This is the Opportunity-cost of NOT implementing my AP idea
Zenaan Harkness
zen at freedbms.net
Thu Jan 9 17:38:34 PST 2020
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 12:40:38AM +0000, jim bell wrote:
> On Thursday, January 9, 2020, 03:13:21 PM PST, Punk-Stasi 2.0 <punks at tfwno.gf> wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 22:10:23 +0000 (UTC)
> jim bell <jdb10987 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> [twice in the last couple of hours I sent this,
> > yes, we got it THREE TIMES
> > https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2020-January/078865.html
> https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2020-January/078867.html
> https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2020-January/078869.html
> > you can check the archive before needlessly resending
>
> But I only got it ONE TIME. And, I notice that nobody else replied before the third time. So far, you're the only one who claim you got it more than once. Let's get some confirmation.
I received all three (second 2 being replies), and various follow ups.
I have noticed inconsistent "email system" timing - there's
(sometimes or always?) a delay on receiving my own posts, if I've
already sent say 2 to the list in "recent time" - haven't bothered to
narrow down what "recent time" is though...
That has caught me surprised a few times.
Occasionally my ISP decides an email must go to a black hole (usually
when the word "snowflake" appears too many times).
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list