shills

[jamesd at echeque.com]

On 2020-10-16 05:40, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 18:35:38 +1000
> jamesd at echeque.com wrote:
> 
> 
>> Here is a simple shill test.  If you are not a shill, should be easy to
>> pass it.
> 
> 	You already subjected me to one such test. You should check the archives...
And the libertarian position on freedom of association?

My fisking of your reply gets misclassified as spam, so posting it in in
fragments.

When people cooperate to create value, when they form a business, hire
employees, or even have a regular and repeat contracting and contract
relationship, it is obviously easier to cooperate if you are of the same
sex, race, religion, culture, and approximately similar IQ.

So white males should hire people of their own sex, race and religion,
particularly for positions requiring trust, right?

When you hire someone for a position requiring trust, Christians tend to
be more trustworthy, whites tend to be more trustworthy, and males tend
to be more trustworthy.  So even if you are not white, male, and
Christian, it makes sense to hire white Christian males, and if you are
a white Christian male, definitely makes sense.

Agree?

You might disagree with the proposition that Christians tend to be more
trustworthy, but you cannot plausibly disagree with the proposition that
whites and males tend to be more trustworthy, nor can you plausibly
disagree with the proposition that coreligionists tend to be more
trustworthy with people of their own religion.

Well, do you disagree?

You claim to be more libertarian than thou.  If you were claiming to be
more  Christian than thou, I would be hitting you with stuff on the
Trinity that demon worshipers find uncomfortable to speak.  Since you
claim to be more libertarian than thou, I am hitting you with
libertarian positions that government shills find uncomfortable to even
acknowledge.

If you were telling me that you are more Christian than I am, and I
should come to Jesus, I would be asking you questions about the trinity
to test for demon worship.  Since you claim to be more Libertarian than
I am, and I should come to libertarianism, I am asking you about issues
of female nature and freedom of association.

If women are different from men, different rules must apply, rendering
libertarianism incompatible with progressivism.  Are they different?
Should different rules apply? What proportion of female complaints
about rape and sexual harassment are not complaints about rape and
sexual harassment, but are complaints about failed shit tests?

Should employers, landlords, the country club, and people who operate
a pub have freedom of association?

You will notice that men cannot be themselves when women are around.
Should a pub be able to maintain a female free zone.  Should a
restaurant be able to bar unaccompanied women?