[COVID] Anti-Lockdown Open Letter from Belgian Medical Community

[Se7en]

<https://www.aier.org/article/open-letter-from-medical-doctors-and-health-
professionals-to-all-belgian-authorities-and-all-belgian-media/>

Reproduced in full, below:

We, Belgian doctors and health professionals, wish to express our
serious concern about the evolution of the situation in the recent
months surrounding the outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. We call on
politicians to be independently and critically informed in the
decision-making process and in the compulsory implementation of
corona-measures. We ask for an open debate, where all experts are
represented without any form of censorship. After the initial panic
surrounding covid-19, the objective facts now show a completely
different picture – there is no medical justification for any
emergency policy anymore.  The current crisis management has become
totally disproportionate and causes more damage than it does any good.
We call for an end to all measures and ask for an immediate
restoration of our normal democratic governance and legal structures
and of all our civil liberties.

‘A cure must not be worse than the problem’ is a thesis that is more
relevant than ever in the current situation. We note, however, that
the collateral damage now being caused to the population will have a
greater impact in the short and long term on all sections of the
population than the number of people now being safeguarded from
corona.  In our opinion, the current corona measures and the strict
penalties for non-compliance with them are contrary to the values
formulated by the Belgian Supreme Health Council, which, until
recently, as the health authority, has always ensured quality medicine
in our country: “Science – Expertise – Quality – Impartiality –
Independence – Transparency”. 1

We believe that the policy has introduced mandatory measures that are
not sufficiently scientifically based, unilaterally directed, and that
there is not enough space in the media for an open debate in which
different views and opinions are heard. In addition, each municipality
and province now has the authorisation to add its own measures,
whether well-founded or not.

Moreover, the strict repressive policy on corona strongly contrasts
with the government’s minimal policy when it comes to disease
prevention, strengthening our own immune system through a healthy
lifestyle, optimal care with attention for the individual and
investment in care personnel.2

The concept of health

In 1948, the WHO defined health as follows: ‘Health is a state of
complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the
absence of disease or other physical impairment’.3

Health, therefore, is a broad concept that goes beyond the physical
and also relates to the emotional and social well-being of the
individual. Belgium also has a duty, from the point of view of
subscribing to fundamental human rights, to include these human rights
in its decision-making when it comes to measures taken in the context
of public health. 4 The current global measures taken to combat
SARS-CoV-2 violate to a large extent this view of health and human
rights. Measures include compulsory wearing of a mask (also in open
air and during sporting activities, and in some municipalities even
when there are no other people in the vicinity), physical distancing,
social isolation, compulsory quarantine for some groups and hygiene
measures.

The predicted pandemic with millions of deaths

At the beginning of the pandemic, the measures were understandable and
widely supported, even if there were differences in implementation in
the countries around us. The WHO originally predicted a pandemic that
would claim 3.4% victims, in other words millions of deaths, and a
highly contagious virus for which no treatment or vaccine was
available.  This would put unprecedented pressure on the intensive
care units (ICUs) of our hospitals.

This led to a global alarm situation, never seen in the history of
mankind: “flatten the curve” was represented by a lockdown that shut
down the entire society and economy and quarantined healthy
people. Social distancing became the new normal in anticipation of a
rescue vaccine.

The facts about covid-19

Gradually, the alarm bell was sounded from many sources: the objective
facts showed a completely different reality. 5 6

The course of covid-19 followed the course of a normal wave of
infection similar to a flu season. As every year, we see a mix of flu
viruses following the curve: first the rhinoviruses, then the
influenza A and B viruses, followed by the coronaviruses. There is
nothing different from what we normally see.

