other.arkitech at protonmail.com
Mon May 25 18:44:35 PDT 2020
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Tuesday, May 26, 2020 12:20 AM, Punk-Stasi 2.0 <punks at tfwno.gf> wrote:
> On Mon, 25 May 2020 18:33:05 -0400
> grarpamp grarpamp at gmail.com wrote:
> > > Crytocurrencies require a log of ALL TRANSACTIONS, not just the so called
> > >
> > >
> > > utxo set...
> > If one can form a consensus over one set of data, peoples
> > favorite bloated log, which is in effect one big pile of state,
> > then one can perhaps form a consensus over any other set
> > from it, eventually among other possiblities, mining deltas
> > to move a UTXO state db forward, potential db distribution
> > and update mechanisms, etc... all under some form of
> > consensus, facts of formal verification, etc.
> > To claim Satoshi Genesis Blockchain whitepaper is only
> > way to do things,
> It seems to be the only way to do things as far as current 'cryptocurrencies' are concerned. I obviously don't know a better a way, and nobody seems to know such a way either, but I don't claim that a better way is impossible. Just that it doesn't exist today.
rofl.. people hear what they want to hear and disregard the rest. The boxer.
> > that there are no other ways to be found,
> > or proofs proving no others, is really quite ridiculous in
> > such early days of research where no one knows much
> > about what is or isn't possible. All possible within physics.
> ...what do you think your reference to 'physics' means, exactly?
> anyway, so far cryptographic 'coins' are not coins at all. They are just global accounting systems. An actual coin is an object that stands by itself and doesn't require the arpanet to exist.
> > People with head locked in sand will never find them.
More information about the cypherpunks