radical group from an American professor =E2=80=9Cwho was in Iran working w=
ith
this militant organization.=E2=80=9D
He said he was asked by the bureau to assess =E2=80=9Cthe chances of gettin=
g
in there and photographing them,=E2=80=9D but replied that the office was s=
o
well guarded that =E2=80=9Cyou can't even get a telephone serviceman in
there.=E2=80=9D
The F.B.I., he said, then offered to supply him with a small,
expensive camera =E2=80=9Cdeveloped in the Soviet Union,=E2=80=9D but Mr. B=
urton,
concerned about losing his cover, rejected the offer.
During the first year he worked for the F.B.I., he said he subsisted
entirely on the meager profits of the swap shop and the salary earned
by his wife and declined, out of patriotism, to accept any payment for
his services.
But as his finances dwindled, le said he reluctantly agreed in the
spring of 1973 to begin incepting compensation from the bureau.
Assigned to Union
Although the payments eventually reached $400 a month, to said, he
found it necessary to ask the bureau for help in finding a second job
to supplerent his income.
The F.B.I. told him, he said, that they had long wanted to get
somebody in=E2=80=9D the Tampa local of the United Electrical, ladio and
Machine Workers of America which had organized a Westinghouse
Corporation plant there that produced equipment for the nuclear power
industry.
The bureau told him, he said, that the electrical union was
=E2=80=9Ccontrolled by Communists,=E2=80=9D and that to ingratiate himself =
with the
other members, he should =E2=80=9Ccome off as a Marxist.=E2=80=9D
Although Mr. Burton by then had a reputation as a strident
revolutionary and although there was a waiting list for employment at
the plant, he said, he was hired immediately and assigned to the
daytime shift, unusual for a new worker.
One F.B.I. official in Washington conceded that =E2=80=9Cwe got him a job a=
t
Westinghouse,=E2=80=9D but denied that Mr. Burton had been assigned to
infiltrate the union or that the bureau had prevailed upon
Westinghouse officials to falsify some aspects of his employment
application.
Mr. Burton said that during his five months at Westinghouse, he was
asked by the F.B.I. to provide information on =E2=80=9Canybody connected wi=
th
U.E. =E2=80=94what =E2=80=90their sentiments were and how they felt.=E2=80=
=9D
The bureau was especially interested, he said, in the union's chief
Tampa organizer, who had played a key role in the vote to unionize,
and Mr. Burton said he kept them advised of what the man =E2=80=9Cwas doing=
,
where he was, what time he was there, and who he was meeting with.=E2=80=9D
Important to Union
According to one union lawyer, the outcome of the vote was of the
greatest importance to the union.
A rejection of the national contract, he said, would have been =E2=80=9Ca r=
eal
crisis=E2=80=9D and would have undermined the union's bargaining position w=
ith
the company in other plants.
Among the information Mr. Burton was asked to get by the F.B.I., he
said, was an estimate of =E2=80=9Chow many people would reject the contract=
.=E2=80=9D
He said he had made discreet inquiries and reported that it would be
accepted without a single negative vote, but that the bureau, terming
such an outcome unlikely, expressed disbelief.
The contract was accented unanimously, a union official said.
Although union officials said that Mr. Burton's radical proselytizing
had made him suspect among his fellow workers as a =E2=80=9Ccompany agent=
=E2=80=9D or
worse, it apparently did little to damage his stature within the
organized labor community.
Several months later, he said, he successfully carried out an
assignment to infiltrate a local chapter of the American Federation of
State, County and Municipal Employes, whose efforts to unionize Tampa
garbage collectors had attracted the bureau's attention.
Mr. Burton, who said he earned nearly $3,000 for his F.B.I. work
during the first hall of last year, said he was also paid about $400
each month to cover his operating expenses in Tampa, plus additional
funds to finance out=E2=80=90of=E2=80=90town trips, including =E2=80=9Cabou=
t 10=E2=80=9D to meet with
radical organizations in Canada.
Some of the bureau's money, he said, was contributed by him in the
name of Red Star to pay for the activities of domestic and foreign
leftist groups, including a wing of the Canadian Communist party,
which he said he had been assigned to infiltrate and disrupt.
On one occasion, he said, he was approached by the leader of the Tampa
chapter of the Vietnam Veterans Against the War, which sought American
withdrawal from Vietnam.
Wanted to Merge
The veterans, he said, wanted to merge with the Red Star Cadre and to
share expenses on a headquarters office.
=E2=80=9CI called the bureau,=E2=80=9D Mr. Burton said, =E2=80=9Cand they s=
aid, =E2=80=98Yeah, go
ahead, we'll give you the money.=E2=80=99 =E2=80=9D
Although the two groups never formally merged, Mr. Burton said he and
two other operatives the bureau had placed in the Red Star
organization did join the veterans=E2=80=99 group at the F.B.I.'s direction=
.
He said that at the F.B.I.'s direction, he began giving the veterans
$50 a month in bu=E2=80=90 reau money to pay half of the rent on the office=
.
He said that at first he took his assignment seriously and began
helping the veterans=E2=80=99 Tampa chapter to recruit new members, but was
told by his F.B.I. superior, =E2=80=9CWe don't want to do that, were trying=
to
kill them in Florida.
Mr. Burton said he then reversed his course and began to promote an
internecine dispute between the Tampa chapter and the group's national
office that resulted last August in the chapter's expulsion from the
organization.
Anti=E2=80=90Nixon Group
Another organization that Mr. Burton said the F.B.I. encouraged him
and his two fellow operatives, both former military intelligence
officers, to =E2=80=9Cget control of=E2=80=9D was the Bay Area Citizens Opp=
osed to
Nixon, which conducted demonstrations in and around Tampa during the
Nixon Administration's Watergate difficulties.
The group organized a protest last March when then Vice President Ford
visited Tampa, he said, adding that shortly before the visit, he and
the two other operatives met with bureau agents to plan for their
participation in the demonstration.
One of the F.B.I. agents, Mr. Burton said, agreed to provide
anti=E2=80=90Nixon placards for the three operatives to distribute to
protesters who did not have signs.
Short of gaining outright control of the group, Mr. Burton said, the
bureau's hope was =E2=80=9Cthat we could control demonstrations, make them
move when we wanted them to, make them shout what we wanted them to.=E2=80=
=9D
Despite their apparent lack of success, he said, the F.B.I. did not
abandon its efforts to neutralize the group. He said the same
technique, complete with F.B.I.=E2=80=90provided placards, was employed aga=
in
a few weeks later during a protest outside Tampa's Federal Building,
where the F.B.I. has its offices.
"
"
dundarious 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Somewhat famously, in an interview with BBC's Andrew Marr, Noam
Chomsky[0] used COINTELPRO as an example of press subordination to
power, by comparing their self-adulation over uncovering Watergate (an
attack on 50% of corporate/state power, the Democrats) to their lack
of reporting and even awareness of COINTELPRO (an attack on a wide
variety of largely powerless social movements and civil liberties
groups).
Knowledge of COINTELPRO was only achieved thanks to the burglary of an
FBI office, with documents mailed to major newspapers, and only the
Washington Post willing to run the story. The burglars[1] revealed
themselves[2] only recently.
[0] https://youtu.be/-34w0OUIOyw?t=3D961
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens%27_Commission_to_Inve...
[2] https://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/07/us/burglars-who-took-on-f...
reply
=09
=09
api 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
The fight against totalitarian communism is full of great examples of
the principle that if you fight against an enemy there's a tendency to
become that enemy. COINTELPRO is only one example. Another is the fact
that we placed much of the US economy under at least indirect state
control via the Cold War national security state in order to battle
the evil of state controlled economies.
I saw the same thing after 9/11 when there seemed to be a strong push
for some kind of theocracy in the USA, albeit of a far lighter variety
than was found in Afghanistan, and a general revival of ultra-right
reactionary ideologies that somewhat resemble those of the 9/11
hijackers. We also surrendered a great deal of freedom (especially
privacy) to battle those terrorists who supposedly hate our freedom.
Edit: I can keep going... during WWII we put Japanese Americans in camps.
reply
=09
=09
voodootrucker 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Not sure why the down votes.
I've been joking for a while I'd like to see a sitcom where the main
characters are an Islamic and domestic terrorist living together in
New York while they execute their plots. A terrorist "odd couple" if
you will.
I think the characters could bond over a lot of shared ideals, despite
their superficial differences.
(And of course they'd have to be incompetent or it wouldn't be a funny.)
reply
=09
=09
mhh__ 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Lions
reply
=09
=09
virgulino 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
This is a great movie. Odd but great.
reply
=09
=09
mhh__ 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
That describes most of Chris Morris's work
Brass Eye is his most outlandish creation but before that he did Jam
which is (to quote the comments of the following YouTube video)
"absurdly poignant" https://youtu.be/LhKla4MEstY
reply
=09
=09
virgulino 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Thanks for the tip, I will try to watch these two. Anyways, you made
me look for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Morris_(satirist) ,
and I'm shocked to learn that he is Denholm Reynholm, from the IT
Crowd!
reply
=09
=09
leetcrew 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
I wonder if you might enjoy the first couple seasons of homeland?
there are a lot of problems with the show, but in some ways it's a
surprisingly charitable portrayal of islamic terrorists.
reply
=09
=09
Alupis 3 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Sounds like the TV show "The Americans", although that focuses on KGB
sleeper agents in America during the Cold War.
reply
=09
=09
voodootrucker 3 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
I was thinking more like "damn it, we failed to blow up the government
again", and "you got your bacon in my tagine" and "you woke me up with
your call to prayer", "you might worship a different god than me, but
at least we both hate women's rights". The domestic terrorist could be
a coal-rolling hick. That kind of shtick.
I'm scared to even type that. You'd need writers legitimately from
each culture to keep it funny, balanced, and self-deprecating.
reply
=09
=09
Alupis 2 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
It's not a full show, but Key & Peele have a hilarious skit where they
are terrorists in a cave, plotting to overthrow America, only to be
thwarted by TSA's rules.
You might get a kick out of it.
https://youtu.be/IHfiMoJUDVQ
reply
=09
=09
maxerickson 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Isn't Watergate far more consequential?
It's problematic that the FBI targets groups for poor reasons, but it
doesn't result in much change to the country, it just unfairly
harasses members of those powerless groups.
reply
=09
=09
dundarious 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
It is somewhat tautological that Watergate is more consequential. 50%
of private power has more power than relatively powerless groups, and
powerful people run the country and the economy, so their concerns
have more consequence. Even in this framing of "consequential", one
can argue about the narrow range of consequences on offer by Democrats
and Republicans, and the broad potential consequences of social
movements, but I tend to agree with you.