The use of the non-specific PCR test, which produces many false
positives, showed an exponential picture.  This test was rushed
through with an emergency procedure and was never seriously
self-tested. The creator expressly warned that this test was intended
for research and not for diagnostics.7 The PCR test works with cycles
of amplification of genetic material – a piece of genome is amplified
each time. Any contamination (e.g. other viruses, debris from old
virus genomes) can possibly result in false positives.8

The test does not measure how many viruses are present in the
sample. A real viral infection means a massive presence of viruses,
the so-called virus load. If someone tests positive, this does not
mean that that person is actually clinically infected, is ill or is
going to become ill. Koch’s postulate was not fulfilled (“The pure
agent found in a patient with complaints can provoke the same
complaints in a healthy person”).

Since a positive PCR test does not automatically indicate active
infection or infectivity, this does not justify the social measures
taken, which are based solely on these tests. 9 10

Lockdown.

If we compare the waves of infection in countries with strict lockdown
policies to countries that did not impose lockdowns (Sweden, Iceland
…), we see similar curves.  So there is no link between the imposed
lockdown and the course of the infection. Lockdown has not led to a
lower mortality rate.

If we look at the date of application of the imposed lockdowns we see
that the lockdowns were set after the peak was already over and the
number of cases decreasing. The drop was therefore not the result of
the taken measures. 11 As every year, it seems that climatic
conditions (weather, temperature and humidity) and growing immunity
are more likely to reduce the wave of infection.

Our immune system

For thousands of years, the human body has been exposed daily to
moisture and droplets containing infectious microorganisms (viruses,
bacteria and fungi).

The penetration of these microorganisms is prevented by an advanced
defence mechanism – the immune system. A strong immune system relies
on normal daily exposure to these microbial influences. Overly
hygienic measures have a detrimental effect on our immunity. 12 13
Only people with a weak or faulty immune system should be protected by
extensive hygiene or social distancing.

Influenza will re-emerge in the autumn (in combination with covid-19)
and a possible decrease in natural resilience may lead to further
casualties.

Our immune system consists of two parts: a congenital, non-specific
immune system and an adaptive immune system.

The non-specific immune system forms a first barrier: skin, saliva,
gastric juice, intestinal mucus, vibratory hair cells, commensal
flora, … and prevents the attachment of micro-organisms to tissue.

If they do attach, macrophages can cause the microorganisms to be
encapsulated and destroyed.

The adaptive immune system consists of mucosal immunity (IgA
antibodies, mainly produced by cells in the intestines and lung
epithelium), cellular immunity (T-cell activation), which can be
generated in contact with foreign substances or microorganisms, and
humoral immunity (IgM and IgG antibodies produced by the B cells).

Recent research shows that both systems are highly entangled.

It appears that most people already have a congenital or general
immunity to e.g. influenza and other viruses. This is confirmed by the
findings on the cruise ship Diamond Princess, which was quarantined
because of a few passengers who died of Covid-19. Most of the
passengers were elderly and were in an ideal situation of transmission
on the ship. However, 75% did not appear to be infected. So even in
this high-risk group, the majority are resistant to the virus.

A study in the journal Cell shows that most people neutralise the
coronavirus by mucosal (IgA) and cellular immunity (T-cells), while
experiencing few or no symptoms 14.

Researchers found up to 60% SARS-Cov-2 reactivity with CD4+T cells in
a non-infected population, suggesting cross-reactivity with other cold
(corona) viruses.15

Most people therefore already have a congenital or cross-immunity
because they were already in contact with variants of the same virus.

The antibody formation (IgM and IgG) by B-cells only occupies a
relatively small part of our immune system. This may explain why, with
an antibody percentage of 5-10%, there may be a group immunity
anyway. The efficacy of vaccines is assessed precisely on the basis of
whether or not we have these antibodies. This is a misrepresentation.

Most people who test positive (PCR) have no complaints. Their immune
system is strong enough. Strengthening natural immunity is a much more
logical approach. Prevention is an important, insufficiently
highlighted pillar: healthy, full-fledged nutrition, exercise in fresh
air, without a mask, stress reduction and nourishing emotional and
social contacts.

