Cryptocurrency: China Rolls Your CBDC DCEP Into Law, Baits You With Free Shitcoins

grarpamp grarpamp at
Sun Apr 11 12:42:52 PDT 2021

China is the model that you stupid fucking slave sheeple will
be forced to use since none of you will fight against tyranny.

"You will own nothing, and you will be Happy!" -- Slaves.

Now your CBDC's come with expiration dates forcing you to spend them.

You are so FUCKED now, lol.

@GreekFire23 aka the idiocy of paper money with an expiration date

CBDC DCEP UBI MMT Expiration Censorship Cancelling Inflation
DCEP Digital Currency Electronic Payment, CBDC Central Bank Digital Currency

China's Digital Yuan Comes With An Expiration Date

It's been a long time coming, and now it's almost here.

Last August we reported that China's Commerce Ministry had released
fresh details of a pilot program for the country's central bank
digital currency (CBDC) to be expanded to several metropolitan areas,
including Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area,
Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, and Yangtze River Delta region. This was
the inevitable culmination of a process which started back in 2014
when as we reported at the time, "China Readies Digital Currency, IMF
Says "Extremely Beneficial".

Fast forward a few months when China's preparations to rollout a
digital yuan gathered pace, and we reported in October that China was
poised to give legal backing to the launch of its own sovereign
digital currency, "cementing its trailblazer status in virtual
currencies far ahead of other countries, after already recently
experimenting with large-scale trials of actual payments by consumers,
which was met with mixed results." Specifically, the South China
Morning Post reported that "The People’s Bank of China published a
draft law on Friday that would give legal status to the Digital
Currency Electronic Payment (DCEP) system, and for the first time the
digital yuan has been included and defined as part of the country’s
sovereign fiat currency."

The design framework for the digital yuan had been released one year
ago on the heels of Facebook's ambitious but disastrous Libra token
rollout after founding corporate partners split for lack of confidence
in the project and on fears US federal regulators would seek to block
it just as they did encrypted-messaging company Telegram's Gram

"The draft law would also forbid any party from making or issuing
yuan-backed digital tokens to replace the renminbi in the market," the
SCMP said.

This in turn brought us to the so-called "Shenzhen case study"  when
in October of 2020, China became the first nation to hold a trial run
of its digital currency, when the government in Shenzhen carried out a
lottery to give away a total of 10 million yuan (about $1.5 million)
worth of the digital currency (nearly 2 million people applied and
50,000 people actually "won").

The winners were required to download a digital Renminbi app in order
to receive a "red packet" worth 200 digital yuan ($30), which they can
then spend at over 3,000 designated retailers in Shenzhen’s Luohu
district, according to China Daily. After that, they’ll be able to buy
goods from local pharmacies, supermarkets and even Walmart.

The idea was to not only test the technology involved, but boost
consumer spending in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. In short,
China is not only subsidizing the centrally-planned economy by
manipulating the supply-side of the question- it now can prop up
demand by handing out digital currency to anyone (or everyone).

Of course, unlike traditional central bank account-based currencies
such as reserves, or decentralized cryptocurrencies like bitcoin,
China’s digital currency would be controlled by the country’s central
bank and will be instantly made available at a moment's notice to
anyone who can receive it.

And since "China's adoption of digital central bank tokens is expected
to be seamless as most of the nation's digital payments already pass
through companies like TenCent and AliPay and are already very popular
in the country", we concluded that "the successful Shenzhen test means
that a broad rollout is just a matter of time."

Still, one thing was missing: a stamp of approval by the gatekeeper of
not only the global payments system, but the protector of the dollar
reserve system, SWIFT. But as two months ago, China got that too: as
we reported in February, "SWIFT, the global system for financial
messaging and cross-border payments, has set up a joint venture with
the Chinese central bank’s digital currency research institute and
clearing centre, in a sign that China is exploring global use of its
planned digital yuan."

Actually, not just "exploring" but thanks to year of testing and
partial rollouts, Beijing was about to become the first country in the
world set to launch the digital yuan, and with both the IMF's and
SWIFT's blessing, we said that it was "just a matter of months if not

We were right, because just a few days ago, China's "cyber yuan"
became official when the WSJ finally caught up, writing "China Creates
Its Own Digital Currency, a First for Major Economy."