However, Chomsky's argument is that this "perfect experiment" of
history, Watergate vs. COINTELPRO, reveals that "on the question of
principles", Watergate shows that the press "think[s] that powerful
people ought to be able to defend themselves", whereas "one tiny part
of the COINTELPRO program was itself far more significant in terms of
principle than all of Watergate, and if you look at the whole program,
it's not even a discussion".
This is to help dispel the notion that the press are adversarial,
truth-seekers, thumbing their nose at authority. And the purpose of
this argument isn't just to deflate the pompous self-esteem of the
press, but also helps explain the press' _lack_ of adversarial,
truth-seeking reporting on other matters of _extreme_ consequence,
such as the Vietnam War and the first Gulf War, NAFTA, etc.
reply
=09
=09
yrimaxi 2 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
> It is somewhat tautological that Watergate is more consequential.
The tautology being that important people are important.[1]
Applying wishful thinking for the moment, what would America look like
today if popular movements in the 60=E2=80=99s had never been infiltrated?
What would the civic culture of America look like if regular people
were =E2=80=9Callowed=E2=80=9D to participate in the public sphere without =
such
underhanded tactics from the the government=E2=80=99s side?
But I guess all of that is inconsequential, wishful thinking or not.
[1] Infer disclaimers.
> This is to help dispel the notion that the press are adversarial, truth-s=
eekers, thumbing their nose at authority. And the purpose of this argument =
isn't just to deflate the pompous self-esteem of the press, but also helps =
explain the press' _lack_ of adversarial, truth-seeking reporting on other =
matters of _extreme_ consequence, such as the Vietnam War and the first Gul=
f War, NAFTA, etc.
You predictably, given the demographics on this board, think that _the
point_ is to stick it to The Man, The Press, or some Important Person,
in order to embarass or dress them down.[1] And yet that is just a
bonus, and was never the point at all. How many small-venue lectures
has this man held, how many letters and emails to
people-of-no-consequence has he sent, etc.? All in order to support
and connect people working in grassroots movements (he explains this
in the same interview). Not in order to, once in a blue moon, land a
somewhat mainstream interview in order to tell The Press off to their
faces or to combat other Important People of Consequence.
[1] Andrew Marr was so =E2=80=9Cdressed down=E2=80=9D that he some years la=
ter cheered
when GB and the US invaded Iraq=E2=80=94that interview had no impact on his
view of the press or his role within it, as the Propaganda Model would
have predicted.
reply
=09
=09
dundarious 31 minutes ago [=E2=80=93]
I agree with all your points and my post was meant to convey the same
logic. I think you misunderstand me. In particular, I mention
deflating press self-esteem specifically to say that is _not_ the
point. Chomsky is not interested in =E2=80=9Cepic smackdowns=E2=80=9D like =
the Ben
Shapiros or even Hitchenses of the world.
reply
=09
=09
maxerickson 2 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Oh, I guess I take it as a given that most media is not engaged in
adversarial truth seeking, so it doesn't land as a point.
I guess on the other side of it I'm not convinced that the FBI would
be effective at disrupting groups. There's lots of other things at
play when you are talking about small groups of people with views
outside the mainstream (a major one is that the mainstream will
concede ideological ground, which can massively deflate a group, but
that's the group succeeding=E2=80=A6).
reply
=09
=09
AndrewBissell 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
> It is somewhat tautological that Watergate is more consequential. 50% of =
private power has more power than relatively powerless groups, and powerful=
people run the country and the economy, so their concerns have more conseq=
uence.
But whom amongst those powerful groups would have had any kind of
serious stake in whether Nixon or Ford was president? As opposed to
whether the Black Panthers continued with their free breakfast and
housing programs?
reply
=09
=09
klodolph 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
I=E2=80=99d say COINTELPRO is more consequential by far, and it=E2=80=99s n=
ot even
close. You might ask questions like, =E2=80=9CWhat happened to the Black
Panthers?=E2=80=9D
Or the question, =E2=80=9CWhy are these groups powerless?=E2=80=9D
reply
=09
=09
AshWolfy 38 minutes ago [=E2=80=93]
A number of powerful and mainstream people got caught up in cointelpro
including members of congress, the naacp, and the sclc, including most
famously mlk
reply
=09
=09
dundarious 29 minutes ago [=E2=80=93]
It=E2=80=99s a near certainty that Fred Hampton was assassinated as part of
COINTELORO. I agree with you.
reply
=09
=09
delecti 2 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
> [...] but it doesn't result in much change to the country [...]
I would argue that it deliberately results in no change, which is
subtly but meaningfully different. Kinda like how not choosing is
still a choice, suppressing change is enforcing a preference for the
status quo.
reply
=09
=09
goodluckchuck 3 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Watergate (probably) was COINTELPRO.
reply
=09
=09
maxerickson 2 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Not in any meaningful sense. It's not like the tapes of Nixon sitting
in the Oval Office ordering some crimes were faked, and that wasn't at
all related to activities carried out against activists, it was Nixon
seeking political advantage.
reply
=09
=09
arminiusreturns 2 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Bigger than COINTELPRO, an FBI program, it was largely a coverup of
CIA involvement and connections that spread out like tendrils across
the globe and touched other matters such as the coup of 63, the rise
of Bush and CIA, etc.
"I just said that the thing was leading into directions that were
going to create potential problems because they were exploring leads
that led back into areas that would be harmful to the CIA and harmful
to the government (unintelligible) didn=E2=80=99t have anything to do
unintelligible)."..."Gray called Helms and said I think we=E2=80=99ve run
right into the middle of a CIA covert operation."..."the problem is it
tracks back to the Bay of Pigs and"..."the Bureau is going on this
because they don=E2=80=99t know what they are uncovering" - H. R. Haldeman,
Nixons Chief of Staff [1]
"Another leading Watergate burglar was James McCord, a former top
official of the CIA Office of Security, the agency bureau which is
supposed to maintain contacts with U.S. police agencies in order to
facilitate its basic task of providing security for CIA installations
and personnel. The Office of Security was thus heavily implicated in
the CIA's illegal domestic operations, including cointelpro operations
against political dissidents and groups, and was the vehicle for such
mind-control experiments as Operations Bluebird, Artichoke, and
MK-Ultra. The Office of Security also utilized male and female
prostitutes and other sex operatives for purposes of compromising and
blackmailing public figures, information gathering, and control.
According to Hougan, the Office of Security maintained a "fag file" of
some 300,000 U.S. citizens, with heavy stress on homosexuals. The
Office of Security also had responsibility for Soviet and other
defectors. James McCord was at one time responsible for the physical
security of all CIA premises in the U.S. McCord was also a close
friend of CIA Counterintelligence Director James Jesus Angleton.
McCord was anxious to cover the CIA's role; at one point he wrote to
his superior, General Gaynor, urging him to "flood the newspapers with
leaks or anonymous letters" to discredit those who wanted to establish
the responsibility of "the company."" - George Bush: The Unauthorized
Biography by Webster Tarpley
Another angle worth considering, especially given his actions the last
4 years, is how Woodward was former naval intelligence and an FBI
asset. [2]
1. http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1996/analysis/back.time/9608/...
2. https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/19174#efmAMfANh
reply
=09
=09
honkycat 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
You look around at the gig economy, our stagnant wages, our failing
industrial sector, our hyper-militarized police force, and wonder "How
did we get here?"
I can tell you how we got here: COINTELPRO. The FBI's war on political
freedom. I don't believe for a second it ever stopped, rather, they
just found new euphemisms to use.
I believe the behaviour of our law enforcement agencies to destabalize
progressive movements has been WILDLY destructive to our culture and
politics.
The FBI and law enforcement agencies use federal funds to destabilize
and destroy our worker and leftist movements over and over again.
Progress cannot happen because whenever people begin to organize,
their organizations are destroyed.
Look at Occupy Wall Street, a valid movement protesting the bailing
out of big, corrupt banking institutions while leaving the average
person out to dry. They were maced, demeaned by the media, their
organizers stalked and harassed by police organizations.
reply
=09
=09
fwsgonzo 2 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
I wonder if the number and size of the 3-letter agencies in the US
make this a certainty simply because people want to have something to
do.
And they can't go after money, not even the IRS does that:
https://www.gq.com/story/no-irs-audits-for-the-rich
reply
=09
=09
AnthonyMouse 1 hour ago [=E2=80=93]
> I believe the behaviour of our law enforcement agencies to destabalize pr=
ogressive movements has been WILDLY destructive to our culture and politics=
.
It's important to realize that this isn't partisan behavior. They use
the same tactics against anarchists and anti-authoritarians, or really
any threat to institutional power.
An obvious recent example on the other side being their campaign
against Trump, e.g. Steele Dossier, and the apparently true Hunter
Biden story being derided as "Russian disinformation" by "intelligence
sources" in the run up to the election. Because Trump, for all his
faults, was one of the most prominent threats to institutional power
in recent history. And Trump sucks, let's be clear about that, but
it's the same dynamic and it's important to see it for what it is even
when it's being deployed against someone you don't like.
reply
=09
=09
alsetmusic 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
This type of behavior has resulted in an inquiry of long-term (up to
five years at a time) police undercover work in the UK[0].
There is a short podcast series on the ways in which UC police wrecked
the lives of women with whom they entered into long-term sexual
relationships as part of their cover. Really unconscionable behavior
by the state. The series is called Bed of Lies.
[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Undercover_Policing_Inquiry
reply
=09
=09
HashThis 6 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
And that was before the FBI had NSA's data on US citizens. The FBI's
version of X-Keyscore has a different name.
reply
=09
=09
AndrewBissell 6 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
It's obvious these sorts of programs are still ongoing. Probably all
that really came out of the Congressional inquiries in the 1970s was
the development of better methods to keep them hidden from the public.
We only know about COINTELPRO because some mysterious group of
activists stole a bunch of the records from an FBI field office in
Pennsylvania!
reply
=09
=09
boomboomsubban 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
They aren't mysterious anymore, six members of the Citizens'
Commission to Investigate the FBI revealed themselves a few years ago.
reply
=09
=09
AndrewBissell 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
TIL! Kinda surprising none of them suffered any repercussions but I
suppose enough time had passed it wasn't considered worth drawing
attention to it.
reply
=09
=09
arminiusreturns 3 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Isnt that just a bunch of conspiracy theories? Hanlons razor! Its just
a few bad actors not systemic to the org. At least it stopped after
the Church committee, because its impossible to keep a secret
conspiracy secret. Its just a bunch of coincidences that aligned by
chance. Did everyone here forget their tinfoil hat? We should censor
such conspiracy craziness for the greater good, because the platforms
are private and have every right to do so, also people who believe in
conspiracy theories are mentally ill. Talk like this is just illogical
people trying to put meaning to events that happen where there is
none. Its not like there is cordination among rich and powerful groups
of people to conspire against the people, thats just a cliched trope.
reply
=09
=09
AnthonyMouse 1 hour ago [=E2=80=93]
Conspiracy theory: Many crazy conspiracy theories are published and
promoted by intelligence agencies to foster public distrust in the
existence of actual conspiracies.