Consequences of social isolation on physical and mental health

Social isolation and economic damage led to an increase in depression,
anxiety, suicides, intra-family violence and child abuse.16

Studies have shown that the more social and emotional commitments
people have, the more resistant they are to viruses. It is much more
likely that isolation and quarantine have fatal consequences. 17

The isolation measures have also led to physical inactivity in many
older people due to their being forced to stay indoors. However,
sufficient exercise has a positive effect on cognitive functioning,
reducing depressive complaints and anxiety and improving physical
health, energy levels, well-being and, in general, quality of life.18

Fear, persistent stress and loneliness induced by social distancing
have a proven negative influence on psychological and general
health. 19

A highly contagious virus with millions of deaths without any
treatment?

Mortality turned out to be many times lower than expected and close to
that of a normal seasonal flu (0.2%). 20 The number of registered
corona deaths therefore still seems to be overestimated.  There is a
difference between death by corona and death with corona. Humans are
often carriers of multiple viruses and potentially pathogenic bacteria
at the same time. Taking into account the fact that most people who
developed serious symptoms suffered from additional pathology, one
cannot simply conclude that the corona-infection was the cause of
death. This was mostly not taken into account in the statistics.

The most vulnerable groups can be clearly identified. The vast
majority of deceased patients were 80 years of age or older. The
majority (70%) of the deceased, younger than 70 years, had an
underlying disorder, such as cardiovascular suffering, diabetes
mellitus, chronic lung disease or obesity. The vast majority of
infected persons (>98%) did not or hardly became ill or recovered
spontaneously.

Meanwhile, there is an affordable, safe and efficient therapy
available for those who do show severe symptoms of disease in the form
of HCQ (hydroxychloroquine), zinc and azithromycin. Rapidly applied
this therapy leads to recovery and often prevents
hospitalisation. Hardly anyone has to die now.

This effective therapy has been confirmed by the clinical experience
of colleagues in the field with impressive results. This contrasts
sharply with the theoretical criticism (insufficient substantiation by
double-blind studies) which in some countries (e.g. the Netherlands)
has even led to a ban on this therapy. A meta-analysis in The Lancet,
which could not demonstrate an effect of HCQ, was withdrawn. The
primary data sources used proved to be unreliable and 2 out of 3
authors were in conflict of interest. However, most of the guidelines
based on this study remained unchanged … 48 49 We have serious
questions about this state of affairs.  In the US, a group of doctors
in the field, who see patients on a daily basis, united in “America’s
Frontline Doctors” and gave a press conference which has been watched
millions of times.21 51 French Prof Didier Raoult of the Institut
d’Infectiologie de Marseille (IHU) also presented this promising
combination therapy as early as April. Dutch GP Rob Elens, who cured
many patients in his practice with HCQ and zinc, called on colleagues
in a petition for freedom of therapy.22 The definitive evidence comes
from the epidemiological follow-up in Switzerland: mortality rates
compared with and without this therapy.23

From the distressing media images of ARDS (acute respiratory distress
syndrome) where people were suffocating and given artificial
respiration in agony, we now know that this was caused by an
exaggerated immune response with intravascular coagulation in the
pulmonary blood vessels. The administration of blood thinners and
dexamethasone and the avoidance of artificial ventilation, which was
found to cause additional damage to lung tissue, means that this
dreaded complication, too, is virtually not fatal anymore. 47

It is therefore not a killer virus, but a well-treatable condition.

Propagation

Spreading occurs by drip infection (only for patients who cough or
sneeze) and aerosols in closed, unventilated rooms. Contamination is
therefore not possible in the open air. Contact tracing and
epidemiological studies show that healthy people (or positively tested
asymptomatic carriers) are virtually unable to transmit the
virus. Healthy people therefore do not put each other at risk. 24 25
Transfer via objects (e.g. money, shopping or shopping trolleys) has
not been scientifically proven.26 27 28

All this seriously calls into question the whole policy of social
distancing and compulsory mouth masks for healthy people – there is no
scientific basis for this.

