Coronavirus: Thread

[grarpamp]

> https://www.c19vaxreactions.com/
> https://www.openvaers.com/
>
> https://vaers.hhs.gov/
> https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/immunization/reporting-adverse-events-following-immunization/form.html
> https://coronavirus-yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/
> https://www.tga.gov.au/form/national-adverse-events-following-immunisation-aefi-reporting-form

https://humansarefree.com/2021/07/countries-where-covid-19-vaccination-is-mandatory.html

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1191568/reported-deaths-from-covid-by-age-us/
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1254271/us-total-number-of-covid-cases-by-age-group/
https://archive.ph/sDyA0
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moderna#2017

https://www.lareb.nl/coronameldingen

Australia are DAENS database

http://vigiaccess.org/

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions

https://www.adrreports.eu/en/index.html

https://vaccinetracker.ecdc.europa.eu/public/extensions/COVID-19/vaccine-tracker.html

https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-9-2021-0475_PT.html

https://dap.ema.europa.eu/analytics/saw.dll?PortalPages

https://dap.ema.europa.eu/analytics/saw.dll?PortalPages&PortalPath=%2Fshared%2FPHV%20DAP%2F\_portal%2FDAP&Action=Navigate&P0=1&P1=eq&P2=%22Line%20Listing%20Objects%22.%22Substance%20High%20Level%20Code%22&P3=1+40983312
https://dap.ema.europa.eu/analytics/saw.dll?PortalPages&PortalPath=%2Fshared%2FPHV%20DAP%2F\_portal%2FDAP&Action=Navigate&P0=1&P1=eq&P2=%22Line%20Listing%20Objects%22.%22Substance%20High%20Level%20Code%22&P3=1+40995439
https://dap.ema.europa.eu/analytics/saw.dll?PortalPages&PortalPath=%2Fshared%2FPHV%20DAP%2F_portal%2FDAP&Action=Navigate&P0=1&P1=eq&P2=%22Line%20Listing%20Objects%22.%22Substance%20High%20Level%20Code%22&P3=1+42325700
https://dap.ema.europa.eu/analytics/saw.dll?PortalPages&PortalPath=%2Fshared%2FPHV%20DAP%2F_portal%2FDAP&Action=Navigate&P0=1&P1=eq&P2=%22Line%20Listing%20Objects%22.%22Substance%20High%20Level%20Code%22&P3=1+42287887

https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2021/04/covid-19-vaccination-consent-form-for-covid-19-vaccination-covid-19-vaccination-consent-form_0.pdf

https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?TABLE=ON&GROUP1=AGE&EVENTS=on&PAGENO=2&PERPAGE=10&ESORT=AGE&REVERSESORT=&VAX=(COVID19

search: eudravigilance: tozinameron

https://www.timesofisrael.com/hospital-blamed-over-womens-death-from-heart-inflammation-after-vaccination/

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajh.26132 Thrombocytopenia

https://thepulse.one/2021/11/25/pfizer-was-aware-of-over-50k-serious-covid-vaccine-reactions-with-months-of-distribution/

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/18928-dead-1-8-million-injured-50-serious-reported-in-european-unions-database-of-adverse-drug-reactions-for-covid-19-shots/

https://corona-ausschuss.de/
https://reitschuster.de/post/die-erschreckende-impf-bilanz-meines-hausarztes/
https://2020news.de/en/whistleblower-from-berlin-nursing-home-the-terrible-dying-after-vaccination/
https://2020news.de/videos/20210213_online_Ad-hoc_6_Impftod_in_Berliner_Altenheim_.mp4
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/whistleblower-video-exposes-forced-vaccination-in-nursing-homes-which-led-to-8-deaths/
https://2020news.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Verordnung-EG-Nr.-507-2006.pdf
https://www.pei.de/DE/institut/organisation/fuehrungsteam/fuehrungsteam-node.html
https://www.berlin.de/sen/gpg/ueber-uns/leitung/senatorin/
https://2020news.de/risiko-impfstoff-immer-mehr-tote/
https://2020news.de/riesen-skandal-aufgedeckt-covid-19-impfung-zerstoert-unser-immunsystem-nachhaltig/
https://2020news.de/ema-26-849-gemeldete-impfschaeden/
https://2020news.de/en/dr-wodarg-and-dr-yeadon-request-a-stop-of-all-corona-vaccination-studies-and-call-for-co-signing-the-petition/


"
EU and WHO databases prove we are being lied to Vaccine injuries and
fatalities are staggeringly high. Information about vaccine injuries
makes it completely immoral and unethical to force people to get these
vaccines. If people want the vaccine fine. But no one should be forced
or coerced to get a prophylactic vaccine with these risks.
"

https://content.govdelivery.com/attachments/MTAG/2021/11/30/file_attachments/2008888/Nationwide%20Injunction%20-%20CMS%20mandate.pdf

https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/42600713/Missouri,_State_of_et_al_v_Biden_et_al

https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/42474165/State_of_Missouri_et_al_v_Biden_et_al

https://www.sixthcircuitappellateblog.com/

https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46288
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/03/31/2021-06718/temporary-halt-in-residential-evictions-to-prevent-the-further-spread-of-covid-19
https://www.insider.com/supreme-court-says-bidens-moratorium-on-tenant-evictions-unconstitutional-2021-8
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/klain-vaccine-coronvirus-mandate

"
Biden is acting like a dictator and abusing the rule making process.
His mandate is unconstitutional and if challenged will likely fail.

There are limits to what edicts a president or administrative agency
like OSHA can issue. Normally an OSHA rule takes 4-10 years to
promulgate. The exception they’re using is the Emergency temporary
standard (ETS) it’s an interim rule not a final rule.

