Shame on trolls

other.arkitech other.arkitech at protonmail.com
Tue May 26 17:17:09 PDT 2020


no worries, i understand how this sort of threads can produce unintended damage
you're right, many things come from a forefront defensive barrier given past episodes.


Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Tuesday, May 26, 2020 10:53 PM, John Young <jya at pipeline.com> wrote:

> My comment was not aimed at you, a number of folks have posted
> requests to enlist supporters, researchers, funders, for their
> projects. A few have repeated the tequests for many months, became
> irate and accusatory at lack of response. Might wonder if the aim
> is/was to grab free work, or proselitize for an ideology, overcome
> loneliness and isolation, front for others, or to just fuck with
> somebody. All these have been happening on cpunks since its earliest
> days. Lack of moderation allows that abuse or promise. Promises have
> sometimes come true. Moderation never delivers on promises, usually
> suppresses them as off-topic or calling them trolls..
>
> At 06:35 PM 5/26/2020, you wrote:
>
> > > Hey,
> > > It's notable that your software is closed source, and I really
> > > understand open source as what is expected to be supported on this list.
> > > But Punk-Stasi was "flaming" you and you don't need to listen to
> > > that. People aren't censored here. That means random criticism
> > > comes through. Do you need help setting up filters?
> > > K
> >
> > Nah, one thing is criticism and other is a guy calling you
> > repeatedly a scammer when you are showing up your work. That is not
> > precisely good taste.
> > the source code is GPL, but I haven't published it yet, that's all.
> > Is in the roadmap. For reasons it will be released before 1.0
> >
> > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:06 AM other.arkitech
> > > <mailto:other.arkitech at protonmail.comother.arkitech@protonmail.com> wrote:
> > > Dear readers,
> > > My intention is to respond to a public attack against my honesty
> > > and the legitimacy of my proposal.
> > > I am pretty annoyed for the behavior of this individual in the list
> > > towards the system I am presenting here.
> > > I don't know anything about him or her or whether they are a group
> > > of gansters operating the same moniker.
> > > The only thing I know is that they are pushing my project USPS is a
> > > SCAM and thus I am a SCAMMER, or the other way around.
> > > I call to everyone willing to read the landing page of my project,
> > > which I provide a pdf attached,
> > > and, from it and the ideas grasped in this list, manifest IF it
> > > could be deduced that this is a scam, or looks like. Please manifest.
> > > Otherwise, everyone undermining legitimate and respectable projects
> > > run by others, in any stage of development, on any stage in their
> > > roadmap, with counter positive and public undermining attitude.
> > > Those should be IMHO punished with public ashame until an apology
> > > is published by, in this case, PunkStasi.
> > >
> > > I leave it this way,
> > > Please, anyone, let me know reasons for which this email is WRONG
> > > or/and RIGHT.
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Other Arkitech
> > > The project this subject airs as a scam:
> > > http://otheravu4v6pitvw.onion/http://otheravu4v6pitvw.onion/
> > > Ref:
> > > https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2020-May/080648.htmlhttps://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2020-May/080648.html




More information about the cypherpunks mailing list