While regular Zero Hedge readers are quite familiar with the details
and chronology of China's transition to a digital currency, which
incidentally is precisely the opposite of a cryptocurrency and has
absolutely nothing to do with Bitcoin, a fact which Peter Thiel may
want to dwell on a little more next time before making sweep and wrong
statements about bitcoin, the WSJ focuses more on the geopolitical
reasons of China's currency evolution - as a reminder, thousand years
ago, when money meant coins, China invented paper currency, and now
the Chinese government is minting cash digitally, in what the WSJ said
is a "re-imagination of money that could shake a pillar of American
power" - and specifically how to approach a decoupling from the global
reserve currency, the US dollar so not only can Beijing avoid the
"nuclear option", a weaponized US dollar, but allow countries that the
US seeks to punish like Iran, a viable alternative (remember, the
enemies of China's enemies - and none is bigger than the US - is
China's friend). Here is the WSJ:

    The U.S., as the issuer of dollars that the world’s more than
21,000 banks need to do business, has long demanded insight into major
cross-border currency movements. This gives Washington the ability to
freeze individuals and institutions out of the global financial system
by barring banks from doing transactions with them, a practice
criticized as “dollar weaponization.”


    The digital yuan could give those the U.S. seeks to penalize a way
to exchange money without U.S. knowledge. Exchanges wouldn’t need to
use SWIFT, the messaging network that is used in money transfers
between commercial banks and that can be monitored by the U.S.

To be sure, a credible alternative to the dollar, reduces the need to
hoard the currency for US trade partners which in turn would have
profound implications on global saving patterns, from there, global
capital flows. The consequences for the perpetual US current account
deficit would be unprecedented.

In addition to realigining the global balance of monetary power
virtually overnight, China's the digital currency kills another bird
with the same binary stone: it allows unprecedented surveillance and
supervision over every single transaction.

    [The digital yuan is] also trackable, adding another tool to
China’s heavy state surveillance. The government deploys hundreds of
millions of facial-recognition cameras to monitor its population,
sometimes using them to levy fines for activities such as jaywalking.
A digital currency would make it possible to both mete out and collect
fines as soon as an infraction was detected.

    A burst of cash-accumulation in China last year indicates
residents’ concern about the central bank’s eye on every transaction.
Song Ke, a finance professor at Renmin University in Beijing, told a
recent conference that China’s measure of yuan in circulation, or
cash, popped up 10% in 2020.

Then there are the myriad boosts to China's ironclad capital controls:

    While China hasn’t published final legislation for the program,
the central bank says it may initially impose limits on how much
digital yuan individuals can keep on their person, as a way to control
how it circulates and provide users a dose of security and privacy.

To be sure, none of this is actually new as we have discussed all
these nuances of the digital yuan before. What is now, is this blurb
in the WSJ article:

    The money itself is programmable. Beijing has tested expiration
dates to encourage users to spend it quickly, for times when the
economy needs a jump start.

And there you have it: the Keynesian wet dream to boost the velocity
of mean finally comes true. For the past decade we have joked that it
is only a matter of time before central banks slap on an expiration
date on every monetary unit in circulation...

    @GreekFire23 aka the idiocy of paper money with an expiration date
    — zerohedge (@zerohedge) December 2, 2013

... to offset the creeping petrification of the monetary system, where
negative rates have sparked even more saving and not spending as
central banks had intended...

... and where only the threat of money confiscation - which is what a
monetary expiration date actually does - can spark aggressive
spending, and eventually, runaway inflation.

Well, that's precisely what China is now ready to do... and it's only
a matter of time before other central banks follow suit.  As a
reminder, according to tentative estimates for the rollout of ISO
20022, which is the required universal transaction standard which will
make payment in digital currencies possible, we are looking at a 2022
launch date, although China looks ready to go live as soon as this

There is one final, geopolitical reason behind China's decision to
give its digital currency an expiration date: as Byrne Hobart writes,
"programmable money, tied to real-world identities, and universally
tracked by a central bank, starts to look suspiciously like a
substitute for the consumer of last resort. Every year that China gets
richer, domestic consumption plays a bigger role (exports were 26% of
China's GDP in 2010, and 18% last year). If domestic consumption can
be tightly controlled, then it's a way to not just increase the volume
of consumption but to control the variance of demand for the goods
China produces. It's not yet enough to match the size and variability
of global demand for China's exports, but every year it gets closer."

In short, while the US and China are both talking seriously about
decoupling, the digital yuan - which is now a reality - indicates that
China's government is not only more effectively planning for it, but
will be the first to fully sever all ties with the US... when the
moment comes.