Masks

Oral masks belong in contexts where contacts with proven at-risk
groups or people with upper respiratory complaints take place, and in
a medical context/hospital-retirement home setting. They reduce the
risk of droplet infection by sneezing or coughing. Oral masks in
healthy individuals are ineffective against the spread of viral
infections. 29 30 31

Wearing a mask is not without side effects. 32 33 Oxygen deficiency
(headache, nausea, fatigue, loss of concentration) occurs fairly
quickly, an effect similar to altitude sickness. Every day we now see
patients complaining of headaches, sinus problems, respiratory
problems and hyperventilation due to wearing masks. In addition, the
accumulated CO2 leads to a toxic acidification of the organism which
affects our immunity. Some experts even warn of an increased
transmission of the virus in case of inappropriate use of the mask.34

Our Labour Code (Codex 6) refers to a CO2 content (ventilation in
workplaces) of 900 ppm, maximum 1200 ppm in special
circumstances. After wearing a mask for one minute, this toxic limit
is considerably exceeded to values that are three to four times higher
than these maximum values. Anyone who wears a mask is therefore in an
extreme poorly ventilated room. 35

Inappropriate use of masks without a comprehensive medical
cardio-pulmonary test file is therefore not recommended by recognised
safety specialists for workers.  Hospitals have a sterile environment
in their operating rooms where staff wear masks and there is precise
regulation of humidity / temperature with appropriately monitored
oxygen flow to compensate for this, thus meeting strict safety
standards. 36

A second corona wave?

A second wave is now being discussed in Belgium, with a further
tightening of the measures as a result. However, closer examination of
Sciensano’s figures37 shows that, although there has been an increase
in the number of infections since mid-July, there was no increase in
hospital admissions or deaths at that time. It is therefore not a
second wave of corona, but a so-called “case chemistry” due to an
increased number of tests. 50 The number of hospital admissions or
deaths showed a shortlasting minimal increase in recent weeks, but in
interpreting it, we must take into account the recent heatwave. In
addition, the vast majority of the victims are still in the population
group >75 years.  This indicates that the proportion of the measures
taken in relation to the working population and young people is
disproportionate to the intended objectives.  The vast majority of the
positively tested “infected” persons are in the age group of the
active population, which does not develop any or merely limited
symptoms, due to a well-functioning immune system.  So nothing has
changed – the peak is over.

Strengthening a prevention policy

The corona measures form a striking contrast to the minimal policy
pursued by the government until now, when it comes to well-founded
measures with proven health benefits such as the sugar tax, the ban on
(e-)cigarettes and making healthy food, exercise and social support
networks financially attractive and widely accessible. It is a missed
opportunity for a better prevention policy that could have brought
about a change in mentality in all sections of the population with
clear results in terms of public health. At present, only 3% of the
health care budget goes to prevention. 2

The Hippocratic Oath

As a doctor, we took the Hippocratic Oath: “I will above all care for
my patients, promote their health and alleviate their suffering”.

“I will inform my patients correctly.”

“Even under pressure, I will not use my medical knowledge for
practices that are against humanity.”  The current measures force us
to act against this oath.  Other health professionals have a similar
code.

The ‘primum non nocere’, which every doctor and health professional
assumes, is also undermined by the current measures and by the
prospect of the possible introduction of a generalised vaccine, which
is not subject to extensive prior testing.

Vaccine

Survey studies on influenza vaccinations show that in 10 years we have
only succeeded three times in developing a vaccine with an efficiency
rate of more than 50%. Vaccinating our elderly appears to be
inefficient. Over 75 years of age, the efficacy is almost
non-existent.38 Due to the continuous natural mutation of viruses, as
we also see every year in the case of the influenza virus, a vaccine
is at most a temporary solution, which requires new vaccines each time
afterwards. An untested vaccine, which is implemented by emergency
procedure and for which the manufacturers have already obtained legal
immunity from possible harm, raises serious questions. 39 40 We do not
wish to use our patients as guinea pigs.  On a global scale, 700 000
cases of damage or death are expected as a result of the vaccine.41 If
95% of people experience Covid-19 virtually symptom-free, the risk of
exposure to an untested vaccine is irresponsible.

