james donalds 'political philosophy'

[Zenaan Harkness]

On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 04:07:27AM -0300, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:28:04 +1000
> jamesd at echeque.com wrote:
> 
> > On 2020-10-21 07:10, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
> > > 
> > > 	I'll be waiting for any actual 'cypherpunk' or libertarian to shred donalds 'philosophy' to pieces. I think I'm going to wait a looong time. 
> > 
> > The libertarian justification for controls on recreational drug use is
> > that drug abuse, vice, causes harmful externalities for third parties.
> 
> 	DUDE! You are NOT a libertarian and what you have just vomited is more fascist nonsense.
> 
> 	There is no libertarian 'justification' for violating personal rights.

This too sounds like it "should be obvious" :)


>   The idea that libertarians can 'justify' "controls on recreational drug use" is the kind of deranged nonsense that can only come from you. That is, if you're not just a retarded troll with nothing better to do. 
>
>
> > As a result there are no end of ingenious workarounds to provide
> > selective restriction on the availability of alcohol in native American
> > communities while maintaining lip service to equality before the law,
> 
> 	correct, hypocritical fascism is the stock in trade of you, white-trash jew-kkkristian ameri-cunts. Tell me something I don't know?
> 
> 
> > We do not in fact have equality before the law, 
> 
> 	because you are human garbage. Next.
> 
>
> 	Now, I again invite any actual cypherpunk (james is obv. NOT in said category) to refute  james' 'political philosophy'.