Human Rights misnomers - Marxist communists - agreements/ contracts

Zenaan Harkness zen at freedbms.net
Tue Jan 14 15:23:20 PST 2020


So the looney "liberal" lefties (commies) want everyone to -have-
everything, including "free":

  - education

  - medical care

  - insurance

  - food

  - housing

  - legal aid

  - etc


  Labour's Richard Burgon Slams UK Government Cuts to
  Legal Aid as 'Depriving Human Rights'
  https://sputniknews.com/uk/202001141078037104-labours-richard-burgon-slams-uk-government-cuts-to-legal-aid-as-depriving-human-rights/


Sadly this communist neo-Marxism is now being sold under the
deceptive lie of such gibs being "human rights".

Now listen up snowflakes (and all who missed the memo), human rights
are sanctions, not gibs.

And more particularly, a human right is a sanction which does not
infringe the human rights of other humans.

Resist being deceived.

What is a sanction?

A sanction is that action (arising from a power or ability) which you
can exercise independent of the authority, will or power of any other
human.

So a human right is one of those things arising from your own latent
(or natural) capacity and ability.

For example:

  - the right to move, walk, travel

  - the right to communicate

  - the right to survive - to do those things necessary for the
    continuance of my physical body - grow food and plants for
    medicine, farm animals, collect and use water

  - the right to breathe

  - the right to think and believe what one wills

  - the right to build a dwelling to protect you and your family from
    the elements of nature


The reason gibs are not human rights, is that they are not sanctions
- instead, gibs is the imposition of your will (effectively, usually
by force of the state to "collect" tax) upon another human being.

Which is fundamentally evil.

Imposing your will on others, is to deny the other the right to
choose to do as he pleases in his own life, with his own body and his
own time.


The despotic "right" to free shit - free gibs - is a consent to
despotism.

Once we agree to one despotism, we have effectively agreed to all
despotisms.


"Free" gibs, imposed by the force of the state upon productive
individuals, is:

  - the surrender of individual responsibility (for one's own actions
    and choices in life)

  - the consent to all despotisms of the state

  - the consent to the financial enslavement of your people, your
    community, your councils and governments


If "free shit" is to be couched as a "human right", then at best it
is nothing other than a predatorial right of the ignorant and of the
predatorial, upon the productive and the responsible.


The primary challenge to the fable of the grasshopper and the ant, is
"charity".

Imposed charity, tends strongly to despotism and descent into madness.


  https://www.yandex.com/search/?text=grasshopper%20and%20the%20ant&lr=21265


  The Ant and the Grasshopper
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ant_and_the_Grasshopper

    The Ant and the Grasshopper, alternatively titled The Grasshopper
    and the Ant (or Ants), is one of Aesop's Fables, numbered 373 in
    the Perry Index.[1] The fable describes how a hungry grasshopper
    begs for food from an ant when winter comes and is refused. The
    situation sums up moral lessons about the virtues of hard work
    and planning for the future.[2]

    Even in Classical times, however, the advice was mistrusted and
    an alternative story represented the ant's industry as mean and
    self-serving. Jean de la Fontaine's delicately ironical retelling
    in French later widened the debate to cover the themes of
    compassion and charity. Since the 18th century the grasshopper
    has been seen as the type of the artist and the question of the
    place of culture in society has also been included. Argument over
    the fable's ambivalent meaning has generally been conducted
    through adaptation or reinterpretation of the fable in
    literature, arts, and music.

    ...



More information about the cypherpunks mailing list