Shame on trolls

Karl gmkarl at
Tue May 26 15:06:40 PDT 2020

To comment further, it looks like P-S may have been setting up a little
disruption around the difference between the goals of your project and the
benefits and failings of existing blockchains, and maybe some other social
differences going on.  I can't know why they would do that, but often it's
satisfying to see the different people involved learn by getting confused
around each other, because it means the confusion is on a path to resolving
(even if that resolution involves further conflict).  Blockchains are a
high-emotions topic for some: hating or loving them for a variety of
reasons.  P-S's interaction with you resulted in you making this post, and
us responding to you.

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 6:02 PM Karl <gmkarl at> wrote:

> Hey,
> It's notable that your software is closed source, and I really understand
> open source as what is expected to be supported on this list.
> But Punk-Stasi was "flaming" you and you don't need to listen to that.
> People aren't censored here.  That means random criticism comes through.
> Do you need help setting up filters?
> K
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:06 AM other.arkitech <
> other.arkitech at> wrote:
>> Dear readers,
>> My intention is to respond to a public attack against my honesty and the
>> legitimacy of my proposal.
>> I am pretty annoyed for the behavior of this individual in the list
>> towards the system I am presenting here.
>> I don't know anything about him or her or whether they are a group of
>> gansters operating the same moniker.
>> The only thing I know is that they are pushing my project USPS is a SCAM
>> and thus I am a SCAMMER, or the other way around.
>> I call to everyone willing to read the landing page of my project, which
>> I provide a pdf attached,
>> and, from it and the ideas grasped in this list, manifest IF it could be
>> deduced that this is a scam, or looks like. Please manifest.
>> Otherwise, everyone undermining legitimate and respectable projects run
>> by others, in any stage of development, on any stage in their roadmap, with
>> counter positive and public undermining attitude.
>> Those should be IMHO punished with public ashame until an apology is
>> published by, in this case, PunkStasi.
>> I leave it this way,
>> Please, anyone, let me know reasons for which this email is WRONG or/and
>> Thanks.
>> --
>> Other Arkitech
>> The project this subject airs as a scam: http://otheravu4v6pitvw.onion/
>> Ref:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 3551 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>

More information about the cypherpunks mailing list