Coronavirus: Thread

grarpamp grarpamp at gmail.com
Mon Dec 6 23:16:14 PST 2021


> Bogus narratives from Govt + Media + Globalists get
> destroyed as masks, lockdowns, and "vax" are all
> repeatedly proven not to prevent contraction or
> transmission of corona...

But still the forced power grabs and mind programming
continues, and the sheeple keep bowing down...


Oregon Moves To Make Indoor Mask Mandate Permanent

https://summit.news/2021/12/06/oregon-moves-to-make-indoor-mask-mandate-permanent/
https://katu.com/news/coronavirus/oregon-working-to-put-indoor-mask-rule-in-place-indefinitely
https://twitter.com/GenevieveReaume/status/1466584045404319747
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/do-masks-stop-the-spread-of-covid-19-



Oregon is moving to making its indoor mask mandate permanent, meaning
the rule will only be able to be repealed in the highly unlikely event
of Republicans winning the state.

Authorities are progressing in making compulsory face coverings an
indefinite mandate and have taken “the first step in making the rule
permanent,” reports KATU.

    “The Oregon Health Authority (OHA) convened a Rules Advisory
Committee (RAC) on Thursday. The RAC provided feedback on the indoor
mask rule. The point of the committee is to suggest what should and
shouldn’t be included in the ruling and discuss the impact it will
have on the public.”

“Community stakeholders, including those from the hospitality and
faith sectors, joined in the meeting. People from the Seventh Day
Adventists Church, the High Desert Museum, the Oregon Shakespeare
Festival, and McMenamins were a part of the conversation.”

    Yes -- that may sound alarming. Here's what you need to know about it:

    -The current rule is temporary. It can't be in place more than 180 days.
    -Making the rule permanent allows the state to keep the rule.
    -The rule can be repealed.#LiveOnK2 pic.twitter.com/qEZAeExxu8
    — Genevieve Reaume (@GenevieveReaume) December 3, 2021

When the OHA publicly announces its intention to make the rule
permanent, a period of public comment will follow, although that is
largely meaningless and the mandate is likely to be rubber stamped.

Dr. Paul Cieslak, the medical director for communicable diseases and
immunizations with OHA, defended the proposal by ludicrously
attempting to argue that permanent doesn’t mean permanent.

    “Permanent means indefinite. It doesn’t necessarily mean
permanent,” Cieslak said.

    “We can repeal it as well, but we are only allowed to have a
temporary rule for 180 days, and anything that goes beyond 180 days,
we cannot extend it.”

In other words, once the mask rule is imposed permanently, it will
never be repealed until Republicans win the state, something that
hasn’t happened since 1984.

    “Bureauweenies say they must make the mandate permanent in order
to extend it,” writes Dave Blount.

    “If they still want to extend it now, why would they ever let it
end? Even if Covid ever goes away, there is always the flu — plus, you
never know when the ChiComs will oblige them by cooking up a new
virus.”

There is still no body of evidence that shows mask mandates
significantly stop the spread of COVID-19, with large scale
investigations like the Danmask study disproving that premise.

At the start of the pandemic, public health “experts” like Dr. Anthony
Fauci insisted that face masks shouldn’t be worn and could even make
the spread worse, although that rhetoric did a sudden 180 when
technocrats realized they were a potent weapon of population control
to keep fear levels high.


More information about the cypherpunks mailing list