The role of the media and the official communication plan

Over the past few months, newspaper, radio and TV makers seemed to
stand almost uncritically behind the panel of experts and the
government, there, where it is precisely the press that should be
critical and prevent one-sided governmental communication. This has
led to a public communication in our news media, that was more like
propaganda than objective reporting.

In our opinion, it is the task of journalism to bring news as
objectively and neutrally as possible, aimed at finding the truth and
critically controlling power, with dissenting experts also being given
a forum in which to express themselves.

This view is supported by the journalistic codes of ethics.42

The official story that a lockdown was necessary, that this was the
only possible solution, and that everyone stood behind this lockdown,
made it difficult for people with a different view, as well as
experts, to express a different opinion.

Alternative opinions were ignored or ridiculed. We have not seen open
debates in the media, where different views could be expressed.

We were also surprised by the many videos and articles by many
scientific experts and authorities, which were and are still being
removed from social media. We feel that this does not fit in with a
free, democratic constitutional state, all the more so as it leads to
tunnel vision. This policy also has a paralysing effect and feeds fear
and concern in society. In this context, we reject the intention of
censorship of dissidents in the European Union! 43

The way in which Covid-19 has been portrayed by politicians and the
media has not done the situation any good either. War terms were
popular and warlike language was not lacking. There has often been
mention of a ‘war’ with an ‘invisible enemy’ who has to be
‘defeated’. The use in the media of phrases such as ‘care heroes in
the front line’ and ‘corona victims’ has further fuelled fear, as has
the idea that we are globally dealing with a ‘killer virus’.

The relentless bombardment with figures, that were unleashed on the
population day after day, hour after hour, without interpreting those
figures, without comparing them to flu deaths in other years, without
comparing them to deaths from other causes, has induced a real
psychosis of fear in the population. This is not information, this is
manipulation.

We deplore the role of the WHO in this, which has called for the
infodemic (i.e. all divergent opinions from the official discourse,
including by experts with different views) to be silenced by an
unprecedented media censorship.43 44

We urgently call on the media to take their responsibilities here!

We demand an open debate in which all experts are heard.

Emergency law versus Human Rights

The general principle of good governance calls for the proportionality
of government decisions to be weighed up in the light of the Higher
Legal Standards: any interference by government must comply with the
fundamental rights as protected in the European Convention on Human
Rights (ECHR). Interference by public authorities is only permitted in
crisis situations. In other words, discretionary decisions must be
proportionate to an absolute necessity.

The measures currently taken concern interference in the exercise of,
among other things, the right to respect of private and family life,
freedom of thought, conscience and religion, freedom of expression and
freedom of assembly and association, the right to education, etc., and
must therefore comply with fundamental rights as protected by the
European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).  For example, in
accordance with Article 8(2) of the ECHR, interference with the right
to private and family life is permissible only if the measures are
necessary in the interests of national security, public safety, the
economic well-being of the country, the protection of public order and
the prevention of criminal offences, the protection of health or the
protection of the rights and freedoms of others, the regulatory text
on which the interference is based must be sufficiently clear,
foreseeable and proportionate to the objectives pursued.45

The predicted pandemic of millions of deaths seemed to respond to
these crisis conditions, leading to the establishment of an emergency
government. Now that the objective facts show something completely
different, the condition of inability to act otherwise (no time to
evaluate thoroughly if there is an emergency) is no longer in
place. Covid-19 is not a cold virus, but a well treatable condition
with a mortality rate comparable to the seasonal flu. In other words,
there is no longer an insurmountable obstacle to public health.