Finally, for those who have missed our reporting on this fascinating
issue, here again is Rabobank's Wim Boonstra explaining not only why
China will be the first country to launch a digital currency but also
looking at what happens next:

China Will Be The First Country To Launch A Digital Currency: What Happens Then

    China may be the first major country to launch a central bank
digital currency or CBDC
    The Chinese CBDC, named DCEP, will strengthen the position of the
central bank and help to further modernize the Chinese economy
    The DCEP will probably also be available for China’s trade
partners, to begin with Africa
    The DCEP may strengthen the international position of the renminbi
to the detriment of the euro
    The arrival of the DCEP should be a strong wake-up call for
Western, especially European, policymakers


Most central banks are busy preparing for the potential introduction
of central bank digital currency (CBDC). CBDC is a digital currency
issued by the central bank. It is sometimes referred to as a digital
version of a bank note, but in many cases this is not correct. There
are indeed many different potential variants.

So far, virtually all the central banks are keeping their options open
as to whether a CBDC will ultimately appear.

China, where a far-reaching trial is under way, is the major
exception. If this trial is successful, one can expect the Chinese
CBDC to be introduced widely in the near future. China is therefore
comfortably leading the way because the country has big ambitions for
its digital currency. First, it should provide a sizable boost to the
Chinese economy; second, it will concurrently further increase the
Chinese government’s control of Chinese society; finally, the new
currency is part of an ambitious plan to strengthen the international
position of the renminbi, the Chinese currency, and potentially at the
expense of the euro in particular. This Chinese decisiveness should
spur European policymakers into action by further strengthening the

China: from cash-based to almost completely cashless money in 10 years’ time

Not so long ago, retail payments in China were still almost entirely
made in cash. There has been a revolution in payments traffic since
that time, and China is now one of the leading countries in cashless
payments. Unlike in other countries, such as the Netherlands and
Sweden, in China this development did not originate from the banking
system, but it was induced by a few key apps from relatively young
Fintech companies such as WeChat (Tencent) and Alipay (Ant Financial).
These parties, that form a kind of extra layer between the banks and
their customers, now have a collective market share of more than 90%
in Chinese payments cashless retail payments. The Chinese cashless
payments system is already able to settle approximately 100,000
transactions per second.

The Chinese CBDC: DCEP

Against this background, the People’s Bank of China (PBoC), the
Chinese central bank, has taken the initiative of developing its own
digital currency known as the Digital Currency Electronic Payment
(DCEP). Above all, the DCEP is a digital alternative to bank notes,
although it has features that differ from cash in certain respects
(see below). The DCEP does however have the same value as a renminbi.

The technology that can be used by the public for payments is based on
traditional payment technology and not on blockchain technology. This
is the only way to achieve the necessary scale. The aim is to reach a
capacity of 300,000 transactions per second. The central bank might
itself use blockchain, for example for wholesale transactions or
settlements in DCEP between private banks. Although the DCEP is a
cashless currency that will be held in an account with a private
entity, there is also the possibility of using a token-based
functionality on for example a chip to effect peer-to-peer payments,
even where there is no Internet. This is especially needed for
successful adoption in the rural areas of China. This token-based
functionality will be widely used, as a result of which the DCEP will
compete with cash. A sizable trial has been running for several months
in which tens of thousands of people have been participating.

What does the PBoC want to achieve with the DCEP?

The PBoC has several objectives with the introduction of the DCEP.

Prevention of a monopoly in the payment system

The PBoC wants to prevent a situation in which WeChat and AliPay take
over the Chinese payment system. It is concerned that the entire
payment system will soon fall into the hands of these private parties.
The DCEP therefore has to restrict the involvement of these parties
and increase the role of the central bank in the payment system. It is
even more likely that any key private firm will be prevented to become
a dominant player, as ultimately China is not a ‘normal’ market
economy (which explains Beijing's current crackdown on Ant Financial
far better than just a feud between Xi Jinping and Jack Ma).

Promotion of financial inclusion and further reduction of the role
played by cash

Highly efficient cashless payments dominate in large parts of China.
But in the poorer regions, especially the rural areas, people have
less access to banking services such as regular credit. In these
areas, cash still plays an important role. Payments in the criminal
underworld, including the illegal gambling industry, are also still
largely made in cash. The DCEP will offer people in these regions full
access to financial services, but it can also reduce the importance of
cash payments. The main aim of the DCEP is therefore to replace cash.
In terms of features, it will also closely resemble cash.

Better information on payment flows and prevention of illegal transactions

Unlike payment transactions using a bank account, which by definition
leave traces in a bank’s records, cash payments are highly anonymous.
As we have said, the DCEP will closely resemble cash, with the
possibility of making payments directly from one person to another.
Some degree of anonymity would thus appear to be safeguarded. But on
further consideration, it becomes clear that the PBoC, and therefore
the Chinese government, will have full insight.