They used it for health care workers in July. That ETS is valid for
180 days and then they must go through the normal rule making process.
That requires publishing in the federal register, and 30 days for
public comments. I don’t have time right now for a lesson on the APA
and rule making procedures, sorry. You can read about it here:

https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46288

Properly challenged I highly doubt this rule would stand. That’s why
they did it that way. An ETS obviates the regular rules for
promulgating administrative rules. Those procedures can underhandedly
avoid congressional approval and really aren’t democratic at all but
at least there are procedures and they are not followed with an ETS.

Other than challenging the constitutionality of the rule there’s
another path that will make this mandate useless - enforcement. The
thing about enforcement is that some government agency has to find,
follow up, enforce (which is not easy - how do they inspect the
records? What process is the violator is entitled to? What does a
hearing look like? Appeals? Penalties?…) They can write in penalties
all they want but actually bringing the hammer down on a business or
individual is quite a different matter.

Resistance to these edicts are essential. This is a presidential power
grab beyond anything we’ve seen before. It’s dangerous. It’s
frightening.

People and businesses need to refuse to comply. The government doesn’t
have the resources or ability to enforce this if people and businesses
resist.

I add these two excerpts from the linked document because it shows how
deep Biden had to dig to use this ETS workaround. It hasn’t been used
since the 1983 asbestos ETS was invalidated by the courts.

One:

    In addition to addressing a grave danger to employees, an ETS must
also be necessary to protect employees from that danger. In Asbestos
Info. Ass’n, the court invalidated the asbestos ETS for the additional
reason that OSHA had not demonstrated the necessity of the ETS. The
court cited, among other factors, the duplication between the
respirator requirements of the ETS and OSHA’s existing standards
requiring respirator use. The court dismissed OSHA’s argument that the
ETS was necessary because the agency felt that the existing
respiratory standards were “unenforceable absent actual monitoring to
show that ambient asbestos particles are so far above the permissible
limit that respirators are necessary to bring employees’ exposure
within the PEL of 2.0 f/cc.”25 The court determined that “fear of a
successful judicial challenge to enforcement of OSHA’s permanent
standard regarding respirator use hardly justifies resort to the most
dramatic weapon in OSHA’s enforcement arsenal.”

Two:

    OSHA has used its ETS authority sparingly in its history and not
since the asbestos ETS promulgated in 1983. As shown in Table A-1, in
the nine times OSHA has issued an ETS, the courts have fully vacated
or stayed the ETS in four cases and partially vacated the ETS in one
case.29 Of the five cases that were not challenged or that were fully
or partially upheld by the courts, OSHAissued a permanent standard
either within the six months required by the statute or within several
months of the six-month period and always within one year of the
promulgation of the ETS.30 Each of these cases, however, occurred
before 1980, after which a combination of additional federal laws and
court decisions added additional procedural requirements to the OSHA
rulemaking process. OSHAdid not attempt to extend the ETS’s expiration
date in any of these cases. Although the courts have not ruled
directly on an attempt by OSHA to solely extend the life of an ETS, in
1974, the U.S. Court Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held in Florida
Peach Growers Ass’n v. United States Department of Labor that OSHA was
within its authority to amend an ETS without going through the normal
rulemaking process.31 The court stated that “it is inconceivable that
Congress, having granted the Secretary the authority to react quickly
in fast-breaking emergency situations, intended to limit his ability
to react to developments subsequent to his initial response.”32 The
court also recognized the difficulty OSHA may have in promulgating a
standard within six months due to the notice and comment requirements
of the OSHAct, stating that in the case of OSHA seeking to amend an
ETS to expand its focus, “adherence to subsection (b) procedures would
not be in the best interest of employees, whom the Act is designed to
protect.

Biden tried a similar tactic with the eviction moratorium. He abused
his authority by using the CDC to issue a ruling that claimed the
eviction moratorium was a public health issue. The reason he did this
was to circumvent the need to go through Congress.

The CDC eviction moratorium was issued to address areas with
"heightened levels of community transmission in order to respond to
recent, unexpected developments in the trajectory of the COVID-19
pandemic, including the rise of the Delta variant."

The eviction moratorium issued by Trump, was extended but then expired
in May. That was probably unconstitutional too, but no one challenged
it. From then on the eviction moratorium was issued by the CDC and was
unconstitutional, as were the extensions. It should have been
challenged earlier. And Biden knew it was unconstitutional and
expected the S. Ct. Ruling.

So Biden has tried to institute unconstitutional edicts before and
failed. He seems to ignore that he’s been rebuked by the Supreme Court
but has decided why not try again. That’s what’s happening here.

There have only been 9 OSHA Emergency temporary standards (ETS) issued
in the past. Four were fully vacated by the courts, one partially
vacated. The others followed the APA and promulgated permanent rules
within the required 6 months. That’s not going to happen with the
vaccine mandate for private employers. For one thing, the use of the
Administrative Procedures Act is not the same as it was in the 1980s,
at all. Controversial rules can’t be promulgated that quickly. And
most importantly, this ETS vaccine mandate doesn’t stand up to a Grave
Danger or Necessity judicial review. It needs to be tested in the
courts though.

Once this vaccine mandate for private employers is actually published
then it can be challenged, and it should be. Currently it looks like
the governors of Texas, Florida, South Dakota and Arizona are going to
challenge it. I think some large employers will be needed to. I’ll be
curious to see which ones step up for this fight.

No matter what people think about vaccines they should be outraged by
this abuse of power. I am. And I’m scared. Because it seems pretty
clear that Biden knows this is unconstitutional and is doing it
anyway, despite taking an oath to uphold the constitution. That should
frighten us all.
"