There is no state of emergency.

Immense damage caused by the current policies

An open discussion on corona measures means that, in addition to the
years of life gained by corona patients, we must also take into
account other factors affecting the health of the entire
population. These include damage in the psychosocial domain (increase
in depression, anxiety, suicides, intra-family violence and child
abuse)16 and economic damage.

If we take this collateral damage into account, the current policy is
out of all proportion, the proverbial use of a sledgehammer to crack a
nut.

We find it shocking that the government is invoking health as a reason
for the emergency law.

As doctors and health professionals, in the face of a virus which, in
terms of its harmfulness, mortality and transmissibility, approaches
the seasonal influenza, we can only reject these extremely
disproportionate measures.

    We therefore demand an immediate end to all measures.  We are
    questioning the legitimacy of the current advisory experts, who
    meet behind closed doors.  Following on from ACU 2020 46
    https://acu2020.org/nederlandse-versie/ we call for an in-depth
    examination of the role of the WHO and the possible influence of
    conflicts of interest in this organisation. It was also at the
    heart of the fight against the “infodemic”, i.e. the systematic
    censorship of all dissenting opinions in the media. This is
    unacceptable for a democratic state governed by the rule of law.43

Distribution of this letter

We would like to make a public appeal to our professional associations
and fellow carers to give their opinion on the current measures.

We draw attention to and call for an open discussion in which carers
can and dare to speak out.

With this open letter, we send out the signal that progress on the
same footing does more harm than good, and call on politicians to
inform themselves independently and critically about the available
evidence – including that from experts with different views, as long
as it is based on sound science – when rolling out a policy, with the
aim of promoting optimum health.

With concern, hope and in a personal capacity.