To be precise, in a transaction between two people effected with DCEP,
anonymity between these two people will be assured, as is the case
with a cash payment. But the PBoC can always establish at a later date
who were involved in the transaction. This will enable more effective
tracing of illegal transactions than if these were effected in cash.
But there will also be detailed insight into the payment behavior of

Restricting capital flight

Although China does not have free cross-border capital movements,
capital flight is a common and substantial phenomenon. Capital flight
can occur in various ways, and is often difficult to trace. For
example, internationally trading Chinese companies can for instance
manipulate invoices, as a result of which money can be transferred
abroad. People can also use the Bitcoin system to hide money from the
authorities and/or transfer it abroad.

The Chinese government, like its counterparts in Europe and the US, is
concerned that stablecoins could assume an important role as an
alternative to the regular money in circulation, but also may develop
into a vehicle for capital flight (read "How The Chinese Use Illegal
Online Gambling And Tether To Launder Over $1 Trillion Yuan").
Stablecoins are cryptos like Bitcoin, but unlike Bitcoin they are, at
least in theory, secured by financial assets. When Facebook announced
in April 2020 that it intends to add national stablecoins to its
Libra, a digital currency basket that it announced in 2019, central
banks reacted immediately by devoting more urgent attention to CBDC.23
Such stablecoins could for example create the possibility that people
could use a Libra-stablecoin to transfer money abroad. With the DCEP,
the PBoC intends to slow the momentum of private stablecoins. This is
also an important consideration for the Western central banks.

Retention of monetary sovereignty

This is connected with the previous point. If people have easy access
to a private stablecoin, it could actually in a sense reduce the role
of the national currency. Something similar actually happened in
Zimbabwe, where confidence in the national currency completely
vanished as a result of hyperinflation and people turned en masse to
foreign currencies such as US dollars and South African rand. In such
a situation, the national central bank loses control of monetary
conditions in its own country. Importantly, however, the DCEP could
also be used by China to interfere with monetary sovereignty in other

What about privacy?

The PBoC says it will respect the privacy of people and therefore the
anonymity of the transactions but at the same time it says that DCEP
will help it to detect illegal transactions. What this probably comes
down to in practice is that people will be able to effect payments and
retain anonymity between each other, but that the central bank will on
the other hand be able to view the transactions. Anonymity will
therefore not be guaranteed and the central bank will have much
greater insight into people’s payment behaviour than it has at the
moment. The DCEP will also have the status of legal tender. This means
that Chinese residents will be obliged to accept the DCEP, as
confirmed by various statements from the central bank on the issue
(South China Morning Post, 10 November 2020). The DCEP is thus not
really coming into being as a result of strong demand from the Chinese
public, but it is being imposed on the population by the government.
Moreover, the way the DCEP is designed, it may develop into a perfect
vehicle for a quasi-command economy: it allows all transactions to be
monitored, and opens the door for a retreat to a more Soviet model of
banking, viz. banking under full state control.

Internationalization of the renminbi

The use of the renminbi in international transactions is still
relatively limited, certainly in comparison with the dollar and the
euro. But China is working steadily on increasing its usage, and even
hopes that one day the renminbi can succeed the dollar as the global
reserve currency. China sees the DCEP as an important vehicle for
strengthening the renminbi’s international position, as foreigners
will also be able to use the DCEP in transactions with China.

The benefit of this for China is that it can settle more of its
international trade in (digital) renminbi. China has initially
targeted Africa in this respect. Many African countries do not have
fully convertible currencies and mutual trade is frequently settled in
US dollars, which is expensive. China is aiming to achieve a situation
in which African countries can use the DCEP not only in their trade
with China, but will also use it for their domestic transactions. This
is a good example of how China is aiming to position itself
internationally and how various projects and institutions will
cooperate under the direction of the government. The newest model of
the Huawei smartphone indeed includes an app enabling payment in DCEP
without the need for Internet (Eurasia). Huawei is currently already a
leading telecoms provider in Africa, which gives China a head start.
In other parts of the world, where Huawei is less dominant or even
banned, it will off course be less simple for China to push the DCEP

Note that while China intends to strengthen its own monetary
sovereignty with the DCEP, it clearly has no qualms regarding its use
to undermine the monetary sovereignty of other countries. If not only
a larger proportion of the trade between China and African countries
but also part of intra-African trade could soon be settled in DCEP,
therefore renminbi, international use of the Chinese currency will
significantly increase. Note, that if a larger share of China’s
international trade will be conducted in DCEP, it will also become
more difficult for Chinese im- and exporters to use trade as a way to
channel funds abroad. So it will held the Chinese government to reduce
capital flight, although complete elimination of this phenomenon will
not be possible.

