Assassination Politics

[grarpamp]

Oh how so few are brave enough to even utter,
or further speak on, such a cypherpunk subject,
what pussies, the whole lot of them, lol.

Previously it was noted that many may elect not to
ever partake in any analysis, coding, deployment of
an AP system as they might presumably think that as
being against their NAP worldview.
Yet others have noted aspects, rational as they may or
may not be, of "the means to an end", being an efficient,
acceptable, one time lapse in such supposed principles,
or otherwise being reasonable, and even perhaps
necessary, to attainment of any degree of positive
outcome in their lifetime, indeed if ever.
What valid revolution that hath no solid spark?
Still others debate any need to proof AP concept at
the highest level first, if ever at all, versus merely proving
that any lower level as an effective "threat" "just works",
should any "targets" therein abd after be foolish enough
to not elect to stand down at that moment, thus raising
the necessity of any next level coming into effect.


Now... we see more of the technological componenets
needed to build such a system are coming online
in their first generation rollouts...

- The Internet
- Strong cryptography, ZKP, TLS, etc
- Overlay networks, WiFi, GnuRadio, etc
- Blockchain tech, contracts, privacy coins... Eth, Zcash, XMR, mixes
- Bidding, markets, and wagering systems... OpenBazaar, Augur
- Distributed Oracles in crypto networks... Chainlink

Distributed Oracles... this last bit is perhaps quite key.
It addresses some ways to obtain and push
(or pull as the case may be with forthcoming development
of anonymous virtual compute and fetching programs,
"viruses" ie autonomously executing and surviving as instances
inside larger overlay compute networks), generating a consensus view
of the outside envrionment (weather, news, insurance premiums
and payout, sports scores, etc) down into the blockchain
contracts for execution based upon resolution and assessment
of that external data.

https://decrypt.co/resources/what-is-chainlink

The "Chainlink" "coin" may be one such first generation
of an Oracle network now online. Where users may
push obversations of their real physical world
down into the virtual chain for a consensus to
be formed over. Even top worldwide real world ol school
"news" organizations would eventually seek to be profitably
compensated by the consensus for providing their objective
"vote" or "view" on what happened in form of newsfeed release
then summed as part of consensus of verifiers. This function,
separate and unknowable from the consumers of such data
and providers of same, with natural uses being AP,
among many others.

Today anyone can deploy a centralized AP, and payout
and release coin funds based on what they alone
see or deem as the true news.
But in the future there will be a crypto consensus of
truth taken over all the news from all around the globe.
This may prove to be a quite hard to corrupt thing,
on the order of the "difficulty" of say Bitcoin-BTC today.

Point being, in the last few years, perhaps with Chainlink
as a first example of an Oracle, technology is progressing
to where it is now almost possible to create a nearly
autonomous AP system. The AI bot is the last bit,
where Ethereum and others are supposedly trying
to create some pre-first-gen bot compute platforms
for that, payment of gas of course provided by the
AP bidders, a fee as with any mutual fund.

The Future being unknowable and often very far away,
and the post-freedom non-diversity of the
"globalist political homogeneity" situation worldwide
thought by many to be and becoming *extremely* dire,
it would not be surprising to find some risk taking
entrepreneurs seriously launching a more centralized version
of AP using the admittedly poor first gen components
already available to them today.

After all, as some say, any effective AP, by its very nature
of having already proven some minimal degree of function (say
mailing of feces to journos for example documentary purposes),
will surely encourage and convince all rational "targets" to stand
down well before any physical harm befalls them, lest such degree
of function indeed eventually be applied to an unfortunate end.

And is such benign encouragement beforehand not indeed an
embodiment and cherishment of NAP at its maximum, best,
and rational limits? Many might say yes. You decide.