gmkarl at gmail.com
Sat May 23 05:39:38 PDT 2020
On Sat, May 23, 2020, 8:33 AM other.arkitech <other.arkitech at protonmail.com>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Saturday, May 23, 2020 12:21 PM, Karl <gmkarl at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2020, 8:05 AM other.arkitech <
> other.arkitech at protonmail.com> wrote:
>> The solution for this problem doesn't fall into the blockchain platform.
>> The platform will delete the information if evidence signed by the right
>> private key is presented.
> BSV is a blockchain platform that has been working well for me for this
> purpose of information preservation.
> If you want to protect a piece of information from "rubberhosing" you must
>> follow a procedure to safeguard it. for instance :
>> 1. break down your key into several parts, using the Shamir secret
>> sharing squeme.
>> 2 spread the parts acros a distributed group of people you trust
>> 3 delete the key so nobody can force you to reveal
>> 4 the attacker must have to coherce a number of people to reconstruct the
>> private key
> It is true "rubberhosing" is usually mentioned in the context of secrecy
> and privacy, but it can also be used to force erasure and destruction of
> information. In such a case it does not matter whether it is encrypted or
> not: the device that holds it can be destroyed.
> Additionally many can indeed coerce a large number of people. The network
> would need to preserve the information even if all parties purport to want
> it removed. Most blockchains have pulled that off, although I imagine
> there are other solutions too.
> storing in a single device is never secure. it must be distributed.
> If you want the info never ever deleted by any means you just destroy de
> private key used to store it.
It sounds like USPS can store things in this reliable way, spreading them
among many devices?
That really seems the biggest value of a blockchain to me. It also
attempts to prove when the data was created, as consensus time is included
in the block confirmation algorithm, which shows that it was not fabricated
after the fact.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 3395 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the cypherpunks