Decision time: is the DCEP a wake-up call?

China is leading internationally with the introduction of CBDC, and is
clearly moving in a different direction than many other countries
considering a similar move. The debate in Europe is still mainly about
the form the digital euro, its CBDC, should take, the question of
whether there is consumer demand for it, and who should pay for it.
The Chinese authorities are taking a more strategic approach, and most
of all from the perspective of whether a digital currency can
contribute to strengthening/entrenching China’s international

Assuming that the current Chinese trials are successful, we could very
well see the DCEP appear as early as next year. This could be a
significant step in the further movement of the Chinese economy
towards cashless money. The payments system would be further
strengthened by the DCEP, as this will prevent large private parties
gaining a duopoly with the market power that this would entail.
Financial inclusion would be improved in the underdeveloped areas, and
everyone would have access to cashless money and the associated
financial services that this would make possible. The black economy
would be further reduced, and the Chinese government will have better
insight (and control) of the payment behaviour of its citizens to an
extent that we in the West would probably see as unacceptable. Lastly,
the introduction of the DCEP can discourage capital flight and
probably strengthen the renminbi’s international position.

All in all, the DCEP will certainly make a positive contribution to
the further development of the Chinese economy. Although the DCEP
looks to be less innovative than the CBDCs under consideration by the
Western central banks in certain respects, the determination shown by
China is undoubtedly impressive.

This Chinese resoluteness also shows that China is working very
actively on strengthening the renminbi’s international position, with
the central bank and companies such as Huawei working closely together
to achieve this. While still a long way off, a scenario in which first
parts of the African, but later maybe Asian, Latin American of even
some European economies will use the renminbi for cross-border and in
due course also domestic transactions is gradually becoming more

One may also expect China to try to get all countries involved in its
Belt and Road Initiative to use the DCEP and therefore the renminbi.
Today, the renminbi is still a small currency in comparison to the
euro and most of all the dollar. But this situation could change if
the DCEP becomes widely accepted. In the context of a situation in
which the euro’s international position has more or less stagnated
over the last decades, this is at the very least somewhat

Of course we may expect that, once the digital renminbi takes off and
gains traction, other central banks will react strongly. Especially
the US will be determined to hold on to the dollar’s international
dominance. The US authorities will soon understand that a successful
digital renminbi may in the long run turn out to be a larger threat to
the position of the dollar than the euro ever was. The most important
difference is that the euro is institutionally weak and European
politicians have so far failed to use their currency as a geopolitical
instrument. The Chinese government, in contrast, understand very well
the power of money as a ‘peaceful’ instrument to increase
international political clout.

But after all the good news may be, that the DCEP also turns out to be
the important wake-up call that prompts European policymakers to
finally devote serious attention to strengthening the international
role of the euro. Having the second currency after the US dollar is
maybe not optimal, but is not disastrous. Being third after the
Chinese renminbi is a different story. In the end, money talks.

* * *

Appendix: what will the DCEP look like?

The exact design of the DCEP is still not clear. According to the BIS,
the DCEP will be what is known as a hybrid CBDC. People will hold
balances in their names at the central bank, but transactions will be
approved using an intermediate layer of private parties (possibly
including commercial banks). There will then be no direct interaction
between the central bank and the account holders, but people will have
an account in their names at the central bank. This would be similar
to the ideas being mooted at other central banks such as the ECB and
the Bank of England. Bloomberg, Blockchain News and the China Daily on
the other hand describe the DCEP as a two-tier system, in which people
will not directly hold accounts with the PBoC. According to these
reports, in the Chinese system people will hold only a DCEP account
with a bank or, more likely, with a payment service provider. These
parties will in turn hold a balance with the PBoC as a liquidity
reserve that exactly covers the amount of DCEP. They will also settle
interbank payments in DCEP. This kind of system is also known as a
synthetic CBDC (sCBDC), as people will not have their own CBDC
accounts with the central bank. The PBoC will however receive regular
statements of effected transactions.

If this last model is adopted, the Chinese CBDC model would be more
like a full (liquidity) reserve bank than a real CBDC. A full
liquidity reserve bank is a bank that would hold a 100% cash reserve
with the central bank against the CBDC payment accounts held with it.
But in the Chinese model, there would be no additional institution
created, the existing financial institutions would offer additional
accounts that would then be 100% backed by central bank reserves.
Statements from the PBoC also suggest the direction is more towards a
synthetic model. Technically speaking, this would represent a less
innovative move than a true CBDC.

More information about the cypherpunks mailing list