    https://www.health.belgium.be/nl/wie-zijn-we#Missie
    standaard.be/preventie
    https://www.who.int/about/who-we-are/constitution
    https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/human-rights-and-health
    https://swprs.org/feiten-over-covid19/ https://the-iceberg.net/
    https://www.creative-diagnostics.com/sars-cov-2-coronavirus-multiplex-rt-qpcr-kit-277854-457.htm
    President John Magufuli of Tanzania: “Even Papaya and Goats are
    Corona positive” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=207HuOxltvI Open
    letter by biochemist Drs Mario Ortiz Martinez to the Dutch chamber
    https://www.gentechvrij.nl/2020/08/15/foute-interpretatie/
    Interview with Drs Mario Ortiz Martinez
    https://troo.tube/videos/watch/6ed900eb-7459-4a1b-93fd-b393069f4fcd?fbclid=IwAR1XrullC2qopJjgFxEgbSTBvh-4ZCuJa1VxkHTXEtYMEyGG3DsNwUdaatY
    https://infekt.ch/2020/04/sind-wir-tatsaechlich-im-blindflug/
    Lambrecht, B., Hammad, H. The immunology of the allergy epidemic
    and the hygiene hypothesis. Nat Immunol 18, 1076–1083
    (2017). https://www.nature.com/articles/ni.3829 Sharvan Sehrawat,
    Barry T. Rouse, Does the hygiene hypothesis apply to COVID-19
    susceptibility?, Microbes and Infection, 2020, ISSN 1286-4579,
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2020.07.002
    https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(20)30610-3?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0092867420306103%3Fshowall%3Dtrue
    https://www.hpdetijd.nl/2020-08-11/9-manieren-om-corona-te-voorkomen/
    Feys, F., Brokken, S., & De Peuter, S. (2020, May
    22). Risk-benefit and cost-utility analysis for COVID-19 lockdown
    in Belgium: the impact on mental health and
    wellbeing. https://psyarxiv.com/xczb3/ Kompanje, 2020 Conn,
    Hafdahl en Brown, 2009; Martinsen 2008; Yau, 2008
    https://brandbriefggz.nl/
    https://swprs.org/studies-on-covid-19-lethality/#overall-mortality
    https://www.xandernieuws.net/algemeen/groep-artsen-vs-komt-in-verzet-facebook-bant-hun-17-miljoen-keer-bekeken-video/
    https://www.petities.com/einde_corona_crises_overheid_sta_behandeling_van_covid-19_met_hcq_en_zink_toe
    https://zelfzorgcovid19.nl/statistieken-zwitserland-met-hcq-zonder-hcq-met-hcq-leveren-het-bewijs/
    https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/08/asymptomatic-coronavirus-patients-arent-spreading-new-infections-who-says.html
    http://www.emro.who.int/health-topics/corona-virus/transmission-of-covid-19-by-asymptomatic-cases.html
    WHO
    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/who-we-did-not-say-that-cash-was-transmitting-coronavirus-2020-03-06
    https://www.nordkurier.de/ratgeber/es-gibt-keine-gefahr-jemandem-beim-einkaufen-zu-infizieren-0238940804.html
    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-germany-banknotes/banknotes-carry-no-particular-coronavirus-risk-german-disease-expert-idUSKBN20Y2ZT
    29. Contradictory statements by our virologists
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6K9xfmkMsvM
    https://www.hpdetijd.nl/2020-07-05/stop-met-anderhalve-meter-afstand-en-het-verplicht-dragen-van-mondkapjes/
    Security expert Tammy K. Herrema Clark
    https://youtu.be/TgDm_maAglM
    https://theplantstrongclub.org/2020/07/04/healthy-people-should-not-wear-face-masks-by-jim-meehan-md/
    https://www.technocracy.news/blaylock-face-masks-pose-serious-risks-to-the-healthy/
    https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200315/Reusing-masks-may-increase-your-risk-of-coronavirus-infection-expert-says.aspx
    https://werk.belgie.be/nl/nieuws/nieuwe-regels-voor-de-kwaliteit-van-de-binnenlucht-werklokalen
    https://kavlaanderen.blogspot.com/2020/07/als-maskers-niet-werken-waarom-dragen.html
    https://covid-19.sciensano.be/sites/default/files/Covid19/Meest%20recente%20update.pdf
    Haralambieva, I.H. et al., 2015. The impact of immunosenescence on
    humoral immune response variation after influenza A/H1N1
    vaccination in older
    subjects. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26044074/ Global vaccine
    safety summit WHO 2019 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJXXDLGKmPg
    No liability manufacturers vaccines
    https://m.nieuwsblad.be/cnt/dmf20200804_95956456?fbclid=IwAR0IgiA-6sNVQvE8rMC6O5Gq5xhOulbcN1BhdI7Rw-7eq_pRtJDCxde6SQI
    https://www.newsbreak.com/news/1572921830018/bill-gates-admits-700000-people-will-be-harmed-or-killed-by-his-covid-19-solution
    Journalistic code https://www.rvdj.be/node/63 Disinformation
    related to COVID-19 approaches European Commission EurLex, juni
    2020 (this file will not damage your computer)
    https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30461-X/fulltext
    http://www.raadvst-consetat.be/dbx/adviezen/67142.pdf#search=67.142
    https://acu2020.org/
    https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S0049384820303297?token=9718E5413AACDE0D14A3A0A56A89A3EF744B5A201097F4459AE565EA5EDB222803FF46D7C6CD3419652A215FDD2C874F
    https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31180-6/fulltext
    https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31324-6/fulltext
    There is no revival of the pandemic, but a so-called casedemic due
    to more testing.
    https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/crucial-viewing-understanding-covid-19-casedemic1
    https://docs4opendebate.be/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/white-paper-on-hcq-from-AFD.pdf

-- 
|-----/                   | Se7en
     /  The One and Only! | se7en at cock.email
    /                     | 0x0F83F93882CF6116
   /                      | https://se7en-site.neocities.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20200924/c3014cbc/attachment.sig>