[spam] crazy community bag [includes webcomic inside tags]
punks at tfwno.gf
Mon Feb 22 14:53:26 PST 2021
On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 16:58:47 -0500
Karl <gmkarl at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Punk.
> I think we are speaking different languages. I am speaking dictionary
And I speak 'english as a second language'. But regardless of my limited language skills, or other sources of noise, the disagreements have nothing to do with language. I think the communication medium is working as intented. The disagreements are about content (as it should be)
> I have been brainwashed in certain ways, maybe you read my
> brainwashed habits as some kind of secret communication, I do not know.
You are indeed presenting a picture which has a heavy dose of propaganda in it (and that has nothing to with my or your english).
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021, 4:29 PM Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 <punks at tfwno.gf> wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 16:01:54 -0500
> > Karl <gmkarl at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Here is a tutorial on writing 5 lines of python to automatically
> > > differentiate between cats and dogs:
> > > https://docs.fast.ai/tutorial.vision.html
> > you either don't know what you're talking about, or are being
> > obtuse on purpose. I'm starting to think it's the later.
> ?? I linked directly to the tutorial.
yeah ok. So you can use 5 lines of python TO CALL ANOTHER PROGRAM, which has, I don't know, prolly 100s of thousands of line of code, was written in c and assembler AND has a massive database. And that database is what allows the program to classify PICTURES of something as either A or B. And all that has FUCK to do with any 'intelligence' or 'learning', except the intelligence of whowever PROGRAMMED the thing.
So, your comment
"5 lines of python to automatically differentiate between cats and dogs"
is just ADVERTISING. And so the question is, why are you posting advertising for that kind of thing?
Also another question is, why would you think that classifying pictures of cats and dogs has any kind of political consequences or importance?
> > The only reason your phone waits for you to tell it to do something
> > My phone is a landline phone from the 90s.
> That is wonderful =) I meant the smartphones we were talking about
> repurposing the chips from together many weeks ago. You said you had some
> experience looking at them.
Yes, I know what a retarphone is, I even have a joogle randroid tablet lying around (battery is dead so the thing is actually off).
My point was that your comment about retarphones was just more advertising.
"your phone waits for you to tell it to do something before doing what you want it do as if it could read your mind"
yeah the phone can 'predict' what its fuckingly retarded user is going to type! Wow! 'autocomplete' using a trivial database of what the fucktard user already typed! WHAT AN AMAZIN TECHNOLOGY. Or maybe the SPYING PHONE 'knows' that you always call the same person at the same time? And then can 'predict' it? Shocking!
See the problem with everything you're saying? And it's doubly absurd coming from a programmer who should know how this fuckingly stupid garbage works.
You're not some old stupid woman who thinks retarphones are magical are you?
> > Again, here is where I mentioned what really matters. You ignored
> > it.
> The people in charge? Old men telling others what to do? They are so far
> away ... ?
Yeah far away. They can push a button to hear what you say and send the cops to exterminate you in 30 seconds.
AND, they are working on having EVERY SINGLE PIECE OF GARBAGE you use connected to the arpanet, so that you can't lift a finger without their permision. They are really far away from you or me eh.
> > I am looking at you through the bright lights you
> > > are staring at, and I see you staring back at me, seeming to be far
> > > more focused on me, than the things around you.
> > LMAO. I know what's going on better than you do, including what
> > you're doing right now. That is, if I candidly assume you're
> Both of us. We are both entranced by this conversation. We are saying
> silly things to each other obsessively.
Your original claim was
"the technofascist system has us entranced in the mystery of its e-cocaine"
I'm not entranced by the 'system' and there's no 'mystery' here. I am replying to stuff you say. However you may be right if I consider the conversation as an instance of you relaying 'the system's' propaganda.
Another way to look at it is that I'm being trolled by you as well. Which is only 'entrancing' when 'entrancing' is used as sarcasm.
> dumb, instead of playing dumb. But I won't assume that anymore so this is
> > your 'fair warning'.
> > Keep vomiting propaganda and you'll be treated the way propaganda
> > agents deserve to be treated.
> I love you punk. Let me know if I'm being tortured so I can do it to
> myself first. It's less surprising that way.
> I also really need to know wtf you are talking about here. Fair warning
Yeah, I won't bother explaining why your 'naive' views are nonsense and I'll simply regard them as malicious.
> > > idiotic marketing. so PAY ATTENTION : what matters is what the
> > OLIGARCHY is
> > > > doing, not their literally STUPID machines that nerds like to believe
> > are
> > >
> > > So how do we influence the oligarchy while they surveil us?
> > By beating them to death. That's the only influence that such kind
> > of animal can 'understand'.
> This results in death, friend. Oligarchies have more power to beat people
> than we do.
Yes, as long the we are not organized.
> Also, how would you ever reach them?
You walk to the joogle offices and burn them down.
More information about the cypherpunks