This is the Opportunity-cost of NOT implementing my AP idea

Zenaan Harkness zen at freedbms.net
Thu Jan 9 17:38:34 PST 2020


On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 12:40:38AM +0000, jim bell wrote:
>     On Thursday, January 9, 2020, 03:13:21 PM PST, Punk-Stasi 2.0 <punks at tfwno.gf> wrote:  
>  On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 22:10:23 +0000 (UTC)
> jim bell <jdb10987 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>  [twice in the last couple of hours I sent this, 
>  >   yes, we got it THREE TIMES 
> >    https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2020-January/078865.html
>     https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2020-January/078867.html
>     https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2020-January/078869.html
> >    you can check the archive before needlessly resending    
> 
> But I only got it ONE TIME.  And, I notice that nobody else replied before the third time.  So far, you're the only one who claim you got it more than once.    Let's get some confirmation.  


I received all three (second 2 being replies), and various follow ups.

I have noticed inconsistent "email system" timing - there's
(sometimes or always?) a delay on receiving my own posts, if I've
already sent say 2 to the list in "recent time" - haven't bothered to
narrow down what "recent time" is though...

That has caught me surprised a few times.

Occasionally my ISP decides an email must go to a black hole (usually
when the word "snowflake" appears too many times).


More information about the cypherpunks mailing list