Meanwhile many "crazy conspiracy theories" are based on a real
conspiracy, so if QAnon is full of bullshit then Epstein is a
non-story and anyone asking questions is a conspiracy nut.
reply
=09
=09
ilaksh 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
There's a phenomenon I have noticed where things like these are okay
to discuss if they involve someone else's government or if they are
far enough back in the past.
But there is some cut-off point closer to present day where
sinister-sounding allegations about one's own government automatically
become "insane conspiracy theories".
It's just good to know that anything bad they were doing is over now.
It must be. Because the US government, and all of its agencies and
military actions, despite a few bad apples in the past, is trustworthy
and true to the pure mission of democracy and freedom for all. And
there are never any "means to an end" "ethical compromises" anymore.
Other countries, sure. But ours? No, of course we rooted all of that
out. Only the pure of heart survive here. The pure light of Democracy
doesn't permit evil or corruption or subversion to survive.
And anyone who suggests otherwise and makes a serious allegation
against the government or admits a fundamental lack of trust for it,
is definitely mentally ill and should be publicly noted as such.
/s
reply
=09
=09
godelski 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Just the other day I brought up that many countries use things like
memes to modify public perception. Topic was about China but I brought
up that everyone else does it too (US, Russia, Israel, Germany, etc)
and people thought it was insane and a conspiracy theory(specifically
that anyone would want to influence Reddit because it is "a small
website"). It honestly feels like we're gaslighting ourselves because
this topic has been so openly discussed over the last 50 years that it
is hard to say that this isn't happening. Though maybe because I
suggested agencies use memes now instead of more well known sock
puppets.
Even on HN news I've been downvoted for this. I guess people don't
think memes are being weaponized, even when they are explicitly
referred to as such by those in the military[0] and other agencies.
Actually one thing I've liked about The Boys (on Prime) is how it
shows the viral marketing of Stormfront and how it is manipulating
people (and how people didn't even notice the not even remotely subtle
naming of the character). I guess that just shows how effective of a
tool all this is.
[0] https://youtu.be/qOTYgcdNrXE?t=3D1287
reply
=09
=09
dang 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
The problem isn't that it doesn't happen, it's that there's no
reliable way to tell when it's happening vs. isn't, and internet users
are, let's call it, rather undisciplined about jumping to conclusions.
On any divisive topic, people eagerly proclaim without a shred of
evidence that some comment they don't like has been planted. Soon
there are astroturfers and spies and foreign agents under every bed.
However much real manipulation may be happening, it's plain that many
people are simply indulging their assumptions and fantasies about
this, which quickly inflates to grandiose levels. This has an
extremely degrading effect on discussion, surely at least as degrading
as any sophisticated campaigns.
That's why the HN guidelines ask people not to post such insinuations
[1]=E2=80=94it's not because such things don't exist. It's because once a
topic gets polarized enough, it always feels like the other side isn't
arguing in good faith. In the absence of some specific evidence or
data or something at least a teeny bit objective to go on, the default
presumption has to be that the other user is commenting in good faith
and just has a totally different view than you do (I don't mean you
personally, of course).
I find it helpful to imagine that we're already at the endgame of
this, which is that everything is potentially manipulated and
artificial. I call this the SSM: imagine a Sufficiently Smart
Manipulator [2], smart enough to plant whatever they want, make it
sound authentic, and leave no traces that we can detect in the data.
What can we do in such a situation? Only what we should be doing
anyway, which is thinking and writing clearly and respectfully
replying to bad arguments with better ones. Since that's the only
answer in the long run, we might as well practice it now. It has the
desirable side effect of strengthening the community, and a healthy
community is the best immune system against all forms of manipulation.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
[2] https://hn.algolia.com/?query=3Dsufficiently%20smart%20by:dang...
reply
=09
=09
godelski 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
I think this is the root of it but also why it is so effective. You
can never tell when it is happening and when it works correctly it
causes people to independently mimic and generate new content for you.
Even better when you push the very topics to the extreme. Either this
is being done at such a large scale with such precision that the
lizard people effectively are mind controlling the population vs it
doesn't happen at all (for what it is worth I'm on the very mundane
end of the spectrum). The former I would call gaslighting but I don't
have a great term for the latter, maybe someone else does?
Side note: interesting to see you outside your moderator role and
thanks for the service to the community and your thoughtful addition
to the discussion.
Edit: (You got a ninja edit on me!) I think the point you make about
the sufficiently smart enough effect. And I do like that the community
here is (imo) much better at self enforcement with good faith
arguments. But would not a simple tactic be to encourage the use of
bad faith arguments? That seems fairly simple to execute and an easy
way to generate a Divide and Rule[0] tactic. But I think when it comes
down to it the impossibility to even know is what makes all this both
very interesting and frustratingly difficult (as well as effective).
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divide_and_rule
reply
=09
=09
dang 3 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
(Sorry about editing the rug under you - I write these comments by
adding to them bit by bit, but it somehow only 'works' if I do it
live.)
You're raising an important point which I think about a lot. It's very
clear to me that most users who get into intense arguments about
divisive topics are true believers. The anger and hurt feelings that
energize these arguments and get re-energized by them are too
unmistakeable to just be cynically planted. But it may be that these
are second-order effects of propaganda systems. If you convince enough
people and get them feeling angry and hurt enough, they'll do your job
for you, and much better, simply by being intensely sincere. You can't
say that these commenters are manipulators, because they're not.
"You're a shill!!" is simply going to meet with justified indignation,
and "you've been brainwashed!!" is no good either. The whole
distinction between "manipulated" vs. "authentic" simply doesn't help
address the dynamics of what really goes on in these discussions. You
can't use it to make anything better. That's not to say that we should
do nothing when we find some real indication of actual
manipulation=E2=80=94the opposite is the case. But it doesn't make that muc=
h
difference when the 'organic' dynamics point in the same direction.
Certainly it doesn't solve the problem.
Another extremely powerful factor that does the propagandist's work
for them in an entirely innocent way is tribalism. Is it manipulation
if I feed your beliefs about your identity and (especially) the
opposing identity in a way that inflames you with indignation against
the enemy? That "food" is so eagerly gobbled by the consumer that at
some point you have to ask who's influencing who. The tribal psyche,
which we not only all have but are almost totally dominated by, is
enough to generate the situation all on its own. Media stories will
feed it because that's what people want. No one can get enough of
hearing how good their group is and how bad the opposing one is. This
force is so powerful that it's not even possible to discuss it, except
in the abstract.
In my experience, if you take that seriously then you eventually feel
that even such external manipulators as are lurking out there are
really only effective by activating the real manipulators, which are
inside ourselves. "We have met the enemy and it is us," etc. This
perspective is much better because it is empowering: we can do
something about it, we can work on it, we can change. The other
perspective (external agents are manipulating things!) just leads to a
wilderness of mirrors, even if external agents doubtless are
manipulating things. There's nothing we can do about that, except in
the important (but relatively rare) case where evidence appears; in
the absence of evidence, all we're doing is projecting our shadows
onto each other.
The reason I think the sufficiently-smart-manipulator argument is a
good one is that besides being the only response that can actually
work, it points us directly at what we need to be doing anyway, which
is addressing these more powerful factors in ourselves.
Ok, I'm done editing for the moment :)
reply
=09
=09
godelski 2 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
These are some really good points. It is reminding me a lot of one of
my favorite John Cleese videos[0].
One of the things that I think makes this so difficult is that
language has a lot of limits that people don't realize. Since we often
don't run into issues with communication (or rather don't notice since
the errors are small) it is difficult to realize when we're in
boundary cases. For example there's priming[1]. Many may learn that
this is a useful way to influence people and many are aware of the
psychological experiments, but it is also a fundamental part of how we
communicate. We try to communicate the most information with the least
amount of words. But this same factor is why good faith arguments are
so important but also difficult to maintain. We could not easily
converse if we didn't make certain assumptions about another person's
views. This is normally fine but we run into problems in heated topics
where we often act like someone can only hold an extreme opinion (and
of course, mine is not extreme and just common sense). It's the "oh,
I've heard this argument before" and while one person may have subtext
another may not (why it is difficult to identify dog whistling).
Removing nuance from a topic makes it easy, and we like easy things.
But that's not beneficial to resolving issues and like you say "leads
to a wilderness of mirrors".
But it is impossible to tell if priming like this is actively being
pushed or naturally happening, since we do have a natural
predisposition to form tribes and groups. We're nuanced and thoughtful
with our arguments while they are overly simplifying and idiotic. They
just want a win while we want to actually fix things. And since this
kind of talk is natural it is also almost impossible to figure out if
I'm doing the thing I'm actively complaining about or not.
[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DHLNhPMQnWu4
[1] https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/priming
reply
=09
=09
AndrewBissell 3 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
> But it may be that these are second-order effects of propaganda systems. =
If you convince enough people and get them feeling angry and hurt enough, t=
hey'll end up doing your job for you, and much better, simply by being inte=
nsely sincere. You can't say that these commenters are manipulators, becaus=
e they're not. "You're a shill!!" is simply going to meet with justified in=
dignation, and "you've been brainwashed!!" is no good either.
This is a really important point and something I try to very
consciously and actively resist, not always successfully. The thought
"these are all bots" may be a more comforting one to most people than
"lots and lots of my fellow human beings have been manipulated into
behaving like bots." I would bet an SSM might even have sockpuppets
demo and engage in this tactic to encourage divisions.
reply
=09
=09
AndrewBissell 3 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Would like to echo your compliments to dang. The only bit of pushback
I would make to his point is that if the SSM really does exist,
perhaps the correct course of action is to reduce our participation as
much as possible and move our engagement to less easily manipulated
forms of communication, particularly face-to-face meetings. Perhaps,
even if we do our best to post in good faith and make well reasoned,
careful arguments, in the end we only lend a superficial credibility
to a system which still has a negative effect in the aggregate
(because it has been engineered to do so). And yes, I'm aware of the
inherent hypocrisy in posting this on a (well!) moderated forum with a
system of largely opaque voting and flagging. :-)
reply
=09
=09
SpicyLemonZest 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
It's just a pretty fuzzily defined theory. It's surely true that
Western governments use memes and similar content to convince people
of things. Quite often they do so openly, with military ads and public
health messages and such.
