list of people censored on lists.debian.org

Tue Mar 17 00:38:43 PDT 2020

On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 01:48:49PM +1000, jamesd at echeque.com wrote:
> On 2020-03-15 11:58, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> >    So is it fair to assume then that you agree with all the resignations (RMS), knee-bending (Torvalds), and turmoil (openSUSE and many others)?
> > 
> >    It is of course your right to agree with such treatment of various founders, as we have witnessed a fair bit of in recent times. Good lessons for future founders (to enshrine their "broflake" power CoCs before the snowflakes have a chance to usurp power and damage the founders).
> > 
> >    Long term, I believe this is a functional parting of the ways between humans with different preferred ways of being in this world.
> > 
> >    The CoC for those of robust temperament, is a different CoC to those of snowflake temperament.
> 
> Empiricaly, we observe that projects with a CoC suffer bitrot, which bitrot is
> likely to prove fatal in the long run.
> 
> Need a CoC that is hostile to snowflakes, and outright bans social justice
> warriors in total.

"Intuitively" this feels correct to me, but I don't know that anyone's put the IQ cycles into tabulation and summary yet .. though I await to be pleasantly surprised :)