USA 2020 Elections: Thread

[Zenaan Harkness]

On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 03:18:38AM -0300, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:58:02 +1000
> jamesd at echeque.com wrote:
> 
> > > jamesd at echeque.com wrote:
> > >> If you don't have a state and state religion, you get conquered.  
> > 
> > On 2020-10-20 16:06, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
> > > So if you don't have a state, then you end up having a state. So you need a state
> > > to not be conquered by the state. That's called statist 'logic'. 
> > 
> > A state ruled by a friendly elite that identifies with the community
> > that created it is a marked improvement on an enemy state that hates the
> > community.
> 
> 
> 	As I already mentioned, that's what every statist say. 'Their' state is 'good'. Other state 'bad'. You forgot to quote that part, you worthless, retarded, dishonest piece of shit. 


If you really don't want your own nuances of argument to be ignored or treated dismissively, perhaps consider not doing that with the nuanc of others.

If that's something someane finds difficult, there's a simple technique: look for some nuance within your interlocutor's argument or position, which you are able to agree with, and begin your response with that, and only -then- "attack" the part you disagree with :)