But China dictates public perception - in addition to sending
messages, the government has full editorial control over all major
social media platforms, and regularly intervenes to shut off
discussion on any topic they'd prefer people not to hear about. It
seems very unlikely Western governments are doing anything like that.
reply
=09
=09
neves 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
And everybody here believe that US Gov has no influence in the
recommendation algorithms of the main social networks. That they don't
an army of fake profiles to direct public opinion to their economical
benefit.
reply
=09
=09
cwkoss 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
In America, we tend to amplify outrage at irrelevant things instead of
silencing the important ones. Works just as well and is harder to
prove.
reply
=09
=09
godelski 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
> we tend to amplify outrage
I think this is the key word here which makes it impossible to
differentiate sock-puppetry from genuine outrage (or at least genuine
levels of outrage). I think this is why some turn to monsters under
every bed (as dang suggested) vs gaslighting. The fact that this is
both extremely transparent and very opaque makes it very difficult to
even have a discussion. That is amplified by the difficulties we have
in communicating and being able to determine where someone is on the
spectrum of "doesn't exist" to "microphones in my vaccine"
reply
=09
=09
AndrewBissell 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Blatant censorship tends to call attention to things and reveal to
people that their perceptions are being manipulated. It's much subtler
and more effective to exercise editorial control over nominally
"independent" media by firing reporters pushing stories about
inconvenient truths, which Allen Dulles used to do by simply calling
up the heads of major newspapers.
reply
=09
=09
SpicyLemonZest 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
But inconvenient truths come out all the time, don't they? If the CIA
had the power to keep stories they don't like out of the national
conversation, they surely would have used on the Snowden leaks or Abu
Ghraib.
reply
=09
=09
godelski 3 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
I think the Snowden case is actually a good point. When we look at how
officials responded they shifted the conversation to metadata to
downplay the amount of information and what that information could be
used for. It does seem like their responses were fairly effective
since people don't consider metadata particularly useful. But also a
large amount of people don't even know who Snowden is and opinions on
him are quite divided (and there are radicals with ridiculous opinions
on both sides that often take the spotlight).
I don't think people seriously talking about this think the government
has an all seeing power or a hand in everything (I personally don't
think even China does). So it would not be expected that the CIA/NSA
or any agency could prevent a story like that from eventually
breaking. But the question is how effective are they at being able to
downplay it and sway public opinion? Personally I see it as subtle and
frequent nudging more than active control.
reply
=09
=09
AndrewBissell 3 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Compare the way media covered the Snowden leaks vs the Vault 7 ones.
The Vault 7 leaks basically show that as soon as you're a person of
sufficient interest to the state, tools like Signal and Tor (for which
Snowden is probably the highest profile proponent) are at best
useless, and at worst might just paint a target on your back. But
hardly anyone has ever heard of them.
reply
=09
=09
ClumsyPilot 3 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Russian government has the same power in regards to VKontakte, Yandex,
etc. However it does not really stop stories spreading.
What they have realised recently, is that injecting misinformation,
even if it's outrageous bullshit, is far more effective.
Coming back to the West: Snowden and Assange are still pariahs,
Assange is remembered by the public as a rapist escaping justice
rather than for wikileaks. Id say the strategy is working.
reply
=09
=09
VintageCool 2 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
I think that Assange is best known for WikiLeaks, but WikiLeaks is now
a pariah after the 2016 US election.
reply
=09
=09
neves 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Read Greenwald book to know how many big news organizations refuse to
publish Snowden leaks.
reply
=09
=09
viro 3 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Greenwald has really hurt his credibility in recent years.
reply
=09
=09
AnthonyMouse 46 minutes ago [=E2=80=93]
Greenwald has continued to cover both US political parties critically.
In an era of hyper-partisanship, anyone not choosing a tribe and
remaining loyal to it is treated as a pariah by those who do, but it's
the latter group who have lost their credibility.
reply
=09
=09
AndrewBissell 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
I don't think they have the power to exercise total control or prevent
(much of) the truth from eventually coming out, in particular now that
alternative sources have become more widespread. Again it's a
balancing act -- mixing some of these things into the mainstream
sources which are meant to be trusted helps to lend them credibility,
and there seems to have been no serious repercussions to any programs
or the players involved from the Snowden or Abu Ghraib leaks.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limited_hangout
reply
=09
=09
yrimaxi 2 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Eh, memes (or the theory about memes) are so early-aughts.
reply
=09
=09
AndrewBissell 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
The funny thing is, a strategy to do this kind of thing was explicitly
laid out by a U.S. Army major named Michael Aquino in 1980. He appears
to have gained influence after his paper's publication and was
promoted to lieutenant colonel. I imagine the sort of things he
advocated had already been going on for some time so I don't think he
represented some kind of inflection point, but it's not like this
stuff has never been openly discussed.
https://www.wanttoknow.info/mk/mindwar-michael-aquino.pdf
reply
=09
=09
giardini 40 minutes ago [=E2=80=93]
ilaksh says >"It's just good to know that anything bad they were doing
is over now."<
One could make that assumption but since, if something bad once
happened then it might also have happened before, after, or now in the
same or other context[and almost certainly did, will, or is
happening]. If we see a system fail we must become more alert in
watching for failure. If we put fail-safes in place we must constantly
monitor and verify they are working properly, probably forever. Always
verify.
As for mental illness: by now in human history it should be clear that
a man may try most anything to improve his lot, even at the expense of
others. Neither mental illness nor malevolence is required. It is best
to keep an open mind when examining motive.
reply
=09
=09
DubiousPusher 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Had exactly this kind of cognitive disonant moment with a friend of
mine the other day. They were going off about Chinese persecution of
Uighurs (which is terrible and should stop). When I pointed out that
the Chinese government claims this as an antiterror campaign and
compared it to America's disasterous antiterror campaign they were not
having it.
P.S. Before I get dogpiled, I am not saying that one justifies the
other or that they are identical.
reply
=09
=09
dukeofdoom 3 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
I visited Aruba a decade ago. The Hotel TV picked up a channel fro
Venezuela. It was amazing. It was like the Hugo Chavez action channel.
Hugo playing baseball. Hugo interacting with a farmer, Hugo riding in
the back of a truck... and so on. That day I learned all I need to
know about TV. And those who control it.
There's also this great song by John Mayer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DoBIxScJ5rlY
reply
=09
=09
AndrewBissell 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
> But there is some cut-off point closer to present day where sinister-soun=
ding allegations about one's own government automatically become "insane co=
nspiracy theories".
This is indeed a really interesting, perhaps even engineered,
phenomenon. It's quite striking for example that people will clamor to
have Confederate generals' or even George Washington's name removed
from schools and public buildings, but don't bat an eye at having a
major airport named after the Dulles brothers.
reply
=09
=09
godelski 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
I think engineered outrage has been openly discussed for quite some
time. America does it to its own people. Other nations do it to and
about American citizens. And this isn't even remotely unique to
America. Every major country plays the same game, just to different
degrees (if anyone is aware of a major country that doesn't play this
I'm honestly interested). Why would "trying to manipulate perception"
be surprising for a country to do? Is that not what propaganda is at
the root of it? Why wouldn't this idea also advance and get better?
We've got native advertising, why not native propagandizing? (foreign
and/or domestic) And why would America or China (insert enemy) be
unique in using this tactic?
reply
=09
=09
AndrewBissell 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Agreed on all points. What's interesting to consider is the
implications of the existence of a technology like social media which
can provide the perfect means for short feedback cycles,
experimentation, and mass dissemination. And then you dig into the
military roots of the internet itself and start really rubbing your
chin. There's a good account on Twitter that delves into some of this:
https://twitter.com/cuttlefish_btc
reply
=09
=09
SpicyLemonZest 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
The cutoff point is simply the point where modern politics tempts
people to fire off streams of sarcastic quips instead of discussing
the evidence and why they believe it. I've never seen for example the
ATF gunwalking scandal described as a "conspiracy theory", because the
people calling out the ATF focused on concrete evidence for specific
accusations of wrongdoing.
reply
=09
=09
PaulHoule 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
That cointelpro method became the flamboyant sting directed at the
mafia after illegal gambler j Edgar Hoover died and no longer covered
for them.
reply
=09
=09
baby 3 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Is there a good documentary on gov or political disruption as attacks?
reply
=09
=09
dundarious 3 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
There is a documentary about the burglars [0] who revealed COINTELPRO,
called 1971 [1]. It's really an awful name for SEO! It was released in
2014 so searches for "1971 2014" might return useful results. Funnily
enough, there is also a completely unrelated film called '71. Anyway,
1971 is more about the reveal of the program, so details about the
program itself are secondary.
I would love to see a documentary/drama series about UK agent
provocateur, Bob Lambert [2].
> To gain credibility as an activist, he formed friendships with other move=
ment members; he also embarked in long-term relationships with women as a m=
eans of establishing a cover story. He fathered a child with one of the act=
ivists he was spying on.
> In 2013, it was reported that while undercover with London Greenpeace, La=
mbert had co-authored the 'McLibel leaflet', which resulted in a defamation=
lawsuit from McDonald's Corporation that took ten years to resolve.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens%27_Commission_to_Inve...
[1] https://www.pbs.org/independentlens/films/1971/
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Lambert_(undercover_police...
reply
=09
=09
freen 3 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
It is well known that the bulk of the budget for the American
communist party was, and continues to be funded by CIA stooges=E2=80=99 due=
s.
reply
=09
=09
ed25519FUUU 6 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
After we wake up and stop playing this bizarre =E2=80=9Cthe enemy of my ene=
my
is my friend=E2=80=9D game with Trump, the hangover from what the FBI (and =
the
CIA) did in OUR elections is going to be massive.
Make distrusting the intelligence agencies cool again!
reply
=09
=09
jancsika 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
> Make distrusting the intelligence agencies cool again.
How about "make citing sources and referring explicitly to documented
acts of corruption cool again."
reply
=09
=09
AndrewBissell 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
By this line of reasoning you would not have distrusted the FBI up
until the moment these stories broke in the mid 70s, long after the
point where that distrust would have been useful in the present
moment.
reply
=09
=09
jancsika 3 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
I'm not in favor of vague statements like OP's initial comment, which
is compatible with (and on it's own, indistinguishable from) wild
conspiracy theories.
It appears from OP's subsequent comment that OP was referring to
stories in the run-up to the 2016 election that depended on
anonymous/pseudonymous sources with links to the intelligence
agencies. In that case there is a wealth of reporting on those
issues-- some similar to the one the OP has now posted which were
before the election, but many more in the aftermath of it.
Hell, writing on the subject of blind trust in anonymous intelligence
sources is apparently the raison d=C3=AAtre of Glenn Greenwald these days.
Pick any piece at random of his from The Intercept or substack and I'd
bet you'll find reputable sources regarding trumped-up 2016 election
stories that back up his general argument about how problematic that
practice is. Other writers have done the same, consistently, for years
now.
