USA 2020 Elections: Thread
grarpamp at gmail.com
Thu Apr 29 02:04:22 PDT 2021
>> Every day, more fraud, lies, and hypocrisy
> Donald J Trump won the 2020 US Presidential Election.
> US voters were clearly defrauded and fully deceived manipulated and
> influenced by corrupt Democrat owned run staffed aligned biased
> and censoring News and Social Media, Deep State Agencies, etc.
> Amounting in total effect to more than the number of votes
> needed to tilt the outcome from Trump to Biden.
California Officials, Biden-Linked Firm Coordinated With Big Tech To
Censor Election Posts: Judicial Watch
California officials colluded with Big Tech to censor social media
posts in the United States during the 2020 presidential election,
government watchdog group Judicial Watch announced Tuesday.
A thumbprint is displayed on a mobile phone as the logo for the
Twitter social media network is projected onto a screen in London,
England on Aug. 9, 2017. (Leon Neal/Getty Images)
The findings come after Judicial Watch received 540 pages and a
further four pages of documents from the office of the Secretary of
State of California in response to an open records request, the group
It had filed the request after a December 2020 report surfaced
revealing that California’s Office of Election Cybersecurity had
surveilled and asked the social media giants to remove or flag as
“misleading” at least two dozen messages.
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said that SKDKnickerbocker, a
communications company linked to President Joe Biden’s election
campaign, was involved in the censoring of speech during last year’s
The company did this by sharing its “Misinformation Daily Briefings”
with California officials, who then passed them on to social media
giants Facebook, Twitter, and Google for dissemination, according to
“These new documents suggest a conspiracy against the First Amendment
rights of Americans by the California Secretary of State, the Biden
campaign operation, and Big Tech,” Fitton said.
Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, in Washington on Nov. 1,
2019. (Samira Bouaou/The Epoch Times)
He added, “These documents blow up the big lie that Big Tech
censorship is ‘private’—as the documents show collusion between a
whole group of government officials in multiple states to suppress
speech about election controversies.”
Jenna Dresner, senior public information officer for the Office of
Election Cybersecurity, responded to the December report at the time
saying that “we don’t take down posts, that is not our role to play.”
“We alert potential sources of misinformation to the social media
companies and we let them make that call based on community standards
they created,” Dresner said.
According to Judicial Watch, the documents it obtained show how
officials pushed big tech companies to censor social media posts.
The Google and YouTube logos are seen at the entrance to the Google
offices in Los Angeles, Calif., on Nov. 21, 2019. (Robyn Beck/AFP via
Google’s YouTube was contacted directly by a state official to remove
a Judicial Watch video on the platform on Sept. 24, last year,
according to the group.
“YouTube seemed to respond by deleting the video on September 27,
2020,” Judicial Watch said.
In another instance, a Facebook user who implied having voted twice
with multiple ballots had their post removed on Oct. 31, 2020. Other
posts removed by social media giants included claims of voter fraud,
receiving multiple ballots in the mail, and finding thousands of
alleged unopened ballots in a dumpster.
Meanwhile, a Twitter post from Fitton that said “Mailing 51 million
ballots to those who haven’t asked for increases risk of voter fraud
of voter intimidation,” was flagged by SKDKnickerBocker as part of its
Washington-based SKDKnickerBocker said in a statement last November
that it developed the Biden campaign’s vote-by-mail program in
Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Arizona.
The communications firm and California’s Office of Election
Cybersecurity didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment by
The Epoch Times.
Big Tech companies have drawn intense scrutiny for perceived political
bias and alleged unbalanced moderation of users’ content. Critics say
much of the companies’ moderation in the past year has unfairly
targeted conservative speech and speech from individuals deemed to be
supporters of former President Donald Trump.
Meanwhile, groups on the other side of the aisle have been taking
issue with how social media companies are operating, claiming that the
Silicon Valley companies have failed to adequately address
misinformation that is being proliferated online.
More information about the cypherpunks