Coronavirus: Thread

[grarpamp]

NO, you Human Guinea Pigs cannot have any information
on what these GovCorp lunatics are forcibly injecting into
your bodies, nor by precedent for any other mandatory
injection programme of the future...

Fight Back!



FDA Says It Now Needs 75 Years To Fully Release Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Data

https://www.theepochtimes.com/fda-says-it-now-needs-75-years-to-fully-release-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-data_4145410.html
https://www.theepochtimes.com/fda-asks-court-for-55-years-to-fully-release-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-data_4110761.html
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21150416-fda-brief
https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/fda-doubles-down-asks-federal-judge

The Food and Drug Administration is asking a judge to give it 75 years
to produce data concerning the Pfizer and BioNTech vaccine, up 20
years from a previous request.

The agency, known as the FDA, told the court it can work faster than
its previously proposed 500-pages-per-month-rate. But it also said
there are over 59,000 more pages than mentioned in an earlier filing.

That discovery, and a desire to make sure it can work on other Freedom
of Information Act requests at the same time, prompted the fresh
request to the judge to allow production of roughly 12,000 pages by
Jan. 31, 2022, and 500 pages per month thereafter.

That timeline would take it until at least 2096, Aaron Siri, a lawyer
working on the case, said in a blog post.

    “If you find what you are reading difficult to believe - that is
because it is dystopian for the government to give Pfizer billions,
mandate Americans to take its product, prohibit Americans from suing
for harms, but yet refuse to let Americans see the data underlying its
licensure,” Siri said.

The case was brought on behalf of the Public Health and Medical
Professionals for Transparency, which said the FDA was not complying
with its request for data in a timely manner.

The group includes Dr. Carole Browner, a research professor at the
University of California, Los Angeles’ David Geffen School of
Medicine; Peter Doshi, an associate professor at the University of
Maryland’s School of Pharmacy, and Dr. Harvey Risch, a professor of
epidemiology at the Yale School of Public Health.

The group says that the data should be made public quickly because the
FDA spent just 108 days reviewing it before granting emergency use
authorization to the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.

The matter is more urgent because millions of Americans are being
mandated to take the shot or face repercussions, such as a loss of
access to businesses and termination.

The Pfizer jab is the only one that has been approved by drug
regulators. Approvals mean products have met a higher threshold of
safety and effectiveness than those given emergency clearance.

    “The entire purpose of FOIA is government transparency. In
multiple recent cases, in upholding the FOIA’s requirement to ‘make
the records promptly available,’ courts have required agencies,
including the FDA, to produce 10,000 or more pages per month, and
those cases did not involve a request nearly this important–i.e., the
data underlying licensure of a liability-free product that the federal
government requires nearly all Americans to receive,” Siri said.

    “As the present pandemic rages on, independent review of these
documents by outside scientists is urgently needed to assist with
addressing the shortcomings and issues with the response to the
pandemic to date.”

The FDA said its Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research
maintains the records sought by the plaintiff but only has 10 staff
members, and two of them are new, leaving them slower in processing
pages than the other workers.

Each line of each page must be reviewed to ensure proper redactions
are applied, the filing says.

Additionally, a faster rate than that requested would divert
“significant resources away from the processing of other FOIA requests
that are also in litigation,” and requests that came in before the
request in question, the agency said, adding, “In sum, FDA’s proposed
processing schedule is fair to plaintiff.”