Given that wealth of easily searchable material (which, btw, has stood
the test of time and been corroborating by other sources), being
comfortable making vague statements and encouraging blanket distrust
is irresponsible. Are you and OP bedfellows with the "stop the steal"
idgets who AFAICT are following the "make distrusting the deep state
cool again" to the tee?
I'm not. If you aren't either, then I don't see how you would
distinguish your positions if not through clear-headed discussion of
documented acts of corruption. I also don't see why we shouldn't go
out of our way to distinguish our own distrust from the myriad active
campaigns to exploit people's growing general distrust to siphon money
from them. (The hundreds of millions Trump has raised is one such
example.)
Also notice how OP's follow-up essentially implies that I would not be
able to easily figure out the truth without doing my own personal
research project. MSM can't be trusted. Intelligence can't be trusted.
But personal speculation is apparently in play: "Is that by accident?"
OP asks, again without explanation as to scope, evidence, etc. of the
implication.
That way lies rabbit holes.
reply
=09
=09
ed25519FUUU 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
My first experience being =E2=80=9Cblack pilled=E2=80=9D with the Russia ho=
ax was
finally getting to the bottom of what that whole =E2=80=9Ctrump tower compu=
ter
backchannel to Russian Alfa bank=E2=80=9D thing was all about[1] (this link
will not give you the answer, just allegations)
As a technical person it made me curious. A direct =E2=80=9Cconnection=E2=
=80=9D? Was
it an IRC channel? Was trump talking directly to a Russian bank over
AOL instant messenger?? Lol what a joke it turned out to be.
Good luck to you as you wade through mountains of MSM excrement in
search of answers. It=E2=80=99s easy to find the allegations and hard to fi=
nd
the truth. Is that by accident?
Make distrusting the intelligence agencies great again!
1. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-server-tied-to-russi...
reply
=09
=09
VintageCool 2 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
It was three servers doing DNS lookups on each other.
One was Alfa Bank.
One was in Trump Tower.
One was at Spectrum Health, which is owned by the DeVos family.
Notable members include Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos and
Blackwater founder Erik Prince. Erik Prince is known to set up
backchannel meetings between the Trump team and Putin associates in
the Seychelles.
reply
=09
=09
ed25519FUUU 2 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
You=E2=80=99re leaving out the crucial details as to why any DNS queries or
connections were made, while also still clinging to some allusion of
malfeasance.
Also you might want to let Snopes know. They still have it as =E2=80=9Cunpr=
oven=E2=80=9D
reply
=09
=09
dragonwriter 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Maybe, but news from 1975 that already was part of revelations of that
nature that triggered their backlash, legislative responses, and every
other kind of =E2=80=9Changover=E2=80=9D they could, before many people vot=
ing today
we're even born, probably aren't much of a factor in that except as
precedent and context, not news or triggering events.
reply
=09
=09
ed25519FUUU 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
If you thought it was bad in 1975, wait until you learn about the
patriot act, FISA courts, and FVEYS!
reply
=09
=09
dragonwriter 3 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
There weren't =E2=80=9CFISA courts=E2=80=9D before the revelations in the 1=
970s
because there was no judicial oversight or legal limits with penalties
applied to surveillance by the national security apparatus at all.
FISA, the courts it created, and the criminalization of domestic
surveillance outside of specified limitations were part of the
backlash against the abuses that were revealed in the mid-1970s.
reply
=09
=09
ed25519FUUU 2 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
I miss the days when =E2=80=9Cwiretapping=E2=80=9D someone literally requir=
ed you to
physically tap into a wire. It=E2=80=99s so much easier to do it now.
reply
=09
=09
tehjoker 6 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
[flagged]
=09
=09
krapp 6 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
>It's crazy how the intelligence agencies used Trump to make themselves loo=
k like knights in shining armor to liberals
That's not a thing that actually happened - "liberals" don't trust the
intelligence agencies any more or less than they did before Trump. And
I don't know why this article has people suddenly running defense for
Trump when it doesn't even mention him. But interesting play
nonetheless.
reply
=09
=09
tehjoker 6 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Remember all the intelligence people, like former CIA director Brennan
that became MSNBC pundits? Remember the time they made a big deal of
Trump offending the CIA in front of the wall of fallen heroes?
For the record, I despise Trump. I am not defending him, but I don't
like people thinking highly of the longstanding dark institutions that
have been at the heart of American politics since WW2. Trump =3D Bad
does not mean any other part of the American state is good.
reply
=09
=09
AndrewBissell 6 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
It's not just the intelligence agencies. Gallup polling shows
liberals' trust in the media skyrocketed after Trump's election and
has remained persistently high despite the whole Russiagate farce.
reply
=09
=09
triceratops 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
> Russiagate farce
You mean when the DoJ indicted, charged, or successfully prosecuted a
number of Russian nationals and members of the Trump administration
for election-related crimes or obstruction of justice? That farce?
Like someone said, "For a purported witchhunt, they sure found a lot
of actual witches."
reply
=09
=09
jokethrowaway 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
As an outsider I don't follow much USA politics, so apologies if I got
the gist wrong and I'd appreciate corrections. For my bias, I mainly
read left wing publications, listen to right wing YouTubers and I'm an
anarcho-capitalist.
The claim sold by the media was that Russia "hacked" the elections,
making Trump win. (that was before this year's message that election
meddling is highly unlikely)
What was found out was contact with Russia to dig dirt on Trump's opponents=
.
Sure, it may be illegal, but that's hardly interesting.
reply
=09
=09
triceratops 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
> The claim sold by the media was that Russia "hacked" the elections
I didn't see that. Most of the claims were about Russian social media
campaigns. We'll never know if those campaigns made a significant
difference, but they certainly did happen. The other big thing was the
DNC hack, also probably orchestrated by Russia.
> What was found out was contact with Russia to dig dirt on Trump's opponen=
ts.
I'd call that highly illegal, highly interesting, and even more
worrisome than the prospect of a few hacked Diebold machines. A
President who conspired with a foreign power to win election? Can you
imagine the leverage that foreign power would have over such a
President? With machine hacking, the President can claim ignorance. No
such chance here.
The last guy who did that was named Richard Nixon.[1][2]
1. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/08/06/nixon-vie...
2. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/notes-indicate-nix...
reply
=09
=09
maxerickson 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
There were not mainstream US media claims that the Russians hacked the
2016 elections. On the other hand, there were lots of stories about
Russian influence operations.
reply
=09
=09
ed25519FUUU 1 hour ago [=E2=80=93]
Did you watch basically any cable news in 2016? They literally started
the Russian collusion special counsel investigations from allegations
Russia hacked the DNC and released the emails to help Trump.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/how-t...
reply
=09
=09
maxerickson 1 hour ago [=E2=80=93]
The phrase 'Russia "hacked" the elections, making Trump win' implies
tampering with the voting and vote counting. You've linked an
influence operation that may have involved computer hacking.
It's also, you know, pretty clear that Russia was running influence
operations, not a media delusion.
reply
=09
=09
AnthonyMouse 6 minutes ago [=E2=80=93]
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1344319775464415239
=09
=09
AndrewBissell 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
If all that was on offer from the beginning was taking out a few
lackeys like Manafort and Stone obviously it wouldn't have captured
liberals' attention the way it did. They were expecting a big break of
evidence that Trump was a Manchurian candidate installed by the master
Svengali Putin. It was a classic psychological deflection tactic on
liberals' part, "Trump's election can't be a symptom of any real
institutional rot in America, it's just a result of dirty foreign
tricks that will be exposed and easily rectified by removing Trump."
Even the New Yorker was finally forced to admit "maybe we went too far
with this." https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/09/14/is-russian-med...
reply
=09
=09
triceratops 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
> They were expecting a big break of evidence that Trump was a Manchurian c=
andidate installed by the master Svengali Putin
"It couldn't be proved to be bad as some people said" is not the same
thing as "farce". The stuff that was proven was bad and illegal.
The Mueller report concluded that there was some evidence of
coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia.[1] The
investigation achieved multiple convictions and indictments.
> "Trump's election can't be a symptom of any real institutional rot in Ame=
rica, it's just a result of dirty foreign tricks that will be exposed and e=
asily rectified by removing Trump.
It's not an either-or. Trump was only ever a competitive candidate due
to real, deep problems and widespread disillusionment with the
establishment. But it's also possible that Russian social media
campaigns, the DNC email hacks, and the Comey letter tipped the scales
(80k votes in 3 states) in his favor in 2016. We'll never really know.
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mueller_report#Redacted_report...
reply
=09
=09
jeffreyrogers 6 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Liberals tripped over themselves to push a story about Russian
bounties that can't be corroborated[0] and that was criticized by
people like Glenn Greenwald, hardly a right-winger. It's fine to hate
Trump I guess and if you think the ends justify the means, that's your
right, but it's demonstrably true that people who in normal years
would be highly skeptical of anything coming out of the intelligence
agencies are eager to promote anything that makes the Trump
administration look bad.
Edit: Another aspect of this story is that it was pushed after
bipartisan support for exiting Afghanistan was emerging. So basically
this "information" was put out there to keep us in a war no one likes
and the putatively anti-war party eagerly promoted it because Trump is
bad.
Edit 2: I fully expected this comment to be downvoted, but I hope some
of you downvoters will engage with my argument in the replies, since
most of you have no argument against my claims, which are factually
true.
[0]: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/top-pentagon-officials-russi...
reply
=09
=09
JumpCrisscross 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Anyone claiming the Russian bounty program was a certainty or a hoax
is misinformed. Some credible agencies had a high degree of
confidence; others, such as the NSA, disagreed [1]. =E2=80=9CCan=E2=80=99t =
be
corroborated=E2=80=9D reflects the NSA=E2=80=99s view, but not the CIA or N=
IC=E2=80=99s, who
found it =E2=80=9Ccredibly sourced and plausible, but falling short of
certainty.=E2=80=9D
[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_bounty_program
reply
=09
=09
cheaprentalyeti 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
I can't even say this without sounding like a "whataboutism," but the
main material support for the Taliban in Afghanistan, for the last
nineteen years, roughly two decades of war, has been Pakistan, and
we've done NOTHING about it but keep shoveling them money in exchange
for the transit rights to ship material through to support our troops
in a rearguard fight against their minions.
WE are paying people to kill US troops by ignoring what Pakistan does
with the money.
And that they were harboring Osama Bin Laden for a decade.
But we need to chase rumors that Russia does the same. Yeah, right.
Maybe we need to stop sending troops to countries where they're not
accomplishing anything besides being hostages?
reply
=09
=09
AndrewBissell 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
The tone of the initial NYT story that broke the scoop certainly
didn't reflect any of this uncertainty. Would have been a good idea
for them to check in with the NSA or the DoD first!
reply
=09
=09
Zetaphor 6 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
James Comey and Robert Mueller were popular among the left (of which I
consider myself a part) because of their resistance to Trump
reply
=09
=09
munk-a 6 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
"among the left" is a really wide net to throw and I don't think it
really does any favors to your statement to be so overly general.
I think it's pretty much the mirror image of the Benghazi
investigations. Some investigating needed to happen, but politics got
involved and turned the whole thing into a circus. This isn't
particularly surprising since the US's two party system usually leads
to extremely incompatible "truths" now that social media bubbles
exist.
reply
=09
=09
8note 1 hour ago [=E2=80=93]
I'm pretty sure the left dislikes James Comey quite a lot since he did
a last minute "give Trump's Hillary emails conspiracy a false sense of
legitimacy right before the election" thing
reply
=09
=09
AndrewBissell 6 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Both of these guys have been involved in really shady stuff in
America's past, they are career company men and never represented or
mounted any real threat to Trump. Comey may even be a big part of how
Trump even became POTUS in the first place.
reply
=09
=09
bee_rider 6 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
"The left" is multiply defined. If you mean Democrats generally, the
party has become the number one home of middle class people with
college degrees. They are naturally going to be more comfortable with
the FBI than, say, old school left wing labor activists.
It seems less likely that opinions are changing, and more likely that
people with certain opinions are moving.
reply
=09
=09
krapp 6 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
> James Comey and Robert Mueller were popular among the left (of which I co=
nsider myself a part) because of their resistance to Trump
Because of their resistance to Trump. That doesn't translate to the
left, in general, suddenly being in favor of and trusting the three
letter agencies or the military industrial complex. You know, the side
of the political spectrum with all of the anti-war protestors and
socialists.
The narrative is bizarre.
Edit: never mind, I see this is about discrediting Russiagate for
whatever reason, I get it now.
reply
=09
=09
dukeofdoom 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
They've done a great job with political prosecutions of Trump's inner
circle and the people that helped to get him elected.
Successful Prosecuted or Charged:
Steve Bannon
Michale Flyn
Julian Assange
Paul Manaford
And Trump Himself (impeachment)
Let that be a lesson to any future Populists!
reply
=09
=09
munk-a 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
I assume that was stated with heavy sarcasm since two of those people
(Micheal Flynn + Paul Manafort) have already been pardoned[1] and none
of them were either handed or likely to be handed serious sentences
anyways. Michael Flynn is as close as you can get to a legit case of
treason and his sentencing had already been kicked down the road
several times.
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_granted_executi...
reply
=09
=09
dukeofdoom 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Well actually, Flynn case was based on him lying to an FBI agent
during a party. The case was pure entrapment. It was so bad, that
eventually the government itself asked for the case to be dismissed.
Then a partisan hack judge (Sullivan), decided that he was going to
continue with the prosecution by appointing his own prosecutor (I kid
you not).
Watch a lawyer explain what happened:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DsvYdF4UvJf0
More background:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DQKQG1lM0gvU
reply
=09
=09
mhh__ 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
> It was so bad, that eventually the government itself asked for the case =
to be dismissed.
I'm sure that's why and not Flynn's relationship with the President...
reply
=09
=09
dukeofdoom 3 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
If you think the courts are on Trump's side, you haven't been paying attent=
ion.
reply
=09
=09
8note 2 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Didnt the government ask for the case to be dismissed after flyn had
already pled guilty?
reply
=09
=09
namdnay 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
> It was so bad, that eventually the government itself asked for the case t=
o be dismissed
=E2=80=9CThe government=E2=80=9D being William Barr... I=E2=80=99m not sure=
how him pushing to
drop charges on a fellow Trump ally signals anything about their
validity
reply
=09
=09
useragent86 3 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
This is a great example of how public perception has been manipulated
by the media.
In fact, the Obama DOJ set Flynn up, sending two FBI agents to
question him before the transition to the new administration. They
pretended that he was not the subject of the investigation, so Flynn
felt no need to have an attorney present while being questioned.
Afterward, the FBI agents themselves, on the form they filled out
regarding the interview, stated that they did not think that Flynn
lied.
Regardless of that, the DOJ continued to prosecute Flynn for doing
something completely normal for an incoming National Security Advisor
to do, speak with a foreign diplomat. Only after bankrupting him with
legal fees, which even forced him to sell his home, did they relent.
And then, when the DOJ refused to further prosecute Flynn, a federal
judge refused to dismiss the case, a bizarre act forcing Flynn's
attorneys to file a plea with a superior court. The judge even
appointed his own prosecutor to continue prosecuting Flynn!
Now, why did all this happen? Is it because the then-newly elected
President's incoming National Security Advisor spoke with a foreign
diplomat? Or is it because the Obama administration hated Flynn
because of what he did while running DIA (which they fired him for),
and the incoming President appointed him to be his National Security
Advisor, and the DOJ is apparently full of "#resist"ers?
But that's not a perspective you'll hear from NYT, CNN, WaPo, etc.
From them, you hear, "Treason!"
The old saying applies: You can fool some of the people some of the time...
reply
=09
=09
munk-a 2 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
> Regardless of that, the DOJ continued to prosecute Flynn for doing someth=
ing completely normal for an incoming National Security Advisor to do, spea=
k with a foreign diplomat. Only after bankrupting him with legal fees, whic=
h even forced him to sell his home, did they relent.
Just to clarify here... Michael Flynn was retained by a Turkish firm
to try and run PR against a cleric that had fled to the US - he was
not "reaching out" or "establishing open lines" - he was employed as a
hatchet man against an American resident while employed as a National
Security Advisor. When you take a cabinet level position in the US
government it's generally accepted that you sever all foreign
financial ties.
reply
=09
=09
namdnay 3 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
> the DOJ continued to prosecute Flynn for doing something completely norma=
l for an incoming National Security Advisor to do, speak with a foreign
So normal that he lied about it to the press and his own entire
incoming administration? Yeah right
reply
=09
=09
dukeofdoom 3 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
He's an Ally in the same Brutus was to Caesar.
1) Did not investigate any voter Fraud. Still ran his mouth saying
there was none. Georgia seems to have a Zombie voting problem.
Amazing!
2) Sat on the Hunter Biden investigation. Knew there was one, kept his
mouth shut about it before the election when it could have helped
Trump.
Its debatable how much loyalty Republicans have to Trump.
reply
=09
=09
namdnay 3 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
> He's an Ally in the same Brutus was to Caesar.
An interesting analogy...Brutus who was close and loyal to Caesar
until Caesar=E2=80=99s extrajudicial and dictatorial excesses pushed him to
put republic before family and kill his mentor? :)
reply
=09
=09
dukeofdoom 2 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Except Trump is not a dictator, no matter how much the TV tells you so.
What you should realize you are defending the current two party system
in the US. The same cabal of people that have been in power forever.
Communism fell and new people took over. But these US politicians
predate that. They're so old and corrupt, they are literally crapping
their pants on live TV. Enjoy the Biden administration. Its all you
deserve.
https://youtu.be/7l04Xovebuc?t=3D32
reply
=09
=09
8note 2 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Kicking Flynn to jail is something you should support then?
He's himself admitted to being one of those corrupt folks you're against.
What makes you think trump isn't more of the same corruption? He brags
about being a donor with benefits over the past 20+ years.
The bad results from this corruption is the stuff that trump and his
compatriots wanted done
reply
=09
=09
not_a_moth 6 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
> sham =E2=80=9Crevolutionary=E2=80=9D front groups used to disrupt a varie=
ty of political activities in this country
More recently, the riots leading up to 2020 election. Glad they
mysteriously stopped now anyways.
reply
=09
=09
tehjoker 6 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
It got cold out is the more obvious explanation. There's a reason they
are called "hot summers" in the history books.
However, there is an element of truth in the fact that the Biden
campaign succeeded in coopting liberal civil rights people after the
election. IMO they should continue to fight hard against state
oppression, which will continue regardless of the face of power.
reply
=09
=09
tuesdayrain 2 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Google trends shows major spikes in "black lives matter" searches
around election time
https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=3Dtoday%205-y&ge...
It's foolish to assume that is a coincidence.
reply
=09
=09
chokeartist 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
> It got cold out is the more obvious explanation.
Right. Because if Trump won the cold would have curtailed rioting.
Totally believable.
reply
=09
=09
zug_zug 6 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
If it were up to me, I'd pass a law saying anybody hired by such
agencies must take an oath to America, to report their bosses within
the agency who violate morality, democracy, or legality, to an
oversight court.
Consider just for one moment how likely you would be to ask somebody
to do something illegal if they have taken an oath to report you to an
oversight body.
reply
=09
=09
cies 6 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
They take oaths and break them. Oaths dont help.
We need: less dark budgets, less people/positions "above the law",
whistle blower protection programs for these heroes, and put people in
jail who thought to be above the law (this never happened yet).
You can go to jail for some weed, but executing
evil-yet-state-sponsored atrocities is a serious career. Topsy turvy
all the way.
reply
=09
=09
munk-a 6 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
I agree specifically with less people/positions "above the law" but
it'll be rough. The law in this case is politics - it's whatever the
people say it is - and the political system is terribly broken right
now. I think it is still proper to move these agencies to have more
civilian oversight but in the short term we're going to see a whole
lot of abuse of the system until our representation can be fixed.
reply
=09
=09
walshemj 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Should have split the FBI into a federal police force (with much
stricter limits) and a smaller mi5 equivalent.
reply
=09
=09
munk-a 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
I'm pretty certain we did - and that mi5 equivalent is the CIA.
reply
=09
=09
walshemj 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
CIA cant work internally "supposedly"
reply
=09
=09
rgblambda 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Doesn't stop MI5 from doing shady shit.
reply
=09
=09
cwkoss 4 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Fully agree. Pardoning Snowden would be the most effective single act
a president could take towards reducing corruption in the intelligence
community.
reply
=09
=09
rmrfstar 6 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
While the title is about CIA, its actually a story about DOJ and FBI.
[1] The rot runs pretty deep.
[1] https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/11/09/how-a-cia-cove...
reply
=09
=09
meekrohprocess 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
I wish that modern oaths also had curse clauses. It seems oddly common
for autocrats and kleptocrats to have no problem screwing over
millions of people, while still being terrified of religious or
superstitious wrath.
"So help me god" is not enough. How about, "And should I ever violate
this sacred oath, in thought or in deed, may I be forever cursed and
damned."
Anyways, the US military already takes those sorts of oaths to refuse
and report illegal orders, but they still commit plenty of war crimes.
reply
=09
=09
Lammy 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
=E2=80=9CAgain, your ancestors were taught, =E2=80=98Never swear an oath th=
at you
don=E2=80=99t intend to keep, but keep your vows to the Lord God.=E2=80=99 =
However, I
say to you, don=E2=80=99t bind yourself by taking an oath at all. Don=E2=80=
=99t swear
by heaven, for heaven is where God=E2=80=99s throne is placed. Don=E2=80=99=
t swear an
oath by the earth, because it is the rug under God=E2=80=99s feet, and not =
by
Jerusalem, because it is the city of the Great King. And why would you
swear by your own head, because it=E2=80=99s not in your power to turn a
single hair white or black? But just let your words ring true. A
simple =E2=80=98Yes=E2=80=99 or =E2=80=98No=E2=80=99 will suffice. Anything=
beyond this springs from a
deceiver.=E2=80=9D
- Matthew 5: 33=E2=80=9337 (TPT)
reply
=09
=09
AaronFriel 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
There are evangelical Christian sites that interpret this as oaths of
office being non-binding or non-Christian, and while I don't think
many people consciously use that as a reason for violating their
oaths, it's something to keep in mind.
reply
=09
=09
munk-a 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
These are extremely twisted interpretations - a better way to read
that is "Don't be a dick whether or not you took an oath - be truthful
in all things."
Those interpretations don't surprise me though since, like with any
other group of people, there are a bunch of evangelical christians
that bend the tenants of the group beyond a breaking point to suit
their own interest.
reply
=09
=09
jfk13 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Who bend the tenants....? I don't think you mean that.
Tenets, perhaps.
reply
=09
=09
pjc50 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
I believe there's a similar clause in the German constitution.
Something about all those people claiming at Nuremburg to just be
following orders.
reply
=09
=09
boomboomsubban 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
While the sentiment is good, this doesn't sound much different from
loyalty oaths and policing your neighbors.
reply
=09
=09
jokethrowaway 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
That's never going to work. Power mostly attracts the worst individuals.
The only solution is not having these agencies
reply
=09
=09
DubiousPusher 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
What? Get rid of the oaths entirely. It's just pageantry. It's the
most human thing in the world to twist words to your desire and then
justify it morally through rationist gymnastics.
reply
=09
=09
dietr1ch 5 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
I'm ok with them only taking an oath to the US if that means they
won't mess around with the rest of America
reply
=09
=09
colejohnson66 6 hours ago [=E2=80=93]
Don=E2=80=99t they already do?
reply
"
-------------- next part --------------
Delivered-To: gmkarl at gmail.com
Received: by 2002:a2e:b816:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u22csp12828111ljo;
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 19:45:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a19:10:: with SMTP id 16mr252459lfa.334.1609472734736;
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 19:45:34 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=3; a=rsa-sha256; t=1609472734; cv=pass;
d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
b=VOqdIWxzris/gDIz345q3hYJsKtiVCyGW4Q0KzVltY9Ib6+LVhCp44jY99Za3GYbM3
6vBhH/2W3l2/3Ow3HS+JcE0ai8JDkNwNXaMNBe0iH2bZ++0IlpCiIQbyT1+gudi/6yzS
+nr59msmzIyx2At4YuQIFDG5qKODt8GnuQCAM4yL50RzMFaqW65CQlVWh6IsQ82INFtQ
c+hq0ZjK7CXRCgYhpJ7eu8W5RnDEhB7i/yyyer4YfXGvlc3zjvnCwEQFq48o34f5sbVN
j7ADYH0xuiOqfb+OBGOM5PiaU1aEZlCXcZiWF6+uYEKzfHqHfdrB5obMxV4Rnn1VBbi/
VUTw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=3; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
h=sender:errors-to:list-subscribe:list-help:list-post:list-archive
:list-unsubscribe:list-id:precedence:to:subject:message-id:date:from
:mime-version:dkim-signature:delivered-to:delivered-to:delivered-to;
bh=GIkBeSEGowfv3gO9/1WS3D52Ehzpby1dORa0tKOsX9Y=;
b=pCn8uVfwVOWn/jMRS8UegPcDw/RodY5PhPBDl09PaZuM3V9NHNjBrekDA75AZSQPuv
XAwJk9Oh5ddEArrghd5GdjTqItrfnpOLfXlGyQguLx3hq4WPYsK7mA7K0JEXT5BVxhsI
Se56NMJO3+3kCmYP1kBrAcyTiziGkvOoY/XL3Xv3ONRhMOcb3HTv/WJ3TExa+CJVRELn
R+FbtuZhn2KB+cpIp8m80l7gauj0WjEozCBYeNmVKfV3ZzexSFLrxK8/K28rMOtVpbtb
FZmuEvWRiycXTxbNmJjtw3lY1xnyxplhlWr8X5pdWLIftcNNcFIf0g3nN2fHjyliutEH
bSfA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=3; mx.google.com;
dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=HT+qpVwx;
arc=pass (i=2 spf=pass spfdomain=gmail.com dkim=pass dkdomain=gmail.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=gmail.com);
spf=pass (google.com: domain of baffo32+caf_=gmkarl=gmail.com at gmail.com designates 209.85.220.41 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="baffo32+caf_=gmkarl=gmail.com at gmail.com";
dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
Return-Path: <baffo32+caf_=gmkarl=gmail.com at gmail.com>
Received: from mail-sor-f41.google.com (mail-sor-f41.google.com. [209.85.220.41])
by mx.google.com with SMTPS id s22sor28595330ljp.67.2020.12.31.19.45.34
for <gmkarl at gmail.com>
(Google Transport Security);
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 19:45:34 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of baffo32+caf_=gmkarl=gmail.com at gmail.com designates 209.85.220.41 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.41;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=HT+qpVwx;
arc=pass (i=2 spf=pass spfdomain=gmail.com dkim=pass dkdomain=gmail.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=gmail.com);
spf=pass (google.com: domain of baffo32+caf_=gmkarl=gmail.com at gmail.com designates 209.85.220.41 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="baffo32+caf_=gmkarl=gmail.com at gmail.com";
dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
Authentication-Results: mx1.riseup.net;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="HT+qpVwx";
dkim-atps=neutral
Authentication-Results: pglaf.org;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="HT+qpVwx";
dkim-atps=neutral
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:delivered-to:delivered-to:delivered-to
:dkim-signature:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:precedence:list-id:list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:list-subscribe:errors-to:sender;
bh=GIkBeSEGowfv3gO9/1WS3D52Ehzpby1dORa0tKOsX9Y=;
b=bju4ltLZuYA0APOH7k+SMZE+Ax5giWy9Og/Se/FlzxEuQChV7pHxgNb6BRtsBwediL
TRRas4u3l99K6WC/gfFNa49qN1bGenRS+a8hYEcdeZTJlUubadLQKglwuFInKHNokKqG
jEjE9LN57KBqqIbDNOxDiD3P/E9LipZAzXHmwCjnyNx7yBkDyWwkD98AoB6hppLuoOp2
xHUyc6zedxcQfFZJkVujCxUXldFIKuvur3m3R7RnTxZaqvZcblWx2+vwSR2ijMbrb/zi
aR6vwc3ZOLUd1CVeZYhkx4re0tOhvZgBTq79sdjc7fPf9niFUcJ5JqBvkNJd4PZg/3CR
9Zfw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532p4jLRcdCCx5fc4++ygeIHmEfNVfU2Vrn4DP/MuKHaNpsmyHtM
dMpoh7pnxSFkUIHtJ5umaex4m58iPaSzCNniWIHav7htTLmTbgVitQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:3503:: with SMTP id z3mr31203524ljz.74.1609472734591;
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 19:45:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Forwarded-To: gmkarl at gmail.com
X-Forwarded-For: baffo32 at gmail.com gmkarl at gmail.com
Delivered-To: baffo32 at gmail.com
Received: by 2002:ac2:51da:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u26csp13035384lfm;
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 19:45:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:77c5:: with SMTP id m5mr54389922ejn.424.1609472733606;
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 19:45:33 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1609472733; cv=pass;
d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
b=Dy60adQtay2l14J45R6uwhS0cf3LDZ23pYOdVcfvjU2OzVsEbRJukR1YP1sMqX8JTL
YczOfIVbV7JpEpD/vS/eMLDMt4deDkqkXCd2SJa7B5I2hCqqdcpVyetcChS1GIVx1sK7
eoUxSE7M9PRraBpMwU4fx30yhZA6EJ+cxbcsbpk+OapVeP7pwW5SwidSpIdfu7MqIITy
DCgXQip6LDxy/hx+eJRgHj8oNkkw1lti2wqt4+5K8ZkQKuE9Cz9387MUQjzm/woVzrup
QlHvJO3UzSP5Mi7XLSctOSlkcTiJElHMHOvDPW+dAuvwyoHul4Q05GHrx/kS0UuGya4d
OahA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
h=sender:errors-to:list-subscribe:list-help:list-post:list-archive
:list-unsubscribe:list-id:precedence:to:subject:message-id:date:from
:mime-version:dkim-signature:delivered-to:delivered-to;
bh=GIkBeSEGowfv3gO9/1WS3D52Ehzpby1dORa0tKOsX9Y=;
b=gFS35Nu23LVn56ISu2eHIly4Q5rjI95e2HVLmlGwhJCznKUX2j17vSOIESS89Js5vy
hwKcjEtOVUunTWvAEf9/Y9Zl3m8FIdEriHXgzmFkb8nche00+XVwy7zgS47DkPyH8r+e
qni66r+x6hTqEJjtpUmJkKgWAuVpo3oI4bfeYHBMavDfii67iPKHLv7ntpaLSedJlVZv
xAmftCEir2ckryu1JhdXzgLOvoPbR7iZEpRdueBQQD7Oqy7mVjxjMDyT2Jyy6S/C5ViT
LUaPprWkNoePz/aPY7+SGOP4ah8aAwc4e98BPbM0d6lQ1tL5DblSi/7XHQAvtkmf83LJ
OpmA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com;
dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=HT+qpVwx;
arc=pass (i=1 dkim=pass dkdomain=gmail.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=gmail.com);
spf=pass (google.com: domain of 0xloem+caf_=baffo32=gmail.com at gmail.com designates 209.85.220.41 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="0xloem+caf_=baffo32=gmail.com at gmail.com";
dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
Return-Path: <0xloem+caf_=baffo32=gmail.com at gmail.com>
Received: from mail-sor-f41.google.com (mail-sor-f41.google.com. [209.85.220.41])
by mx.google.com with SMTPS id a23sor40448498edn.1.2020.12.31.19.45.33
for <baffo32 at gmail.com>
(Google Transport Security);
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 19:45:33 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of 0xloem+caf_=baffo32=gmail.com at gmail.com designates 209.85.220.41 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.41;
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c603:: with SMTP id h3mr53642889edq.254.1609472733481;
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 19:45:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Forwarded-To: baffo32 at gmail.com
X-X-Forwarded-For: 0xloem at gmail.com baffo32 at gmail.com
Delivered-To: 0xloem at gmail.com
Received: by 2002:ab4:a744:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id fg4csp12286821ecb;
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 19:45:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxR7Eofpv/0K61uiVQk/mADa6X2UQdV57jSJSfjveK4JRf6uy6lV4Dw8IE5oQRFtzkV+yHv
X-Received: by 2002:a65:6381:: with SMTP id h1mr59635527pgv.301.1609472732193;
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 19:45:32 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1609472732; cv=none;
d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
b=kXXtdhJdQAWmb1CBwoGCO7JgkimBNawXYv7g4fD5KaVN6vBUrvUrZearj9p5SuYBMm
csxyhRHWKwUe/H0WmLvvrUQo2VXeDEdsCHwV0CCIJyjg8RcNAfldHTl8+QGZYAk0HyXK
h2QrNbI78USRByUIWXuJCmMeuuUFYqqhObtVWtSX0PZzI1mEun5vZwF2RFhfP2jUb8bF
gzi1gWOtrjtFfvnqS3KfCY2TZkErZhkeftWGauhEqetrWRY4X6+gBkS3Bbuj/9cIh0h3
CFH5YLTsM6obk0+T+l6M6lnHGRLOxBoj3S/lt8eHHqxkZ4mg3stu8E1Fx9IV9g/7pDb+
VhEg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
h=sender:errors-to:list-subscribe:list-help:list-post:list-archive
:list-unsubscribe:list-id:precedence:to:subject:message-id:date:from
:mime-version:dkim-signature:delivered-to;
bh=GIkBeSEGowfv3gO9/1WS3D52Ehzpby1dORa0tKOsX9Y=;
b=cIJ0v9u38G1dJoDr967pnnu1hGftlDMCqHS3uDMffmpVBigMYV+qGv2saDNR5Vug8W
ecUqiKG6A/YqDWSDeRF6+8im5WI2qYXeyXzLpXPbL7o1lWO7n744lioa3bvQHr9mSS7p
Iz/yK+gf3vLdlcsUZIVV1TpmbYWi1tz7CIcffB4r7KYV9f9xOGgn3pQOOBsqjajzB3vX
OsFHjOwj33d0tHFQWOGo+nalemr7Ts16xx2mPYM1oDW9sYH9EQVf4MOxPfHpg3uCFJpm
NlXvdQncxAEJTsCIgbqP4smUBOhniekhMY+TtGZaOaEorAq6NOsyTh3Glo0R9yW7nuKf
BTjw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;
dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=HT+qpVwx;
spf=fail (google.com: domain of cypherpunks-bounces at lists.cpunks.org does not designate 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=cypherpunks-bounces at lists.cpunks.org;
dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
Return-Path: <cypherpunks-bounces at lists.cpunks.org>
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net. [198.252.153.129])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b8si48057712plz.192.2020.12.31.19.45.31
for <0xloem at gmail.com>
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256);
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 19:45:32 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: fail (google.com: domain of cypherpunks-bounces at lists.cpunks.org does not designate 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender) client-ip=198.252.153.129;
Received: from pglaf.org (mail.pglaf.org [65.50.255.19])
by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6WB85h0RzDsXJ;
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 19:45:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pglaf.org (Postfix, from userid 116)
id 897A311C0467; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 19:44:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail.pglaf.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable
autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from mail.pglaf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pglaf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6D3F11C036D;
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 19:44:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: cypherpunks at lists.cpunks.org
Delivered-To: cypherpunks at lists.cpunks.org
Received: by pglaf.org (Postfix, from userid 116)
id 5119411C0382; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 19:44:48 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.217.53;
helo=mail-vs1-f53.google.com; envelope-from=cecilia.tanaka at gmail.com;
receiver=<UNKNOWN>
Received: from mail-vs1-f53.google.com (mail-vs1-f53.google.com
[209.85.217.53])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pglaf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5760011C00E1
for <cypherpunks at lists.cpunks.org>; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 19:44:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vs1-f53.google.com with SMTP id u7so10722780vsg.11
for <cypherpunks at lists.cpunks.org>; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 19:44:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=GIkBeSEGowfv3gO9/1WS3D52Ehzpby1dORa0tKOsX9Y=;
b=HT+qpVwxMW8rGh31YZVtghawlrljudMB7eYm7p6NRc2NpkApVRjjzuKAnWNdQMsNEG
NBJlcm3rnK62q3AZIctBqgHypcFBhLfac2gqtM9p8CCYW9y9rjb9vwF86Ay2fzLeF5mp
bM7EGNNiBrFqt4UpAMa3JpiX66DHdv6hdl038Q1WkEVJ6bXiRT/joPxoFEjwra2jUi5+
3FbjG/hVtGo1yZQNFesIxeKokhfJhqLr6GqD/WRDX9VDjskcGihF6x6DEpy5YTPF4aGn
qZflVt+KiSV5duE2jlSc/Qilk33mEjgRB7NC9Kq3kPwJ2Dyrl4F9JNPjXu9drdJ4tnRV
WlBg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:215c:: with SMTP id
h28mr36532886vsg.58.1609472623151;
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 19:43:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Cecilia Tanaka <cecilia.tanaka at gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2021 00:43:32 -0300
Message-ID: <CAG2tMp4ja2eB6qqq93o5o04=sGRYV-7RN-yTPZg+enOh+69EoA at mail.gmail.com>
Subject: 2021 from Brazil...
To: CypherPunks <cypherpunks at lists.cpunks.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fa8e1a05b7ce8b36"
X-BeenThere: cypherpunks at lists.cpunks.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Cypherpunks Mailing List <cypherpunks.lists.cpunks.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.cpunks.org/mailman/options/cypherpunks>,
<mailto:cypherpunks-request at lists.cpunks.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks>
List-Post: <mailto:cypherpunks at lists.cpunks.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cypherpunks-request at lists.cpunks.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.cpunks.org/mailman/listinfo/cypherpunks>,
<mailto:cypherpunks-request at lists.cpunks.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: cypherpunks-bounces at lists.cpunks.org
Sender: "cypherpunks" <cypherpunks-bounces at lists.cpunks.org>
--000000000000fa8e1a05b7ce8b36
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I do love you, Cypherpunks List. Sincerely, Tenderly, Like a girl trying
learning about a whole new world and several different perspectives... I
disagree of some of them, but is fascinating to have so many different
people are searching for a better world, without censorship and unfair
governments too.
Thank you from the bottom of my heart for being so special, even in your
more decadent state!!! You and the Cypherpunks will be great again!!! <3
Without you all, a lot of us would be already (suici)died because of the
way the society judge our dreams, our fears, our "paranoia" with
governments and institutions... Well, this list is very therapeutic,
hahaha!!! ;D
And in several moments, Cypherpunks List, you are my only source of sexual
fun, because really do _fuck_ my patience and my mind, hahahaha!!! ;D
(The government also fucks me but it's always a brutal rape, with lots of
pain and without condom or consent!)
Love each one of you in my own way. Wish you all many tender kisses, warm
hugs, and hot chocolate with marshmallows. I ate my last Japanese
marshmallow right now and, well, it was gorgeous to feel its taste... Mush
less sweet than Brazilian and North-American candies, soft like a hug... :)
I do love you all more than you think. That's the reason I am (still) not
a spammer serial killer, hahahaha!!! ;D
Wish you all sincere happiness, physical, emocional and psychological
health, serenity, inner peace, self-love, patience, good sleep, and more
love to each other, even when the other sucks... ;)
Take care and be well, please. Courage, Strength, Music and Fun.
Ceci. <3
----------
Loving. Caring. Sharing. Being Excellent To Each Other And To Our
Hackerspace. <3
----------
"Don't let anyone rob you of your imagination, your creativity, or your
curiosity. It's your place in the world; it's your life. Go on and do all
you can with it, and make it the life you want to live." - Mae Jemison
--000000000000fa8e1a05b7ce8b36
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"auto">I do love you, Cypherpunks List.=C2=A0 Sincerely, Tenderl=
y, Like a girl trying learning about a whole new world and several differen=
t perspectives...=C2=A0 I disagree of some of them, but is fascinating to h=
ave so many different people are searching for a better world, without cens=
orship and unfair governments too.<div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"a=
uto">Thank you from the bottom of my heart for being so special, even in yo=
ur more decadent state!!!=C2=A0 You and the Cypherpunks will be great again=
!!!=C2=A0 <3<div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Without you al=
l, a lot of us would be already (suici)died because of the way the society =
judge our dreams, our fears, our "paranoia" with governments and =
institutions...=C2=A0 Well, this list is very therapeutic, hahaha!!!=C2=A0 =
=C2=A0;D</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">And in several =
moments, Cypherpunks List, you are my only source of sexual fun, because re=
ally do _fuck_ my patience and my mind, hahahaha!!!=C2=A0 ;D=C2=A0</div><di=
v dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">(The government also fucks me bu=
t it's always a brutal rape, with lots of pain and without condom or co=
nsent!)<br><br>Love each one of you in my own way.=C2=A0 Wish you all many =
tender kisses, warm hugs, and hot chocolate with marshmallows.=C2=A0 I ate =
my last Japanese marshmallow right now and, well, it was gorgeous to feel i=
ts taste...=C2=A0 Mush less sweet than Brazilian and North-American candies=
, soft like a hug...=C2=A0 :)</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"=
auto">I do love you all more than you think.=C2=A0 That's the reason I =
am (still) not a spammer serial killer, hahahaha!!!=C2=A0 ;D</div><div dir=
=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Wish you all sincere happiness, physi=
cal, emocional and psychological health, serenity, inner peace, self-love, =
patience, good sleep, and more love to each other, even when the other suck=
s...=C2=A0 ;)</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Take care =
and be well, please.=C2=A0 Courage, Strength, Music and Fun.</div><div dir=
=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Ceci. <3</div><div dir=3D"auto"><b=
r><div data-smartmail=3D"gmail_signature" dir=3D"auto">----------<br>Loving=
.=C2=A0 Caring.=C2=A0 Sharing.=C2=A0 Being Excellent To Each Other And To O=
ur Hackerspace.=C2=A0 <3<br>----------<br>"Don't let anyone rob=
you of your imagination, your creativity, or your curiosity.=C2=A0 It'=
s your place in the world; it's your life.=C2=A0 Go on and do all you c=
an with it, and make it the life you want to live."=C2=A0 -=C2=A0 Mae =
Jemison</div></div></div></div>
--000000000000fa8e1a05b7ce8b36--
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list